Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

A.M. Links: Obama Focuses Hot Air on Climate Change, Benghazi Security Decision Made By Top State Department Officials, Regulators Preparing to Sue Jon Corzine

Ed Krayewski | 6.25.2013 9:00 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | C-SPAN
(C-SPAN)
  • where's the money lebowski?
    C-SPAN

    President Obama will be talking about climate change today, the latest attempt to drive the discussion to any topic other than the many scandals that have beset his government.

  • Internal State Department documents obtained by Fox News suggest the decision on security levels at the U.S. facility in Benghazi was made at the highest levels of the department.
  • A federal judge does not appear to be buying the government's argument that air travel is not part of a fundamental right of U.S. citizens.
  • The U.S. knows nothing, despite more than a decade of war in the Middle East, says Ron Paul.
  • The Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the agency responsible for regulating MF Global, is preparing to sue Jon Corzine over the collapse of the company.
  • The Russian foreign minister says Edward Snowden never technically crossed into Russia, remaining in a transit zone at the international airport, and so his government has no authority over his movements.
  • Taliban fighters attacked the CIA headquarters and other buildings in Kabul, threatening the already precarious peace talks with the U.S.
  • Fat Joe is sentenced to four months in prison for tax evasion.

Get Reason.com and Reason 24/7 content widgets for your websites.

Follow Reason and Reason 24/7 on Twitter, and like us on Facebook.  You can also get the top stories mailed to you—sign up here. Have a news tip? Send it to us!

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Six Libyan Soldiers Killed At Checkpoint

Ed Krayewski is a former associate editor at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (284)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    Internal State Department documents obtained by Fox News suggest the decision on security levels at the U.S. facility in Benghazi was made at the highest levels of the department.

    But by no future presidents, they can assure you.

    1. Ted S.   12 years ago

      It’s only Fox News reporting. I won’t believe it until it’s reported by naked Page 3 chicks from the Mail.

      1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

        Maybe the other journalists are waiting to see if Fox gets arrested for espionage.

    2. Aloysious   12 years ago

      So, is being first in the comments section called ‘Fisting’ or ‘to Fist’ or ‘ has Fisted’?

      I might have missed that discussion.

      As for the Stateless Dept., can we ship them all to Ecuador?

      1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

        Making the first comment is a terrible burden. One must set the tone for entire commenting section. Reading through the links, choosing one and creating an insightful statement, coding it correctly… it’s all very stressful. I wouldn’t wish it on my worst enemy. Or certainly not on any of these lame-o’s.

  2. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    Fat Joe is sentenced to four months in prison for tax evasion.

    Tried to claim too many def-pendents.

    1. a better weapon   12 years ago

      I thought he died a while ago, or was that Big Punisher?

      I’m not up to date on my obese rap stars.

      1. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

        Watch yerself!

        – The Ghost of Heavy D

      2. Not Sure   12 years ago

        It was Pun.

  3. Matrix   12 years ago

    Our universe may have collided with another

    1. robc   12 years ago

      I think my definition of universe is different from theirs.

      1. Brett L   12 years ago

        I think the reporters are loosely using “everything which came into existence from our Big Bang singularity” as universe, rather than “everything which exists that humans can potentially interact with”, which is the more formal and correct definition.

      2. Zeb   12 years ago

        Yeah, in a universe where there is more than one big bang (or whatever it is), you should probably get a new word for each of the things like what we previously understood to be the universe. But I suspect we will just have to deal with the word being used that way.

    2. Brett L   12 years ago

      This is awesome. If it is true, then…

      Sorry, my brain blew a fuse. Anyhow, the important thing is that we have eternity to colonize the Universe and should get started right the fuck now.

      1. Matrix   12 years ago

        eternity? Well, not really. All stars will eventually burn out. Life will, eventually, cease to exist. But, by that time, we will be long forgotten… an insignificant blip in time.

        1. Brett L   12 years ago

          No, see, if there is another source of matter outside of our Big Bang then the probability that a younger matter creating singularity will exist is pretty high. At that point, proton decay and start burnout are localized problems, not universal.

          1. RBS   12 years ago

            This kind of thing makes me wish I had studied the had sciences instead of history/law.

        2. Clich? Bandit   12 years ago

          Heat Death, while a valid, is not the ONLY scenario that is accepted.

    3. Rich   12 years ago

      I’m too lazy to DuckDuckGo it right now, but I recall reading that another Big Bang could occur at any time.

      Seems like that’d be worse than getting hit by an asteroid.

      1. Zeb   12 years ago

        Depends. Since a big bang is expansion of space, it wouldn’t necessarily disrupt the space we live in that much. It’s not an explosion.

  4. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

    I’m not growing pot, I’m searching for Bigfoot
    http://news.nationalpost.com/2…..r-bigfoot/

    1. DJF   12 years ago

      The Bigfoot that is growing pot?

      1. some guy   12 years ago

        That theory explains a lot, actually.

        1. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

          STEVE SMITH CULTIVATE CANNABIS, YES.

    2. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

      damn you. I would have beaten you to this except reason.com very efficiently signed me out and I had to go through all the rigmarole of signing back in. They’re in your pay aren’t they

      1. Ted S.   12 years ago

        All the anti-social networking shit makes the pages load so slowly that by the time I was able to post my reply downthread, you’d already responded to Lord Humongous. 🙁

      2. Clich? Bandit   12 years ago

        wait a minute…don’t you live in the future ifh? Isnt it already tomorrow for you?

        1. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

          Greetings from the future Cliche Bandit! It’s just gone midnight and is now Wednesday. The air is suddenly thick with people using their new jetpacks. I am commenting here via a complicated time-typing device which must be carefully calibrated. Sometimes i enter the wrong number, time-type in the wrong moment, and get beaten by Lord Humungus, or write a response before the original post.

          1. Thane-kin   12 years ago

            For a second I thought you meant you were going to depose CB and assume his handle.

  5. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

    At Chernobyl, Radioactive Danger Lurks in the Trees

    For 26 years, forests around Chernobyl have been absorbing radioactive elements but a fire would send them skyward again ? a concern as summers grow longer, hotter and drier
    http://www.scientificamerican……-the-trees

    RADIOACTIVE TREES!

    1. Matrix   12 years ago

      The Ents will march again!

    2. Ted S.   12 years ago

      Mildly creepy trees

    3. a better weapon   12 years ago

      Sounds like a good “soft target” for the turrurists.

  6. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    The Russian foreign minister says Edward Snowden never technically crossed into Russia, remaining in a transit zone at the international airport, and so his government has no authority over his movements.

    Like this better when it was The Terminal.

    1. PS   12 years ago

      Krakozhia is the new whistleblowers paradise.

    2. thom   12 years ago

      He is surviving on a diet of duty free liquor, chocolate, and cigarettes.

      1. Not Sure   12 years ago

        The college lifestyle he missed!

      2. Jon Lester   12 years ago

        There are worse problems to have, I think.

  7. Matrix   12 years ago

    Michael Hastings sends chilling e-mail to colleagues before death
    Some are saying his accident “weren’t no accident.”

    1. some guy   12 years ago

      So what if this was foul play by someone Hastings was investigating? What if it was another decision made “by individuals at the local level”? Will this finally be the straw that breaks the camel’s back?

    2. PS   12 years ago

      Mercedes always burst into flames upon impact. They are just like Pintos in that regard.

    3. Rich   12 years ago

      Law enforcement sources said the car was believed to have been traveling at a high rate of speed.

      Is that so hard?

      1. some guy   12 years ago

        “high rate of speed”

        Redundant is as redundant does.

        1. kinnath   12 years ago

          must have been accelerating

          1. Rich   12 years ago

            Jerk. 😉

            1. kinnath   12 years ago

              Most likely, it was the sudden deceleration that caused all the problems.

              1. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

                it’s not the fall…

  8. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

    I’m not growing pot, I’m searching for Bigfoot: Sasquatch hunter says he was wrongly arrested in Durham forest

    more

    1. Ted S.   12 years ago

      Will the folks at H&R give the hat-tip to IFH or Lord Humongous?

      1. some guy   12 years ago

        Both names are quite apropos.

      2. Brett L   12 years ago

        H&R give the hat-tip

        Haha, like Reason gives hat-tips when they steal our stories anymore.

        1. Zakalwe   12 years ago

          You fuckers would have demanded a hat tip for posting the first rumor of 9/11.

          1. Brett L   12 years ago

            I would demand a hat-tip for posting the first reports of the end of the world.

          2. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

            meh, hat tips are easy. It’s the slow monocle polish that’s hard to get

            1. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

              it helps to have a penis.

    2. Numeromancer   12 years ago

      Bigfoot cannot be defeated until Durham wood comes to Dunsinane!

  9. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    …is preparing to sue Jon Corzine over the collapse of the company.

    Is there anything that New Jerksey produces that isn’t terrible?

    1. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

      The Sopranos?

    2. KDN   12 years ago

      Pork roll, subs, and pizza.

      We’re also much better at producing hockey players than you’d expect.

    3. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

      After nearly two years of stitching together evidence, criminal investigators have concluded that porous risk controls at the firm, rather than fraud, allowed the customer money to disappear, according to the law enforcement officials with knowledge of the case.

      http://dealbook.nytimes.com/20…..=5065&_r=0

      Just as a told the peanut gallery – Corzine didn’t steal a dime, MFG could never pass an audit.

      The money has been located and returned.

      1. Don Mynack   12 years ago

        Not according to the regulators, he didn’t.

        Now, the regulators could very well be wrong, but we all know how that worked out for the boys at Enron, don’t we?

    4. WTF   12 years ago

      Fuck that, Corzine is from Illinois.

  10. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

    Marc A. Thiessen: The Taliban is playing Obama
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/…..story.html

    Taliban leaders are not interested in sharing power. Their goal is to get the United States out of the way so they can take over Afghanistan.

    So why are the Taliban negotiating? Simple. It knows that Barack Obama wants to leave Afghanistan and close Guantanamo Bay ? and they want to help him do both.

    1. gaijin   12 years ago

      The Taliban is playing Obama

      Putin, the Chinese, Correa…Who isn’t these days?

    2. Ted S.   12 years ago

      Any relation to Tiffani A Thiessen?

      1. RBS   12 years ago

        Why couldn’t she have been in Showgirls?

  11. Brett L   12 years ago

    Printing plastic tough as bone on a 3D Printer. Totally need to see if we can print car frames at my buddy’s lab.

    1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

      Does the name Preston Tucker mean anything to you?

    2. PS   12 years ago

      I’ll take one 3D printed flying car please.

    3. a better weapon   12 years ago

      Hey, That’s a medical device if I’ve ever seen one! Cough up the tax or destroy it, buddy!”

      – IRS

  12. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    A federal judge does not appear to be buying the government’s argument that air travel is not part of a fundamental right of U.S. citizens.

    Anything on the right to petition?

    1. gaijin   12 years ago

      damn you and your minute to win it.

  13. gaijin   12 years ago

    that air travel is not part of a fundamental right of U.S. citizens

    So like driving, it’s a priviledge granted by the state. Because Air Space is like ROADZZZ?

    1. some guy   12 years ago

      All large airports have to be build with government money and eminent domain because large projects can only be achieved through coercion because individuals are greedy and stuff.

      1. a better weapon   12 years ago

        You forgot to put “mmmkay?” at the end.

  14. Marginal   12 years ago

    First Fat Joe loses 100lbs on low-carb and then the feds send him to the clink fornot paying taxes? Dude’s a lbtrn for sure.

    1. Marginal   12 years ago

      forgotten linky.

  15. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

    Valerie Plame Wilson and Joe Wilson: The NSA’s metastasised intelligence-industrial complex is ripe for abuse

    Where oversight and accountability have failed, Snowden’s leaks have opened up a vital public debate on our rights and privacy
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/comm…..plex-abuse

    Snowden will be hunted relentlessly and, when finally found, with glee, brought back to the US in handcuffs and severely punished. (If Private Bradley Manning’s obscene conditions while incarcerated are any indication, it won’t be pleasant for Snowden either, even while awaiting trial.) Snowden has already been the object of scorn and derision from the Washington establishment and mainstream media, but, once again, the focus is misplaced on the transiently shiny object. The relevant issue should be: what exactly is the US government doing in the people’s name to “keep us safe” from terrorists?

    Prism and other NSA data-mining programs might indeed be very effective in hunting and capturing actual terrorists, but we don’t have enough information as a society to make that decision.

    1. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

      Valerie Plame was one hot spy.

    2. VG Zaytsev   12 years ago

      Remember the good old days when republican presidents released the preceding democrat president’s politica prisoners?

      Any chance of that happening in again.

      1. The Last American Hero   12 years ago

        Sure, if Rand gets elected.

  16. Brett L   12 years ago

    When you start to lose the New Yorker on Snowden, it could be tough sledding.

    Mea culpa. Having spent almost eighteen years at The New Yorker, I’m arguably just as much a part of the media establishment as David Gregory and his guests. In this case, though, I’m with Snowden?not only for the reasons that Drake enumerated but also because of an old-fashioned and maybe na?ve inkling that journalists are meant to stick up for the underdog and irritate the powerful. On its side, the Obama Administration has the courts, the intelligence services, Congress, the diplomatic service, much of the media, and most of the American public. Snowden’s got Greenwald, a woman from Wikileaks, and a dodgy travel document from Ecuador. Which side are you on?

    1. Sevo   12 years ago

      Mr. Cassidy forgot the IRS, but I’ll bet they don’t forget him.

    2. Hash Brown   12 years ago

      Welcome to the party, pal!

  17. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

    Fucking Magnets, how do they work?

    MIT researchers discover a new kind of magnetism
    Experiments demonstrate ‘quantum spin liquid,’ which could have applications in new computer memory storage.
    http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/…..-1219.html

    1. Brett L   12 years ago

      I have no fucking clue. I mean, I can write the modelling equations, but I have no clue how they actually work.

      1. robc   12 years ago

        “Professor Eddington, you must be one of three persons in the world who understands general relativity.” Eddington paused, unable to answer. Silberstein continued “Don’t be modest, Eddington!” Finally, Eddington replied “On the contrary, I’m trying to think who the third person is.”

        1. Zeb   12 years ago

          I’m pretty sure that is apocryphal. General relativity isn’t that difficult to understand.

      2. Ted S.   12 years ago

        What kind of engnieer are you anyway?

        1. Brett L   12 years ago

          The honest kind? But trained as a chemical, so I’m better with charges than magnets, to be honest.

      3. T   12 years ago

        Nobody I’ve ever met does. They work, and that’s about all anybody can say. Maxwell was a goddamn genius to figure out the EM equations.

        1. Scruffy Nerfherder   12 years ago

          My post-grad class on electromagnetics was an exercise in math to say the least. The professor gave the entire class from his 30 year old notes, no text. If you missed a lecture, you were screwed.

      4. Suthenboy   12 years ago

        neither does anyone else.

      5. Zeb   12 years ago

        Here is the best response I have heard to a layperson asking how magnets work: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMFPe-DwULM

        1. Scruffy Nerfherder   12 years ago

          As usual, Feynman rules.

  18. Brett L   12 years ago

    Why the fuck does the NIH have to fund this? Shouldn’t drug companies be doing this for their own gain?

    The fledgling National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) says that it will oversee the spending of US$12.7 million on the ambitious projects, which aim to produce treatments for ailments including Alzheimer’s disease, schizophrenia, alcoholism and calcified heart valves. As Nature wrote last October, the awardees have their work cut out for them: all the compounds, donated by big pharmaceutical firms, have been shown to be safe in humans but were discarded for lack of effectiveness against their original targets or for business reasons.

    1. gaijin   12 years ago

      Alzheimer’s disease, schizophrenia, alcoholism and calcified heart valves.

      One of these things is not like the others, one of these things does not belong.

      1. Ted S.   12 years ago

        It wasn’t government funding that determined Pfizer’s anti-angina drug Viagra didn’t work as intended.

      2. SIV   12 years ago

        Schizophrenia has no pathology.

        1. gaijin   12 years ago

          ding.ding.ding…you win your very own copy of the DSM V!

        2. Thane-kin   12 years ago

          Yet you brought it up.

          1. gaijin   12 years ago

            yes. SIV correctly identified the ‘condition’ that has no pathology. He wins a useless book.

            1. Thane-kin   12 years ago

              A condition doesn’t need a pathology to be eased by drugs.

              So, no, he doesn’t win a (mostly) useless book.

              1. gaijin   12 years ago

                A condition doesn’t need a pathology to be eased by drugs.

                true. Then again, a condition with no pathology might just as effectively be eased by aromatherapy as drugs.

                1. Thane-kin   12 years ago

                  It is possible, but highly unlikely in cases of schizophrenia (where it has been diagnosed based on actual, significant impairments on quality of life, rather than on a doctor thinking that the patient is a weirdo or doesn’t properly align with societally imposed values).

            2. Christina   12 years ago

              Well, almost.

              http://brain.oxfordjournals.or…..4/593.full

              1. Christina   12 years ago

                By the way, this is a great book on brain development by a research neuroscientist. I read it while pregnant with my first.

                What’s Going on in There? : How the Brain and Mind Develop in the First Five Years of Life by Lise Eliot
                Link: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0553378252/reasonmagazinea-20/

              2. Thane-kin   12 years ago

                I dunno about gaijin, but that won’t get you far with MonkeyAIDS. He doesn’t “believe” in neuroscience.

                1. SIV   12 years ago

                  “Neuroscience” is a strange choice of study for your career as a fry cook. Then again my hippie cousin studied holistic massage and ended up as a barista.

                  1. Thane-kin   12 years ago

                    The problem with your little theory, you dumb piece of shit, is that I didn’t go into neuroscience without a backup plan. I can program and I can administer Linux systems. I won’t have any trouble finding a job, much less be relegated to frycook.

                2. gaijin   12 years ago

                  I dunno about gaijin,

                  fwiw, I have a bias toward neuroscience over psychology for looking into questions of brain function and disease…with the caveat that much of the brain imaging work to date seems superficial (i.e., whole brain versus local bloodflow/electrical activity).

                  1. Thane-kin   12 years ago

                    I’m basically in the same boat, gaijin.

  19. Rich   12 years ago

    Obama’s climate change plan goes around Congress

    The wide-ranging plan … has programs to help harden communities against climate-fueled extreme weather.

    “Climate-fueled weather”, eh?

    1. gaijin   12 years ago

      EXTREME weather. The kind that is unexpected…or that is more than forecast…or less. Or something.

    2. some guy   12 years ago

      Screw the chicken and the egg. Which came first, the weather or the climate?

    3. Rich   12 years ago

      And this “hardening” — Would it involve DOMES, by any chance?

    4. a better weapon   12 years ago

      I bet house and senate dems up for election are fucking THRILLED that he’s going after coal again.

      Its like he doesn’t want a majority in both chambers or something. The executive branch is swimming in yes men.

  20. Bardas Phocas   12 years ago

    I applaud the alt text.
    Also appropriate would be:
    “This is what happens when you fuck a stranger in the ass!”

  21. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

    A Beagle, Basset Hound & Boxer Mix Named Walle Wins The 2013 World’s Ugliest Dog Contest
    http://laughingsquid.com/a-bea…..g-contest/

    A Beagle, Basset Hound & Boxer mix named Walle beat out 29 other canines on Friday, June 21, 2013 to win first place in the 25th annual World’s Ugliest Dog Contest at Sonoma-Marin Fairgrounds in Petaluma, California. Walle and his owner Tammie Barbee traveled from Chico, California for the competition and entered mere minutes before it began. Huffington Post has photos of some of the other dogs that competed. Last year, Mugly, an 8-year-old hairless Chinese Crested rescue dog, won the contest.

    1. some guy   12 years ago

      That is a horribly misshapen dog, but not that ugly. I mean it has all its fur and its eyes are actually inside its head.

      1. RBS   12 years ago

        Poor dog.

      2. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

        Frankly, if that’s all that’s needed to win this competition then standards are slipping. Check out these beauties

    2. Matrix   12 years ago

      really?… yeesh. This isn’t even close to the previous “ugliest dog”.

      I mean, it’s by no means a handsome dog, but ugliest in the world? hardly

    3. VG Zaytsev   12 years ago

      That dog’s not ugly.

      I have uglier dogs in my neighborhood.

    4. SugarFree   12 years ago

      That dog is adorable. It’s people like you that are the monsters.

      1. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

        granted.

  22. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

    when you gotta go, you gotta go:

    Man arrested after exiting car and defecating in Holland Tunnel booth
    http://www.upi.com/Odd_News/20…..371957477/

    Port Authority police say they saw the 21-year-old exit a car traveling in the north tunnel and walk inside a tunnel booth. Police allegedly found him defecating inside, Coleman said.

    Coleman said Nam had been in the car with three other passengers about 10 p.m. when he felt sick and told the driver to let him out as they headed through the tunnel, the newspaper said.

    The incident forced the closure of the north tunnel for 5 to 10 minutes as police conducted a “standardized security sweep,” Coleman said.

    1. Brett L   12 years ago

      Just to be clear, it is now illegal to eat bad ethnic food in NYC if you’re driving out. Fuckers. This aggression should not stand. Man.

    2. gaijin   12 years ago

      The incident forced the closure of the north tunnel for 5 to 10 minutes

      Dont give the terrorists new biological weapons ideas!

  23. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

    Gee, compulsory education and government social workers really work to protect children from being beaten to death by their fucked-up parents

  24. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

    Robert J. Samuelson: Cheap money can’t buy a strong economy
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/…..story.html

    The most charitable verdict on this massive monetary experiment is that it’s done modest good. In the United States, it did reduce long-term interest rates and, to some extent, bolster stocks. Even so, the speed of the U.S. recovery (about 2 percent annually) is roughly half the average of all recoveries from 1960 to 2007. As for the global economy, it grew 2.5 percent in 2012, down from the 3.7 percent average from 2003 to 2007, says IHS Global Insight. Few major countries are doing better now than before the financial crisis. Cheap money hasn’t been a smashing success. Still, when the Fed suggested last week that it might curb bond-buying later this year, stocks swooned.

    That’s one downside: Cheap money is hard to reverse gracefully. The larger problem is that central banks are trying to do things beyond their powers.

    1. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

      down from the 3.7 percent average from 2003 to 2007

      Gee, how did the economy grow at that rate then? The FUCKING HOUSING BUBBLE, IDIOT!

      2% is the new normal.

      1. some guy   12 years ago

        And why is 2% the new normal? The US has been at the head of the world economy for decades. Why can’t we match growth rates from last century? Why is our productivity stagnating? Why is our employment rate crashing?

        1. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

          Our Gross National Income is higher than ever. We’re still #1 by a mile.

          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gross_national_income

          We’re efficient. We don’t need the labor pool we have. We also have overcapacity in plants. That is why there is zero chance of inflation.

          1. Jordan   12 years ago

            That is grossly distorted by massive government spending.

            1. Sevo   12 years ago

              That’s been explained to shreek more times than he can count.
              Doesn’t matter; he keeps lying in the hopes someone is fooled. Shreek’s a lying idiot.

          2. Citizen Nothing   12 years ago

            We don’t need the labor pool we have.

            Why doesn’t this surprise me? Derp.

      2. Jordan   12 years ago

        2% is the new normal.

        Until the latest bubble pops.

    2. some guy   12 years ago

      Its almost as if all that cheap money never made it out into the real economy where collateralized loans are made, payrolls are met and goods and services are bought and sold…

      1. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

        We have cheap money and very tight credit for everyone less than perfect.

        Loose credit/tight credit cycle – old as dirt.

        1. some guy   12 years ago

          Foreseeable consequences are not unintended, right?

          1. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

            Well, tight money AND tight credit would have been disastrous for the economy.

            “Hey, you with the 700 FICO? We give you 12% loan for 15 years..”

            1. Sevo   12 years ago

              Ever heard of ‘false dichotomy’ dipshit?

              1. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

                Heard of it? He lives it!

  25. KDN   12 years ago

    The Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the agency responsible for regulating MF Global, is preparing to sue Jon Corzine over the collapse of the company.

    Wait, wait, wait. That can’t be right. Shrike told us that there was absolutely no wrongdoing on Corzine’s part and this was all another Republican witch hunt.

    1. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

      No, I said Corzine didn’t steal anything – as has been confirmed.

      MFG was a basket case before he joined up. And that clown was buying stock as late as August before the October blowup.

      1. KDN   12 years ago

        Knowing Corzine’s history, brutal incompetence was always the most likely outcome. Such incompetence is often not enough to shield one from criminal prosecution, though.

        1. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

          That’s fair except for the criminal part. This regulator lawsuit is civil only.

          1. KDN   12 years ago

            Well yeah, that’s my point. They probably could have gone after him for it anyway but they chose not to, especially if the shoddy controls were put in after he arrived and with his approval.

            Not that it would have mattered, if they were to bring such charges it would have been a decade before it saw the inside of a courtroom; odds are that he’d be dead before anything was settled one way or the other.

      2. DJF   12 years ago

        If he did not steal anything then where did the money go?

        Its still stealing if you take money that is not yours and pay off company debts.

        Just because it might not have ended up in his pocket does not mean that he did not steal.

        1. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

          Counterparties had it and were reluctant about giving it back.

          JP Morgan had over $500 million of it.

          1. Sevo   12 years ago

            So he didn’t ‘steal’ it, he sort of ‘borrowed’ it and loaned it to other people?
            Doesn’t that make you dizzy?

          2. T   12 years ago

            When you give away $500 mmillion dollars of other people’s money under circumstances that make it difficult, if not impossible, for you to get it back, your incompotence has risen to a level that is usually considered criminal. Theft may niot be an accurate charge, but criminal negligence, breach of fiduciary duty, and possibly constructive fraud come into play.

  26. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

    He punctures the tyres too!

    Masturbating man caught molesting bicycle

    1. Brett L   12 years ago

      A 35-year-old man was arrested in 2007 after having slashed the tyres and ejaculated over some 20 bike seats in the city.

      The man was sentenced to secure psychiatric care and is reported to have since been released.

      Jesus. This guy would fit right in.

      1. gaijin   12 years ago

        and ejaculated over some 20 bike seats in the city.

        In one day?! That’s sure a whole lotta bike seats.

        1. Brett L   12 years ago

          Kegels, man. Gotta keep working on the Kegel muscles.

    2. Ted S.   12 years ago

      What the hell are tyres, you antipodean freak? 😉

  27. Rich   12 years ago

    Boy fatally impaled on statue outside Texas Tech’s Ranching Museum

    Yippee ki-yay! Let the lawsuits begin!

    1. Brett L   12 years ago

      Damn. That’s a realistic statue.

    2. a better weapon   12 years ago

      What the hell are 2 adults and 2 “youths” doing playing hide and seek at 3 am? I was out and about doing stupid shit at that hour when I was 14 but I sure as hell wasn’t being encouraged by adults.

      1. Not Sure   12 years ago

        Could have been cousins who happen to be 18?

    3. Don Mynack   12 years ago

      Damn, sad story, but that’s a Darwin Award finalist right there.

  28. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

    Palin: Holes in the Border as Big as the Holes in Their Amnesty Bill
    http://www.breitbart.com/Big-G…..nesty-Bill

    Just like they did for Obamacare, the permanent political class is sugaring this bill with one goody after another to entice certain senators to vote for it. Look no further than page 983 of the bill, which contains a special visa exemption for foreign seafood workers in the 49th state despite huge unemployment numbers in the American workforce. This is obviously a hidden favor designed to buy the votes of Alaska Senators Murkowski and Begich.

    And just like Obamacare, this amnesty bill fails on every level of economic sanity and sane reform. It offers no solutions. It will barely slow the flow of illegal immigration, which means we can expect millions and millions of new illegal aliens in coming years. Sort of what happened when we passed amnesty in 1986 without securing our borders first.

    1. some guy   12 years ago

      Why can’t we just give illegal immigrants two choices:

      1. Pay back taxes, go through a background check, pay a fine and get legal status, but give up any chance of ever becoming a citizen, OR

      2. Leave the country, go through the process of legal entry, residency and eventually becoming a citizen.

      It is possible to make these people legal residents without letting them become citizens.

      1. VG Zaytsev   12 years ago

        How does that benefit democrats?

        1. some guy   12 years ago

          Cutting right the heart of the matter, aren’t we?

      2. thom   12 years ago

        Permanent residence without citizenship is the ideal status for most undocumented immigrants in this country, so I assume number one would be highly desirable.

        Additionally, many, many undocumented immigrants either file a tax return or over-pay their taxes by failing to file a return to claim their refunds. From a government receipts perspective, I have a hard time believing that forcing compliance with the tax code would increase tax revenues.

        1. some guy   12 years ago

          From my perspective the point isn’t to increase revenue, but to ensure as best as possible that these people have complied with all other laws before we forgive them their immigration offenses. So, the back taxes part only applies to the few who actually would owe back taxes.

    2. Don Mynack   12 years ago

      I don’t understand why they need to be citizens. Just make them resident aliens and be done with it. Why the drive to full citizenship?

      1. thom   12 years ago

        Non-citizen residents can’t vote.

      2. Fatty Bolger   12 years ago

        What thom said. No new citizens means no new Democratic voters. And without that, the Democrats won’t antagonize the unions by making it easier for foreign workers to enter the country and get higher paying jobs.

  29. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

    awesome lizard cow dinosaur dscovered

    1. gaijin   12 years ago

      Isn;t that the kind that Moses rode through the desert to escape the Egyptians?

  30. bostonaod   12 years ago

    OT: Somebody fairly recently (few months?) posted a great legal essay or speech from a law professor explaining the interpretations of law were almost completely dependent on individual opinion and finding data and cases to back up that opinion. Any help finding that link based on my hazy recollection is much appreciated

    1. Citizen Nothing   12 years ago

      Try this.

      1. generic Brand   12 years ago

        Excellent essay. Depressing considering the reality we live in, but I found it very insightful.

      2. bostonaod   12 years ago

        This was exactly it, thanks very much!

  31. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

    Alms for the Upper Middle Class: Subsidized Apartments Aim at $200K Earners
    http://observer.com/2013/06/al…..k-earners/

    “New York has made it so difficult to build that you forget what free and easy supply really does,” said Harvard economics professor Ed Glaeser, who co-authored a study a decade ago that found that half of the cost of housing in Manhattan could be blamed on artificial supply constraints. “Chicago remains a vastly more affordable city because Mayor Daley unleashed the cranes on Lake Michigan”?a reference to the Windy City’s far more lenient land-use regulations and commensurate low rents.

    When it comes to New York City housing policy, said Mr. Glaeser, “there’s been a funny combination, from an economic point of view, of on one level making it difficult to build housing supply, and then trying to make up for it on a smaller scale by giving a privileged few access to housing.” In other words, those lucky enough to win the housing lottery like the couple at Elliott-Chelsea, who said they’d been applying for 15 years before they won a spot.

    1. Sevo   12 years ago

      The right crowd and no crowding!

    2. Ted S.   12 years ago

      who co-authored a study a decade ago that found that half of the cost of housing in Manhattan could be blamed on artificial supply constraints.

      No shit, Sherlock!

      1. Corneliusm   12 years ago

        Half?

    3. John   12 years ago

      and then trying to make up for it on a smaller scale by giving a privileged few access to housing.

      That sounds like a winning strategy to buy votes to me. Rent control is a dream for local politicians. You create a class of voters who are totally at your mercy. I don’t care what your overall interests are. You are going to vote whichever way allows you to keep your artificially cheap home.

      1. VG Zaytsev   12 years ago

        Plus it inflates the property value of the legacy owners.

  32. hamilton   12 years ago

    Now we know where Epi was yesterday.

    I presume he’s the guy in #1.

    1. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

      Or number 53 after some hormone shots

  33. SugarFree   12 years ago

    What does this have to do with global warming? It’s almost like he’s writing an astronomy article or some shit.

    1. Brett L   12 years ago

      Changing it up for the lulz.

  34. Sevo   12 years ago

    AP says China and Russia fart in the general direction of Obozo:
    “Indeed, Russia’s foreign minister on Tuesday called U.S. demands for Snowden’s extradition “ungrounded and unacceptable.””
    http://www.sfgate.com/news/pol…..620173.php

  35. Rich   12 years ago

    The state claims that because the Zimmermans may be witnesses for the state, they must be barred from the courtroom.

    IANAL, but WTF?

    You mean *Martin’s* parents *could not possibly be witnesses for the state*?

    1. RBS   12 years ago

      It’s pretty common for potential witnesses to be sequestered until they give their testimony.

      1. Rich   12 years ago

        “Please, simply answer the question.”

    2. Thane-kin   12 years ago

      I?ANAL, also, but it strikes me that having family members present could negatively affect the objectivity of the jury in general, and I don’t know why they allow it (other than to appear not be cold-hearted, bemonocled libertarians).

      1. thom   12 years ago

        Because criminal trials are conducted openly, and because the members of the public who probably have the most interest in the outcome are the defendant’s family members?

        1. Thane-kin   12 years ago

          But apparently they can bar certain people from the courtroom. It seems, given that ability, it would be in the interest of a fair trial to exclude them.

          1. Hash Brown   12 years ago

            It’s probably a wash, since members of both the victim’s family and the defendant’s family are free to attend.

  36. Thane-kin   12 years ago

    Kristen:

    If you are still trying to make that site work in IE you might try:

    * Testing it in 8/9/10 to see if it works in any of them, and if so, look up what changes were made in the interim. Among other options, you can test on different versions of IE by downloading VM images that MS provides.

    * You can try IE8.js or IE9.js. Of course that could break any IE-specific hacks, though.

    Apologies if you already know either of those options.

  37. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

    OT: for the summer most of my (crappy) ebooks are free. May or may not apply to Amazon since they have a very odd pricing structure – they don’t allow free books unless it’s a KDP select title or they are price matching a competitor.

    Anyway, I’ve noticed that my (awful) erotica gets more downloads than anything else.

    1. SugarFree   12 years ago

      Go on…

      1. T   12 years ago

        Finally, a way to monetize your gifts. Or at least get them out to a wider audience.

    2. Hash Brown   12 years ago

      How can I find them?

      1. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

        B&N, Sony, Kobo, Smashwords, Apple, Diesel – under the author “Paul Westwood”

        For Kindle users, as mentioned above, the price may not be zero – it depends if they price matched or not. I know my book “Malediction” has recently been made free on Amazon.

  38. Adam330   12 years ago

    “The Russian foreign minister says Edward Snowden never technically crossed into Russia, remaining in a transit zone at the international airport, and so his government has no authority over his movements.”

    I love this. It’s great when someone else gets to make up arbitrary rules and throw them back at the government, and make them stick.

  39. Andrew S.   12 years ago

    Alan Dershowitz is an unmitigaged piece of shit.

    http://piersmorgan.blogs.cnn.c…..hpt=pm_bn2

    1. Brett L   12 years ago

      Who cares why he did it? What effect does that have on the information that was released?

      1. John   12 years ago

        Pretty much. Greenwald is a nasty socialist. And yes, he hates the US. I will never like Greenwald. But my abiding dislike of Greenwald has nothing to do with my opinion of the NSA.

        1. Andrew S.   12 years ago

          Sure, he’s a socialist economically, but at least he actually cares about civil liberties, and is the only lefty journalist I know of that’s consistently willing to call out the Obama administration and Team Blue on its constant bullshit.

          Besides, I’m not sure hating the US is a very uncommon opinion around here at this point…

          1. John   12 years ago

            He cares about them some. The problem is he is a total apologist for Hamas and the PA. Somehow his concern for civil liberties doesn’t extend to victims of Hamas (including Palestinian victims) or if caring interferes with his pathological hatred of Israel.

            1. Somalian Road Corporation   12 years ago

              Well, yes, but that just makes it all the more amusing that a gay Marxist Hamas-apologist kkkorporation-hater still doesn’t have enough identity politics cred to go against Obama in the minds of his fellow travelers. (Although quite frankly even if he were also nonwhite and a woman–or, better yet, trans–I still think that wouldn’t be enough to absolve him of the mortal sin of pointing out the Lightworker’s lack of clothes.)

              1. John   12 years ago

                They will go after him for being gay. You watch.

    2. Rich   12 years ago

      “I would think of a journalist as someone who is neutral.”

      *** facepalm ***

  40. Thane-kin   12 years ago

    I had a nightmare lastnight wherein I sent in a tip for a news story, yet Tucille or the Polish guy, whoever it was, made up a sender rather than H/T me.

  41. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

    Taliban militants storm Afghan government compound
    http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/s…..FGHANISTAN

    Taliban militants stormed the presidential compound Tuesday after bluffing their way past two checkpoints, triggering a gunbattle that left eight attackers and three guards dead and sent journalists attending an official event scrambling for cover, officials and witnesses said.

    The well-planned daylight assault in a highly fortified zone of the capital was a bold challenge to Kabul’s authority just a week after the Taliban opened a political office in Qatar as the Islamic militant movement said it was willing to begin a U.S.-led peace process.

    1. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

      So the Talib all end up dead, and the Afghans lose three guys.

      I think I would have a different definition of “well-planned”. You know, one that includes getting my people out.

      1. RBS   12 years ago

        Yeah, I think their definition is something like “as long at least one infidel dog is killed.”

  42. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

    Surge in ‘digital dementia’
    Doctors in South Korea are reporting a surge in “digital dementia” among young people who have become so reliant on electronic devices that they can no longer remember everyday details like their phone numbers.
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/new…..entia.html

  43. Thane-kin   12 years ago

    Why Ed Krayewski isn’t credible or patriotic (Reason, immigration)

    I stopped reading after this:

    “The government” is a political entity representing the joint interests of all Americans, it isn’t a separate entity that’s been imposed externally. “The government” is us. Saying that “[t]he government doesn’t own the country” is the same as saying that U.S. citizens don’t collectively own the U.S.

    PS doing a quick search, it appears “24ahead” has been alleged to be lonewacko.

    1. SugarFree   12 years ago

      Not alleged. That is Chris Kelly, Epic Shitgargler.

      1. Thane-kin   12 years ago

        Apparently Shitgarlgler is the vocalist for a band called Bumilingus, whose most recent album is “Fifty Shades of Poo”.

        Sounds right up your alley, Sug.

        1. SugarFree   12 years ago

          Poop: The Rock Opera

    2. John   12 years ago

      I think you are misunderstanding him. The government doesn’t own the country. But we certainly own the government. And Americans have every right to expect the government to act in their interests.

      One of the more annoying arguments open borders people make is that open borders are good because they increase the overall well being of the world at large. So what? The US government isn’t supposed to look out for the world. It is supposed to look out for Americans. So the only relevant question is “is this good for Americans, you know the people who own the government, fund it and whose interests it is supposed to look after.

      1. Thane-kin   12 years ago

        I understand. However, the government should be owned by us. But it is not; it is most certainly imposed externally.

        1. John   12 years ago

          Imposed externally by whom? I disagree. I understand that the government is separate from the people. All of this bullshit about the government being “us” and thus infallible is just that bullshit. But we created the monster. The American people are the ones who voted for the people who did this and supported the policies that created this thing. They own it and ultimately are responsible for its existence and for doing something about it. No one imposed the government on this country. We did it to ourselves.

          1. Citizen Nothing   12 years ago

            we created the monster.

            Who the fuck is this “we,” kimosabe?
            I’ve voted in nearly every election for 34 years, and never voted for a winner above the level of township trustee.

            1. John   12 years ago

              You motherfucker. Unless you want to live on an Island, you are stuck with the consequences of many of the decisions your neighbors make. Sucks to be you. But hey, it sucks to be a lot of us these days.

              1. Citizen Nothing   12 years ago

                we created the monster.

                1. John   12 years ago

                  We did. Just because you and I tried to stop it, doesn’t mean we didn’t help create it, if for no other reason than we failed to stop it.

                  1. Citizen Nothing   12 years ago

                    You know who else some people tried to stop but failed and so must take collective responsibility for?

                    1. Citizen Nothing   12 years ago

                      Oh. Sorry. I see you already Godwined yourself below.

              2. Citizen Nothing   12 years ago

                we

                1. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

                  oui.

                  1. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

                    Whee!

          2. Thane-kin   12 years ago

            The (federal) government was created in the late 18th century by men long since dead. I happen to be distantly related to a couple of them, but that by no means binds me to their decisions. Nor do I legitimate it by voting (and of course, there are quite a few people in the US who have never voted).

            1. John   12 years ago

              Then move. The fact is you live here. And as long as you live here, you are in some measure responsible for what happens here. It is like people in Nazi Germany who claimed that they were not responsible. Bullshit. If you live here and let it happen, you are to some degree responsible for what happens. It is a small degree. But to some degree you are. If you find the government that loathsome and objectionable, you need to leave. Staying here is immoral and cowardly on your part. By staying here and paying taxes, you are supporting this immorality. I don’t understand how anyone who thinks the government is that horrible would voluntarily stay here. The day I conclude the government is that bad, I am leaving because I will no longer morally be able to stay and support it even via taxes.

              1. Rebekah   12 years ago

                Then move.

                Fuck you. Do you have any idea how difficult and expensive it is to expatriate, especially if you want to go somewhere halfway fucking decent? And just what do you suggest we should do about the current state of affairs? When we live in a defacto democracy and the majority of our neighbors are completely mindfucked by more than a decade in government indoctrination centers public schools to think that the status quo is both moral and just, that leaves one with precious few options.

                By staying here and paying taxes, you are supporting this immorality.

                So the slave is guilty of the master’s evil deeds. Gotcha. Now go DIAF.

                1. Thane-kin   12 years ago

                  By staying here and paying taxes, you are supporting this immorality.

                  So the slave is guilty of the master’s evil deeds. Gotcha. Now go DIAF.

                  And even if you expatriate, you will still have to file a tax return with the U.S., and in many cases pay taxes.

                  1. SugarFree   12 years ago

                    “Why should I have to change my name? He’s the one that sucks.”

                    1. Ska   12 years ago

                      You should never have told those fudgepackers that you like his music.

              2. mad libertarian guy   12 years ago

                Love it or leave it? Really, John?

                I never thought you’d sink that low.

                1. John   12 years ago

                  You don’t have to love it MLG. But don’t tell me that you think the government is this horribly immoral thing. If you honestly believe that leave. If I had lived in Nazi Germany, I would have been morally obligated to leave if I could or if I couldn’t make war on the government. If I did neither and sat on my ass and did nothing, then yes, I am at least partially responsible for what happened there.

                  The bottomline is that the people above are talking out of their ass. They don’t think the government is that immoral or they would do something about it. Since they are not doing shit, they are either liars or cowards.

                  Stop it with they hyperbole and stop it with the bullshit about how the government is some kind of alien being imposed from above. Bullshit. The government is the creation of the American people. And we all own a little bit of that shit sandwich whether you like it or not.

      2. thom   12 years ago

        Do open borders people actually make that argument? It seems like a straw-man to me. I’ve never met an open borders person who argued that open borders, although detrimental to America, are justified because they are good for the world at large. The argument instead is usually that open borders are good for America and Americans, and that they benefit the world at large is a nice side benefit.

        Regardless, the government isn’t me, I’m not the government, and I have no particular interest in owning any part of it. Unfortunately, my rejection of any ownership stake in that sinking ship is considered unacceptable by other people, who dismiss it out of hand.

        1. John   12 years ago

          They totally make that argument. Reason has made it several times. They talk about overall increase of standard of living achieved by moving to the United States. It drives me crazy.

          Regardless, the government isn’t me, I’m not the government, and I have no particular interest in owning any part of it.

          No one said it was you. And you most certainly have an ownership stake in it. You fund it. How can you say you don’t have any ownership of it?

          1. thom   12 years ago

            I don’t want any ownership stake in it. Consider my tax payments to be rent.

            When I was younger I lived in shitty houses. I rented them, but I never wanted to own them.

            Same thing.

      3. Outlaw   12 years ago

        If we are the government, then I’m my car.

        1. John   12 years ago

          No one says you are the government. You own the government. And yes, you own your car. You paid for it didn’t you?

          1. Thane-kin   12 years ago

            Lonewacko did in the passage above. So someone says that.

            1. Outlaw   12 years ago

              I’m pretty sure I’ve seen other progs say the same stupid shit too.

              They do this because they want to be able to frame anyone that’s “anti-government” as anti-society. Again, it’s the old socialist lie.

              “Socialism, like the ancient ideas from which it springs, confuses the distinction between government and society.” – Bastiat

              The only way it would be accurate is if we were a direct democracy.

              1. John   12 years ago

                Just because society creates government and owns it and is ultimately in some sense responsible for what they create, does not mean there is no difference between society and government.

                You bought your car. You are responsible for owning it. But you are not your car. You do not become one with the things you create or buy.

                1. itsnotmeitsyou   12 years ago

                  “You’re not your fucking khakis” – Tyler Durden

                2. VG Zaytsev   12 years ago

                  You bought your car. You are responsible for owning it.

                  That’s a false analogy because none of today created the government, we can’t sell (dispose of) it collectively or individually.

                  The situation is more akin to one where ancestors made a deal that binds us with no opportunity to exit the ‘deal’.

                  1. John   12 years ago

                    with no opportunity to exit the ‘deal

                    You can totally exit. Leave. No one says you have to stay here. And in fact you may be morally obligated to leave.

    3. T   12 years ago

      No alleged to it. 24ahead is the internet home of all your ImmigrationPhobia and other AssortedInsanity.

  44. Hollywood   12 years ago

    Excellent alt text, man.

  45. Ken Shultz   12 years ago

    “Internal State Department documents obtained by Fox News suggest the decision on security levels at the U.S. facility in Benghazi was made at the highest levels of the department.”

    It’ll work that way in the IRS scandal, as well. Lower level bureaucrats in the federal government don’t have the discretion to think for themselves–that’s one of the big reasons why putting bureaucrats in charge of any aspect of the economy is such a bad idea.

    And it works that way in every government bureaucracy. Lower level bureaucrats don’t have the discretion to make decisions that might embarrass their bosses, and any time their bosses force them to do something out of the ordinary–something that might be misinterpreted in the future as a decision they made for themselves? They write a memo just to cover their asses.

    Lower level bureaucrats couldn’t think for themselves if they wanted to!

    And it’s been that way since time immemorial–Babylonian bureaucrats chiseled CYA memos thousands of years ago. The only sure things in life are death, taxes, and government bureaucrats writing memos just to cover their asses–in case someone tries to blame them for their boss’ decisions.

    1. John   12 years ago

      It’ll work that way in the IRS scandal, as well. Lower level bureaucrats in the federal government don’t have the discretion to think for themselves–that’s one of the big reasons why putting bureaucrats in charge of any aspect of the economy is such a bad idea.

      That is not entirely true. They have a lot of discretion and spend most of their lives fighting with other agencies to keep it.

      It would not have shocked me at all if some lower level bureaucrat had killed the security funding at Bengazi to save their own pet project. That kind of shit goes on all of the time. The head people have very little control over what actually happens.

      That said, bureaucrats generally are not looking to go to jail or get fired. So while cutting someone else’ funding is fair game, breaking laws and going after people politically not so much. The IRS scandal certainly came from the top.

  46. Brett L   12 years ago

    How to win at Twitter.

    1. RBS   12 years ago

      I like when people don’t get the joke/reference and they start posting random stuff they think is funny.

  47. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    Holy shit, Dershowitz is a despicable little slug.

  48. Brett L   12 years ago

    Detroit man tears off penis after eating ‘shrooms. I have never, I would like to emphasize, NEVER, wanted to separate my penis from my body on even heroic doses of psilocybin.

    1. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

      found the 41-year-old man naked, screaming and bleeding from his groin.

      there’s a certain poetry in that line

      1. SugarFree   12 years ago

        I saw the best minds of my generation destroyed by madness, starving hysterical naked, screaming and bleeding from their groin,
        dragging themselves through the elementary school at night looking for an angry dick,
        mushroomheaded autoeunuchs burning for the ancient heavenly connection to the starry dynamo in the machinery of PCP,

        1. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

          thankyou for putting your queer shoulder to the wheel

        2. Brett L   12 years ago

          You really need to get someone to cover the American Pop animated version of Howl with your words. YouTube would eat this up. And throw up.

          1. SugarFree   12 years ago

            Two Girls, Two Hundred Cups

      2. T   12 years ago

        Yeah, but it’s not news if a woman is doing that.

  49. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

    nothing to see here:

    Do new IRS revelations prove there is no Tea Party scandal?
    http://theweek.com/article/ind…..ty-scandal

    Along with conservative and small-government tax-exempt applicants, IRS officials in Cincinnati also flagged groups whose applications contained words like “progressive,” “occupy,” “medical marijuana,” and Israel. The final BOLO list from April contained the search term “Green Energy Organizations.”

    “House Democrats can hardly contain their delight” at the new revelations, says David Weigel at Slate. The extra scrutiny for “lefty/libertarian causes” seemingly “contradicts the theory that conservatives and only conservatives came under the laser.”

    1. John   12 years ago

      Flagging is not the same as harassing. So what if they flagged them? Show me where they held up their applications or harassed them the way we know they did the Tea Party. It is not surprising at all they would have thrown out a few flags for the other side as a way of covering what they were really doing.

      But it will give some talking points to their trolls and that was the point of doing it.

      1. SugarFree   12 years ago

        We’ve known all along that they also looked at liberal groups, but processed them much faster, approved them more often, and subjected them to far less scrutiny.

        They can’t get a hold of Snowden for lynching, so they cough up a mysteriously uncovered new document. Uh-huh.

      2. robc   12 years ago

        I dont think it changes anything, even assuming the harassment. Only TEAM people would think it matters. Harassing both sides is a WORSE scandal, not less of one.

        1. John   12 years ago

          Not necessarily. Going after both equally could just mean they didn’t understand the law. Going after one means they were corrupted to support one political side.

          1. robc   12 years ago

            Ignorance of the law is no excuse.

            1. John   12 years ago

              I am not saying it is good. But being incompetent is what you expect from government. That is nothing like being used as a political tool for the President.

    2. Somalian Road Corporation   12 years ago

      Weigel’d again. You know, I’ve made a lot of terrible decisions during the course of my life, but at least I can say I never hired David Weigel to work for my libertarian periodical.

      1. robc   12 years ago

        http://www.reactionface.info/s…..qzsyre.gif

    3. Sevo   12 years ago

      Shreek posted that last night, doing his best Ron Ziegler.

      1. John   12 years ago

        They just need a reed. A single nugget of truth to build their lies on. I have no doubt the people who planned the IRS operation flagged other groups for that purpose. You have to give people like Shreek a base upon which to lie.

  50. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

    Markets upended because Fed has “no clue” how it will end bond buying-IMF
    http://www.reuters.com/article…..M120130625

    Markets have overreacted to the U.S. Federal Reserve’s plans to stop buying bonds but part of the problem is a lack of clarity over how it will be done, the International Monetary Fund said on Tuesday.

    “The Fed has no clue what will happen when it starts selling assets,” IMF Chief Economist Olivier Blanchard told a meeting of the Institute of International Finance in Paris. “So it cannot make any commitments in term of quantities.”

  51. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    Detroit man tears off penis after eating ‘shrooms.

    I was thinking about that stupid “transgender” kid I posted the link abut yesterday, and that was exactly what I was thinking. His parents are fomenting this bizarre schizoid behavior to buff up their tortured notions of social justice, or whatever the fuck drives them. They think they’re being totally awesome by putting him in dresses and dying his hair purple, and letting him pee in the girls’ room.

    What will they do when their precocious little whacko becomes completely untethered from objective reality and cuts his own dick off with a pair of tin snips at the age of eleven?

    1. Somalian Road Corporation   12 years ago

      http://fourtimesthefun.blogspo…..in-on.html

      I’m going to weigh in on this, because I’ve “known” this mom online for six years and I’ve got some perspective on this story, given the background information I am privy to.

      My opinion, based on my knowledge, is the mom of this child is a fame-seeking attention whore, who will stop at nothing to prove how edgy and non-mainstream she is, even at the expense of her child’s privacy. I “met” her online six years ago when she came to the Triplet Connection and made a huge ruckus because she was dead-set on homebirthing her “natural” triplets in a kiddie pool in her living room. I thought she was a faker, so I immediately set out to see if she was real, or not, where I discovered that she didn’t, in fact, have “natural” triplets. She had ordered clomid from Mexico, and gotten pregnant using non-prescribed fertility drugs. Here’s her post about that. It’s still public all these years later. Her name is Kathryn.

      1. RBS   12 years ago

        I never would have guess this woman is a “fame-seeking whore.”

    2. John   12 years ago

      I never realized this until my wife went to work for a medical center. But I guess in the rest of the world mushrooms are rarely poisonous. So picking wild mushrooms is a big hobby in a lot of places, particularly China and Russia. And sadly, a number of immigrants poison themselves in the US not realizing north American mushrooms are often deadly.

      1. Zeb   12 years ago

        Most mushrooms are non-poisonous everywhere. But there are a lot of poisonous ones that look a lot like ones that are good to eat, so when people go to a new part of the world, it is easy to make mistakes in identifying them.

  52. UnCivilServant   12 years ago

    Koontz Decision is in.

    SCOTUS Opinion here

    1. UnCivilServant   12 years ago

      Still reading, but I think it’s a win for Koontz (the property owner)

      1. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

        Haven’t read it, but I noticed this:

        “ALITO, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which ROBERTS, C. J., and SCALIA, KENNEDY, and THOMAS, JJ., joined. KAGAN, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which GINSBURG, BREYER, and SOTOMAYOR, JJ., joined.”

        I’m guessing the decision is good news for the property owner.

    2. Fluffy   12 years ago

      It looks like a win, and they threw in a nice reference to an unconstitutional conditions doctrine, which I think is not employed nearly enough.

  53. mad libertarian guy   12 years ago

    Vertigo

    “Vertigo” is the longest track off of Deafheaven’s new album Sunbather, my album of the year so far. It’s both beautiful as well as crushing and emotional.

  54. Fatty Bolger   12 years ago

    A ‘Far Broader’ BOLO List?

    Acting IRS commissioner Danny Werfel on Monday told reporters that the now-infamous “Be On The Lookout” list was far broader than originally disclosed in the Treasury Department inspector general’s report. News accounts in outlets such as the Associated Press and Bloomberg News supported Werfel’s claim, indicating that terms on the list ran the gamut, politically speaking, from “tea party” to “progressive” and “occupy,” and even to groups whose applications included the word “Israel.”

    A November 2010 version of the list obtained by National Review Online, however, suggests that while the list did contain the word “progressive,” screeners were instructed to treat progressive groups differently from tea-party groups. Whereas they were merely alerted that a designation of 501(c)(3) status “may not be appropriate” for progressive groups ? 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from conducting any political activity ? they were told to send applications from tea-party groups off to IRS higher-ups for further scrutiny.

    1. Fatty Bolger   12 years ago

      continued

      That means the applications of progressive organizations could be approved by line agents on the spot, while those of tea-party groups could not. Furthermore, the November 2010 list noted that tea-party cases were “currently being coordinated with EOT” ? Exempt Organizations Technical, a group of tax lawyers in Washington, D.C. Those of progressive organizations were not.

    2. Don Mynack   12 years ago

      On the other hand, putting the words “Barack” or “Obama” into your org’s name got you extra-speedy approval.

      http://articles.washingtonpost…..pplication

      1. UnCivilServant   12 years ago

        Does that extend to the “Comittee to Impeach Barack Obama”?

        1. itsnotmeitsyou   12 years ago

          Nope, that one will get you droned, then audited.

  55. Jason2k   12 years ago

    Everything is a show off. They play it like a DJ and mix and match.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

A Runner Was Prosecuted for Unapproved Trail Use After the Referring Agency Called It 'Overcriminalization'

Jacob Sullum | 6.6.2025 2:50 PM

Police Blew Up This Innocent Woman's House and Left Her With the Bill. A Judge Says She's Owed $60,000.

Billy Binion | 6.6.2025 1:51 PM

As Trump Threatens Columbia's Accreditation, the School Should Stop Trying To Placate Him

Autumn Billings | 6.6.2025 1:21 PM

Texas Cop Who Killed Unarmed Man Is Not Entitled to Qualified Immunity

Tosin Akintola | 6.6.2025 1:00 PM

The 5 Worst Green Energy Projects Funded by Biden

Jeff Luse | 6.6.2025 12:45 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!