Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Maine Doctor Stops Accepting Insurance, First French Gay Couple To Marry, Brazil To Cancel African Debt: P.M. Links

Matthew Feeney | 5.28.2013 4:30 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | US Navy/Wikimedia
(US Navy/Wikimedia)
  • Credit: Hommen59/wikimedia

    A doctor in Maine has stopped accepting any form of insurance and now posts the prices of his practice's services online.

  • The first gay marriage in France will be performed tomorrow a little over a week after a man protested the recent legalization of gay marriage by shooting himself in Notre Dame.
  • The Brazilian government has announced that it will cancel or restructure roughly $900 million in debt affecting 12 African nations.
  • A judge has refused to delay the trial of George Zimmerman, who is charged with second-degree murder in the death of Trayvon Martin.
  • One of the suspects in the beheading of a British soldier last week has left hospital and been taken to a police station for questioning.
  • Bureaucrats in California are looking into how to regulate driverless cars.

Get Reason.com and Reason 24/7 content widgets for your websites.

Follow Reason and Reason 24/7 on Twitter, and like us on Facebook.  You can also get the top stories mailed to you—sign up here. Have a news tip? Send it to us!


Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: China Building City in Belarus, the "Last Dictatorship in Europe"

Matthew Feeney is a policy analyst at the Cato Institute.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (395)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    The Brazilian government has announced that it will cancel or restructure roughly $900 million in debt affecting 12 African nations.

    Brazil looking for a break on its tax return.

    1. playa manhattan   12 years ago

      Do you hit refresh dozens of times to pull this off?

      1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

        You only need to hit refresh once if you own a watch. The real trick is reading the links and coming up with a HIGH-larious comment for one.

        1. CE   12 years ago

          As if you read them before you post.

          1. Agammamon   12 years ago

            We should get the SEC involved in this - it looks like some insider trading is going on here.

      2. Nikki makes the sign of a tsp   12 years ago

        Hundreds.

        1. SugarFree   12 years ago

          "Clicking the refresh button" is how FoE achieves completion of his selfish desire to finish first.

          1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

            My comments are something everyone can enjoy and take pride in.

            1. Archduke Pantsfan   12 years ago

              I disagree.

            2. Clich? Bandit   12 years ago

              I miss the old days of time travel in the comments.

              Ahh nostalgia

      3. A Serious Man   12 years ago

        The trick is to be on the main Reason page when it comes up, that way you can click on the link in the H&R box and you'll have an immediate option of posting a comment without jumping an extra link if you were scrolling through the blog.

        1. db   12 years ago

          The trick is to be on an internet connection that doesn't employ significant caching and proxies. Cell phone connections are terrible for getting this done right.

    2. DJF   12 years ago

      Shouldn't this read, "Brazil transfers African debt to Brazil"?

      After all they paid this money out and now they don't get paid back, they get the debt.

      1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

        It's a write-off for them.

        1. DJF   12 years ago

          So they add it to the overall Brazilian debt. It was an asset, but now its a liability.

          1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

            You don't even know what a write-off is.

            1. RBS   12 years ago

              But they do, and they're the ones writing it off.

    3. CE   12 years ago

      That's nothing compared to the 6-billion-dollar "money laundering scheme" the feds shut down, aka "Liberty Reserve".

      Apparently it's a federal crime to allow privacy on financial transactions, because criminals might use your service.

  2. A Serious Man   12 years ago

    The first gay marriage in France will be performed tomorrow a little over a week after a man protested the recent legalization of gay marriage by shooting himself in Notre Dame.

    Do you hear the people sing? Singing the songs of angry men? It is the music of a people who will not be gay again!

    1. Brett L   12 years ago

      Why are there a bunch of oiled up dudes without shirts protesting gay marriage? Yeah, sure, bros. You're totally not into that.

      1. Dr. Frankenstein   12 years ago

        Srsly,
        What was the thinking on this? We're going to protest gay marriage in the most gay way possible.

      2. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

        Maybe they're hoping the gays will be too busy fapping to get married...

        Also a higher res version to facilitate that.

    2. Ted S.   12 years ago

      Do you hear the people sing?
      Singing the hit songs from Les Mis
      It is the best show of a classic
      Since they modernised The Wiz

  3. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    The first gay marriage in France will be performed tomorrow...

    FIRST ONE EVER???

    1. some guy   12 years ago

      First officially recognized. But who really cares what the state government has to say about love and marriage, right?

      1. robc   12 years ago

        love and marriage

        [Moe Szyslak voice]
        Do those mix?
        [/Moe]

        1. mad libertarian guy   12 years ago

          They go together like a motherfuckin' horse and carriage.

      2. MJGreen   12 years ago

        It's France. Isn't their language regulated by the state?

        1. Virginian   12 years ago

          My Spanish teacher in high school loved the fact that Spanish has, according to her, an actual governing body that decides when a word is a word.

          1. The Last American Hero   12 years ago

            In France they are known as the Immortals. No joke.

  4. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    A doctor in Maine has stopped accepting any form of insurance...

    1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

      Go on...

      1. Rich   12 years ago

        ..., as have I.

      2. Rich   12 years ago

        ... but he does accept penaltaxes.

    2. Brett L   12 years ago

      Notice his rates are 25-45% of what others who do accept insurance are charging. I'm sure the doctors' guild will be on him for unfair pricing practices by tomorrow.

      1. Duke   12 years ago

        You can rest assured that the government won't allow this doctor to continue gouging his patients by charging them lower cash prices for long.

    3. Neoliberal Kochtopus   12 years ago

      As a professional in similar straits, I am strongly considering going this guy's route. The thing that scares me is: why has no one else thought of it?

      1. Nikki makes the sign of a tsp   12 years ago

        Among doctors? Because their patients will be really pissed they have to pay something other than a copay. Because people flip out about shit like that. Because they're stupid.

        Also, cartels mean not having to justify your prices.

      2. RBS   12 years ago

        See Brett's comment above.

        1. Neoliberal Kochtopus   12 years ago

          You're an attorney, aren't you?

          1. RBS   12 years ago

            Possibly...

            1. Neoliberal Kochtopus   12 years ago

              I am seriously considering doing Discount Law. I'm talking like $40 an hour. See any pitfalls?

              1. RBS   12 years ago

                Depends, how does your state treat fees and such from an ethics standpoint? Other than that you might piss off some other attorneys. I few weeks ago I was talking to some guys I went to school with and I suggested letting clients pay me whatever they though my services were worth. They looked at me like a just kicked a small child. But, I've never been one to think I should get paid a certain amount just because I have JD.

                1. Overt   12 years ago

                  A friend of mine was doing (basically) cash-only Immigration representation work for a few years. They literally had an office across the street from the courthouse, next to the bail-bonds places.

                  The down side was that you didn't tend to get really organized clients, and they tended to think the impending deportation was their attorney's fault.

              2. playa manhattan   12 years ago

                None, as long as you don't have loans to pay off and don't mind making $40/hr.

            2. Ted S.   12 years ago

              Single-payer legal care. Because no lawyer does anything worth more than minimum wage.

              1. Gbob   12 years ago

                I drive my liberal lawyer girlfriend crazy by suggesting that the legal system should be single payer just like she wants the health care industry to be.

                The more I think about it, the more I may start a movement for this out of pure spite.

      3. fish   12 years ago

        Hasn't the recent trend been either concierge medicine or Kaiser Permanente style industrial medicine?

        1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

          Hasn't the recent trend been either concierge medicine or Kaiser Permanente style industrial medicine?

          Mostly, one of our chiropractors is looking at setting up a cash-only, boutique clinic to diversify us away from what we're currently doing.

      4. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

        Because as cool as I think this is, I won't go to him. By company provides me insurance, so I can go to someone who accepts insurance much cheaper.

        Now, if I could forgo the insurance and get an equivalent raise, I would take it and go to this guy.

        1. some guy   12 years ago

          But Congress has seen to it that your company is better off paying you in over-priced health insurance rather than money.

      5. robc   12 years ago

        Its been done in a number of places a number of times. Tennessee and Oklahoma are two I know of.

      6. PapayaSF   12 years ago

        I think what can happen in that situation is that the patient can still request reimbursement from his insurance company, assuming the procedure is covered, but then all the paperwork is between patient and insurer, and the doctor doesn't have to deal with it.

    4. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

      He also gets the benefit of completely bypassing Obamacare (which is really just a euphenism for regulated health insurance).

      1. some guy   12 years ago

        But he still has to deal with Maine's regulations, whatever they happen to be. I assume they focus on logging related injuries.

        1. NeonCat   12 years ago

          Lobster pinches, unruly Canadian attacks, moose allergies?

          1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

            Frostbite from the ocean. . . .

            1. RBS   12 years ago

              Maple syrup bandits.

              1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                Thousands of French-speaking tourists. . . .

            2. db   12 years ago

              Checkered lumberjack shirt-induced seizures...

              1. CE   12 years ago

                Zumba instructors with "private classes"...

            3. Agammamon   12 years ago

              Having your ankles broken by crazy women.

              Eldritch abominations eating your face.

              Weird old gypsy curses.

      2. Marc F Cheney   12 years ago

        You're, like, aggressively stupid. You're like the Kwisatz Haderach, except from a program of selectively breeding YouTube commenters.

    5. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

      My doctor knows a few doctors in the area who have gone cash-only.

      1. some guy   12 years ago

        Now we need a website that lists all doctors that have gone cash-only and gives their prices and customer reviews.

        1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

          I'm sure that's coming. Along with underground medical services.

          1. alittlesense   12 years ago

            Clinics in subway stations?

      2. Marshall Gill   12 years ago

        http://reason.com/reasontv/201.....doctors-fi

        I took my daughter here last Thursday. I called them at 8:00AM and they did the procedure later that day. Saved me $750 over what the hospital quoted as the "minimum".

        1. hotsy totsy   12 years ago

          I wonder how long we'll have medical tourism to countries who offer cheaper care. Dental work, for example.

          1. Agammamon   12 years ago

            Already have it - where I live people cross the border all the time for dental and medical care in Mexico.

            Not to mention people who go to south America for surgeries or Canada for cheap prescriptions and Lasik.

          2. hamilton   12 years ago

            My folks, who winter in India, get their major dental done there. It is cheaper even counting the plane fare and the quality and technique is excellent.

    6. Red Rocks Rockin   12 years ago

      Before the switch, Ciampi had about 2,000 patients. He lost several hundred, he said. Some patients with health coverage, faced with having to seek reimbursement themselves rather than through his office, bristled at the paperwork burden.

      I wonder how much medical costs would be on average if hospitals basically ended the process of filing insurance claims for their patients and said, "If you want others to cover the cost of your medical care, you'll have to jump through the hoops yourself."

      1. Red Rocks Rockin   12 years ago

        And the irony of losing all those other patients is that he and his staff have more time to work with the ones that are willing to pay out of pocket.

  5. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    Bureaucrats in California are looking into how to regulate driverless cars.

    With bureacracyless regulations, naturally.

    1. Brett L   12 years ago

      Of course, the GPS that California will require will definitely not be the basis for a use tax. Don't be silly.

    2. Mad Scientist   12 years ago

      I predict CARB will grow a new tentacle, consisting of hundreds of new bureaucrats tasked with reviewing the software operating the cars.

      1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

        Skynet went underregulated at the beginning, you know.

        1. JW   12 years ago

          How do you think it destroyed civilization? All it took was a little deregulation.

        2. Xenocles   12 years ago

          In post-apocalyptic dystopia, Skynet regulate you!

  6. Goldwyn Smith   12 years ago

    You know which other protesters won't get their way?

    1. NeonCat   12 years ago

      Those that protest too much?

  7. playa manhattan   12 years ago

    "A doctor in Maine has stopped accepting any form of insurance and now posts the prices of his practice's services online."

    I used to have a doctor who did that (except for the online prices). He said it saved him the equivalent cost of 4 full time positions in not having a billing department anymore.

    1. deified   12 years ago

      Medical billing is insane. Walls and walls of enormous, built-in shelves just for storing... file folders filled with forms of basic information that has all be reproduced 7 times by hand.

      Drives me bananas.

      1. Xenocles   12 years ago

        But who's going to save their phony-baloney jobs!?

        1. Brett L   12 years ago

          Have you seen the ICD-10 specification? Its basically an invitation to the lawyers to cream off 15% of the medical payment money in the system as payors and payees fight about which codes are and are not valid.

          1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

            Our billing department is bracing for the rollover.

            The doctor I go to joked he'd retire before they implemented ICD-10 and his staff at that point hadn't even heard of it. I should probably go in a bit early for my annual check up just to avoid the nightmare of dealing with the office in flux.

    2. robc   12 years ago

      The practice in Tennessee that did it went from 5 full time to 1 part time employee in the billing department. So that sounds about right.

    3. Red Rocks Rockin   12 years ago

      Just think of the impact of medical spending on GDP, and what would happen if prices across the board went down 25-45% of what they are now. Last fiscal year, Medicare and Medicaid alone cost over $1 trillion; that doesn't even include private sector spending.

      Imagine the hit to our GDP if that spending was $250-450 billion rather than $1 trillion, just in government spending. No wonder Obama signed off on a bill that increases the industry's bureaucratic bloat rather than decease it--he doesn't want to deal with the political impact a 2.5-5% drop in GDP from federal spending.

      1. Overt   12 years ago

        Hopefully you are being sarcastic. If not, you know that money would be spent elsewhere, right?

        1. Red Rocks Rockin   12 years ago

          Oh, of course--he has to justify that $3.8 trillion price tag somehow.

      2. Agammamon   12 years ago

        Of course this is a key problem of counting government action as positive GDP.

  8. Brett L   12 years ago

    Totally shocking, but America's top colleges disproportionately select for the children of the rich.

    At the most selective schools in the country,* 70 percent of students come from the wealthiest quarter of U.S. families. Just 14 percent come from the poorest half. And while these statistics date back to 2006, I think it's safe to say they haven't changed greatly in the last few years.

    1. Goldwyn Smith   12 years ago

      The solution obviously is free tuition and boarding and books, etc.

      That said as long as they are Team Blue rich kids is that a problem?

      1. Agammamon   12 years ago

        Single payer college tuition.

    2. Nikki makes the sign of a tsp   12 years ago

      The wealthiest schools in the country could have more economic diversity if they wanted it. So why don't they?

      Because economic diversity isn't the kind of diversity they want.

      1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

        White male from a poor family here to say: very true.

        1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

          You were born a poor black child.

          1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

            Then why do I burn?

            1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

              I dunno, ask Steve Martin.

              1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

                You know I won't!

                1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                  He was just in town, playing the banjo. I'd have asked him for you if I'd known your problem.

                  Perhaps you should watch The Jerk.

                  1. CE   12 years ago

                    You're nobody until your name's in the phone book.

    3. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

      This just in: even leftists want paid.

    4. playa manhattan   12 years ago

      Someone has to pay full price..

      I took my kids to Expo Park last week, where I encountered a USC admissions and financial aid officer at lunchtime. I chatted him up, and one of the things he told me, almost verbatim, was "We let in lots of stupid rich kids so that we can offer scholarships to smart poor kids".

      I talked to him about the MBA program (which I am not seriously considering), and once he determined that I could afford to pay full price, he assured me that "my feet would never touch the ground".

      1. Calidissident   12 years ago

        As a current USC student, that actually makes a lot of sense. Not that it describes most people here, but there are definitely some people I encounter that leave me wondering how they got in

        1. RBS   12 years ago

          I think that pretty much describes all "private" colleges/universities.

    5. Acosmist   12 years ago

      IQ correlates with socioeconomic status, though.

  9. A Serious Man   12 years ago

    Mountain officials considering installing a ladder on Mount Everest to ease congestion as people climb down after reaching the summit.

    Kids these days, can't even descend a mountain without these fancy conveniences.

    1. some guy   12 years ago

      "Climbers will only be able to use the ladder for descents, no ascents."

      The first guy to the step each day is going to be really tempted to climb the aluminum rather than the rock.

    2. PapayaSF   12 years ago

      Better would be a really, really long slide.

      1. CE   12 years ago

        How about an elevator?

      2. hotsy totsy   12 years ago

        Right! Then they could use the ladder for the ascents and slide down!

      3. prolefeed   12 years ago

        Better would be a really, really long slide.

        Already installed. It's called "the cliff you die on if you fall down it".

  10. Brett L   12 years ago

    When whisky failed to keep the Irish down, God resorted to blight. The potato famine pest explained.

  11. Thane of #HOLO   12 years ago

    100 points to whomever figures out what the hell this sign held at the March Against Monsanto is supposed to mean.

    1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

      Square pegs are carcinogens.

      1. C. Anacreon   12 years ago

        Looks like they had a helluva turnout. How many people were there, fifty?

        If it was indeed that small, I never can understand why the "correct" demonstration, even if it is just a couple hippies and their dogs, will get major press, but 50,000 people assembling for a cause the opposite of the NY Times belief system will not even get a mention in any media outlet.

    2. Brett L   12 years ago

      Its the Monsanto Defense, modelled on the famous Chewbacca Defense. If a square is not a circle, it must give you cancer.

    3. RBS   12 years ago

      I have no idea. Since you brought it up though. I saw some girl I went to high school with post that shit on her facebook page so I read the little description of the event on the webpage. Part of it was to encourage people to start their own gardens and feed poor people. Naturally I asked her if it would be ok if I used some GMO's to increase my crop yield while cutting down on the amount of space I needed to grow the stuff and cut down on the amount of pesticides I would have to use.

      1. robc   12 years ago

        What was the response?

        1. RBS   12 years ago

          Nothing. I assume her mind collapsed into itself.

          1. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

            She probably didn't even appreciate the difference between a GMO and a GEO (Genetically Engineered Organism), which is what most people mean when they erroneously use the term GMO.

    4. fish   12 years ago

      Square pegs not fitting in round holes give you cancer?

      I thought it only affected ones ability to fit into a career?

      This is why I didn't go into medicine!

      1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

        I thought it also affected your ability to breathe during a trip back from the moon.

        1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

          Look, NASA fixed that problem with some duct tape. What are you complaining about?

          1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

            I didn't say it couldn't be solved. I said it affected it.

            1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

              So does looking at pornography during the flight.

              Okay, first man on Mars--private or public? I'm just about convinced that it actually will be private. And maybe not even that many years from now.

    5. Rich   12 years ago

      "I have brain cancer."

    6. Bobarian   12 years ago

      Circle does not get the square for the block, therefore Cancer wins Hollywood Squares?

    7. scape   12 years ago

      I think he's using wingdings. "Not perfect, I'm a cancer." Stupid astrology.

    8. Generic Stranger   12 years ago

      It seems to be a stupid way of saying that unnatural things cause cancer. Square = manmade, manufactured, circle = organic, natural, etc.

      I wonder; if I offered this guy a nice tea made out of hemlock, would the idiot drink it because it's natural?

  12. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    A judge has refused to delay the trial of George Zimmerman, who is charged with second-degree murder in the death of Trayvon Martin.

    They're really itching to convict this guy.

    1. Goldwyn Smith   12 years ago

      You know which other Southerners wanted a conviction to prevent riots?

      1. Bobarian   12 years ago

        Bill Clinton, after the original Rodney King verdict?

        Hillary Clinton, after the Paula Jones verdict?

    2. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

      George Zimmerman, Libertarian hero:

      Circuit Judge Debra Nelson, at a hearing on motions ahead of the trial, also ruled that lawyers can't mention Trayvon's school records, past fights, marijuana use, ownership of gold teeth, or any photos or text messages found on the teen's phone.

      1. Rich   12 years ago

        Can they mention that he bought Skittles?

      2. Neoliberal Kochtopus   12 years ago

        George Zimmerman, Libertarian hero

        What? What the fuck does that even mean?

        1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

          I'm a little confused. What's libertarian about Zimmerman?

        2. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

          With the possible exception of the past fights, how is any of that relevant to whether or not the shooting was a valid act of self defense? Everyone want to pretend Zimmerman is some sort of civil rights hero, but he was apparently going to argue that marijuana use means people should reasonably be afraid for their lives around you.

          1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

            Of course, what the defense actually wants to do is offset the media portrayal of the victim as a 10 year-old teddy bear, which was ridiculous.

            I'm not surprised by the ruling, because most of that stuff is irrelevant. They might be able to get some stuff in on any propensity to get into fights, though, depending on where the prosecution goes. What this may actually do--and what the defense may have intended--is to stop the prosecution from going down the road of portraying the kid as pure sunshine. They pretty much can't do that now, unless they want that evidence to become admissible.

            1. RBS   12 years ago

              Probably and since it's a high profile case in Florida the prosecution will probably play right into the defense.

              1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                Well, to be sure, there's Florida and there's Florida. The prosecutors are local, after all.

            2. PapayaSF   12 years ago

              Trayvon apparently had more than a "propensity to get into fights": he was part of some sort of Fight Club group.

              I would say that some (but not all) of that is relevant. There are many, many signs that Trayvon was a gangsta wannabe. True, by itself smoking pot means nothing, as does having gold teeth or getting suspended from school or kicked out of the house by Mom or whatever. Add it all up, though, and it's hard to ignore the big picture.

              1. Smells Like Tom Skerritt   12 years ago

                There are many, many signs that Trayvon was a gangsta wannabe

                FIFY

              2. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                There's a whole balancing act in evidence between what is probative and what is prejudicial. But when the defense is based on self-defense, at some point, whether the victim may have initiated force is a relevant question.

                1. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

                  Yeah, but his dental work has nothing todo with whether he initiated force, other than than prejudicing the jury.

              3. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

                he was part of some sort of Fight Club group.

                So are all those little kids I see taking Tae Kwon Do classes next to the sandwhich shop.

                1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                  Aren't you the least bit concerned that Zimmerman might have actually acted in self-defense? I mean, we'll never know the total truth, but the evidence certainly doesn't contradict that argument. Which is why the chances are very slim that Zimmerman will be convicted.

                  The race issue is clouding a lot of judgments, especially much of the media's. The legal case is shitty, and the biased reporting was criminal. Zimmerman may well have used unnecessary force or even may have initiated the violence in the first place (which, incidentally, doesn't waive the self-defense claim), but there's no real way of knowing for sure, based on the evidence.

                  1. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

                    My feeling is he should go free, as there doesn't seem to be enough evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he wasn't engaged in self defense. That said, I don't think he's a good person, so while I understand the need to make sure he gets a fair child, I am also repulsed by the lionization he seems to be getting from some quarters.

                    1. Not an Economist   12 years ago

                      A fair "child"? What does that mean?

                    2. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

                      It means I meant "a fair trial" by the part of my brain that converts thoughts into typing sucks.

                    3. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

                      Actually, I think "a fair chance" and "a fair trial" tried to both come out at the same time and somehow got mangled into "a fair child".

                    4. Gray Ghost   12 years ago

                      I'm pretty much agreeing entirely with Stormy's take here. Which is strange, but there you go. I think Murder 2 was gross overcharging and I wouldn't vote to convict on manslaughter. I would however, absent additional evidence, happily find him liable for wrongful death. It'd be nice if the Sanford PD bothered to do more than a cursory investigation and interview, but then again, there you are.

                      Not sure who has the burden of proof on an affirmative D, nor what the std of proof is. I 'think' that Z has to prove his D by a preponderance, but it could easily be something else (rebut-table presumption, etc...)

                      It's going to be "interesting" seeing the State of Florida rape justice in this case to try and avoid a race riot. Didn't think I'd see the Bonfire of the Vanities (-ish) brought to life.

          2. VG Zaytsev   12 years ago

            It is relevant if the prosecution wants to paint Treyvon as an angelic choir boy.

            1. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

              And how is, say, having gold teeth contrary to that?

              1. robc   12 years ago

                I dont know, run the correlation numbers and let us know.

              2. VG Zaytsev   12 years ago

                I say let it all in and leave it up to the jury to make a judgement.

                Do you think the judge is going to exclude the prosecution from show what an 'angel' T was?

          3. Mr. Weebles   12 years ago

            Zimmerman's attorneys got the information into the court of public opinion which is what I believe their goal was all along.

            1. Zakalwe   12 years ago

              He's got the best fucking attorneys.

              1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

                No touching on certain subjects, though. NO TOUCHING.

          4. Virginian   12 years ago

            He's the defendant in a criminal trial. It's the job of the state to convict. If telling the truth about Martin derails the state's case, then their case sucks.

            Since their case is entirely constructed around the theory that Zimmerman was the aggressor, then the defense is showing that Martin had a pattern of criminal behavior that supports their theory that Martin was the aggressor.

            Martin was no saint. That doesn't mean he attacked Zimmerman. But his pattern of criminal behavior, IMO, means that you can't convict Zimmerman for murder. Now, if they had charged him with manslaughter or some other lesser crime...but they didn't. They went for murder, and there is no way in hell you can make a murder conviction stand up.

            1. Agammamon   12 years ago

              Didn't the include manslaughter as a lesser charge? I thought that was pretty standard - to include possible lesser charges and let the jury decide which he's guilty of.

            2. Gray Ghost   12 years ago

              As far as a pattern of criminal behavior, how about we ring up the guy who actually has a documented history of violent behavior, admittedly minor? Z's the one with the assaulting the LEO charge history, not Martin. Yes, it's bullshit. Then again, if Martin were involved in some sort of Fight Club, wouldn't he have a juvenile criminal history by now?

              Their case is centered around the fact that Z put a bullet into Martin's chest, as he was getting his ass kicked. It's up to Z to prove that he had a legal reason to do so, by showing that Martin started the fight. It also helps Z to show some supporting evidence for his claim that Martin came out of nowhere and attacked him. Nothing says the jury has to believe anything that comes out of Z's mouth. And if they don't believe his story, his defense doesn't work. So, some supporting evidence would be nice.

              Me, I don't know what happened on that street, and ties go to the defendant. I have a high standard before I vote to stick someone in a cage for the nest 20 years. What I "think" happened is the PD applicant decided to get hands on with the kid, the kid reacted as a 17 year old hot head and decided to spar, and died for it. But I can't prove that.

              Zimmerman's a horrible poster child for CHL laws. I don't know why so many people are defending him. And yet, IMHO, he should walk. Guess the saying's true about shooting until the only people left are those who'll support your story.

      3. Acosmist   12 years ago

        How dare he try to defend himself against charges! He should shut up and obey the state like a good libertarian.

        ????

    3. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

      They can itch all they want, it's not likely. This is going to be a very difficult case for the prosecution.

  13. A Serious Man   12 years ago

    Tony award winning actor and gay rights activist doesn't believe in freedom of association or understand the concept of free speech.

    And thirdly, when we excuse homophobia as a matter of opinion instead of treating it as a destructive social illness, we invite fear to explode into violence. How often are the perpetrators of hate-crimes discovered to be self-loathing? Valued individuals do not strike out against strangers.

    These continuing acts of violence, physical and rhetorical, terrify me. If we are ever to scrape the black rot of prejudice from the heart of our nation, we must stop excusing those who give it expression and even excuse. The next time someone dares to say, "Just because I don't approve of homosexuality doesn't make me a bigot," we must all answer back, "Yes, it does. Not only does it make you a bigot, it makes you a criminal, a danger to me, my family, my community, my city, and my country."

    Intolerance is not a matter of opinion. It is a call to violence.

    1. Tonio   12 years ago

      Well, he did win a Tony award, so what did you expect.

    2. Neoliberal Kochtopus   12 years ago

      This guy is basically a non-entity, thank galt.

      1. NeonCat   12 years ago

        He just wants to be loved, is that so wrong?!?

    3. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

      It's violent intolerance all the way down.

    4. JW   12 years ago

      Intolerance is not a matter of opinion. It is a call to violence.

      What is indifference a call to? Cattiness?

      1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

        It, too, is a call to violence. Really, anything but total and absolute political conformity is a call to violence.

        1. JW   12 years ago

          Well, that sucks. I had a really cutting comment about his shoes at the ready.

          Is the violence mandatory? I had other plans this week.

    5. JW   12 years ago

      Intolerance is not a matter of opinion. It is a call to violence.

      What, exactly, is he tolerating here?

    6. PapayaSF   12 years ago

      Harvey won't tolerate intolerance. He also hates hate and is violently opposed to violence.

    7. Zombie Jimbo   12 years ago

      The ad behind it was about a Loreal award for a star from Glee. Could it get any gayer?

    8. Mickey Rat   12 years ago

      And water is wet.

  14. Mike M.   12 years ago

    The comments here are about a hundred times more tolerable since Weigel the scumbag went on vacation a few days ago. If we're really lucky, maybe it'll turn into a permanent vacation.

    1. Neoliberal Kochtopus   12 years ago

      ???

      Weigel? What?

      1. Goldwyn Smith   12 years ago

        He thinks Shrike/PB is Weigel.

        1. RBS   12 years ago

          Interesting.

        2. Neoliberal Kochtopus   12 years ago

          Well PB has shown up in this thread, so that makes Ol' Yokely even dumber than before.

          1. Mike M.   12 years ago

            And he makes his first post in days like a minute after I mention him. He's obviously still obsessively monitoring the blog even while he's on vacation.

            1. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

              Yes, I waited to post until the same time you posted your silly theory just to annoy you.

              1. PRX   12 years ago

                hmmm. Weigel does get angry like Stalin's Buttplug. Weigel has pretended to be libertarian like Stalin's Buttplug. you got zits Buttplug?

                1. Smells Like Tom Skerritt   12 years ago

                  You cruise for backfillers, Buttplug?

        3. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

          I think he meant John. John posts innocuous drivel and links to irrelevant youtube videos all day.

          1. Agammamon   12 years ago

            And you class the joint up, right?

      2. fish   12 years ago

        Time warp! He's come back to a universe where Dave Weigel married Harvey Fierstein.

  15. SugarFree   12 years ago

    New York City's bike sharing program has first bike stolen before New York City's bike sharing program even begins.

    1. Nikki makes the sign of a tsp   12 years ago

      They look like that and they'll still get stolen. Damn.

    2. Tonio   12 years ago

      The New York Post reports that a thief grabbed one of the bikes as it was being delivered to a Manhattan docking station, and rode away before anyone realized what was happening.

      Emphasis mine. But how do they know it was actually stolen? Maybe the dude just, like, needed a bike for a while.

    3. playa manhattan   12 years ago

      Stolen? No, no, no, they're calling it "sharing" now, the guy just didn't understand the rules.

      1. Clich? Bandit   12 years ago

        In Amsterdam it is high art to own several bikes which are simultaneously sufficiently crappy to prevent theft and still functional.

        1. PapayaSF   12 years ago

          Amsterdam tried a free bike share thing back in the late '60s (IIRC) and it was abandoned because bikes were stolen or trashed.

    4. CE   12 years ago

      He didn't steal it -- he borrowed it. They said it was okay to share.

    5. Agammamon   12 years ago

      How can it be stolen? They're available for public use, maybe the guy was just on a really long ride.

  16. Brett L   12 years ago

    Walmart detains father for 'kidnapping' his own kids. Kids are biracial. I'll give you one guess what dad's race is.

    1. Thane of #HOLO   12 years ago

      I guessed incorrectly.

      1. fish   12 years ago

        If this was an Indiana Jones movie you'd be looking pretty rough about now!

      2. Brett L   12 years ago

        Its a trick. No one would stop a black man with two little white girls. That would be racist.

    2. Rich   12 years ago

      'Hey, I was sent here by Walmart security. I just need to make sure that the children that you have are your own,'

      and then, I just needs to check inside your asshole.

      1. Agammamon   12 years ago

        Of course I have to wonder why the cop wanted to see ID.

    3. playa manhattan   12 years ago

      Weird. My kids identify me in public by calling me "Dad". Even my 1 year old can do it.

      1. Rich   12 years ago

        "The ol' Jim Jones ploy, eh, Sir?"

    4. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

      It's not because of his race, it's because he's a creepy looking dude.

      1. PapayaSF   12 years ago

        No kidding.

    5. Greg   12 years ago

      Man, so many of the comments on that story make me so angry. I only started reading them because I figured that wouldn't be the case, but the "if you're not doing anything wrong then what's the big deal if someone sends the cops after you?" crowd seems to be growing every day.

    6. Agammamon   12 years ago

      What's sad is the guy assumes racism when its obviously not. Its just overly fearful people assuming that child-abduction is ridiculously common over-reacting to the situation.

      The sad thing here is that the first thought of the person who reported the situation was abduction and not that it was a mixed race family or that he was taking care of a friend's kids for a bit - both orders of magnitude more likely than a kidnapping.

  17. deified   12 years ago

    Now bureaucrats in state government are playing catch-up, writing a whole new set of rules of the road.

    Fuck, dude. Why do you need bureaucrats shitting in the ice cream every single time?

    Why can't you just wait to see if any problems actually crop up and then handle them with Ye Olde Common Law? It's what Coke would've wanted.

  18. Thane of #HOLO   12 years ago

    Liberty Reserve Founder Arrested, Site Shuttered

    From the comments on the HN thread comes this gem:

    Libertarian anarchist theory is based on non-aggression, that is, the idea that capitalism can be a system where people deal only by consent. But the kind of consent it uses is "affirmative consent" - you said "yes", or you signed a contract agreeing ahead of time.

    Feminism introduced me to the stricter idea of "enthusiastic consent" - you ongoingly and genuinely want to. From this improved perspective, contract is unacceptable (it's there to allow you to be forced despite no longer wanting to), and putting someone in an arm twisted position of "say yes or starve" is clearly not consensual. But this is precisely what capitalism does.

    Honestly as things are now, I don't agree with the existence of money systems at all. I am not pro-tax, I'm against the whole of the money/paying/salary/finance system in its entirety. But tax is a weak hack to at least claw back a little economic equality. And breaking it without replacing it is harmful.

    1. Nikki makes the sign of a tsp   12 years ago

      As much as we make fun of "enthusiastic consent," this is actually the most depressing feminist thingy I've ever read here (today). I mean, I'm always hoping they'll discover that the consent they discovered was so important was...actually fucking important. But somehow they still found a way to turn it all inside out.

      1. SugarFree   12 years ago

        Yup. The nature and limits of consent is a very important philosophical conversation to have in libertarianism, but feminism gets one part of it so very right and the rest of it so very wrong (just like their stance on self-ownsership.)

        1. Nikki makes the sign of a tsp   12 years ago

          I mean...

          From this improved perspective, the social contract is impossible (you never agreed to begin with, and it's there to allow you to be forced despite no longer wanting to or never having wanted to), and putting someone in an arm-twisted position of "say yes or go to prison" is clearly not consensual. But this is precisely what the state does.

          It's too obvious, right? How is it not obvious?

          1. SugarFree   12 years ago

            Maybe this is Poe's Law situation. Because that is right on the parody line.

          2. Thane of #HOLO   12 years ago

            Yeah, and you also have the problem that "enthusiastic consent" is bolted on to mental contortions justifying why something or other is rape.

            Obviously, you can change your mind during sex; if you tell your partner something along the lines of "stop, I don't want to do this anymore", if he or she understands and does not comply, it's raped.

            But then it is brought up in ludicrous arguments about how, for instance, "emotional coercion" -- e.g., guilt-tripping someone into sex (which is douchey, of course) -- is rape.

            1. Nikki makes the sign of a tsp   12 years ago

              Maybe we need to just take the bull by the horns and start explicitly calling everything the state does rape.

              1. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

                Isn't it?

                1. Nikki makes the sign of a tsp   12 years ago

                  Of course it is.

                  I partly think it will be fun because of all the cries about how you're not supposed to say "rape" unless it's really "rape," e.g., rape jokes are always bad, etc. Because if anyone complains that whatever you're complaining about isn't really rapey enough, just slam the whole enthusiastic consent thing right in their face.

                  I'm not saying it will work. But I do think it's actually a closer argument than slavery is, under the terms people are already using.

              2. robc   12 years ago

                My attempts to do that with slavery havent worked.

                1. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

                  That's because being angry over slavery is sooooo 90's.

                  I bet you still wear your pants and baseball jersey backwards too, right?

    2. CE   12 years ago

      While you're all worried about how some moron feels about taxes, why is no one worried that the feds can call a financial services firm a "money laundering scheme" just because they dare protect the privacy of their customers?

    3. ant1sthenes   12 years ago

      Well, it's basically a variant of consent more likely to be popular with people that are capricious, dishonest, irresponsible, and/or conniving, so obviously that's what feminists are going to go with.

  19. A Serious Man   12 years ago

    Vatican issues a clarification: Atheists and other non-Christians are still going to hell.

    Now I was able to understand the Pope's meaning the first time I heard it, he was basically saying that everyone can be saved by Christ, including atheists, if they choose to accept it.

    So I find it amusing that critics of the Catholic Church are gnashing their teeth over long established Catholic doctrine when they wouldn't even care anyway.

    1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

      Does this mean that Protestants aren't? Tell me what I've won, Alex.

      1. Tonio   12 years ago

        You've won an indeterminite time in purgatory.

        1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

          Beats hell, I suppose.

      2. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

        Don't worry Pro Lib. Given how old you are, it's clear that you immortal. Thus you shouldn't be worried about going to hell.

        Unless you count the hell on earth that will result from just existing, unable to move or eat or do anything at the end of the universe.

        1. NeonCat   12 years ago

          So it's like working in telemarketing, then?

          1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

            But forever.

            1. NeonCat   12 years ago

              So it's exactly like telemarketing.

        2. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

          That's where you're wrong, again, Auric, because I have an entropy insurance policy.

          1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

            Bad news, Obama decided that doesn't count as "real" insurance.

            1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

              Well, that don't confront me none, because I didn't vote for his reality.

              1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

                Social contract!

                1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                  Didn't sign one of them, neither.

                  1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

                    Silly, you don't sign the social contract. You just obey.

                    1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                      And I thought the law made no sense.

                    2. db   12 years ago

                      The Social Contract is a pre-existing condition and you can't be insured against or excused from it because that would be unfair to all the other folks who believe in the Social Contract who would be deprived of the fruits of your labor.

                    3. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                      What I need is a government policy to go with my entropy policy.

                    4. db   12 years ago

                      Government is exactly like entropy--it is a waste of energy that you can never get back, produces nothing useful, and continuously increases.

                    5. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                      Oh, good, maybe my entropy policy covers Leviathan, then.

                    6. Agammamon   12 years ago

                      "Silly, you don't sign the social contract. You just obey."

                      This is why Superman is one of the worst superheroes ever.

                      He's effectively invulnerable to anything we can throw at him and yet he still kow-tows to "top men" to the point of fightin wars for the American government.

    2. Tonio   12 years ago

      Oh, I very much approve when religious leaders condemn others. It's one of the few times when they are absolutely honest about their belief systems.

      1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

        I know, it was so lame when the pope and patriarch un-excommunicated each other.

    3. The Last American Hero   12 years ago

      Oh, they'll be gnashing their teeth all right. Wailing and gnashing as they burn in the fiery pit.

  20. Slammer   12 years ago

    I'm against the whole of the money/paying/salary/finance system in its entirety.

    WTF does that even mean?

    1. Nikki makes the sign of a tsp   12 years ago

      "Wage slavery waaaaah!"

      1. Goldwyn Smith   12 years ago

        So pardon my ignorance but what exactly is the alternative to wage slavery?

        1. fish   12 years ago

          Death?

        2. Nikki makes the sign of a tsp   12 years ago

          Well, you could be an entrepreneur, or independently wealthy.

          1. Goldwyn Smith   12 years ago

            But don't entrepeneurs and independently wealthy people have employees?

            1. Agammamon   12 years ago

              Wage *slavery* is bad, wage *slave-owning* is ok.

        3. KDN   12 years ago

          Communes where every decision is enthusiastically consented to.

        4. SugarFree   12 years ago

          We, like, use barter, man. Like I trade you some groovy earrings I made from trash for an organic tofu wrap, man. And you get to keep love as a tip, dude.

          1. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

            There is nothing inherently wrong with barter; it's just that in our type of economy, transactions with money are more convenient.

            1. SugarFree   12 years ago

              There's nothing convenient about capitalist oppression, man. I read that in some book in some class I took at Dartmouth, man.

              1. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

                Speaking of Dartmouth, I still wish there was a Peter Christian's in Hanover.

                Good times.

                1. Ted S.   12 years ago

                  A quick Google search reveals that Everything But Anchovies is still there.

          2. Thane of #HOLO   12 years ago

            And like, if it turns out you don't want earrings, man, then maybe I'll trade you some seashells for that organic tofu wrap, man. And then you can like, trade those shells with somebody else for a hemp manthong, man.

          3. Zakalwe   12 years ago

            CW Swappigans is still not taking hotel soaps.

            1. SugarFree   12 years ago

              Which is hilarious, because soap is what the people working there desperately need.

              1. Zakalwe   12 years ago

                "How much butter?"

                "I don't know, a Star Trek chess set's worth?"

        5. A Serious Man   12 years ago

          A magical world where no one has to work unless they really want to yet they still have all their needs met and there is no scarcity?

          1. Nikki makes the sign of a tsp   12 years ago

            I know, I know! Star Trek!

            1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

              No, Nikki, the Culture. Do try to keep up.

              1. Zakalwe   12 years ago

                Apparently no one needs a Micro Armament System, Rifle, the bastards.

            2. A Serious Man   12 years ago

              There was an episode of TNG where they find some 20th century humans frozen in a space ship a la Space Seed. One of them was a drug addict who is still addicted and Data tells him that the replicators can create the same drugs minus the harmful physical effects.

              Which raises the question: just how man smackhounds and junkies must their be in the 24th century if you can get high all the time and not suffer any ill-effects?

              1. Goldwyn Smith   12 years ago

                Haven. It featured this speech from Picard.

                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pzqW0YaN2ho

              2. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

                The same episode where Data presents the Federation as a junkie's paradise is also the episode where Riker wanted to punch out some old fat dude just because he was a successful stockbroker.

                1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

                  They had an entire race of villains where the original pitch was "capitalists".

                  (Though they did later add "sexist", and change them from villains to kind of neutral).

                  1. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

                    Indeed. Roddenberry dying was the best thing to happen to Star Trek.

                    1. Goldwyn Smith   12 years ago

                      Probably the best thing was getting kicked upstairs after TMP so Harve Bennett could make Wrath of Khan.

              3. Nikki makes the sign of a tsp   12 years ago

                I think they consider the "harmful physical effects" to include the part that makes you high.

                1. Agammamon   12 years ago

                  Nah, they got "synthehol" which gets you drunk, no hangover and somehow you can sober up immediately if you want.

                  1. Agammamon   12 years ago

                    It was mentioned in an episode with the Irish gypsy stereotypes who didn't like it because apparently the pain after the pleasure makes the pleasure more pleasurable or something.

              4. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                Comparing that episode with "Space Seed" is an instructive contrast between what was right about TOS and what was wrong about TNG.

              5. CE   12 years ago

                With the Holodeck, who needs drugs?

                1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

                  I found it really weird that they don't even mention the holodeck when the 20th revived hick wants to watch TV and they say they don't have that any more.

                  1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                    Come on, we primitives can't handle the temptations of the holodeck. Addictive personalities and compulsive consumption, you know.

    2. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

      The speaker wishes to work for free, clearly. Perhaps in some sort of unpaid internship?

      1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

        Unpaid interns are the only people who are not being exploited for their labor.

        Well, them and people working on the internet for $89 an hour.

        1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

          I don't know why this popped in my head after reading your comment, but is there such a thing as intern prostitutes? Or, if the illegality is an issue, intern strippers?

          1. Nikki makes the sign of a tsp   12 years ago

            I thought girlfriends were intern prostitutes?

            1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

              You'd think so, but apparently most of them do not go on to the time-honored profession.

            2. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

              Clearly you've never had a girlfriend. Or we left out the "unpaid" portion.

              1. Nikki makes the sign of a tsp   12 years ago

                It's true that I have never had a girlfriend.

            3. Brett L   12 years ago

              I thought girlfriends were intern prostitutes?

              Only in jewelry commercials

              1. Nikki makes the sign of a tsp   12 years ago

                Only in jewelry commercials

                Brett gets it.

              2. prolefeed   12 years ago

                I thought girlfriends were intern prostitutes?

                Only the ones who want to be strippers, hookers, or wives.

          2. RBS   12 years ago

            Hooters is like a paid internship.

          3. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

            First off, that's pretty reasonable. I make most people start thinking about sex.

            Second, according to the most realiable source that I know of, Game of Thrones, yes there is. They spend several years training before they actually have sex with a customer.

            1. Nikki makes the sign of a tsp   12 years ago

              Auric actually learned this from Memoirs of a Geisha, but he's too embarrassed to admit it.

              1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

                I think this is supposed to be an insult, but I'm too lost to be sure.

                1. Nikki makes the sign of a tsp   12 years ago

                  I figured it was a "girlier" book/franchise than GoT, but mostly I was amused because I thought that kind of training-to-be-a-courtesan was generally well known.

                  1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

                    Perhaps it is, in the industry. What are you trying to say, nicole?

                    1. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

                      What nikki is trying to say is "Hos up and Pimps down, bitch!"

                      But in White girl-speak.

                    2. Nikki makes the sign of a tsp   12 years ago

                      Some people take whoring seriously, okay?

                    3. Killazontherun   12 years ago

                      I bet Geishas are actually pretty boring in bed if you don't have a taste for mannerist displays.

                    4. Nikki makes the sign of a tsp   12 years ago

                      Who doesn't have a taste for mannerist displays?

                  2. Agammamon   12 years ago

                    To be a *courtesan* yes, to be a prostitute only requires that you can bend over.

          4. NeonCat   12 years ago

            I am reminded (and so may have some of it wrong) of an old Norm MacDonald Weekend Update "The survey on the worst jobs in America has come out and the old worst job, assistant crack whore, has been superseded. The new low? Trainee crack whore."

          5. PapayaSF   12 years ago

            if your occupation doesn't require any training, it doesn't need interns, so newbies can dive right in.

    3. NeonCat   12 years ago

      They have a degree in Grievance Studies and are having a hard time paying back their loans with what gets left in the Starbucks tip jar?

    4. fish   12 years ago

      WTF does that even mean?

      Take care of me mommy!

    5. Bobarian   12 years ago

      WTF does that even mean?

      It means that because I have no marketable skills or intrinsic value, you should just give me shit.

    6. Mickey Rat   12 years ago

      It means that person resents capitalism requiring a person to make a quantifiable contribution to society rather than just BSing their way through life.

    7. Agammamon   12 years ago

      Give me free shit.

  21. Thane of #HOLO   12 years ago

    It was funny watching Jason Brennan get beat up over his post about cartoon libertarians at BHL.

    I especially enjoyed this:

    You [might be a cartoon libertarian if you] think the term "social justice" has no definite meaning in philosophy today. Perhaps the term was too loosely used in Hayek's time. I'm not criticizing him. But the term has a real meaning now. The question is no longer whether the idea of social justice is coherent, but whether any such principles of social justice are true.

    For anybody well-read in Austrian economics, I also wonder what the difference between behavior and human action is (or if he's just attacking a straw man):

    If you think you can describe how actual economies work just by manipulating definitions. You think you can refute behavioral economists by saying, "Oh, that's behavior, not human action."

    1. Goldwyn Smith   12 years ago

      So what does "social justice" mean?

      1. OldMexican   12 years ago

        Re: Goldwyn Smith,

        So what does "social justice" mean?

        Thomas Sowell defined it as justice for certain groups of individuals by virtue of belonging to any of those groups.

        1. fish   12 years ago

          Thomas Sowell defined it as justice for certain groups of individuals by virtue of belonging to any of those groups.

          Isn't it usually expressed as money and special privileges granted because you look like others that had bad things happen to them?

          1. OldMexican   12 years ago

            I believe I (or rather, Sowell) said the same thing.

      2. tarran   12 years ago

        It's delightfully emotional

        Social Injustice: A social injustice obtains when an institutional arrangement generates a distribution of goods [broadly construed] that is unfair [broadly construed], independently of the deliberate design of individuals comprising the institutions.

        An example of Social Injustice from a Rothbardian standpoint:

        Say, for instance, that David lives next door to a public park where people are allowed to smoke (call it Smoker's Park). The smoke produced by any one smoker would normally dissipate quickly, and have no noticeable impact on David's person and property. But since so many people smoke in Smoker's Park, David's home and possessions begin to reek of smoke. And on some afternoons, he and his family choke from smoke inhalation. Arguably David's person and property have been aggressed against in the sense that people together have imposed a cost on him that they could only do so fairly with his consent. But no one person caused the rights violation. In that case, I think it is fair to say that a Rothbardian social injustice has occurred.

        It's a cathedral of rationalization of the sort that produces the idea that a federal ban on distributing pornography does not violate the 1st ammendment.

        1. Mickey Rat   12 years ago

          "Arguably David's person and property have been aggressed against in the sense that people together have imposed a cost on him that they could only do so fairly with his consent. But no one person caused the rights violation."

          Arguably, the owner of the park caused the rights violation, which has been complicated by making it a public park in the example.

        2. Agammamon   12 years ago

          Or you mean *externalities*? Something Pigou figured out how to deal with a long time ago.

        3. Mickey Rat   12 years ago

          "I take it that an institution is racist insofar as it reliably outputs states of affairs where a racial group fails to receive its due based solely on the racial properties of its members."

          The question begging here is how one determines what is "due" to a group. The disparate outcome may be each group receiving the dues that they have earned and the differences in outcome are therefore just. Brennan seems to go forth with the idea that any disparities in outcome that make him uncomfortable are "unjust", while they may be just reflections of reality that he does not like.

    2. fish   12 years ago

      Guess I'm not very libertarian....I'm forced to ask who the fuck is Jason Brennan?

      1. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

        I'm forced to ask who the fuck is Jason Brennan?

        Jason Brennan is a dude I went to school with, but he was two years behind. I regret not beating the living shit out of him when I had the chance.

        1. Killazontherun   12 years ago

          If you had cornered him, I bet he would have tried reasoning his way out of it with something approximating the NAP.

    3. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

      "social" as used in phrases like "social justice" or "social science" is a Latin prefix meaning "the opposite of", right?

      1. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

        Pretty much.

      2. db   12 years ago

        It's kind of like "Library Science" or "Political Science."

    4. Killazontherun   12 years ago

      11. You believe there are no involuntary positive duties to others.

      That is a conclusion concerning the validity of that belief, not a premise. It presupposes a theory of the illegitimacy of self ownership that libertarians dispute.

      1. Nikki makes the sign of a tsp   12 years ago

        That one really threw me, and it doesn't seem to be supported at all anywhere in the post or whatever. WTF?

        1. Killazontherun   12 years ago

          When the premise of your post is that everyone else lacks your exquisite level of sophistication but what you produce to back that opinion up are squiggles of conjecture that would embarrass a Neanderthal cave painter, well don't be surprise if no one takes you very seriously thereon after.

          1. Nikki makes the sign of a tsp   12 years ago

            I should expect a glib response. Seriously, though, what involuntary positive duties to others would gain any nonminimal level of agreement among libertarians? The only thing I can think of is positive duties toward children among prolife libertarians (among prochoice libertarians such duties would be voluntary).

            1. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

              what involuntary positive duties to others would gain any nonminimal level of agreement among libertarians?

              Oral sex.

            2. Apatheist ?_??   12 years ago

              Wouldn't pro-choicers agree with us that you have positive duties to children (post-birth/whatever your line is)? I mean you can put them up for adoption but at least while they are in your care.

            3. Killazontherun   12 years ago

              Just to be clear, I was saying that that wasn't the only statement on that list that threw me off and I wasn't trying to brush you off with a glib reply (the usual strategy, of course). Most of the list read that way. Some of it was self serving, 14. Reading this post made you angry. Much of it plain wrong 1. You think the term "social justice" has no definite meaning in philosophy today. Perhaps the term was too loosely used in Hayek's time. I'm not criticizing him. But the term has a real meaning now. The question is no longer whether the idea of social justice is coherent, but whether any such principles of social justice are true. Social justice as a term is no where near as well defined or recognized as a singular instance of meaning as say the NAP. David Friedman covers this one here.

              1. Killazontherun   12 years ago

                http://daviddfriedman.blogspot.....e-and.html

                1. Nikki makes the sign of a tsp   12 years ago

                  Killaz, no, I didn't think you were, and I saw the Friedman piece. I just don't think much other than a glib answer would actually fit my question.

                  Apatheist, if pro-choice libertarians believe you have positive duties toward children you choose to bear, I would say they still think those duties are voluntary, as you only accrue them if you choose to bear children.

                  1. Agammamon   12 years ago

                    Yes but pro-life libertarians would also say the same thing - if you choose to have children then you have a duty to care for them.

                    The difference between the two is at what point you can choose not to have children (ie once conception happens you have to live with the consequences vice being able to abort before a specific time).

  22. A Serious Man   12 years ago

    Australian PM Julia Gillard aligns with House Targaryen.

    And as Risk has taught us, Australia is the key to the whole game.

    1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

      Australia is a nice asset, but the key to the game is really turning in your Risk cards at the right time.

      1. Archduke Pantsfan   12 years ago

        Also holding Europe, taking turns with Afghanistan like it's Epi's mom as a free card with your "ally" until you are ready to destroy him.

        1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

          Holding Europe is damn hard. Only time I've seen someone do it( before the game was already over) was when there were two people holding Africa and (attempting) Asia. Neither wanted to enter Europe even though the borderlands only had 1 guy because there was a massive army stacked in Northern Europe and no one wanted to unleash it.

      2. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

        I've never lost with control of Australia. Which is why I've conquered it already. Yes, that's right, I rule Australia. And Greenland.

        1. A Serious Man   12 years ago

          So you were the bastard who sold out Superman to General Zod in exchange for control of Australia!

        2. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

          Australia will guarantee you are one of the final 2 (or 3 if you start with a ton) players. From that point on it's about turning in your cards at the right point.

        3. General Butt Naked   12 years ago

          What about Ukraine? Ukraine is STRONG!

        4. CE   12 years ago

          Take Australia, and you at least make the Risk World Finals, but you don't always win.

          1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

            Well, the key is Australia and my lust for global dominion.

    2. OldMexican   12 years ago

      Re: A Serious Man,

      Australian PM Julia Gillard aligns with House Targaryen.

      When she decides to align with House Harkonnen, then we'll know that something's afoot.

      1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

        Yeah, something wrong with someone who backs the Targaryens.

        1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

          Maybe she just wants some of that sweet blonde ass?

          1. CE   12 years ago

            Probably the dragons.

            1. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

              No, I prefer redheads.

              1. Agammamon   12 years ago

                So *you're* into the Harkonnens?

                1. Rabban   12 years ago

                  Giedi Prime is a perfect vacation destination.

        2. Agammamon   12 years ago

          Yeah, she backs the one group that has a small infantry army, is marching the across a desert with damn near no logistical support, and then plans to cram them into boats like slave-traders to sail across the ocean and *finally* start an invasion with no logistic supply, no siege engines, and an army that's mostly dead.

          Her ace in the hole are a couple of immature dragons.

          On the one hand its nice to see her character develop from the mousy girl she was to the self-assured woman she is but she's bug-shit insane.

          And if her was succeeds (or even if its not put down immediately upon landing) then I will refuse to watch the damn show anymore.

          Well, except for the Tyrion Lannister scenes - he's the guy who should be king.

          1. Mickey Rat   12 years ago

            "On the one hand its nice to see her character develop from the mousy girl she was to the self-assured woman she is but she's bug-shit insane."

            She's a Targaryen, insane is their hat. Her actual problem is losing focus on what her real goal is.

            1. prolefeed   12 years ago

              Her actual problem is not being content with easily ruling a continent that is the equivalent of a large Australia in Risk, instead of going after an insanely competed over throne elsewhere.

              1. Mickey Rat   12 years ago

                A throne she has an actual claim to, while trying to rule over a land and a culture that neither wants her or her values.

      2. Mickey Rat   12 years ago

        So a politician favors the side with the weapons of mass destruction and a penchant for eating people?

        That does not surprise me.

  23. SeaCaptain(Yokeltarian)   12 years ago

    OT: Ummm, when is Reason going to write article after article about the "immigrant" riots in Sweden? http://reason.com/24-7/2013/05.....r-fifth-da

    1. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

      Reason is pro-immigrant.

      If you are not that is some serious demerits on the LP Purity Test.

      1. fish   12 years ago

        Again with the test!?

      2. Irish   12 years ago

        Reason is pro-immigrant.

        You can still acknowledge that immigrant riots are occurring and then argue that immigration is still a good idea.

        Ignoring something because it conflicts with your biases is weak sauce. Acknowledge something that conflicts with your beliefs, then explain why your beliefs are still right.

        If you are not that is some serious demerits on the LP Purity Test.

        Is that the same one you scored a 92 on?

        1. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

          94.

          I got docked two points for the Fed and four for regs against industrial pollution spilling into public waterways.

          Still beat Ron Paul though.

    2. Mike M.   12 years ago

      Never. The subject of violent radical Muslims has been declared strictly off limits by the so-called "mainstream" media.

  24. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

    9 Worst Recession Ghost Towns in America

    One condo owner is the loneliest number, especially when you're the last remaining resident in a 32-story tower. Victor Vangelakos paid $430,000 for his downtown Fort Myers condo in 2008, but when the building couldn't sell the rest of the units, they hashed out deals with the buyers, except for Vangelakos, who says his lenders wouldn't agree to a swap. He now uses the apartment as a vacation home, but he says it's eerie at night and birds have built nests in nearby apartments. The lone light in the building pictured here belongs to Vangelakos.

    One condo sold in a 32-story tower.

    http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/.....px?index=8

  25. A Serious Man   12 years ago

    Mother who let her daughter ride in the cage with her dog in bed of a pick up truck insists her daughter wanted to ride with the dog.

    Poor judgment? Probably. Felony child endangerment charges and losing custody of the child? Definite overreach in my opinion.

    1. RBS   12 years ago

      It's only poor judgment from the modern overprotective parent standpoint.

      State police were notified about the girl in the cage and told the Millvale Police to be on the lookout.

      Fuck that person or persons.

    2. fish   12 years ago

      I positively begged my father to ride home from the beach at Santa Cruz in the trunk of his 1964 Chrysler 300.

      He let me. I guess this means I was abused! Where's my "social justice"?

    3. CE   12 years ago

      But riding in the cage is less dangerous than sitting on the wheel well in the back of the pickup.

    4. Ted S.   12 years ago

      It could be worse; the parent could have used one of these (safe for work).

  26. OldMexican   12 years ago

    Bureaucrats in California are looking into how to regulate driverless cars.

    The very same way they regulate cars with drivers inside. The way Californians drive, those vehicles might was well be driverless for all intents and purposes.

  27. Archduke Pantsfan   12 years ago

    Justin Bieber 'ran away like a scared little child' after being chased home by former NFL player Keyshawn Johnson, reports claim.

    1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

      I don't know why. He should be able to outrun Johnson.

      1. Brett L   12 years ago

        Keyshawn's so fast, he just Flinstoned his Prius to catch that Ferrari. Also, if you can't outrun a Prius in a Ferrari, just sell your Ferrari.

        1. CE   12 years ago

          You don't watch football, do you?

          1. Brett L   12 years ago

            It was meant to be ironic.

    2. tarran   12 years ago

      He must not be doing too well; judging from the photo's in your link, it looks like he can't afford to pay for both sleeves when he buys a jacket.

  28. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

    Fannie Mae common closed at $4.11 on massive volume. It was 70 cent wallpaper a month ago before they announced record earnings.

    http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=FNMA

    Someone thinks the Obama administration will return it to its shareholders (Bush nationalized in 2008).

    1. VG Zaytsev   12 years ago

      QE lifts all stocks.

      1. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

        Silly comment.

        Dow component and giant cyclical Alcoa (AA) should be the first to benefit.

        http://finance.yahoo.com/echar.....undefined;

        Dead as a door nail.

    2. OldMexican   12 years ago

      It was $87 back in Dec 2000 (using the same chart), when the dollar was worth more. That means the whole fucking house of cards crumbled to nothing not long ago (2007) and is still pretty close to nothing despite the massive injection of FRNs.

      Someone thinks the Obama administration will return it to its shareholders

      There are people that still believe in pixies and fairies, PB.

      1. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

        Nope, buyers think there is a legal case for the common since FNMA never went through a formal chapter 11.

        Now, I'd like to tell you I bought it but I haven't. The common should be worthless.

        1. OldMexican   12 years ago

          Re: Palin's Buttwipe,

          Nope, buyers think there is a legal case for the common since FNMA never went through a formal chapter 11.

          So what? You're saying that "someone" thinks Obama will return the common stock to the shareholders. What makes you think the Obama administration will do crap? Ever?

  29. OldMexican   12 years ago

    From the newsfeed:
    Obama to Confront Chinese President over Cyberattacks

    See what happens when you lend money to someone? You instantaneously become the bad guy!

    Hundreds of hours of Judge Judy taught me that lesson:

    "What's your defense? Why don't you pay the money back?"
    "Because he's been harrasing me with cyberattacks, Judge Judy!"

  30. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

    Wells Fargo forecloses on homeowner for making his mortgage payments too early:

    http://www.wftv.com/news/news/.....id-/nXsMr/

    1. robc   12 years ago

      Computer systems get confused by weird payment schedule, Wells Fargo humans arent smart enough to correct for it.

      1. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

        I've been getting the same letters from Wells Fargo offering me a loan modification even though I've never missed a payment and I've always been leery of responding because I've heard too many horror stories like this.

    2. Brett L   12 years ago

      Every mortgage contract I've ever had specifies existence of pre-payment consequences. Notice that his loan was in a Federal modification program. This is not as straightforward crazy as it might look at first glance.

      1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

        What's the logic behind penalties for prepaying? They just want the interest more?

        1. Red Rocks Rockin   12 years ago

          Pretty much. When you're offering 3.5% on a 30-year mortgage and the house costs $200K, you're going to want to soak every penny of interest you can out of the loan. It's one reason I haven't bought a house and why I always make sure there's no penalties for prepayment on any other loans I take out.

          1. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

            If they were using prepayment as a basis for applying penalties or something like that, I could buy it. I don't see how you can legitimately claim it as a basis for foreclosure.

            1. Brett L   12 years ago

              If you signed a contract that says you will pay $X for y months, it doesn't matter if you pay $(x+z)*n which adds up to x*y. The contract has both a cost and duration which you failed to meet. And is exactly the kind of shitty thing you'd expect to be foisted on a restructured home loan.

        2. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

          Pre-paying reduces their earnings.

  31. Jesus H. Christ   12 years ago

    Hey, Feeney, this isn't the Norwegian Times. Here in 'murika we say "the hospital" not some stupid shite, such as "has left hospital."

    1. CE   12 years ago

      Or "graduated university". It's "went to college."

  32. lap83   12 years ago

    House panel subpoenas State Department over Benghazi

    http://www.cnn.com/2013/05/28/.....index.html

    comments are of the usual brain-dead liberal variety

  33. OldMexican   12 years ago

    "Because I'm entitled to that job regardless of such insignificant little things like contracts and Freedom of Association"

    Catholic School Teacher Fights Firing over Insemination Pregnancy

  34. GILMORE   12 years ago

    This is pretty awesome =

    http://www.reuters.com/article.....YN20130528

    U.S. Embassy workers hurt in Venezuela strip club shooting

    (Reuters) - Two U.S. Embassy employees in Venezuela were injured on Tuesday in a shooting at a well-known Caracas strip club, police said.

    Officers heard shots around 4:25 a.m. at the Antonella 2012 club, better known as "Angelus" in the upscale Chacao district, a police source told Reuters.

    One of the embassy employees, military attach? Roberto Ezequiel Rosas, was shot in the leg after a fight between club patrons, according to a police report seen by Reuters and the source, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

    The second embassy official was shot in the stomach but did not notice the injury until arriving home, the source said.

    OK. Partying at strip club till 4:30AM? Understandable.

    ON A MONDAY??

    Also, dude. So drunk you didn't notice you had a bullet hole in your tummy? Also, funny they didn't name that guy. He's referred to as an "Official" which may mean..."someone more than just a low-level employee"?

    Someone will blame this on The Sequester.

    1. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

      OK. Partying at strip club till 4:30AM? Understandable.

      ON A MONDAY??

      I can say from personal experience that in the Thailand club scene Monday was the day when they nightclubs where most active.

      Nothing like going to a club on a Monday night, finding an after-club when the other clubs close at 1:30, partying till 4:30, coming home to get 3 hours of sleep before stumbling into work on Tuesday.

      1. CE   12 years ago

        Thursday is always the best day. The best employees can make money any day of the week, and they want weekends off to hang out with their boyfriends.

    2. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

      "It was not a significant bullet."

  35. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

    Shares of Tesla leaped to a new high of $110.75 late Tuesday afternoon, settling back only slightly to close up $13.25, or 13.7 percent, at $110.33. Tesla shares are trading at more than three times the Jan. 2 opening price of $35.

    http://news.yahoo.com/tesla-sh.....28725.html

    1. Brett L   12 years ago

      Sell now. Elon can pull the ripcord and exit at any time now that he's paid back the DOE.

  36. WomSom   12 years ago

    Lets roll that beautiful bean footage!

    http://www.GetYourAnon.tk

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Brickbat: Second Opinion

Charles Oliver | 7.3.2025 4:00 AM

How the NCAA Helped Trump Score Big on Transgender Issues

Billy Binion | 7.2.2025 5:34 PM

Under the 'Big, Beautiful Bill,' Car Companies Won't Be Fined for Failing To Hit Arbitrary Fuel Efficiency Goals

Joe Lancaster | 7.2.2025 5:15 PM

The 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Keeps Most of Joe Biden's Energy Subsidies

Jeff Luse | 7.2.2025 4:44 PM

Florida Plans To Deputize 9 National Guardsmen as Immigration Judges To Increase Deportations

Autumn Billings | 7.2.2025 4:08 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!