Ronald Bailey: Do You Have a Right to Genetic Ignorance?

Whole genome testing is becoming ever cheaper and more widespread, enabling testing clinics to find not only the genetic mutations relevant to specific illnesses being investigated but also incidental genetic variants that may be associated with other disease risks. In response to this rapid progress, a panel of experts convened by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics issued a new policy statement in March on the medical and ethical implications of incidental genetic findings for patients and physicians. Some prominent bioethicists object to the college's recommendations, claiming that they violate your right to remain ignorant of your genetic risks. Reason Science Correspondent Ronald Bailey wonders if protecting genetic ignorance is such a good idea.
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?