Justice Department Insists Holder Didn't Lie About Press Investigation
He said he didn't know about prosecuting journalists, not spying on them
U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder didn't lie to Congress about a leak probe because probing a reporter isn't prosecuting one, a Justice Department deputy said.
"At the outset, it is important to note the difference between an investigation and a prosecution," Peter Kadzik, principal deputy assistant attorney general for legislative affairs, said in a letter to House Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., and Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security Chairman Jim Sensenbrenner, R-Wis.
An investigation of potential criminal activity "typically comes before any final decision about prosecution" and can be conducted with a lower burden of proof, the letter said.
It referred to Holder's approval of a search-warrant request for Fox News reporter James Rosen's private correspondence after he reported in June 2009 about a North Korean nuclear test that had not been made public.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Exactly. He wasn't lying to Congress; he had no intention of prosecuting Rosen. So, he was just lying to a judge to get a warrant instead, which is totally fine.
Holder's testimony wasn't that he didn't hear of and wasn't involved in the prosecution of the press. He testified that he didn't hear of and wasn't involved in the "potential prosecution" of the press. Investigation equates to Potential Prosecution.
Is he suggesting that he was investigating someone as an "aider, an abettor, and/or a co-conspirator" but the potential for prosecuting that person had never crossed DOJ's mind?
In absolutely no uncertain terms... he lied.