Judge Napolitano on Drones, Guns, and Obama

Defense Images Flickr

As if to antagonize further those who believe the Constitution means what it says, writes Judge Andrew Napolitano, the same president who says he can't reveal the legal basis for his targeted killing program wants to take away your right to self-defense against a killer, and he wants to prevent you from having the means with which to shoot at a tyrant should such a monster take over the government.

Comments

[WomSom]

Sounds liek a serious plan to me dude.

http://www.SurfitAnon.tk

[Palin's Buttplug]

wants to take away your right to self-defense against a killer

THAR COMIN' FOR YER GUNS!

[wareagle]

some people thought it was okay when govt came down on tobacco years ago, laughing at anyone who suggested that sodas, sugar, snacks, etc would be next. Not so funny any more.

[Francisco d Anconia]

Yep, dipshit, you are CERTAINLY a libertarian. After all, you scored 90 something on a libertarian test.

PROGFAG!

[AlmightyJB]

But he can be trusted and we can't. That's the difference.

[Ted S.]

Is there supposed to be a link in that blurb?

[Rich]

THAR TERK IT AWAY!

[Mensan]

I was wondering about that as well.

[John Galt]

And here, also.

[Mensan]

... he wants to prevent you from having the means with which to shoot at a tyrant should such a monster take over the government.

That's not new; the secret service already won't let anybody have a gun anywhere near Obama.

[Rich]

So, the Secret Service is using clubs or Tasers these days?

[Mensan]

Swords and slingshots.

[db]

I would have thought Judge Napolitano would have written more than a single introductory paragraph on this subject.

[Matrix]

and you would have thought wrong!

[John Galt]

Likewise.

[John Galt]

Where's the rest of the article? The Judge usually has much more than a single paragraph to share.

[Bardas Phocas]

Austerity is hitting everyone these days.

[Mensan]

If whoever wrote this blurb doesn't want to give the link to the article, I guess I'll do it.

read the article here

[Rich]

"The government derives its powers from the consent of the governed. Do you know anyone who consented to this? If you do, they consented for themselves."

Now, Judge, you know better than that. The folks who implemented this were elected fair and square.

[John Galt]

You must have had your coffee already. Thanks.

[heller]

Off topic: MATT DAMON stars in class warfare commie bullshit sci-fi movie, Elysium. It's like the liberal version of Atlas Shrugged, except with production values!

[Sam Grove]

Matt Damon would likely be living on that "man made-space station".

Think they'll ever find a non man-made space station?

[mrvco]

They left off the "FWAAAP...." and "THUMP".

[Suthenboy]

"...wants to take away your right to self-defense against a killer, and he wants to prevent you from having the means with which to shoot at a tyrant should such a monster take over the government."

Call me crazy, but I would posit that anyone who wants to disarm you, to deny you your right to self defense, is just such a monster.

[heller]

You're crazy!

[Ted S.]

I'm proud to be crazy right alongside him.

OK, at a suitable distance (several hundred miles) from him, but similarly crazy in sympathy.

[Tim]

Why is anybody surprised when men in power oppose policies and people who act as checks on power. In the United States the entirety of the People are a check on power and the meat of that is the gun.

[Tim]

I understand why it shocks people, it is a RADICAL idea. RADICAL.

[IamNotEvil]

You should be careful or you could be next on the block.

http://whotv.com/2013/04/10/te.....n-ordered/

Apparently the main charge is disturbing the police state. Facts and/or opinions should be keep to yourself.