Life Is Not Fair
The otherwise unbuttressed complaint "It's not fair!" is a frequent lament. Not nearly as common is the response: "So what?" The moral virtue of fairness often dominates discussions on economics, morality, and how the two realms meet. With Against Fairness (University of Chicago), philosopher Stephen Asma rejects the idea that fairness is morally central and defends the moral theory of favoritism.
Asma refreshingly outlines the moral virtues that come with favoritism: loyalty, generosity, and gratitude. While it might strike some as cruel or outdated to accept that we tend to care more about those close to us, Asma shows that this outlook is actually conducive to the moral virtues that utilitarians struggle to justify. —Matthew Feeney
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"... defends the moral theory of favoritism".
Crony capitalism, anyone? Sounds like the perfect scenario for testing this.
to us, Asma shows that this outlook is actually conducive
outlines the moral virtues that come with favoritism: loyalty