Cyber-Crime Bill Threatens Online Activism
Shades of Aaron Swartz!
The House Judiciary Committee this week circulated a bill intended to revamp the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), but Internet activists who hoped the revamp would help avoid a situation like the one that befell Aaron Swartz are not exactly pleased.
Among other things, the draft bill adds computer fraud to the definition of racketeering and increases the penalty for stealing trade secrets from 15 to 20 years. It also specifies that a "critical infrastructure computer" is one that manages or controls systems or assets vital to national defense, national security, national economic security, public health or safety - like the water supply, telecom systems, or the electrical power grid.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I can't imagine anyone thinks that's unintended...