Anemic Economy Unable To Sustain Job Growth
And the forecast is not encouraging
Job growth has been solid this year, but it's unclear if that's sustainable given the anemic pace of economic growth. That further muddles the outlook for winding down monetary stimulus.
Typically, gross domestic product rises faster than payrolls. Productivity gains allow employers to boost output somewhat before bringing in new staff.
But in the last several quarters, the reverse has generally held.
In Q4 2012, payrolls rose at a 1.6% annual rate even though GDP barely eked out a 0.4% rise. In the first three months of 2013, jobs gains slightly outpaced economic growth of 1.8%. In Q2, payrolls rose 1.8%, but analysts have been slashing GDP growth targets to around 1%.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
If the "payroll growth" is in number of people employed rather than hours worked, then you have your answer. Businesses are expanding by hiring more part-time workers. I'd suggest that legislation such as ACA has something to do with this, but of course we all know that businesses don't react to incentives if the Government intends for them not to.