Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

CDC Finds Poop in Pools, Gay Marriage Legislation Ruled Constitutional in France, LulzSec Hackers Get Prison Sentences: P.M. Links

Matthew Feeney | 5.17.2013 4:30 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | Jeff Sandquist/wikimedia
(Jeff Sandquist/wikimedia)
Credit: Jeff Sandquist/wikimedia
  • Readers who are looking forward to taking a dip in their local public pool this summer may want to reconsider given that the CDC found traces of feces 58 percent of the public pools they tested. 
  • France's constitutional high court has upheld legislation passed by both the Senate and the National Assembly that allows gay couples to marry and adopt children. 
  • Four members of the LulzSec hacking group have been sentenced to between two and two-and-a-half years in prison in England.
  • A federal judge has temporarily blocked the enforcement of a new law in Arkansas that bans abortions after 12 weeks of a pregnancy. 
  • The Air Force chief of staff has recommended removing the authority to prosecute military personnel accused of sexual misconduct from the chain of command. 
  • Former presidential candidate John Edwards has reactivated his license to practice law. The first step of a potential comeback perhaps.

Get Reason.com and Reason 24/7 content widgets for your websites.

Follow Reason and Reason 24/7 on Twitter, and like us on Facebook.  You can also get the top stories mailed to you—sign up here. Have a news tip? Send it to us!

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Court Upholds French Gay Marriage Law

Matthew Feeney is a policy analyst at the Cato Institute.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (194)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    Former presidential candidate John Edwards has reactivated his license to practice law.

    I wonder which of the two Americas he'll like better.

    1. DontShootMe   12 years ago

      The one where he gets to wield the IRS like a mace to beat anybody who brings up his marital history.

    2. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

      There are two Americas: Those who sue, and those who are sued.

    3. NeonCat   12 years ago

      Has he bought a new pair of Nikes to chase ambulances in?

    4. PapayaSF   12 years ago

      That accounts for some percentage of the poop in the pool, right there.

  2. db   12 years ago

    Not to belabor this but I think it's an important story potentially. Customs and Border Patrol searches of private aircraft in Oklahoma and Iowa possibly brought on by the fact that the pilot had landed in Colorado, which has recently legalized marijuana.

    An article at AOPA (Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association) details a disturbing detention and search of a pilot and his plane by agents that may have been Customs and Border Patrol (they offered no identification).

    During a coast-to-coast trip,the pilot was subjected to two "random" ramp checks, one of which resulted in the extensive and invasive search of his aircraft. "Ramp checks" are typically performed at random by FAA personnel and are generally limited to inspecting the aircraft's required paperwork and the pilot's credentials. According to the pilot,who claims to be a teetotaler,the agents tried to get him to admit to possessing a small amount of marijuana, which was never found during the search. He also claims the agents suggested to him that the search may have been related to the fact that he had landed in Colorado, which recently legalized marijuana, earlier in the trip.

    1. NeonCat   12 years ago

      I would bet they were DEA, not CBP.

      1. db   12 years ago

        The pilot reported they were wearing tan uniforms with an insignia that resembled CBP's. They were accompanied by local police and a K-9 unit.

        1. NeonCat   12 years ago

          Reading the article, I guess they are CBP. Which makes sense, seeing as how every airport is a "border".

          1. db   12 years ago

            How is that? And how would it apply to domestic flights?

    2. Tonio   12 years ago

      Saw that earlier, database. It is worrying.

      The pilots consented to searches by people claiming to be government agents, yet who offered no identification to prove that. That creates plausible deniability for the government.

      I know pilots are at the complete mercy of the FAA, but unless you start demanding ID and taking names you got nothing. Also, record the SOBs.

    3. shamalam   12 years ago

      That sure reads like an onion article... I think it is legitimate, but the picture and other aspects cry out for comedy.

  3. A Serious Man   12 years ago

    Readers who are looking forward to taking a dip in their local public pool this summer may want to reconsider given that the CDC found traces of feces 58 percent of the public pools they tested.

    But how many were just Baby Ruths?

    1. Mike M.   12 years ago

      +1 Carl Spackler

    2. Capt Ace Rimmer   12 years ago

      Trust me, it wasn't a Baby Ruth. I was locked out so I jumped in for relief.

  4. Archduke Pantsfan   12 years ago

    ROB FORD

    1. BigT   12 years ago

      Who says Canucks ain't kewl!

  5. Archduke Pantsfan   12 years ago

    Was that wrong? Should I not have done that?

    1. Ted S.   12 years ago

      If this is the "sneaky nuts" story (I only looked at the URL), we discussed it this morning: IFH is trying to freak us all out.

  6. Archduke Pantsfan   12 years ago

    The curious appeal of 'power paunches'

  7. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    France's constitutional high court has upheld legislation passed by both the Senate and the National Assembly that allows gay couples to marry and adopt children.

    More wedding business plus burning Citroens equals economic multplier boosts for France!

  8. NeonCat   12 years ago

    Scientists create graphite based paper circuits.

    http://www.gizmag.com/paper-gr.....c-90999673

  9. $park?   12 years ago

    Even really cool science can make you laugh like Beavis.

    Screaming winds of infernal violence alternate with periods of dead calm as one nears the surface of Uranus, according to a new analysis of the gas giant.

    The turbulent weather patterns on gaseous planets has long been known -- think of the giant storm raging on Jupiter that makes up its famous eye. But little had been known about life on the surface of distant Uranus.

    1. JW   12 years ago

      "That's no eye..."

    2. NeonCat   12 years ago

      I'd use "conditions" rather than "life", since as far as we know there isn't anything living there.

      And I'm sure we can all agree they wouldn't have violent winds if it weren't for ASSW (anthropogenic solar system warming).

    3. Sidd Finch   12 years ago

      +1 bunghole

  10. A Serious Man   12 years ago

    So I'll be seeing Star Trek later tonight. You can expect a full rant on the subject come Monday's PM links. Carry on.

    1. JW   12 years ago

      You're going drunk, right?

      1. Restoras   12 years ago

        In fact, you should get so drunk that you pass out.

    2. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

      Why bother? It'll be action-packed stupidity, with lots of flashing.

      1. A Serious Man   12 years ago

        I got a date, so yes, I hope for lots of flashing.

        Besides, I want to see if my prediction is correct: that Abrams is essentially taking all the great things about Wrath of Khan and mutilating them into something horrible.

        1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

          Indeed, that is precisely what he's doing.

          I think me and Auric's proposed sitcom (The Odd Couple) with Kirk and Khan stuck as roommates due to a time-travel accident back to the 1970s is far more compelling.

          1. Ray   12 years ago

            Robot Chicken did it first.

        2. JW   12 years ago

          No one can look into the face of the AbrahmsOrciKurtzmanLindelof and not come out a changed man, if he comes out at all.

          1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

            Super Baby Starfleet Officers Wars!

            1. JW   12 years ago

              ...of the Carribean

              1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                I accept correction.

          2. A Serious Man   12 years ago

            I've seen things you wouldn't believe. The Enterprise on fire on the shoulder of the Kessel Run, photo torpedoes glittering in the dark at Tatooine.

            1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

              Really, that's what this reboot is--a YouTube mash-up writ large.

        3. kinnath   12 years ago

          What is a "date"? Isn't that a piece of fruit from a tree?

          1. $park?   12 years ago

            I think ASM is one of those punk kids. They're allowed to go out with members of the opposite sex.

            1. Invisible Finger   12 years ago

              So, left-hand instead of right-hand.

              1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

                You're as bad as Episiarch, thoughtlessly othering all the left-handed commenters.

              2. Too_Big_to_Fail   12 years ago

                Everybody knows you have to numb the hand first for it to count as another person.

            2. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

              I thought that sort of thing had been banned.

            3. Archduke Pantsfan   12 years ago

              I'm coming out of the closet as an open cisgender heterosexual male

          2. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

            It's some female ritual that men don't understand.

            1. kinnath   12 years ago

              That explains a lot.

  11. Caleb Turberville   12 years ago

    Christopher Nolan could be up for directing Bond 24 or at least 25.

    1. Brandon   12 years ago

      It'll be the grittiest Bond ever.

    2. Bam!   12 years ago

      Christopher Nolan seems to like making complicate films. When the subject matter isn't complicated, as it wasn't with the Batman trilogy, he seems to add many characters to increase the complexity.

      Not sure how good he'd be at Bond.

      1. cavalier973   12 years ago

        Just so long as they bring back Daniel Craig. Of all the Bonds, he's the one that most resembles the guy in the novels.

  12. Mike M.   12 years ago

    Debt ceiling to be automatically reinstated on Sunday, Treasury Secretary Jack Lew to continue brazenly fudging the numbers on the nation's balance sheet for most of the duration of the fiscal year.

  13. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    ...the CDC found traces of feces 58 percent of the public pools they tested.

    Don't worry, all the urine will sterilize that.

    1. Tonio   12 years ago

      So, we can look forward to a season of moms keeping their fragile little poop machines out of the pools in fear they will come into contact with someone else's feces, right?

  14. Archduke Pantsfan   12 years ago

    so now Video Games make kids healthier

  15. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

    "Doodie!"

  16. deified   12 years ago

    Political Scientist uses SCIENCE(!) to explain why IRS staffers are basically hostile to libertarians.

    1. Suthenboy   12 years ago

      Why would people who collect taxes for a living be hostile towards people who believe taxation is basically theft?

      I dont get it.

  17. Paul.   12 years ago

    Readers who are looking forward to taking a dip in their local public pool this summer may want to reconsider given that the CDC found traces of feces 58 percent of the public pools they tested.

    I believe that's why we chlorinate them.

    1. Tonio   12 years ago

      Yep, look for the pools to crank up the chlorine levels, and the moms to further complain about that.

      No pleasing them.

    2. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

      Hasn't killed us yet. We used to go to a salt water public swimming hole that pumped in from just outside the marina. Incidentally boats flushed just outside the marina because it was forbidden to do so IN the marina. Occasionally you'd find you were swimming with floaters.

    3. Zeb   12 years ago

      Have they ever tested that before? Who knows if that's any worse than it ever has been. Anyway, there is some amount of poop on everything. I'd be surprised if they didn't find any. I'm sre every pond or lake you swim in has some fecal E Coli in it,

  18. $park?   12 years ago

    This is what actual child abuse looks like?

    Reed says police investigators did not report any signs of physical abuse on the children. But the kids were confined in a room at night without access to a bathroom. The four children are in state custody.

    1. Brett L   12 years ago

      What the Fuck?

      1. Brett L   12 years ago

        Follow up. At dinner tonight a guy took his unruly 2-3 year old out the door of the restaurant where I was eating dinner and gave him a single attention-getting (ie, not pain inducing) swat on the seat to drive home a point. Some lady got up and said something to him about how she thought what he was doing was wrong. He was surprisingly polite.

        I informed the gf that she should expect the words "fuck right off you stupid cunt" to come out of my mouth at top volume should I ever be in a similar situation. She was not supportive, but at least accepting.

  19. Archduke Pantsfan   12 years ago

    Dick Trickle, Dead.

    1. Almanian!   12 years ago

      🙁

    2. Invisible Finger   12 years ago

      Did Florsheim ever sponsor his car?

      1. Almanian!   12 years ago

        I believe you're thinking of Dave Marcis (wingtip shoe guy) who's alive and kicking.

  20. Paul.   12 years ago

    France's constitutional high court has upheld legislation passed by both the Senate and the National Assembly that allows gay couples to marry and adopt children.

    And demands that florists must do business with them?

  21. Joe M   12 years ago

    Watch the Biggest Explosion Ever Seen on the Moon

    1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

      Did we finally. . .Nuke the Moon?

      1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

        Michael Bay, it ain't.

      2. JW   12 years ago

        No, you dummy. That was just the first of the nuclear waste dumps starting to destabilize. Moonbase Alpha is fine...no damage.

        1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

          What on Earth are you talking about? Alpha, along with the Moon, blasted out of orbit back in 1999. What we see now, of course, is just a projection.

          1. JW   12 years ago

            See? The moon landing was faked!

            1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

              That was '69 when they faked the Moon landings. They had to fake them to prevent the astronauts from seeing the secret SHADO base.

              1. Sy   12 years ago

                Truman: Whistling Dixie! I want this sent to Area 51 for study.

                General: But, sir, that's where we're building the fake moon landing set.

                Truman: Then we'll have to really land on the moon. Invent NASA and tell them to get off their fannies!

          2. Generic Stranger   12 years ago

            That's no moon...

          3. Zeb   12 years ago

            How do they do the tides?

    2. Tonio   12 years ago

      Kiera Wilmot strikes again?

    3. Houkt Un Fanixs   12 years ago

      In response to mooninite aggression of course

  22. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    A federal judge has temporarily blocked the enforcement of a new law in Arkansas that bans abortions after 12 weeks of a pregnancy.

    Take away all the negatives in that sentence and I think it means every four month or older fetus in Arkansas will be forcefully terminated.

    1. Suthenboy   12 years ago

      Why did the Judge have to undergo 12 weeks of pregnancy before she could block enforcement of the new law?

      1. cavalier973   12 years ago

        FMLA.

  23. A Serious Man   12 years ago

    Video: Biggest explosion ever recorded on the Moon made by 40 kilogram boulder slamming into the surface.

    1. Archduke Pantsfan   12 years ago

      AGAIN?!?!?!

    2. robc   12 years ago

      too slow.

    3. Restoras   12 years ago

      If you click on the link expecting to see a moon-shattering kaboom...you will be sorely disappointed.

      1. JW   12 years ago

        Where's the kaboom?

        1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

          Okay, okay, it was me. The Moon was obstructing my view of Venus.

          1. $park?   12 years ago

            How could you not use 'Moon' and 'Uranus' in that comment? Now I see the real reason you're literally worse than Hitler.

            1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

              Because that's not what Marvin the Martian said?

              1. $park?   12 years ago

                Would you rather be funny or quote Looney Toons?

                1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                  Of course you realize, this means war!

    4. Aresen   12 years ago

      Only 40 kg? Considering the frequency of meteriod falls on earth (literally thousands of tons per day), this sounds way too low.

      1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

        Well, we do have that atmosphere thingee.

      2. NeonCat   12 years ago

        F=MV. A lot of velocity makes up for (relatively) low mass.

        1. hunger_artist   12 years ago

          F=MA

          Inertia is MV

          1. T   12 years ago

            Kinetic energy is (MV^2)/2.

        2. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

          F=MA

          P=MV

          And more importantly to your point:

          KE = 1/2MV^2

        3. NeonCat   12 years ago

          Well, F ME.

    5. Paul.   12 years ago

      I saw it the first time and I was all, "BOOOORINNNGGG!"

    6. Sidd Finch   12 years ago

      boulder-sized rock

      huh?

      1. Archduke Pantsfan   12 years ago

        duck sized horse?

      2. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

        He meant a rock-sized boulder.

  24. a better weapon   12 years ago

    http://latino.foxnews.com/lati.....ive-group/

    To be fair, they aren't really hispanic if they're conservative

  25. $park?   12 years ago

    When all you have is a hammer CDC, everything looks like a nail disease.

    "This is a deliberate effort by CDC to show mental health is a health issue. As with any health concern, the more attention we give to it, the better. It's parents becoming aware of the facts and talking to a healthcare provider about how their child is learning, behaving, and playing with other kids," Dr. Ruth Perou, the lead author of the study, said in an interview.

    "What's concerning is the number of families affected by these issues. But we can do something about this. Mental health problems are diagnosable, treatable and people can recover and lead full healthy lives," Perou added.

    1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

      Apparently, anti-government viewpoints are a disease as well.

    2. db   12 years ago

      You can recover from mental illness, but never from an involuntary commission-related removal of your Constitutional rights.

    3. Suthenboy   12 years ago

      "...people can recover and lead full healthy lives," Perou added."

      I am guessing that by 'lead full, healthy lives' she means they are unable to buy a gun.

  26. Archduke Pantsfan   12 years ago

    Eurovision song contest 2013: the key songs to watch out for

    1. Joe M   12 years ago

      There will never be another Epic Sax Guy.

  27. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    The Air Force chief of staff has recommended removing the authority to prosecute military personnel accused of sexual misconduct from the chain of command.

    Harm and Mac never had any problems bucking the chain of command in upholding the UCMJ. Or maybe they did, I forget.

  28. #HOLO YOLO   12 years ago

    WTF does coerce mean, anyway?

    Neither of these plans would violate the FCC Net Neutrality rules but they do, in effect, coerce users into making decision about data usage that favors specific sources and services to the financial benefit of the ISP.

    Anon, 14 hours ago

    "they? coerce users into making decision about data usage?"

    Providing a service for free is not coercion.

    Merriam-Webster:

    1: to restrain or dominate by force
    2: to compel to an act or choice
    3: to achieve by force or threat

    Mark Gibbs, Contributor 3 hours ago

    My use of "coerce" is accurate ? I use it in the sense of the second definition you cite "2: to compel to an act or choice". Coercion isn't always obvious, it's often subtle and relies on offering alternatives that appear to be equal but where one choice has an advantage or disadvantage over the other. These companies are giving people a choice to take the freebie (which they have already actually paid for) or not. Not taking the freebie and choosing an alternative has a cost so there is not a real choice when it comes, for example, to watching ESPN as opposed to another sports channel. That is coercive.

    Definitions, how do they werk?

    1. MJGreen   12 years ago

      relies on offering alternatives that appear to be equal but where one choice has an advantage or disadvantage over the other.

      It's only a 'free choice' when you're completely indifferent to it.

      This is actually considered a serious position in philosophy departments.

      1. #HOLO YOLO   12 years ago

        It's only a 'free choice' when you're completely indifferent to it.

        Then what would be the value of having free choice?

        1. MJGreen   12 years ago

          That's what's so bizarre about that argument. It says that you don't really have a choice when the alternative is sufficiently burdensome. The only solid ground for that distinction is to converge on what that Gibbs fellow said unambiguously: equal alternatives. Which is total indifference. In which case, why choose at all?

          I wonder if someone has used this logic to argue for totalitarianism. The only real choice is when you're indifferent, and that choice doesn't matter, so let us choose for you!

          1. Zeb   12 years ago

            It says that you don't really have a choice when the alternative is sufficiently burdensome

            Well, that's actually true, I think. But not quite the way he wants it to be. "Give me your money or I'll shoot you" doesn't really leave you much choice. But, fo course, when you are talking about things like data plans, you always have the unspoken choice of going elsewhere for your service or doing without.

      2. PapayaSF   12 years ago

        So if I slack off and don't exercise tomorrow, because it's more burdensome than not exercising, it's because of coercion?

    2. JW   12 years ago

      Some kinds of stupid can't be cured.

    3. oncogenesis   12 years ago

      "When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, "it means just what I choose it to mean?neither more nor less."

    4. NeonCat   12 years ago

      So if we go to Mark Gibbs's house and he asks if we want a glass of water, we can insist instead of tap, bottled, filtered or what have you that he should burn some hydrogen for us, otherwise he's coercing us?

      Not only an idiot but a terrible host. I'm never visiting him again. If I wanted to be coerced I'd visit STEVE SMITH.

  29. MJGreen   12 years ago

    FYI: This weekend, Steam has Borderlands 2 for $14.

    I'll likely relent and see what it is you freaks keep praising.

    1. $park?   12 years ago

      Well worth $14, you should get it.

      1. Dweebston   12 years ago

        Is it worth even trying with only 512mb vram?

        Yeah, I suck.

        1. $park?   12 years ago

          I think if you turn the video settings to low you should be alright.

        2. JW   12 years ago

          How does your computer even run?

          Get RAM; it's cheap.

          1. JW   12 years ago

            Ah, vram. Nevermind. /letella

      2. Archduke Pantsfan   12 years ago

        I'll try it out too, thanks for the heads up!!

    2. Hollywood   12 years ago

      I'll give it a try, especially since I'm in the process of building a new kick ass rig.

    3. cavalier973   12 years ago

      Borderlands 1: Libertarians are icky
      Borderlands 2: Communists are icky
      Borderlands 3: Christians are icky

      Is this more or less correct?

  30. Aresen   12 years ago

    Readers who are looking forward to taking a dip in their local public pool this summer may want to reconsider given that the CDC found traces of feces 58 percent of the public pools they tested.

    South Park did a whole episode on Peeing in the Pool.

  31. Caleb Turberville   12 years ago

    Readers who are looking forward to taking a dip in their local public pool this summer may want to reconsider given that the CDC found traces of feces 58 percent of the public pools they tested.

    How would you prevent "traces of feces" from getting into public pools?

    1. JW   12 years ago

      Mandatory pre-dip hose downs and rubber plugs.

      1. fish_remote   12 years ago

        Shreek has a new career. Pool water quality guy.

        1. PapayaSF   12 years ago

          It would interfere with his current career of pooping in this pool.

  32. A Serious Man   12 years ago

    Harry Reid brings back the threat of employing the nuclear option to change filibuster rules.

    Mutually Assured Douchebagginess will ensue. No one wants to handicap the tool both parties use when they're the opposition.

    1. Brett L   12 years ago

      Please tell me the Republicans are smart enough to let him take this all the way to the end.

  33. Caleb Turberville   12 years ago

    http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05......html?_r=0

    Wait, I thought Obama had only just learned about the IRS scandal last Friday?

    1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

      One of the things that makes cover-ups difficult is keeping all of the lies in order. He should filter everything through the Big Lie Czar.

      1. Invisible Finger   12 years ago

        I'm sure a Transparency Czar will be appointed in the next couple of weeks.

    2. Mike M.   12 years ago

      The talking points narrative that seems to be coalescing around the Messiah is that, yes, he's the greatest, smartest, and most capable man who has ever lived, yet he has absolutely no idea at all about anything that's going on underneath him.

      1. NeonCat   12 years ago

        "He's just, you know, on a different, better LEVEL, man, and this petty politics just drags on him."

        1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

          "I'm a little man, I'm a little man, he's. . .he's a great man! I should have been a pair of ragged claws scuttling across floors of silent seas."

    3. Joe M   12 years ago

      It remained unclear how much the disclosure would affect the broader debate over the I.R.S.'s problems.

      How it should, or how it actually will?

      1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

        I say. . .pile-on!

    4. Generic Stranger   12 years ago

      Nobody tells him nuthin'.

      (Seriously, there are only two scenarios here: either Obama has absolutely no idea what in the hell his underlings are up to, and hence is completely incompetent, or he knew and committed an impeachable offense. There is absolutely no way you can defend this guy, and yet hordes of idiotic leftards are trying to do just that).

    5. Red Rocks Rockin   12 years ago

      What's been particularly revealing about these scandals is just how obsessed Team Blue is with the acquisition and retention of power and maintenance of the status quo at the expense of supposed political principles. They're going to every length to excuse both the administration and corrupt government institutions, because to not do so means admitting that the government as a whole has grown to such a scale that it's no longer accountable to anyone or anything, and cannot be effectively managed in an open, transparent manner.

      This basically destroys the progressive ideology that there's no problem a new government program or agency can't fix, and so they're forced to defend Obama and the IRS for acting in ways that they would, and did, crucify Bush for doing. It shows that they don't have a problem with the methods, per se, just with whom those methods are directed against.

    6. Suthenboy   12 years ago

      Huh? The king of shitweasels lied? Unnnnnpossible!

  34. A Serious Man   12 years ago

    Pat Robertson to wife who's husband cheated on her: "Here's the secret," the famous evangelical said. "Stop talking the cheating. He cheated on you, well, he's a man."

    1. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

      Adelia Elmer may want to start being suspicious right about now.

    2. Nikki makes the sign of a tsp   12 years ago

      Erin Burnett totally flipped out about this last night on her show. I had it on for a few minutes and I was like uh...yes, Pat Robertson is an idiot, but is this really news? She is supposed to be better than that. But she was pissssssssssssssed.

    3. Houkt Un Fanixs   12 years ago

      He's got a point...

  35. deified   12 years ago

    Professional Piece of Shit Julian Bond thinks that targeting Tea Party organizations on the basis of their displeasing-to-their-masters viewpoints is A-OK:

    http://www.politico.com/story/.....91337.html

    1. Red Rocks Rockin   12 years ago

      See my comment above--they don't have a problem with corruption, just whom the corruption is used to oppress.

  36. #HOLO YOLO   12 years ago

    Re: the Rebel Wilson (wtf kind of name is that?) Feministing post mentioned earlier today...

    ...fat women have "revolutionary bodies"? Someone compared her to Jonah Hill, but IMO he's not nearly as fat when you consider the two of them relative to their own genders.

    At least the Asian girl is cute.

    1. Red Rocks Rockin   12 years ago

      Sure, if you consider "revolutionary" to be the equivalent of "obese glutton with high blood pressure and diabetes."

      Funny how every time I point out to progs that assuming healthcare is a "right" means treating fatties for every ailment they acquire as a result of their weight gain, regardless of cost, they immediately shut up.

  37. Archduke Pantsfan   12 years ago

    Anteater's birth in female-only pen stumps zoo staff

    1. $park?   12 years ago

      Anteaters need a savior too.

    2. Joe M   12 years ago

      This is just like those frogs in Jurassic Park!

    3. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

      I bet Andrew Mendoza blew a nut up in that anteater.

    4. A Serious Man   12 years ago

      Are you slut-shaming the anteater?

    5. NeonCat   12 years ago

      Hermaphrodite Anteater sounds like a terrible US government operation code name.

      Please note no evidence of hermaphroditism is mentioned in the article, the phrase just occurred to me.

      1. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

        "Hermaphrodite Anteater sounds like a terrible US government operation code name."

        Sounds more like a rock band to me.

    6. Invisible Finger   12 years ago

      "Connecticut conservation officers" says it all. Public employees can't sex an anteater and lie about it.

    7. cavalier973   12 years ago

      Although Cerebus considers himself male, and is treated as such, he is a hermaphrodite, possessing both sexes' genitalia and reproductive systems. Theoretically he is capable of impregnating himself; however, a childhood injury to his uterus makes this impossible.

      1. Irish   12 years ago

        Everything about that paragraph confuses me.

  38. A Serious Man   12 years ago

    Is killing a fetus murder?

    I believe that human life begins at conception. I believe that if you force a woman, either by violence or deception, to lose a fetus, you have taken a life. But I also shudder at the prospect of the anti-choice lobby exploiting revolting crimes to prevent women from access to their constitutional right to abortion. We have spent the last several years watching it happen, as abortion opponents have tried to leverage fetal-protection laws to chip away at choice. That's why we need to continue to be vigilant in articulating the difference between a choice a woman makes and an act of violence against her body and her fetus, an act that robs her of that very freedom she is entitled to. We must be clear that being pro-choice is not tantamount to condoning repulsive, criminal behavior. Remee Lee told reporters this week that she's grieving because she "dreams of becoming a mom." And this, she says, "was my chance."

    Yes, but either the fetus has rights or it doesn't. Killing it without the consent of the mother does not make it a victim of homicide if you're going to argue that the mother hiring someone to kill isn't also homicide.

    1. lap83   12 years ago

      "I believe that abortion is taking a life, but I also believe that women have the constitutional right to take a life"

      Yeah, that is not scary at all.

      1. A Serious Man   12 years ago

        Let's combine that notion with the woman who wrote the Mothers' Bill of Rights and claimed an absolute right to protect their children.

        Now that's scary.

    2. oncogenesis   12 years ago

      constitutional right to abortion

      *boggle*

    3. lap83   12 years ago

      In regard to the article, which I hadn't clicked on the first time i posted...(assumed it was about Gosnell)

      Honestly, why does it surprise anyone that shit like that happens? That man is financially responsible for the baby and he lives in a culture that says abortion is ok. Also, if he wants the baby gone, he's probably not going to compartmentalize it like feminists want him to...since the "it's ok for the mom to abort, but wrong for the dad even though he is half responsible for it and is legally forced to raise it if she decides to have it" argument makes no sense.

      Not that I think abortion should be committed by men. I don't like abortion at all. I just think it's amazing how pro-choices can get away with being so retarded.

      1. lap83   12 years ago

        pro-choicers*

    4. Marshall Gill   12 years ago

      Killing it without the consent of the mother does not make it a victim of homicide if you're going to argue that the mother hiring someone to kill isn't also homicide.

      I have recently come to the conclusion that the acceptance of abortion is mass denial. Few do not know the science of sexual reproduction.

      Life is a chain of life. The huge majority of people understand, Monty Python skits notwithstanding, that new human life begins when the two living cells combine to form a new individual. They also know that before birth, there is no time after conception, that an embryo is not alive, human and an individual. Strangely, science doesn't use the term "person" but uses terms like individual, human and living.

      After attempting to cloud the issue of human, individual and alive they then begin to categorize natural rights. Unpersons do not have a right not to be murdered by their mothers. Yes, they concede that the individuals in question are alive and that they are human but they are of the different kind that don't really have the right to not be murdered. Often the fact that individual human beings die before birth is claimed as a reason to deny their right not to be murdered.

      It is all denial because unplanned pregnancies can be very inconvenient. Much, much easier to rationalize evil.

      1. Zeb   12 years ago

        Then you are being deliberately obtuse. None of what you say about how life works is in question. The question is what gives a living organism the full moral status of a human being. I'm not going to argue about what that is right now, but it is nto a scientific question and cannot be answered by observing that an embryo is alive and genetically distinct from the mother.

        1. country bumpkin   12 years ago

          well said

        2. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

          You seem to be the one being obtuse:

          Yes, they concede that the individuals in question are alive and that they are human but they are of the different kind that don't really have the right to not be murdered.

  39. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

    Four members of the LulzSec hacking group have been sentenced to between two and two-and-a-half years in prison in England.

    "Not so funny now is it, funny man?"

  40. Joe M   12 years ago

    Congress demands answers on Google Glass privacy concerns

    Weird how they're not worried about the government video-taping citizens, just citizens taping each other.

    1. robc   12 years ago

      What concerns?

      If you do something in front of someone wearing google contacts (Im projecting into the future, but not that far), it isnt private.

      Dont want your one night stand on the internet? Dont have a one night stand. Honestly, thats the only prevention in the future.

      Well, I guess contractual stuff, but that doesnt stop it, it just allows you to pull it down later, and possibly sue.

  41. Almanian!   12 years ago

    I AM THE 58%!

    *poops pants*

  42. Archduke Pantsfan   12 years ago

    Justin Bieber given until midnight tonight to rescue pet monkey from German customs

    1. NeonCat   12 years ago

      "I'm as happy as a little guuuurrll."

      1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

        "Now's the time on Sprockets when we dance!"

  43. A Serious Man   12 years ago

    Sacramento doctor reprimanded for suggesting oral sex as a means to fix a woman's sensitive gag reflex.

    1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

      What? But that's the right answer! I know, I was pre-law.

    2. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

      you know who else had a sensitive gag reflex?

      1. Zakalwe   12 years ago

        Tulpa?

        1. Redmanfms   12 years ago

          As much statist cock as he gobbles I'm guessing he has the gag reflex of Linda Lovelace.

  44. Houkt Un Fanixs   12 years ago

    -Do not swallow the water you swim in.

    Outrage!

  45. Zakalwe   12 years ago

    Man, I just saw a TSA employ I want to grope me, but our shitty regional airport only has regular metal detectors. Next time I'll forget a knife in my pocket or something.

  46. Hand Surgeon Katy   12 years ago

    Hey there! Do you use Twitter? I'd like to follow you if that would be ok. I'm absolutely enjoying your blog and look forward to new updates.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

The $4 Trillion 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Breaks the Bank and Violates Congress' Own Budget Rules

Veronique de Rugy | 7.3.2025 11:25 AM

Trump's New Trade Deal Has a Clear Winner: Vietnam

Eric Boehm | 7.3.2025 11:10 AM

The Everglades Jetport Was Supposed To Be a World Wonder. Now It's 'Alligator Alcatraz.'

Matthew Petti | 7.3.2025 10:03 AM

Add It to the Tab

Liz Wolfe | 7.3.2025 9:30 AM

What Frederick Douglass Can Still Teach Us About the Fourth of July

Damon Root | 7.3.2025 7:00 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!