Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Three Murder Charges Dropped in Kermit Gosnell Case, Boston Marathon Bomber's Widow Cooperating With Authorities, Parents Fighting Ban on Strapless Dresses in NJ: P.M. Links

Matthew Feeney | 4.23.2013 4:30 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | 2Aaron "tango"Tang/wikimedia
(2Aaron "tango"Tang/wikimedia)
Credit: Joe Wilcox/Foter.com
  • Three murder charges against abortionist Dr. Kermit Gosnell have been dropped. Gosnell, who was charged in the deaths of seven babies and one woman will now only be charged in the deaths of four babies and one woman.
  • Tamerlan Tsarnaev's widow is cooperating with federal authorities. Katherine Russell Tsarnaeva converted to Islam when she married Tamerlan, who died in a shootout with police after the Boston Marathon bombing. 
  • Parents of children who attend Readington Middle School in New Jersey are fighting against a ban on strapless dresses ahead of prom. 
  • The man charged with sending ricin-laced letters to Obama has been released. 
  • Pro-Syria hackers briefly took over the CBS twitter account. 
  • Secretary of State John Kerry says that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu cannot confirm allegations made by Israel's military intelligence chief that Assad's regime had used chemical weapons. 

Get Reason.com and Reason 24/7 content widgets for your websites.

Follow Reason and Reason 24/7 on Twitter, and like us on Facebook.  You can also get the top stories mailed to you—sign up here. Have a news tip? Send it to us!

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Poll: Obama and George W. Bush Now Equal in Public Approval

Matthew Feeney is a policy analyst at the Cato Institute.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (457)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    The man charged with sending ricin-laced letters to Obama has been released.

    Still, the ordeal left him all shook up.

    1. Smilin' Joe Fission   12 years ago

      I'm surprised UPS, FedEx, USPS, etc. haven't stopped delivering letters out of respect after this incident.

    2. Brett L   12 years ago

      If he wasn't paranoid about the government being out to get him before...

    3. Tim   12 years ago

      You bastard.

      1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

        That's how that's done.

    4. #HOLO YOLO   12 years ago

      Defense attorney Christi McCoy raised the possibility in court yesterday that Curtis was being framed for the mailings by a Tupelo man recently arrested on child molestation charges with whom Curtis had a long-running e-mail feud.

      It's really been a bad week for foaming-at-the-mouth progtards, hasn't it?

      1. ThatSkepticGuy   12 years ago

        Nah, they'll just do exactly what they did with the Marathon bombings.

        What's that? This wasn't a deplorable and unforgivable act of fanaticism by racist, right wing extremists?

        Then it must have been a tragic and preventable isolated incident that only occured because capitalism and RethugliKKKant obstructionuists have made conditions in this country so uninhabitable, and as such these people deserve our full sympathy and understanding.

    5. Austrian Anarchy   12 years ago

      The magic of a Democrat bumper sticker cannot be over estimated.

    6. lilian321   12 years ago

      Peyton. I agree that Katherine`s report is exceptional... on saturday I bought a top of the range Mitsubishi Evo from having made $6948 this last 5 weeks and more than 10-k last month. this is certainly the most rewarding I have ever done. I actually started three months/ago and almost immediately startad making at least $70... per-hr. I follow the details on this straightforward website, http://kep2.com/

  2. Smilin' Joe Fission   12 years ago

    Video: Anarchist vs. Libertarian vs. Socialist and a babe of a host.

    But can anarchist actually be against capitalism? What the hell is supposed to take the place of capitalism in an anarchist state?

    1. John   12 years ago

      All of the people working together and not exploiting each other. They actually believe that shit.

      1. Smilin' Joe Fission   12 years ago

        They had to have been able to get a better anarchist on than that. I have my days where I can sort of see an an-cap society, but this guy just seemed to be in a type of fantasy land.

        1. Doktor Kapitalism   12 years ago

          Didn't watch the video, but my personal thought is that anarchocapitalism will only be practical with an intelligent and alert public, but a couple generations of minarchy might get them ready.

          1. Smilin' Joe Fission   12 years ago

            I always feel that it will always just devolve back into a minarchist state or worse anyway. I am trying to decide on my ful verdict on an an-cap state, but I have not come to any conclusions yet.

            1. Doktor Kapitalism   12 years ago

              That's what I'm thinking. A state would form unless a significant portion was actively aware and prevented it.

              For now, minarchy is the best option.

              1. Azathoth!!   12 years ago

                a significant portion was actively aware and prevented it.

                And that would, in and of itself, be the seed for the new state.

                A State will form whenever there is a need for one.

                There wiil be a need for one as long as any adult has needs that can only be met by other adults.

      2. Sevo   12 years ago

        John| 4.23.13 @ 4:34PM |#
        "All of the people working together and not exploiting each other. They actually believe that shit."

        Trade has the explainable and observable mechanism of profit which draws people together to produce things through specialization.
        'Pure' anarchists simply claim as you state; 'why, Joe over here will make plows, 'cause anarchism, and Jake will make the tractor pistons 'cause anarchism...'

        1. John   12 years ago

          Trade is great unless you are one of those people who find it easier to steal. If you are really good at violence and not much else, trade really doesn't make a lot of sense.

        2. John   12 years ago

          And Sevo, lots of anarchists object to the exploitation of "corporations" as if you could stop them from existing without restricting freedom.

    2. Smilin' Joe Fission   12 years ago

      God damn it, my link has the video starting at 4m:16s into it.

    3. Episiarch   12 years ago

      It could be an anarcho-syndicalist commune. They could take turns to act as a sort of executive-officer-for-the-week, but all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special bi-weekly meeting by a simple majority, in the case of purely internal affairs but by a two-thirds majority, in the case of more major...

      1. Dweebston   12 years ago

        Shut up!

        1. Episiarch   12 years ago

          Who do you think you are?!?

          1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

            Bloody peasant.

            1. Episiarch   12 years ago

              Oh, what a giveaway!

        2. rac3rx   12 years ago

          Now we see the violence inherent in the system! Help! Help! I'm being repressed!

      2. John   12 years ago

        Nothing says anarchist like going to meetings.

        1. Nikki makes the sign of a tsp   12 years ago

          Does it sparkle with the girls?

          1. John   12 years ago

            Only if the meetings follow Roberts' Rules of Order. You know chicks dig a well run committee meeting.

            1. T   12 years ago

              My wife does. Amazing what a poli-sci undergrad and law degree do to a person. Shit, she has multiple editions of Roberts'.

              1. Dr. Frankenstein   12 years ago

                So do your motions for a blow job get tabled in a committee?

            2. Kaptious Kristen   12 years ago

              True. fax.

              1. Kaptious Kristen   12 years ago

                (one of the things I hate most in my working life is agendaless, free-form meetings. In fact, I would say it is the thing I hate most).

    4. Smilin' Joe Fission   12 years ago

      Socialist: "We shouldn't have to wait on a Bill Gates to solve cancer, build houses for the poor. We can mobilize government to do these things."

      This guy doesn't realize that the government doesn't have money, people do. That a government needs a Bill Gates to loot from in order to solve these problems.

      1. Boisfeuras   12 years ago

        Because government has not spent any money on cancer research, and as soon as it does, cancer will quickly be cured.

        The National Cancer Institute (NCI), part of the National Institutes of Health and the Department of Health and Human Services, is the Nation's principal agency for cancer research and coordinates the National Cancer Program...In recent years, NCI's budget has been relatively flat, averaging approximately $4.9 billion per year over the past 6 years

    5. Austrian Anarchy   12 years ago

      Well, that is one type of Anarchist. The ones who believe they can make government so big that *poof* it disappears. They don't like the price system and they find Marx Labor Theory of Value to be a natural law of nature.

      Some of us minarchists prefer the other kind of Anarchy.

      1. Smilin' Joe Fission   12 years ago

        Which I more and more consider myself to be (minarchist).

        1. Austrian Anarchy   12 years ago

          I seriously want to move on to Anarchy, but I am still a bitter clinger to the criminal court system for violent crimes against people. As soon as I hear a good argument for this issue, I'm there.

          1. Smilin' Joe Fission   12 years ago

            Same here. I feel that an-cap is the most moral system, I just don't know how that state would last.

            1. Proprietist   12 years ago

              I would think the most moral system is whichever system minimizes the initiation of force. Barring some change to human nature, I have not been convinced anarchocapitalism minimizes overall initiations of force more than libertarian miniarchism, where the only role of government is to prevent or punish initiations of force.

              1. An0nB0t   12 years ago

                We're only going to find out once we have a dedicated ancap community--an actual geographical community, not an online group--that achieves some form of security from external threats.

                If you have enough people dedicated to the principles of individual liberty and trade, I see no reason why it couldn't work just as well as the early U.S. would have. The chief problems for the early generations of an ancap community would be statist threats (think Israel in its nascent stages) and the possibility that immigrants into a free community wouldn't share the same anti-state values.

                Basically, we need enough ideologues, philosophers, entrepreneurs, and artillery to prove that it works, then we need to be careful who we sell land to. Beating down anything that even hints at monopolistic violence is only going to be accomplished by education, and that's going to take multiple generations and possibly hundreds of years. So we may have the Dollar Vigilante's community succeed, but it'll be a long time before ancaps could ever be a real force in the world (which is still a better timetable than anyone who buys into the various anarcho-socialisms that refuse to recognize the impossibility of a community existing without a functional price system--they act like Mises never even lived).

          2. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

            but I am still a bitter clinger to the criminal court system for violent crimes against people. As soon as I hear a good argument for this issue, I'm there.

            Umm...some folks just need killin'?

          3. MJGreen   12 years ago

            What have you read? What arguments have you found wanting?

      2. Killazontherun   12 years ago

        In an advanced society, political science is indistinguishable from utopian fantasy.

        1. Austrian Anarchy   12 years ago

          Actually, it seems to just get skipped over or some reference to "private courts" is interjected, as if the International Maritime Court could be implemented for rapists and murderers.

          1. Austrian Anarchy   12 years ago

            That was supposed to be in reply to MJGreen| 4.23.13 @ 5:44PM

    6. Doktor Kapitalism   12 years ago

      The comments are the epitome of YouTube stupidity.

    7. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

      Capitalism requires rules. Anarchy is anti-capitalist.

      1. John   12 years ago

        Jesus Christ Shreek said something that makes sense. That whole Bush Obama approval rating thing must really have affected you.

      2. Doktor Kapitalism   12 years ago

        Rules =/= Laws

        1. Trespassers W   12 years ago

          Don't lecture Shriek. As a student of Hayek scholar, he will surely school you on the difference between law and legislation.

          Show him, Shriek!

          1. Doktor Kapitalism   12 years ago

            Lecture is a bit much for a 2.5 word comment. How about "feed?"

        2. MJGreen   12 years ago

          Laws =/= Legislation

    8. Anonymous Coward   12 years ago

      A lot of anarchists are socialists. They believe, in their heart of hearts, that once they burn down the state, we'll all just pull together and share and give things to each other and voluntarily work without recompense.

      Basically, they're huffing flour-sized bags of fairy dust.

    9. Chaucer   12 years ago

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NKERC6F7mSM

      1. #HOLO YOLO   12 years ago

        I love WKUK.

        I'M GONNA GRAPE YOU IN THE MOUTH.

        1. #HOLO YOLO   12 years ago

          Oh, and I have a feeling some folks here will like the Never Song

      2. Smilin' Joe Fission   12 years ago

        Haha that was great.

        Their nuclear knowledge is a little incorrect though 😉

  3. Archduke Pantsfan   12 years ago

    A group is calling for the NZ Government to consider legalising multi-partner marriages.

    1. Ted S.   12 years ago

      Who wants multiple mothers-in-law?

    2. Francisco d Anconia   12 years ago

      See, it's the slippery slope. Next someone will marry their dog and it'll be the end of civilization. Mark my words.

      Run! Run for your lives!

      1. Doktor Kapitalism   12 years ago

        As long as the dog consents...but really, how could that stand up in courts? Simple answer: it couldn't. Marriage will stay an inter-human affair until we reach full communication with other intelligent animals.

        1. An0nB0t   12 years ago

          What about marrying a futuristic AI that offers consent because it's been programmed to?

    3. generic Brand   12 years ago

      So Friday Jones a/k/a Marjorie Baldwin finally gets to be screwed over by her line marriage, after all.

  4. generic Brand   12 years ago

    BUT WHO ARE THE CHICKS IN THE PICTURE DAMNIT???? WE DEMAND ALT-TEXT!!!

    1. db   12 years ago

      They're all dudes.

      1. generic Brand   12 years ago

        NOOOOOOOO!!!

      2. Austrian Anarchy   12 years ago

        And those hookers are still better looking than the hookers in this story

  5. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    Pro-Syria hackers briefly took over the CBS twitter account.

    Started tweeting new ideas for Heresy My Dad Says.

    1. DJF   12 years ago

      Don't all sides in the conflict claim to be pro-Syrian?

      1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

        How dare you use my joke as a springboard for your social commentary.

    2. Sevo   12 years ago

      Fist of Etiquette| 4.23.13 @ 4:32PM |#
      "Pro-Syria hackers briefly took over the CBS twitter account."

      Scanning too fast; read that as "Pro-Syria hookers..."

  6. db   12 years ago

    Pro-Syria hackers are hardly the day's biggest Twitter related news.

  7. Archduke Pantsfan   12 years ago

    I call this one
    Brezhnev on the phone in his underwear

    1. NeonCat   12 years ago

      "What the phone was doing in his underwear I haven't a clue."

    2. Ted S.   12 years ago

      One of my favorite Brezhnev jokes involves the Moscow Olympics. It's the ceremonial job of the head of state of the host nation to declare the Olympic Games officially open, so when the time comes for that, Brezhnev steps up to the microhone.

      "Oh. Oh. Ohhhhhh..."

      "No no no, Comrade Brezhnev! You're supposed to read the text below. Those are just the Olympic rings!"

    3. PapayaSF   12 years ago

      So it turns out manboobs are not a recent, Western invention.....

  8. Caleb Turberville   12 years ago

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/.....g-the-nra/

    It really takes a self-described "wonk" to conclude that quadrupling the alcohol tax could have a reductive effect on crime.

    1. Caleb Turberville   12 years ago

      http://freethoughtblogs.com/ph.....ent-607966

      I got this info from Pharyngula. In addition, I wanted to mention Balko's new book. For what it's worth, I got a reply that "Balko is a terrible source for information."

      1. Irish   12 years ago

        Did they give you a reason why Balko is a terrible source of information, beyond the fact that he isn't a doctrinaire leftist?

        1. Caleb Turberville   12 years ago

          Reason: "His economic ideology permeates his writing."

          1. #HOLO YOLO   12 years ago

            So, no, nothing beyond that.

          2. Dweebston   12 years ago

            Seems solid. Often let my gastronomic preferences permeate my choice of restaurant, but I have the decency to realize I'm being unfairly biased.

          3. Jordan   12 years ago

            More evidence that leftists care more about imposing confiscatory tax rates and central economic planning than they do about defending civil liberties.

        2. Caleb Turberville   12 years ago

          It's really ridiculous since Myers is one of the loudest proponents of the "Libertarians are greedy, selfish, cold-hearted pigs" argument.

          Meanwhile, his commentariat consists of people who think Radley Balko (possibly the sweetest, kindest, and humanitarian libertarians) is a "terrible source for information.

          1. Dweebston   12 years ago

            Oh, God, P.Z. Myers. I've stopped taking him seriously since Elevatorgate and his falling out with Dawkins.

            1. Irish   12 years ago

              P.Z. Myers is yet another leftist who is intelligent in his field and just assumes that that intelligence flows over into every other field of human knowledge.

              As a result, he clearly doesn't actually bother thinking about his positions on anything outside of his chosen field, yet manages to be ridiculously smug despite his total lack of knowledge.

            2. #HOLO YOLO   12 years ago

              Elevatorgate has got to be one of the dumbest "-gates" ever.

              1. Irish   12 years ago

                Was that the one where some dude said something sexual to a woman on an elevator, Richard Dawkins defended him and then there was an explosion of leftwing butthurt in which friendships were ruined for no good reason?

                1. Nikki makes the sign of a tsp   12 years ago

                  Yes, except I don't think what was said was actually "sexual."

                  1. Irish   12 years ago

                    Here's what he apparently said

                    Here's the argument I was making. The man in the elevator didn't physically touch her, didn't attempt to bar her way out of the elevator, didn't even use foul language at her. He spoke some words to her. Just words. She no doubt replied with words. That was that. Words. Only words, and apparently quite polite words at that.

                    If she felt his behaviour was creepy, that was her privilege, just as it was the Catholics' privilege to feel offended and hurt when PZ nailed the cracker. PZ didn't physically strike any Catholics. All he did was nail a wafer, and he was absolutely right to do so because the heightened value of the wafer was a fantasy in the minds of the offended Catholics. Similarly, Rebecca's feeling that the man's proposition was 'creepy' was her own interpretation of his behaviour, presumably not his. She was probably offended to about the same extent as I am offended if a man gets into an elevator with me chewing gum. But he does me no physical damage and I simply grin and bear it until either I or he gets out of the elevator. It would be different if he physically attacked me.

                    Note the part I bolded. That's actually a perfect argument from Dawkins. If atheists often do things which they know will offend religious people, why then do they get to freak out when someone does something that offends them?

                2. Dweebston   12 years ago

                  Close enough. The stranger implied sexy fun times via his invitation to coffee in his hotel room, Ms. Watson penned a quick blurb advising men not to be creepy in approaching women, took some heat for reading patriarchy into an innocent exchange, and decided to take the offensive rather than issuing a mea culpa and putting the teapot tempest to bed. P.Z. Myers took up the banner and the thing degenerated into a bitchy freakshow.

            3. Ted S.   12 years ago

              "Elevatorgate"?

              I have no idea what the hell this refers to, and God do I hate the fucking -gate suffix.

              1. NeonCat   12 years ago

                IIRC, some dude asked a woman at some kind of a conference (atheist conf?) if she wanted to stop by his room for a drink and it freaked her the hell out.

              2. #HOLO YOLO   12 years ago

                If you're curious

                Though it seriously is the dumbest thing ever; don't waste your time.

                1. Irish   12 years ago

                  In June 2011, Watson described an experience at an atheist conference, concerning an approach by a man in an elevator, who invited her to his room for coffee and a conversation late at night, after she had talked extensively about disliking being "sexualized" at atheist conferences.[19] In a video blog, among other things, she stated that incident made her feel sexualized and uncomfortable and advised, "Guys, don't do that".[20] Her statement sparked a controversy among the skeptic community.[21] Her critics said she was overreacting to a trivial incident, most notably Richard Dawkins, who wrote a satirical letter to an imaginary Muslim woman undergoing female genital mutilation, sarcastically contrasting her plight to Watson's complaint. This in turn caused him to be criticized by many, including several figures in the community.[22][23] Watson announced that she would not buy or endorse Dawkins's books and lectures in the future.[22] She also wrote that, as a result of Dawkins's criticism, her Wikipedia article was vandalized and offensive images were posted on her Facebook page. [24]

                  So the takeaway from all this is that the 'skeptic' community mostly consists of people with the interpersonal skills of seven year olds but who call themselves skeptics as a form of mental masturbation.

                  1. #HOLO YOLO   12 years ago

                    I used to dabble in the "skeptic community" and the overarching problem seems to be ego.

                    Places like "Free Thought Blogs" are not so named because they value free speech -- many want to censor what they (and I, for that matter) see as ridiculous, dangerous quackery -- but rather, because they see themselves as having broken free from the grip of the evil korporashuns and organized religion.

                    That is, they are Enlightened.

                    1. Nikki makes the sign of a tsp   12 years ago

                      It's just basic scientism, really.

                    2. Irish   12 years ago

                      Again, mental masturbation. Most of those people aren't any more skeptical than any other reasonably intelligent person. They call themselves skeptics as a sort of religious rite in order to separate themselves from the heathen.

                      It's the same impulse that results in religious cults.

                  2. An0nB0t   12 years ago

                    Five minutes reading anything written by PZ Meyers is sufficient condition for that conclusion.

                    The man is one of the world's most massive and oblivious horse's asses.

              3. Killazontherun   12 years ago

                IOW, he didnt look like a twenty year old Brad Pitt. Did I freak out when my study partner, one of the ugliest girls at UNC that year, out of the blue, offered to give me a blow job ? No, I accepted the offer because it was the decent thing to do. Feminism is just an excuse to be an asshole.

                1. #HOLO YOLO   12 years ago

                  No, I accepted the offer because it was the decent thing to do.

                  You are truly a charitable soul.

            4. JW   12 years ago

              I stopped taking him seriously when it became apparent that he was a raving loon outside of his discipline.

          2. Brett L   12 years ago

            Radley Balko (possibly the sweetest, kindest, and humanitarian libertarians)

            The dude who kicked us in the nuts every Friday for years?

            1. NeonCat   12 years ago

              Kicked with LOVE, Brett, with LOVE.

            2. Brandon   12 years ago

              Shouldn't that be "Humanitarianest?"

      2. #HOLO YOLO   12 years ago

        While this isn't wrong, Balko is a really, really bad source for pretty much anything, because his dumbass economic ideology permeates everything he writes so badly that it skews his output even when he has got real numbers, which he often doesn't.

        Seriously? What a dick.

        1. Andrew S.   12 years ago

          I used to read Myers' blog a lot, but I haven't been there in at least 2 years. This is why.

          1. Nikki makes the sign of a tsp   12 years ago

            Seems funny how many folks here used to read Pharyngula. I finally left after enough threads about circumcision and mandatory vaccination. I just had no idea how statist the audience was, because the mindset was so foreign to me. And it seems to have just gotten worse since--or maybe I am more sensitive to it now--but it's one of the few places that if linked here I don't even want to hate-read it, because I actually find it upsetting.

            1. #HOLO YOLO   12 years ago

              I think it's the same dynamic you see in many communities, where as the derp gets louder more reasonable people leave -- and as more reasonable people leave, the derp gets louder.

              1. Nikki makes the sign of a tsp   12 years ago

                Yes, that's what it seems like.

                1. BiMonSciFiCon   12 years ago

                  I gave up on the SGU when they fell all over themselves to talk about how anyone who disagreed with the "consensus" on disastrous AGW was an idiot, and on Pharyngula around the time PZ started bitching about how the Minnesota football coach made more money than him.

                  The "skeptic" community should really be the "We're skeptics about YOUR religion, but don't even think about questioning our perfect perfect progressivism."

                  1. Gbob   12 years ago

                    Ditto. I finally took the step of deleting the podcast around the holidays. I still think Randi and crew do important work, but it allowed politics to creep in. The AGW aspect is especially galling. I don't think it's unreasonable to say that there are some aspects that require further study. Calling the other side "deniers" (or even implying that there are only two sides to the debate) is not advancing the cause of free thought. It's a shame. I'll miss the "science or fiction" segment.

                    1. BiMonSciFiCon   12 years ago

                      It's one thing to debate whether there's warming caused by human activity. I am not as convinced as I used to be, but I still think there's been some warming caused by humans.

                      It's another thing altogether to say it's necessarily bad, and that even if there are some bad aspects of it, it's not clear the bad outweigh the good (more arable land in Siberia or whatever).

                      It's an even further step to say the government programs to "control" warming or climate change or whatever it is these days will actually help and not cause serious harm.

                      But the SGU crew (I haven't listened in a couple years, they may have changed but I doubt it) believe the there's warming and accept on faith the next two logical steps. There's no skepticism, no understanding of economics. It was too frustrating.

        2. Irish   12 years ago

          It really shows you how religious modern progressives are. It's irrelevant what Balko is talking about, he disagrees with you about an unrelated topic and is therefore unreliable.

          If you have beliefs deemed heretical by a leftist, all your other beliefs are suddenly irrelevant.

        3. Killazontherun   12 years ago

          Meyers is a moral coward who can't take an honest, sober look at the ruin of lives and societies that socialism has created. Nor does he have the honesty nor decency to admit the only fallback position proglodytes have to avoid endorsing free market libertarianism as the only salvation from their total wreckage is Obama admistration level crony capitalism and the cultural stagnation that comes from reinforcing that sort of status quo.

      3. #HOLO YOLO   12 years ago

        I looked back on the post about the picture of West, Texas that "debunked" libertarianism and Rand Paul...

        ...oh my FSM, those people are idiots.

    2. Smilin' Joe Fission   12 years ago

      Well everyone stops drinking and starts smoking MJ and ordering a lot of pizza. He may actually have a point.

    3. John   12 years ago

      Preschool. Don't worry that every single study has concluded preschool has no measurable and lasting effects. There is nothing this liberal article of faith can't do.

  9. generic Brand   12 years ago

    GOVERNMENT IN ACTION!

    We had a guest speaker at work the company puts on about once a month. It was a representative from SunRail, central Florida's newest government boondoggle. Apparently all of Florida gets to fund this system that will have a $2 base rate plus $1 per rider per county line crossed for the first 7 years, after which it will be turned over to the county governments through which the line runs.

    I asked, "What happens in 7 years when the local governments take over and realize they can't keep the prices low while trying to remain revenue neutral?" His response was almost word for word "They don't have to be revenue neutral because it's a government service."

    And when the luncheon was over my coworker saw me filling out a comment card with a long paragraph about how train transit is a waste of taxpayer funds and I tried to explain to her that everyone is paying for this twice: they are subsidizing the day to day operations and they are paying the ticket price. And when the state money stops flowing in after 7 years, the local governments will end up pitting those who are now dedicated riders at the cheap rate against those who are occasional or never riders when the debate shifts to "Increased Rates vs. Increased Taxes". She said that she would happily pay higher taxes to avoid driving on I-4.

    tl;dr version: We're boned when only 1 person in a room of 50 looks at long term effects of a policy (and I was only there for the taco bar).

    1. generic Brand   12 years ago

      Limited in characters in the previous post, but here is the SunRail page

    2. Tim   12 years ago

      Not to mention 7 years of deferred maintenance.

    3. Brett L   12 years ago

      Shit. Didn't we vote it down as a constitutional amendment?

      1. generic Brand   12 years ago

        This is distinctly different from the super trail along the I-4 corridor that would have connected Tampa to Orlando, and eventually down to Miami. I know that because four people asked four different times that exact same question.

        1. Brett L   12 years ago

          I was under the impression that I was voting in favor of banning passenger rail in FL... Maybe I should start trying to get that on the ballot.

          1. generic Brand   12 years ago

            Perhaps this got grandfathered in. I'm not sure when the constitutional amendment was supposed to take effect, nor am I sure when these rail lines were purchased and construction started.

            1. Brett L   12 years ago

              I was being hyperbolous. I voted against all the passenger rail I could.

          2. Isaac Bartram   12 years ago

            That vote was against High Speed Rail.

        2. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

          Oh, I see. I voted against that one, right.

      2. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

        I distinctly remember voting against this and my side winning. How?

        1. Mickey Rat   12 years ago

          It is keep voting until they get the right answer then the matter is settled, failing that, do it anyway. See: European Union.

        2. Isaac Bartram   12 years ago

          That vote was against High Speed Rail. It was actually to get reid of the amendment that had been added before mandating the state to pay for HSR.

          Sunrail is local commuter rail. It uses diesel cars and is definitely not High Speed.

    4. $park?   12 years ago

      We're boned when only 1 person in a room of 50 looks at long term effects of a policy (and I was only there for the taco bar).

      You're such a rebel.

      Most people don't give a rat's ass because they know they're going to be taxed anyway and they don't know what their tax money goes to anyway.

  10. #HOLO YOLO   12 years ago

    You got the CBS twitter story but not the AP?

    Alas, it's in 24/7 though. There won't be a "H/T #HOLO YOLO". Some other time, I guess.

    1. Ted S.   12 years ago

      But nobody reads 24/7.

      1. #HOLO YOLO   12 years ago

        Has anybody else noticed that there are commenters that show up in 24/7 threads but not HyR?

        I'll get it out of the way:
        "No, because nobody reads 24/7"

        1. Irish   12 years ago

          That's fucking creepy. It's a like a shadow society beneath the real H&R.

        2. Nikki makes the sign of a tsp   12 years ago

          Commenters, or comments? The latter, yes, the former, no. I guess they are getting distribution to people who aren't familiar with our little cesspool.

          1. #HOLO YOLO   12 years ago

            The former.

            I think all the trolling and in-jokes can intimidate people. It took me a while lurking to really dive in.

            1. Irish   12 years ago

              There's a guy named 'Cryptarchy' who seriously needs to post here because of his awesome name. Cryptarchy, if you're out there, come out of the shadows.

              1. Nikki makes the sign of a tsp   12 years ago

                Why is this making me feel like we're the ones secretly in a comment ghetto?

                1. Archduke Pantsfan   12 years ago

                  We need to go there!

                2. #HOLO YOLO   12 years ago

                  I dunno how others have felt, but when I first started reading the comments here I actually sympathized with the "you know, for a site called reason [DRINK!], these comments sure are vile" folks.

                  It's pretty difficult at first trying to figure out all the memes and the "cast of characters". When you don't already know what a miserable fuck Tony is, the comments can seem pretty harsh.

                  And people calling people by old handles, by real first names instead of handles, etc. is also pretty confusing.

                  1. Irish   12 years ago

                    And people calling people by old handles, by real first names instead of handles, etc. is also pretty confusing.

                    Whatever, Thane.

                    1. #HOLO YOLO   12 years ago

                      Hey, I'm proud to be part of the problem.

                    2. Episiarch   12 years ago

                      We all are, Art.

                    3. #HOLO YOLO   12 years ago

                      Who's Art?

                    4. Episiarch   12 years ago

                      Weren't you "Art Vandelay" before being the Thane? Did I get confused?

                    5. Irish   12 years ago

                      Those are definitely two different people. Art still posts here periodically.

                    6. #HOLO YOLO   12 years ago

                      No, I wasn't. Though I definitely would have used that handle if it hadn't been taken.

                      I've probably gushed about Seinfeld on here a few times.

                    7. C. Anacreon   12 years ago

                      Normally Seinfeld doesn't make me laugh out loud, but it was on the other day and I heard a line that made me bust up. Kramer and Jerry were in the library and they found out they had to see a man named Mr. Bookman. Kramer said, "A guy works in the library and his name is Bookman? That's like an ice-cream man named Cohn."

                    8. #HOLO YOLO   12 years ago

                      I don't laugh as much now that I've seen every episode 2 - 6 times, but I still love it.

  11. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    Secretary of State John Kerry says that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu cannot confirm allegations made by Israel's military intelligence chief that Assad's regime had used chemical weapons.

    Not counting the cannisters labeled "Saddam's - hands off!"

  12. $park?   12 years ago

    How much freedom would you give parents in raising their own children?

    A couple serving probation for the 2009 death of their toddler after they turned to prayer instead of a doctor could face new charges now that another son has died.

    Herbert and Catherine Schaible belong to a fundamentalist Christian church that believes in faith healing. They lost their 8-month-old son, Brandon, last week after he suffered from diarrhea and breathing problems for at least a week, and stopped eating. Four years ago, another son died from bacterial pneumonia.

    1. Brett L   12 years ago

      Sounds like these people are in their own hell.

    2. db   12 years ago

      Tragic? Yes. My business? No.

    3. John   12 years ago

      That is a really hard question. These people are stupid to the point of being evil. I understand the slippery slope issue. But I think "you can raise your kid as you like as long as it doesn't put them in danger of losing life or limb" seems to be a rule we could probably enforce and not abuse. So I am going to say, fuck these people.

      1. generic Brand   12 years ago

        These people are stupid to the point of being evil.

        What does this even mean?

        1. John   12 years ago

          It means just what it says. I don't think they mean their children harm. But they are so ignorant and fanatical, that they might as well. Through their ignorance and stupidity, they have become morally equal to someone who murders their children.

        2. Sevo   12 years ago

          I'm with John on this one.
          There's harmlessly stupid; betting on the Cubs for the World Series, etc.
          Evil stupid means someone's injured or dies.

      2. Dweebston   12 years ago

        Stupid, yes, but almost certainly not evil. Criminally negligent twits whose children die from heat stroke after being locked in a baking sedan for three hours are closer to evil than someone with bizarre ideas about the magical healing properties of wishful thinking.

        I think these parents have fucked themselves well enough.

        1. John   12 years ago

          I think if you sit there and watch your kid die of diarrhea, you are evil. It never occurred to these people that maybe they should try something else? They were so fanatical about their religious views that they let their kid die rather than admit the possibility of being mistaken?

          It is not like they didn't know that medicine existed. That would be ignorance. They knew and chose not to use it because they were so fanatical in their beliefs. That is evil.

          1. $park?   12 years ago

            I think part of their faith is that if the kid dies then it was God's will. That certainly doesn't make them evil, does it?

            1. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

              I think part of their faith is that if the kid dies then it was God's will. That certainly doesn't make them evil, does it?

              From my point of view, as a fairly devout Buddhist, yes, it certainly does.

              1. $park?   12 years ago

                Is that a religious determination? In other words, are they evil because they don't follow your belief system?

              2. Nazdrakke   12 years ago

                "as a fairly devout Buddhist"

                It's the idle talk part that keeps kicking my ass.

            2. John   12 years ago

              Then maybe it is God's will that they go to jail?

            3. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

              Yes, yes it does.

        2. generic Brand   12 years ago

          Criminally negligent twits whose children die from heat stroke after being locked in a baking sedan for three hours are closer to evil than someone with bizarre ideas about the magical healing properties of wishful thinking.

          This was along my thoughts when I asked what you meant, John. Just because someone's thoughts are outside the norm doesn't mean that they are "evil", which is a much more objective term than "stupid". I wouldn't call someone who fed their kids a certain diet out of religious (or other) beliefs evil, even if they died, but I would call them stupid.

    4. Joe M   12 years ago

      I just want to know when this morons are going to question their faith already. Fuck.

      1. Joe M   12 years ago

        *ahem* these morons...

      2. John   12 years ago

        That is why they are evil. They are so vain that they would rather watch their kid die than admit they might be wrong.

        1. Joe M   12 years ago

          They probably think they're following Abraham's example.

        2. $park?   12 years ago

          Again, why would they admit they're wrong? They believe either God will keep the kid alive or not. If God doesn't keep the kid alive, the kid's death was part of God's plan. There's no vanity in that, it's basically pure faith.

          1. Francisco d Anconia   12 years ago

            If God doesn't keep the kid alive, the kid's death was part of God's plan. There's no vanity in that, it's basically pure faith.

            And since there is no god..

            Pure stupidity.

            1. $park?   12 years ago

              I agree with you, many people do not agree with us regarding the existence of a god.

          2. Joe M   12 years ago

            So probably the involuntary manslaughter/gross negligence type charges are the correct ones. But then you get into a weird place where you say, are they lying about their religious beliefs to cover up for some sick desire to kill their own children?

    5. Francisco d Anconia   12 years ago

      How much freedom would you give parents in raising their own children?

      As with all things. You may do as you wish, PROVIDED in doing so you do not infringe on the rights of others.

      Perfectly legitimate to intervene when the child's rights are jeopardized.

      1. $park?   12 years ago

        I'm take it you're ok with this as well?

        Prosecutors on Monday sought to have the couple jailed, but Lerner permitted them to remain free because their seven other children had been placed in foster care.

        The rest of their children were taken away because of their beliefs. Or would you be against that?

        1. Francisco d Anconia   12 years ago

          kinda depends. Were the children taken as punishment for killing the dead child or to protect the others in advance. Punishment is justified for allowing the death. Don't think you can preemptively say their beliefs will necessarily hurt the others.

      2. Mickey Rat   12 years ago

        Who's asking you to play God?

    6. Anonymous Coward   12 years ago

      As long as they don't kill, maim, or rape the little crumb-snatchers, I'm cool with whatever manner parents choose to fuck up their children in their formative years.

  13. Brett L   12 years ago

    Seriously, reason, how can you continue to take money from the t-shirt company with the obviously deranged knife-wielding model after Boston!!1!

    Also, why are so many of these t-shirt ad pics taken by people who obviously hate women. I could make that girl look waay better. And get the t-shirt in the picture still.)

    1. DJF   12 years ago

      What T shirt models, I am getting Christian singles ads. Where have I gone wrong?

      1. Brett L   12 years ago

        Don't worry. As I said, she was photographed by a misogynist, so she's merely cute when she has the potential to be bunk material.

      2. db   12 years ago

        I usually get the Christian singles ad with the decent-looking chick looking back over her shoulder at the camera with obvious lust. It's a weird world we inbabit.

        1. Brett L   12 years ago

          The first honest ad? Everyone knows that Christian singles are the "technical virginity" types.

          1. db   12 years ago

            Never met a girl who was "saving my ass for Jesus."

      3. #HOLO YOLO   12 years ago

        I always get ads for Chinese "dating".

        They have me figured out.

      4. robc   12 years ago

        There are ads on the internet? When did that start?

        1. #HOLO YOLO   12 years ago

          http://i.qkme.me/3u28lc.jpg

          Really, it gets old.

          1. robc   12 years ago

            Then stop whining about ads.

            There is an easy solution to it, so apply it instead of whining.

            1. Brett L   12 years ago

              I'm not complaining about the existence of the ads, just the terrible production quality.

            2. #HOLO YOLO   12 years ago

              Uh, who was whining?

            3. T   12 years ago

              Okay, get my IT department to give me admin rights to this POS laptop so I can install it. I'll wait.

              1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

                Can you just replace the hosts file?

                1. #HOLO YOLO   12 years ago

                  You are a lot more likely to be able to install browser extensions in a corporate environment than you are to have access to your hosts file.

                  1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

                    I vaguely remember booting in using a Linux LiveCD to drop a hosts file on a computer I didn't have admin access to, but it's been a while. I might be confusing two separate events.

                    1. #HOLO YOLO   12 years ago

                      Yeah, you can do that, though if they're on top of things they'll disable booting from external media and possibly run some kind of integrity check at every boot.

                    2. T   12 years ago

                      There's lots of technical tricks one could use, but the fallout if the IT department twigs can be unpleasant. I like having a paycheck.

    2. $park?   12 years ago

      Just have a bunch of hot naked chicks holding up t-shirts?

      1. Brett L   12 years ago

        Tastelessly arrayed so as not to cover up any of the good parts.

        1. Ted S.   12 years ago

          That depends on what you mean by "good parts". Some people have some odd fetishes regarding which parts of the body can be "good parts".

          1. Brett L   12 years ago

            No feet, tits, or asses will be covered. Butterfaces yes.

            1. Nikki makes the sign of a tsp   12 years ago

              Eww, Brett likes feet!

              1. #HOLO YOLO   12 years ago

                Ugh, I hate feet.

                1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

                  Meh, I'm kinda feet neutral. As long as nobody expects me to do any shrimping I don't have a problem with it.

                  1. #HOLO YOLO   12 years ago

                    "shrimping"

                    I learn a lot from you people.

                    ...none of it good.

              2. Brett L   12 years ago

                Eww, Brett likes feet

                Its not my fetish, but I understand that some would be upset (and others turned on) if I were to have models using their ape-toes to hold up the shirts.

            2. generic Brand   12 years ago

              What if they're cinnamon butterfaces? Mmmmmm... cinnabutter...

              1. Nikki makes the sign of a tsp   12 years ago

                Confession: I always forget what "butterface" really means, and think it refers to people with sort of squishy, sweaty features that look melty like butter (or like Odo or something). I mean until about 3 seconds later when I remember the right version.

                1. Irish   12 years ago

                  Confession: I always forget what "butterface" really means, and think it refers to people with sort of squishy, sweaty features that look melty like butter (or like Odo or something).

                  So Warty then? I mean, he isn't really sweaty since his bile ducts don't technically secrete sweat, but otherwise it applies.

                  1. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

                    So Warty then?

                    Ignoramus et ignorabimus.

            3. meta   12 years ago

              wait so no stockings?

    3. Ted S.   12 years ago

      I wouldn't know. I visit here with only cached images set to display, so I never see the ads.

  14. Archduke Pantsfan   12 years ago

    Teachers told they must not use red ink for marking homework in case it upsets pupils

    Yes, red is hard on my eyes.

    1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

      What, because it's blood-colored?

    2. db   12 years ago

      Teachers ought to just blast the tests with a shotgun. 00 Buck = F

    3. Doktor Kapitalism   12 years ago

      Well, when you work really hard on something and it comes back looking mutilated, it can be rather distressing.

      Not something regulation worthy, though. Just a good reason to vary your pen colors.

  15. Matrix   12 years ago

    Wait... since when do middle schools have proms?

    1. Nikki makes the sign of a tsp   12 years ago

      I'm glad I wasn't the only one wondering this.

    2. Restoras   12 years ago

      This was my thought as well. I wonder if it's a sop to the non-Jewish kids that can't/don't get to go to a string of bar/bat mitzvah's in 7th/8th grade?

    3. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

      They have everything now--proms, graduation, the whole thing.

      1. Restoras   12 years ago

        Best line from The Incredibles.

        It's not a graduation! He's moving from the 4th grade to the 5th grade!

        It's psychotic! They keep creating new ways to celebrate mediocrity!

        1. Matrix   12 years ago

          I hate all these stupid graduation things. I didn't even go to my college graduation ceremony. And the only reason I went to any of my work-related graduations was because they were mandatory.

        2. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

          That's such a great movie.

      2. Ted S.   12 years ago

        I had an elementary school "graduation" back in 1984.

        1. Red Rocks Rockin   12 years ago

          I had a kindergarten "graduation," but my kindergarten was at a Lutheran day-care, so they could get away with doing something relatively silly and harmless like a grad ceremony.

    4. Doktor Kapitalism   12 years ago

      We had a "Sixth-Grade Dance" before we moved on the Middle School. But really, it was a waste of time.

      1. Matrix   12 years ago

        Yeah, we had dances throughout elementary, junior high and high school, but they weren't very formal, like prom. Most of them took place during the school day. So, I don't get this at all.

        1. Doktor Kapitalism   12 years ago

          It's another attempt to children into thinking they're mature adults. Observe the consequences when you get into a debate with people in my age-group.

      2. Red Rocks Rockin   12 years ago

        We had after-school dances when I was in middle school, but they weren't especially popular. I think the school dropped it altogether during my 8th grade year because the teachers got tired of policing a bunch of hormone-addled 'tweens.

  16. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    Katherine Russell Tsarnaeva converted to Islam when she married Tamerlan...

    We better not find the couple was registered at Williams-Sonoma or that company is in big trouble.

    1. a better weapon   12 years ago

      "My goodness Katherine, what are we going to do with all these pressure cookers? We just can't return them all!"

      1. PapayaSF   12 years ago

        +1, but I think changing Katherine to Tamerlan would improve the joke.

        1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

          Nothing's ever good enough for you, is it?

          1. PapayaSF   12 years ago

            I'm a former editor with an interest in humor, so... rarely.

  17. Archduke Pantsfan   12 years ago

    Like a Boss

    Police say a man went into the Queens Quay LCBO, selected a rare 50-year-old Glenfiddich Single Malt scotch, and left without paying

    1. Paul.   12 years ago

      That man should run for office.

    2. Brett L   12 years ago

      Jesus Christ. They lock up the fucking Hendricks at my local liquor store.

    3. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

      You know what tastes better than 50-year-old Glenfiddich? Free 50-year-old Glenfiddich.

  18. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

    No alt-text for PM Links? This is a travesty. And it's a picture of 4 chicks in dresses? It would have been so easy: "I know the question you will all answer, and that is why there are no libertarian women."

    Also, after an unbelievable thread on the NFL Draft where libertymike claimed that enforcing contracts is socialist, I'm ducking out early to head to a (I assume since it's so old) privately funded ballpark, so I can get the game canceled on my way there.

    1. generic Brand   12 years ago

      Is it too early to say "Fuck Boston"?

      1. Ted S.   12 years ago

        It's never too early to say "Fuck Boston".

    2. Restoras   12 years ago

      Enjoy the game - maybe Aceves will charge the batters box.

  19. #HOLO YOLO   12 years ago

    Mike Tobin is a smooth operator.

    1. Irish   12 years ago

      Wow. The double stiff arm and then right back into the report.

      That's professionalism, people.

      1. #HOLO YOLO   12 years ago

        Dunno, it looks like he might've been able to cop a feel on their boobs.

    2. db   12 years ago

      Is that the guy who wrote Tobin's Spirit Guide?

  20. Paul.   12 years ago

    The man charged with sending ricin-laced letters to Obama has been released.

    Man, this has not been a good week for DemOp media conspiracy theorists.

  21. Zeb   12 years ago

    Katherine Russell Tsarnaeva converted to Islam when she married Tamerlan

    I wonder if she is going to un-convert now that he's dead and everyone hates him.

    1. Mike M.   12 years ago

      One would certainly hope that this dumb bitch would pull her head out of her fucking ass in light of recent events.

      The modern young American women of today really are a rather stupid lot.

      1. Nikki makes the sign of a tsp   12 years ago

        Yeah, because the young men involved in the situation look wicked smart.

        1. T   12 years ago

          And point to Nicole.

        2. Francisco d Anconia   12 years ago

          Wikkid smaught.

    2. PapayaSF   12 years ago

      I have a hard time seeing any Westerner who converted to Islam after 9/11 as anything other than a fool, a tool, or a future terrorist.

  22. Dweebston   12 years ago

    My Reason ads this week are all for various ethnicity/hobby-focused dating websites and online correspondence schools.

  23. rts   12 years ago

    B.C. students face tough summer job market

    No mention of the recent minimum wages hikes, of course.

    1. Ted S.   12 years ago

      What about AD students?

      1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

        It's an obscure Canadian province. Like Nunavut, which is actually not a province at all, but a radical splinter state that defies the Northwest Territories tyrannical rule.

        1. Dagny T.   12 years ago

          I've heard reports of that alleged territory, but I'm having none of it.

          1. Archduke Pantsfan   12 years ago

            I liked it better when it was Frobisher Bay

          2. db   12 years ago

            Goddammit I tried to post mine four times before you did but the skwerls ate them all.

          3. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

            Your anti-Inuit views are typical, Canadian scum. Nunavut is the largest of all Canadian territories and provinces and will, rest assured, dominate you all.

            Can you say miles and miles of Arctic Ocean beachfront? They must make billions in tourism.

            1. Ted S.   12 years ago

              Global warming will make them rich.

              1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                Some bald guy is buying up a lot of land on the coast up there. No idea why.

                1. Francisco d Anconia   12 years ago

                  This is a job for...

                  1. Mickey Rat   12 years ago

                    Of course, that violates his Solitude.

        2. db   12 years ago

          Provincial government? They're having Nunavut.

          1. Dagny T.   12 years ago

            The cut of your jib, good sir, I likes it.

            1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

              I managed a research project many years ago tracking certain on-line initiatives of the states and provinces. Nunavut was liberated during that time, so I had a staffer reach out to them for information. They sent us free Nunavut mousepads. Nobody else in all of North America sent us free anything. I think they were thrilled that we knew they existed.

              1. Dagny T.   12 years ago

                That is so cute. They probably printed your email to put on the town bulletin board. Legends are probably passed down to this day of the Special Time when actual USA Americans contacted them on matters most important and official.

                1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                  You think I got a statue?

                  1. Brett L   12 years ago

                    "No... this must be what going mad feels like. "

                  2. db   12 years ago

                    "The hero of Nunavut"

                    1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                      Exactly. I need to go on a road trip to find out.

                    2. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                      Well, here's a conundrum: I went to Google Maps to see how to drive to the capital of Nunavut, and here's what it said: "We could not calculate directions between Tampa, FL and Iqaluit, NU, Canada."

                      Dangit.

                    3. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                      Upon further reading, I've learned that "Iqaluit is located east of Nunavut's mainland and north of Quebec on Baffin Island, and is only accessible via aircraft, dogsled, snowmobile and some boats" and that "the furthest you can go on a road is Yellowknife in the North West Territories. There are NO public roads into Nunavut as of today. There is a private ice road out of Yellowknife the mining companies have built. But it's slippery, dangerous, and full of convoys of fully loaded equipment trucks racing at top speed. You DO NOT want to be on that road without taking ALL precautions!!"

            2. db   12 years ago

              I didn't have any say in whether my jib was to be cut!

              1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                I'm distressed that the only town on Earth that worships me like a god is so inaccessible.

                1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                  And, since it has no public roads, clearly Nunavut is a libertarian paradise.

                  1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                    It gets even worse--from Wikipedia: "Most vehicles in the territory are moved from community to community and in and out of the territory by large barges that move during the summer shipping season. Less commonly, vehicles may be flown in on a cargo plane. Car companies will usually fly vehicles in to test them in Arctic conditions."

                    1. Warty   12 years ago

                      HOLY FUCKING SHIT I LOVE THEIR ALPHABET

                    2. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                      I really like the random placement of the letters. Think they just make it up as they go?

                    3. Zakalwe   12 years ago

                      Are they really libertarian or are they just desperate for some global warming?

                    4. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                      No, they're libertarians all right--no roads. Really, I'm surprised Reason hasn't written an article on it.

                      You know, the Free Staters should go there.

      2. rts   12 years ago

        Plenty of jobs rebuilding the temple... you know, broken windows and whatnot.

    2. Archduke Pantsfan   12 years ago

      What's minimum wage in BC now?
      MB is going to $10.45 in Oct.

      1. rts   12 years ago

        $10.25 / hour, $9.00 / hour for liquor servers.

        1. Dagny T.   12 years ago

          Pure insanity. And you wonder why the Commercial Drive hippie class is permanently under-employed.

          Even Alberta's minimum wage ($9.75) is pretty stupid, which I must admit I wasn't expecting.

        2. Ted S.   12 years ago

          Does BC tax liquor servers on the expected value of tips?

    3. Brandon   12 years ago

      Interesting mix of cluelessness, illiteracy and pretentiousness in the comments:

      jdizzle
      2013/04/23
      at 11:19 AM ET
      I'm a student. also unemployed. I've put out resumes everywhere, in addition to being near graduated with relative experience! I feel like I have much more to offer than my ability to ensure the doneness of a medium rare steak, or the proper opening of nice bottles of chianti for those who are able to experience times of leisure, in which their employment provides. Time to put on my big-boy pants and walk in somewhere with one of my ideas, chin up, and not be afraid to be turned away - make a position for myself. In saying that, adulthood is kind of frightening.

  24. Archduke Pantsfan   12 years ago

    Hard work will kill you.

    1. Matrix   12 years ago

      and here they said sitting at a desk for 8 hours a day will do it.

      1. NeonCat   12 years ago

        "Living Will Kill You, new study suggests."

        1. Doktor Kapitalism   12 years ago

          In all seriousness, the majority of people survive their lives. How boring is that?

    2. NeonCat   12 years ago

      But I was told hard work never killed anybody! I never even retorted "Maybe, but I'm not taking any chances."

  25. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

    The man charged with sending ricin-laced letters to Obama has been released.

    LADIES AND GENTLEMEN! ELVIS HAS LEFT THE BUILDING!

  26. Ted S.   12 years ago

    Anybody want to talk about the Champions League? I won't say more in case anybody DVRed it and doesn't want the result spoiled. 🙂

    1. Archduke Pantsfan   12 years ago

      2 words: Thomas Muller.
      NO SPOILER

      1. Ted S.   12 years ago

        No bitings, either.

        1. Jerry on the boat   12 years ago

          But some player did get balled in the face.

  27. rts   12 years ago

    Animal-rights activists wreak havoc in Milan laboratory

    Activists occupied an animal facility at the University of Milan, Italy, at the weekend, releasing mice and rabbits and mixing up cage labels to confuse experimental protocols. Researchers at the university say that it will take years to recover their work.

    1. NeonCat   12 years ago

      Never watched 28 Days Later, I guess.

    2. Doktor Kapitalism   12 years ago

      Ecoactivists don't care about scientific or technological progress in the least.

      1. Killazontherun   12 years ago

        I'm told that only gun toting right wing rednecks are anti-science. Surely this must be a misunderstanding of sorts.

  28. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

    Apparently CNN is planning to continue their marketing strategy of tricking Comedy Central into giving them free advertising by airing more clips of CNN employees saying stupid things:

    http://www.politico.com/blogs/.....62439.html

    1. John   12 years ago

      Cuttler and Gingrich kind of look like each other.

    2. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

      Remember when CNN first got going, with the first Gulf War? I recall thinking they were truly hardcore back then. Alas, those days are gone.

      1. John   12 years ago

        They used to be great.

        1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

          Ted Turner may be insane, but he knew TV like nobody else. He leaves, and the shit falls apart.

          1. T   12 years ago

            Ted Turner may be insane

            There's doubt?

            1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

              I was being kind. After all, he did help get cable TV off the ground.

      2. Ted S.   12 years ago

        I think they really got going with the SF earthquake of 1989.

  29. Coeus   12 years ago

    Dude gets owned by game designer after complaining about his big breasted characters and is dumb enough to write another article about the pwnage.

    "It seems that Mr. Jason Schreier of Kotaku is pleased also with neither sorceress nor amazon," Kamitani wrote. "The art of the direction which he likes was prepared."

    The blurb was posted next to an illustration of three burly, bearded men embracing one another. The implication, as some have pointed out on message boards like NeoGAF, is that because I didn't like Kamitani's female characters, I must instead like an image of muscled men hugging. A gay joke, perhaps?

    "I like Kotaku," Kamitani added later in the Facebook thread. "I will be glad if Mr. Jason Schreier is made pleasant with a Dragon's Crown."

    1. Jordan   12 years ago

      Kotaku's constant drumbeat of "OMG TEH SEXISM" is absolutely awful.

      1. Jordan   12 years ago

        Oh, and that sorceress has amazing tits.

        1. C. Anacreon   12 years ago

          I dunno, seems like they'd kind of slosh around and get in the way a lot.....

    2. #HOLO YOLO   12 years ago

      No. I'm suggesting that labeling the heterosexual, cisgender male perspective's overt hyper-sexualization of the female gender as a "power fantasy" is inherently silly.

      Derp.

      1. Red Rocks Rockin   12 years ago

        Kamitani clearly doesn't know nerd sexual fetishes.

        Schreier's reaction indicates that he clearly would have preferred an anthropomorphic cat with huge tits and ass, or a 13-year-old Japanese schoolgirl character to fap to instead.

        1. #HOLO YOLO   12 years ago

          "or"? Why not both?

          1. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

            A 13-year-old anthropomorphic Japanese schoolcat-girl with huge tits and ass?

            I like the cut of your jib, mister!

            1. #HOLO YOLO   12 years ago

              Just for the record, I may like Asian chicks (with small boobs and butts, to boot), but I am not one of those people.

              1. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

                Stop othering Stormy.

              2. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

                I may like Asian chicks (with small boobs and butts, to boot), but I am not one of those people.

                How about completely legal Asian women who have a lung disorder which gives them the voice of a 5-year-old girl, talking about how much she likes masturbation?

                1. #HOLO YOLO   12 years ago

                  what the fucking fuck?

                  1. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

                    My work here is done.

                2. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

                  Not gonna click it. Wouldn't be prudent.

      2. Mickey Rat   12 years ago

        Or the comments:

        "Being beautiful as a woman has nothing to do with appealing to horny men, and vice versa."

        Not the only thing, but nothing. Really?

    3. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

      If the dwarves are gonna be bald, they need to keep their helmets on the whole time.

    4. Anonymous Coward   12 years ago

      hopefully we'll be able to chat about Dragon's Crown, which, incidentally, I had the chance to play last December, and I enjoyed, character design aside. Hopefully he'll clarify his response.

      I think I can summarize his response:

      Go buy a ladder, find a fence, GET THE FUCK OVER IT.

  30. a better weapon   12 years ago

    CNN has an interesting idea for a crossfire reboot.

    Stephanie Cutter will have her lunch eaten every day.

    1. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

      Literally. You know that fat bastard is the kinda guy that steals from the breakroom refrigerator.

    2. C. Anacreon   12 years ago

      Well, in the original "Crossfire," the pre-crazy Pat Buchanan used to mop the floor with Michael Kinsley, so at least it would be consistent.

      1. Mickey Rat   12 years ago

        The original Crossfire lefty was the older looking than dirt Tom Braden.

  31. Nikki makes the sign of a tsp   12 years ago

    He may be Canadian, but this astronaut made an awesome video.

    1. Brett L   12 years ago

      That fucking mustache gets to go to the space station, despite being Canadian, and I'm stuck here on Earth. Fuck you, universe.

    2. Dweebston   12 years ago

      I caught this a few days ago. Could not take my eyes of the mic. Then I remembered what I do for a living relative to what this guy does, and my eyeballs imitated a wrung sponge.

  32. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

    And briefly believing Joe Biden might be in charge of the country, all hell broke loose:

    http://finance.yahoo.com/news/.....29454.html

    1. Matrix   12 years ago

      That, truly, is a horrifying idea.

    2. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

      What difference would it make if it were him or Obama? Both are idiots from where I'm sitting.

      1. Matrix   12 years ago

        Biden is a barely functional retard. Obama just can't admit that he's wrong and prefers to doubledown. He has an ego problem.

        1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

          Define "functional."

          1. Matrix   12 years ago

            I might have been generous

        2. generic Brand   12 years ago

          Obama just can't admit that he's wrong and prefers to doubledown. He has an ego problem.

          John is Barack Obama?

          (I kid, I kid!)

  33. itsnotmeitsyou   12 years ago

    fighting against a ban on strapless dresses ahead of prom.

    Today's kink discussion... Shoulders... mmmmmmmm

    1. Rich   12 years ago

      She considers them too distracting for boys.

      Why? Do they have crossed rifles embroidered on them?

    2. Alack   12 years ago

      I read that as "fighting against a ban on strap-on-less dresses". Which was frightening for many reasons.

    3. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

      Huh, that one doesn't seem to be taking off itsnotmeitsyou. I can't imagine why.

  34. mr simple   12 years ago

    Futurama canceled. Again.

    I think it might be a mercy killing at this point.

    1. Episiarch   12 years ago

      The new stuff was fucking terrible. They shouldn't have brought it back at all if they weren't going to do it right. I fear the same for Arrested Development.

      1. Archduke Pantsfan   12 years ago

        Don't say things like that. It will be fine!

      2. Nikki makes the sign of a tsp   12 years ago

        DON'T EVEN FUCKING SAY IT

        1. Episiarch   12 years ago

          Look, sometimes you have to prepare for the worst eventuality, like when considering whether to go see the new Indiana Jones movie, or for a remake of The Wicker Man, or when reading past the first Robert Jordan WoT book. Or when having sex with NutraSweet. (lots and lots of crying is involved, and a lot of mucous)

          1. Brett L   12 years ago

            The "new" Indiana Jones movie is almost 20 years old and featured Sean Connery. What was so bad about that?

            1. Archduke Pantsfan   12 years ago

              I see what you did there.

            2. Episiarch   12 years ago

              Going into denial helps no one, Brett. Sometimes monsters really are birthed into the world.

              1. T   12 years ago

                Better to light a flamethrower than curse the darkness, Epi.

              2. Brett L   12 years ago

                Going into denial helps no one, Brett.

                3 Star Wars
                3 Indiana Jones
                2 Godfathers

                This is known.

                1. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

                  ONE HIGHLANDER

                  1. Nikki makes the sign of a tsp   12 years ago

                    Well of course. There can be only one.

                    1. Joe M   12 years ago

                      I always thought it was weird how they numbered the Star Trek movies, personally.

          2. Nikki makes the sign of a tsp   12 years ago

            (lots and lots of crying is involved, and a lot of mucous)

            That sounds not unlike Arrested Development.

            1. Archduke Pantsfan   12 years ago

              double negative.

        2. Jordan   12 years ago

          I hate to tell you this, but the new Arrested Development is going to be garbage. I'm calling it now.

          1. Nikki makes the sign of a tsp   12 years ago

            I've never cared for Jordan.

            1. Irish   12 years ago

              Jordan and Epi are both terrible dream crushers, Nicole.

              Terrible dream crushers.

              1. Nikki makes the sign of a tsp   12 years ago

                Dream-grabber characters, Irish, they're dream-grabber characters.

              2. Jordan   12 years ago

                Jordan and Epi are both terrible dream crushers, Nicole.

                Well duh. I'm a libertarian after all.

            2. generic Brand   12 years ago

              You've never even met my sister.

          2. Episiarch   12 years ago

            I agree, but saying so will get about 50 people here trying to kill me, so let's just wait and see.

            1. Irish   12 years ago

              I'm already outside your house with a hockey mask and a chainsaw.

              You're dead either way, so you might as well tell us how you really feel.

              1. Episiarch   12 years ago

                It's a good thing I'm at work then.

                I would say that I think chances are high that it's "meh"; it'll have a few witty moments but will lack the spark it had before. I doubt it will be "terrible" (when I said the new Futurama was terrible, I meant in comparison to the original; by itself it's mostly "meh" with some funny bits thrown in).

                The thing is, the original of both shows can't be recreated. It was a certain group of writers and actors at a certain time who came together and made something great. How can you possibly get that exact synergy back? Even if you could get the exact writing team, they're years older and they've changed.

                It's basically impossible in my opinion.

      3. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

        I don't think the new episodes are any worse than the old episode. Some are great ("Lethal Inspection", "Prisoner of Benda", "The Late Philip J. Fry"). The same is true about the original run, except that a decade later we only remember the great episodes and not the crap ones.

        1. Acosmist   12 years ago

          What's to remember? They're re-run constantly. We can SEE that the old ones were better.

          1. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

            There are plenty of episodes from the original run ("Put your head on my shoulders", "The route of all evil", "The 30% iron chef", etc.) that are just as bad as anything from the current run.

            1. Episiarch   12 years ago

              What?!? "30% Iron Chef" is great!

              Elzar: [Bender asks for cooking lessons] Absolutely not.

              Bender: But I watch your show! You owe me!

              Elzar: I owe you nothing! For starters your antenna's in my crotch. Also I hate you. And finally, you can't cook for squat.

              Bender: [stands up] What was the first one again?

              Elzar: I hate you.

              Bender: I thought that was number two!

              Elzar: I knocked it up a notch! Bam!

              1. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

                Yeah, because the whole "Hey look, we have a cartoon version of Emeril Lagrasse" joke hadn't been done to death in the 10 episodes he'd already appeared in by then, let's base an entire episode around it. Because really, "I knocked it up a notch! Bam!" and the equally beat to death Bender-can't-cook joke are plenty to hold up 20 minutes of one of the most cliche plots ever.

            2. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

              Oh, also "That's Lobstertainment!" and "A Leela of Her Own", which were so bad my brain apparently wiped out the memories of them.

              1. Irish   12 years ago

                Regardless, the worst episodes of Futurama are far better than the worst episodes of latter-day Simpson's.

                On that we can all agree.

                1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

                  You're just saying that because our resident contrarian is in self-imposed exile.

              2. Episiarch   12 years ago

                Dude, you must be my arch-nemesis because "That's Lobstertainment" is my favorite episode. The more Calculon the better.

                "Everyone walked out. They hated it. I've seen plagues that had better opening nights than this."

                1. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

                  The fact you can pull one or two funny lines out of a terrible episode doesn't change the fact the episode as a whole was terrible.

                2. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

                  And I like Calculon too. Part of the reason I hate "That's Lobstertainment" is that it derails the Calculon character. Part of what makes Calculon so funny is that he acts like he's still his soap opera character in "real life". In that Lobstertainment, he suddenly starts acting like a normal person offstage who only hams it up on set.

      4. Irish   12 years ago

        You're a monster, Epi. There's no excuse for claiming Arrested Development won't be awesome.

      5. db   12 years ago

        I will see you dragged through the dust of Sudden Valley behind Gob's Segway for this heresy.

    2. Andrew S.   12 years ago

      I thought Season 7 was better than Seasons 5 or 6 were. I dunno. It's not as good as the original series, but I want this one to live forever.

    3. Mickey Rat   12 years ago

      "And the series finale, which features a wedding between Fry and Leela, is "a tasteful, emotional gorefest," he raves."

      Great, another Red Wedding this year.

  35. Archduke Pantsfan   12 years ago

    Giant fish caught.

    1. Jordan   12 years ago

      I actually saw a stingray that was close to that size swimming around on one of my SCUBA dives last summer. Pretty damn impressive. He even had an entourage of other fish (they would scoop up the little fish that he disturbed as he swam around).

      1. Trespassers W   12 years ago

        Did you know "scuba" was originally an acronym?

        APPARENTLY YOU DO.

        1. Dweebston   12 years ago

          There's a word for words like scuba: anacronym

          1. db   12 years ago

            "Say 'SCUBA.' It sounds funny. SCUBA."

            "'SCUBA.' Yeah, it does."

            1. Dweebston   12 years ago

              I am thrilled they're finally debuting season 5. You have no idea.

  36. Archduke Pantsfan   12 years ago

    Add instant power to your life.

    and send one to Piers Morgan

  37. Archduke Pantsfan   12 years ago

    Tamerlan took an interest in Infowars, a conspiracy theory website.

    1. #HOLO YOLO   12 years ago

      SF'd. And hilarious.

    2. db   12 years ago

      If that isn't evidence of a government conspiracy to discredit Infowars I don't know what is.

      /tinfoil

  38. Coeus   12 years ago

    Jezebel has a new hero.

    And his chick is definitely what I picture when I read their bullshit.

    Here's a video where she loses an argument with a damn evangelist. Honestly, how much do you have to suck in order to lose an argument with an evangelist?

    1. #HOLO YOLO   12 years ago

      Holy shit, they're actually embracing her? I literally got a headache listening to her.

      1. Matrix   12 years ago

        You must not be aware of the level of stupidity of the Jezzies.

      2. Irish   12 years ago

        Watch that second video. I'm like 3 minutes in, and I am laughing my ass off. The evangelist is clearly just trolling her, and she can't do anything about it but loudly bitch.

        It's like an hour long, so there's no way I'm watching the whole thing, but God she is insufferable.

        1. #HOLO YOLO   12 years ago

          DO YOU NEED A WHAMBULANCE TO GO WITH YOUR TONE POLICE?!

          lmfao, they really are just walking sets of talking points.

          1. Irish   12 years ago

            That's the part that set me off laughing. Who in the world talks like that in real life?

            1. #HOLO YOLO   12 years ago

              What I love about accusations of using tone argument are often themselves examples of derailment.

              1. Irish   12 years ago

                Not only that, but tone arguments are often valid and aren't actually fallacies.

                If we're arguing about tax law, and you just start screaming at me so that I can't get a word in, it's perfectly valid for me to point out that you're drowning out my argument by screaming at me.

                In this case, the preacher is being totally rational and calm, and the girl responds by screaming mindlessly and insulting him. Calling her out on tone is acceptable.

          2. #HOLO YOLO   12 years ago

            I like the slip a bit before minute 5, telling the black dude "You don't wanna see no KKK dudes sittin' there."

            1. #HOLO YOLO   12 years ago

              I'm not judging other people's morals. I'm not judging people's lives.

              She really said that. Oh god.

    2. Nikki makes the sign of a tsp   12 years ago

      Ugh, but how much do you have to suck to respond to this BS with something other than death and rape threats? That shit is not helping anyone. And it's actually vile. Ugh.

      1. Nikki makes the sign of a tsp   12 years ago

        sorry, "to *not* respond"

        1. Coeus   12 years ago

          That's 4chan for ya. They respond with rape and death threats when a guy delivers pizza.

          1. Nikki makes the sign of a tsp   12 years ago

            I know, and I only care at all because it means Jez doesn't have to respond to any real criticism of anything they do or say, because they can just yell RAPE at every turn.

            1. Coeus   12 years ago

              because they can just yell RAPE at every turn.

              But they do that anyway. One of my favorite things about the articles I bring by is how they manage to link rape to anything they don't like. A-N-Y-T-H-I-N-G. I saw one linking leaving the toilet seat up to rape.

              1. Nikki makes the sign of a tsp   12 years ago

                Yeah, but let's make them link leaving the toilet seat up to rape, because that will make them look like fucking idiots. Linking rape threats to rape is not hard.

                1. SugarFree   12 years ago

                  If only it were possible to rape rape, so the rape finally learns the lesson rape should have learned long ago.

            2. JW   12 years ago

              When everything is rape-y, nothing is rape-y.

      2. #HOLO YOLO   12 years ago

        I really wish people would cut it out with rape and death threats against anyone, but especially with these professional victims.

        1. Nikki makes the sign of a tsp   12 years ago

          Exactly.

        2. T   12 years ago

          Is DIAF considered a death threat? Because I might have a "No Soliciting - FOADIAF" sign on my front door...

        3. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

          If the special snowflakes of the world can't deal with the karmic justice of "a sane and just world," they should be stripped naked and then lead out into the streets where a large angry mob will throw rancid shit and piss at them. The mob will also humiliate them with cruel and vile words concerning their appearance and lack of morality. Then a group of young children will be given large wooden staves and be encouraged to beat them to the encouragement of the mob. As they fall to the ground, no longer being able to stand as their tissues swell, in turn, the nozzle of a firehose will be shoved up their rectums and the high pressure water will blast into their intestines. The pressure generated will cause an extreme anal prolapse, disemboweling them. Their last moments on Earth shall be ones of pain, fear, and abject debasement, as they lie in the gutter, slowly dying in agony, as the mob abuses the corpses of their friends.

          1. Dweebston   12 years ago

            Trigger warning, dude!

    3. Coeus   12 years ago

      Saw this in the comments on Jezebel:

      Besides, are you really going to defend a crowd of stupid fucks who say, ON VIDEO, that consent can be retracted "after the fact", that sex you end up regretting is actually rape? Really? You've sunk that low? Because the feminist fools in the video actually say that. Watch it again.

      Did anyone catch that on the video? I would definitely not be surprised.

      1. Fool   12 years ago

        It kind of comes out in pieces around the 7 minute mark.

    4. Red Rocks Rockin   12 years ago

      LOL--she looks like the spawn of the Underminer from the Incredibles.

  39. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

    BHANGRA TUESDAY!

  40. Archduke Pantsfan   12 years ago

    This is a thing? The MILF diet

    1. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

      The author of said tome.

      I'll let you make your own judgements.

      1. Anonymous Coward   12 years ago

        7/10.

        6/10 if she talks a lot.

        1. PapayaSF   12 years ago

          If all she eats is macrobiotic food, and in real life she looks more like this picture, 5/10.

          1. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

            5????

            You are too generous.

            1. Irish   12 years ago

              Picture HM posted: 7.

              Picture Papaya posted: 4.

              I hope she looks more like HM's and less like Papaya's.

            2. PapayaSF   12 years ago

              My scale is corrected for age.

    2. Ted S.   12 years ago

      Can you survive eating only MILFs?

    3. Brett L   12 years ago

      Honestly, I thought this was going to be a diet used by Moro Separatists to wage their 125 years of war against the US and their running dog Filipino sympathizers.

    4. Zombie Jimbo   12 years ago

      Can I have two, if they are small?

  41. Archduke Pantsfan   12 years ago

    CNN is doing one thing right.

    1. Irish   12 years ago

      That show sounds pretty awesome, even though I haven't seen it.

      If they could mix in Erin Burnett showing a little bit of leg, I'd be all over that show. It would be a ratings bonanza.

    2. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

      Meh, Bourdain is too much of an iconoclast for my tastes (in the sense that he seems to dislike popular things solely because they're popular).

      1. #HOLO YOLO   12 years ago

        Over the course of an hour or so:

        Friend: Are you theist or atheist?
        Me: Agnostic.
        Friend: Do you use Windows or Mac?
        Me: Linux.
        Friend: Are you liberal or conservative?
        Me: Libertarian.
        Friend: Ugh, you really are one of those people, aren't you?

        1. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

          There's a distinction between liking things that happen to be unpopular, and liking things specifically because they're unpopular and that therefore you are cooler than everyone else for liking them.

          1. #HOLO YOLO   12 years ago

            Oh I know. It was just a funny situation.

          2. Irish   12 years ago

            Stormy's got it exactly right.

            Also, what the hell kind of a friend do you have that jams questions about your religion and questions about your political beliefs into a conversation like that?

            That friend sounds like kind of an asshole.

            1. #HOLO YOLO   12 years ago

              The conversation didn't actually go that way -- all three of those subjects came up, and then on the last one (whatever it is), he said something like: "So, to recap, you're a Linux-using agnostic libertarian? Sheesh, you really are one of those people"

              It wasn't that unusual, either, because though we don't hang out much anymore, when we did most of our conversations were about politics, economics, or philosophy.

              Plus he meant it as a joke.

          3. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

            I take it you're not a fan of hipsters then Stormy?

            1. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

              No, I don't like hipsters. Although I also don't like people who spend all their time talking about how much they hate hipsters either, as being explicitly anti-hipster has almost become a form of meta-hipsterism.

              1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

                Mind. Blown.

              2. Coeus   12 years ago

                as being explicitly anti-hipster has almost become a form of meta-hipsterism.

                So even though your beliefs are anti-hipster, you're against anti-hipsterism because it's popular?

                1. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

                  Note the key phrase: "people who spend all their time talking about how much they hate hipsters". I don't understand People who get obssessed with something they claim to hate and spend all their time on it. I get not liking hipsters. I don't get setting up a website about it so you can make not liking hipsters a core part of your identity.

                  1. Coeus   12 years ago

                    I saw it. I was just going for the easy dig (very busy at work today). Mea culpa.

  42. GILMORE   12 years ago

    Harvard to Shut Research Center Warned on Monkey Deaths

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/.....eaths.html

    I didn't even RTFA. All I needed was "Government threats over monkey deaths..." FTW

    Also interesting = "Terrorist in UK Tries to Raise Money for Terror Plot by Trading Currency; Sucks So Bad at it, Goes Broke"

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/.....-plot.html

    1. Dweebston   12 years ago

      Markets solve everything!

  43. a better weapon   12 years ago

    Headline: House GOP Concludes Hillary blew Benghazi Response

    In other news, I asked my barber if I needed a haircut and he said "Yes."

    http://www.washingtontimes.com.....-response/

    1. Dweebston   12 years ago

      Any chance "WATPDIM?" will catch on?

      And does this feel about six months late to anyone else?

    2. C. Anacreon   12 years ago

      Headline: House GOP Concludes Hillary blew Benghazi Response

      I think had Hillary blown other things in the past there might not have been the impeachment.

  44. Comment Handle   12 years ago

    The tone of that "strapless dresses" link is disgustingly feminist. Supposedly the rule violates the fourteenth amendment. These people really believe that shit.

  45. WomSom   12 years ago

    So, who comes up with all that stuff?

    http://www.Dodge-CISPA.tk

  46. An0nB0t   12 years ago

    http://shropshiresheep.org/FarmedAndDangerous
    http://www.trentonian.ca/2012/.....eep-farmer

    The Anonbot Agrarian Rage Meter is now sitting at 11. Say "regulations protect the innocent" one more time, motherfucker.

  47. Rhinonamous   12 years ago

    Ok, which one of you is trolling Time?

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Trump's Tariffs and Immigration Policies Could Make Housing Even More Expensive

M. Nolan Gray | From the July 2025 issue

Photo: Dire Wolf De-extinction

Ronald Bailey | From the July 2025 issue

How Making GLP-1s Available Over the Counter Can Unlock Their Full Potential

Jeffrey A. Singer | From the June 2025 issue

Bob Menendez Does Not Deserve a Pardon

Billy Binion | 5.30.2025 5:25 PM

12-Year-Old Tennessee Boy Arrested for Instagram Post Says He Was Trying To Warn Students of a School Shooting

Autumn Billings | 5.30.2025 5:12 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!