What the Academy Awards, Oscar Pistorius, and Public Libraries Have in Common
The new national neurosis is cultural hoarding.

Does it surprise anyone in a nation that has turned hoarding into a hit cable TV franchise that we've got trouble letting go of things that have clearly outlived whatever usefulness they might once have possessed?
The Academy Awards, the conflation of celebrities with role models, and public libraries: All are worthy of the sort of unsentimental, unflinching cost-benefit analyses we typically direct only at our least-favorite relatives, co-workers, and politicians.
Week after week, A&E's Hoarders showcases folks who are holding on to every litterbox their cat or child ever soiled and every Ronco pasta maker or sandwich press they ever purchased. What Faulkner said about the American South's uniquely regional inability to move into the future – "The past is never dead. It's not even past" – is now officially a national neurosis.
You need look no further than this Sunday's marquee television event to grok this more fully than the title character in Faulkner's "A Rose for Emily," who spent years sleeping next to her lover's corpse rather than sign up for Match.com. ABC's "Live Oscar Sunday" begins at 7p.m. Eastern time and, if past performance is any indication of future results, the 85th Academy Awards ceremony will last longer, have less plot, and deliver fewer laughs than the director's cut of John Carter of Mars.
Last year, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts finally located the cryogenic tube housing Billy Crystal and thawed out the well-preseved former host just in time to see a modest uptick in viewership. This year, the Academy is banking on Seth MacFarlane, the very funny and irreverent auteur behind the TV shows Family Guy and the movie Ted (which starred a stuffed animal fond of smoking pot and casual sex). In a commerical announcing his hosting duties, MacFarlane tells kids to ask their parents what the Oscars are and tells parents to ask their kids who the hell he is.

That doesn't bode well for the Academy Awards, which has recently expanded the number of films considered for best picture and other honors in a bid to maintain relevance in a mediaverse in which individuals thankfully have ever more power to choose what they watch, where they watch it, and how they value it.
Which brings us to a very different sort of Oscar, one who symbolizes a long-cherished ideal that deserves to be tossed out along with the Academy Awards: the bizarre notion that public figures should be role models. During the last Summer Olympics (another spectacle whose best days seem firmly in the past), the legless sprinter Oscar Pistorius was held up as an inspiration to us all because he overcame his disability en route to finishing last in a 400-meter semifinal at the London Games.

Now that he's being investigated by police in his native South Africa for killing his girlfriend, observers seem open to rethinking the easy equation of athletic prowess, political success, or general media visibility with anything resembling moral virtue (the recent confessions/convictions by/of folks as varied as Lance Armstrong and Jesse Jackson, Jr. are contributing factors as well). Which means that such people are only about 20 years behind college dropout and former basketball great Charles Barkley, who declared in a 1993 Nike ad, "I am not a role model," after spitting on a girl, cursing at fans, and elbowing a hapless and half-starved Angolan opponent during a 68-point blowout.
Chances are that you heard about Pistorius's arrest while surfing online at work, fishing a newspaper out of the garbage at a Starbucks, or watching ESPN at the gym. Just about the last place you would have caught wind of the news is a public library, whose primary patrons these days seem to be the employees who work there, homeless people looking for a crash pad, and porn watchers whose home internet connections have been choked off by concerned family members.
Popular children's book author Terry Deary – he writes the Horrible Histories series, which chart just how awful the old days really were – has come under fire for calling libraries "no longer relevant." Citing declines in use and shrinking availability of tax dollars, Deary told the (U.K.) Guardian that it was time to revisit the idea that the public has a right "read books for free, at the expense of authors, publishers and…tax payers." Libraries, he notes, were created at a time when books were expensive, schooling wasn't universal, and the term "British queen" referred only to royalty. Further proof that Deary is right that times have changed since the 19th century? Virtually none of his hate mail is being delivered by traditional postmen.
This much seems certain come Sunday evening: Your local library will be closed, Oscar Pistorius will be pronouncing his innocence, and the Academy Awards will run overtime.
How best to pass the time if you choose to turn away from the dreary past and embrace the meh present? Hoarders is, alas, currently on hiatus, yet A&E's website invites us to watch not just whole episodes but, god help us all, deleted scenes from past seasons.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Interesting. Put Seth MacFarlane in a monkey suit and he becomes even more of a generic douchebag.
+1 manatee
my classmate's mother makes $65 every hour on the computer. She has been fired for seven months but last month her pay was $20843 just working on the computer for a few hours. Read more on this site... http://www.Snag4.com
Is she single?
YOur classmate's mother sucks my dick, that's the real way she makes that $65 an hour, your classmate was just embarrased to tell you.
I hadn't actually thought about public libraries as irrelevant - I think you're right, Nick. Thanks for destroying ANOTHER cherised part of my past, you bastard!
*runs away crying...stops...faces audience....*
ACTING! Thank you! Thank you! Thank you!
The library was just a short walk down the street from the pub with the best teriyaki glazed wings and draft beer in town. There were times I'd meet a nice girl at one, and spring for an evening at the other. A pretty nice set up.
How much does an evening at the library cost?
If the ladies didn't insist on drinking at the water fountains, pretty much just gas money, and a life time percentage on my property and income taxes to maintain it.
I spent a LOT of time at the public library as a teenager, and as an adult I used to love going to Chicago's main public library (Harold Washington), but haven't been in a while. It's just so much easier, and quite inexpensive, to order a used book off half.com or Amazon Marketplace. A week or two wait for half.com or Marketplace, two days sometimes with Amazon Prime, and several seconds with Kindle.
The library might have it for free, yes, but that's if it's available, if it's indeed shelved where it's supposed to be, and then I only get it for a few weeks. And I have to either pay for parking, or kill time on the CTA.
There's something to be said for just browsing, but I hardly ever do that at the library anymore anyway.
Meanwhile, my daughter has a library at school.
Yeah, it's increasingly irrelevant.
I used to go there in law school. Big-ass library, that's for sure. I bought crates of books during a book sale there, too. This while I was pretty broke.
That said, I actually don't agree. I still use the library quite a bit (and, yes, standard libertarian disclaimer applies--privatize it all!!!). In fact, I think I use it as much as ever, despite everything I have access to today, including my Kindle.
Actually, I've gotten far more use out of public libraries in the last four years than I did in the entire first few decades of my life. Having an hour commute has led me to check out a ton of audio books, which combined would've cost me hundreds or thousands of dollars, even used. I'm possibly getting close to breaking even on property taxes.
A couple of months ago, I went to the LA County Central Library to look at a book that currently sells for @ $500 on Amazon. I never got to read the book, though. The book, and those near it on the shelf were smeared with fecal matter. Never going to the library again.
PS Family Guy sucks donkey balls, and Ted was one of the stupidest, not-funny movies I've seen in a...ever.
Therefore, Seth McFuckhead is the new "formerly Mr. Katy Perry" Russell Fuckhead, who is equally loathsome and detestable.
All the more reason not to watch! As if I needed any more reasons...
Family Guy is very funny and American Dad is even funnier.
If you don't laugh at either, you have no sense of humor.
Yeah, that's it.
It is.
If you didn't laugh when Peter fled his prostate exam and later claimed to have been raped, you have no soul.
Peter vs the chicken is the funniest thing on TV.
I'm a "Peter hurt his shin" man, myself.
Sideshow Bob vs the rakes was funnier.
I didn't see that, and therefore have no cause to laugh at it.
Now, every episode of Beavis and Butthead or South Park EVER? THAT'S funny.
Oh, plus when that figure skating team from I think Germany dumped the girl face first on the ice at the winter Olympics - comedy GOLD.
I honestly don't understand how South Park keeps belting it out there year after year.
They're coming up on 20 years now.
The Simpsons started mailing it in after what, ten years?
The writers.
Here's an interesting question, has the Simpsons been bad for longer than it was good? Definite possibility.
Eh, I'd split the difference between you guys. Family Guy and American Dad are watchable, but there are much better shows out there (Archer, Always Sunny, South Park, Metalocalypse)
Archer has been weaker this season, IMO.
Last night's did have some good moments though.
I like Family Guy, at times.
But Ive never seen a funny episode of American Dad.
Family Guy WAS* very funny and American Dad is STILL KINDA* funnier.
If you DIDN'T* laugh at either, you have no sense of humour.
FIFY
I like Family Guy. But I have to admit that pretty much everything people who hate it say about it is true.
Family guy used to be funny. They started going downhill fast around 2007. Now I don't even watch it because the new episodes aren't that funny and the old episodes I've seen way too many times. Interestingly enough, the show's decline came almost immediately after the South Park that beautifully ripped on Family Guy's lack of creativity and their becoming a mouth piece for the Democratic Party. I'd like to think these two things contributed heavily to the show's jumping of the shark.
Cleveland Show is a spin off? I just watched an episode where the mom passed away and at the eulogy they said she was a "five time Libertarian candidate for mayor."
In what fuckin' way is South Park the mouth piece for the Democratic Party.. they have.. and always will be.. a major libertarian voice on TV. They criticized Food-Fascists in their Medicinal Fried Marijuana episode, they made a case for the free market in their MargaritaVille episode, the TSA episode was definitely a criticism of the fact that it is STILL an issue... They aren't as politically charged anymore, but if you listen to their episodic commentaries and interviews.. they are libertarian as fuck, understanding this they don't like to refer to themselves as such.
Ohh shit.. sorry, i realized you said that they were ripping ON family guy for it's leftist formula, not ripping OFF... soz bro. my bad
Family Guy was pretty funny in the first few years and found it interesting South Park attacked it because it's pretty much how I came to view Family Guy.
My personal favorites list includes:
1) The Simpsons (first, what, 8 years? Don't watch it now. I want to remember Homer's 'Magical animal' line forever.
2) South Park. I know a lot of people hate it but they go after all the moonbattery we see in contemporary life - with total aggression. Tim-meh!
3) King of the Hill has to be one of the more under rated shows.
Call me a geezer but I still consider all those Merrie Melody cartoons, Loony Tunes, and The Flintstones to be pure timeless works of arts.
Family Guy used to be must see for a couple of seasons but that was it. Peter and Brian are great characters though.
Almanian! is correct. And henceforth I will always refer to McFarland as Seth McFuckhead (which is better than he deserves).
Did you see his "interview" on Larry King? Everyone who is not a liberal statist is a fascist, racist insect, according to Seth McFuckhead (I never get tired of saying that name!)
Seth MacFarlane must give the best head in Hollywood.
I'm betting on Jimmy Fallon. How else does he get work?
Not good enough to get an Emmy apparently.
It could be worse. Russell Brand. Dane Cook. Lena Dunham.
Lena "Dyson" Dunham has that honor, I believe.
I thought she won the Hollywook Pie eating Contest
"rethinking the easy equation of athletic prowess, political success, or general media visibility with anything resembling moral virtue".
It's puzzling to me how hated someone who openly touts their virtue like Tim Tebow becomes by the media and how ready they are to strike them down, but they are eager to appear to build up someone as virtuous who has no interest in becoming a model of virtuousness.
The only thing people like to do more than create heroes is tear them down.
But, but, the Oscars still matter!
Oh, it's this week? Just learned who the host is from this thread.
Who?
You know, that guy with the nickname 'bud'. Who use to be the Secretary of the Navy, or something like that.
I'm trying to remember the last time the Academy got it (mostly) right. Would it have been the sweep of the top five awards by The Silence of the Lambs at the 64th Academy Awards?
Titanic at the 70th
As much as I hate it, Titanic did deserve most of its awards. But L.A. Confidential was the superior film.
Titanic is one of the biggest disasters ever committed to film. Fantastic sets and subject matter that is truly tragic and stranger than fiction. Yet they had to green light a script that involved pretty boys having a gun fight as the ship goes down, because the viewing public just can't handle a straight-up telling of the Titanic story.
It also included Kate Winslet's boobs, which for the 11 year old me was good enough.
Whippersnapper. GET OFF MY LAWN.
^THIS.^ Those were the first big screen boobs I ever saw, and they were fantastic.
That was about the only good part of the movie, as far as I could tell.
And how the hell did everyone get so young all of a sudden?
If it makes you feel any older, I've been reading/posting under different aliases for over 10 years now.
Sorry 8 years.
I stand by my previous suggestion that they wait 25 years before awarding the Oscars.
This years possible best picture nominees (from 1988):
Rain Man
Die Hard
Who Framed Roger Rabbit
Coming to America
Big
The Naked Gun
Beetlejuice
Working Girl
Mississippi Burning
Dangerous Liaisons
The Accidental Tourist
Im going with Mississippi Burning for the best picture over Rain Man, who won it.
How did Working Girl get nominated over Die Hard or Roger Rabbit?
Cronenberg's Dead Ringers shoulda won in '88
Sounds good on paper, but you realize Star Wars would have won an Oscar during the year Attack of the Clones came out.
The 1988 list blows the hell out of recent nominees.
Does anyone actually watch the Oscars other than the audience sitting inside the auditorium?
I doubt they even watch. They all stare at the back of Scarlett Johanssen's dress willing the clasps to fail.
Shit son, I'd watch it for that if I thought my telekinetic powers would work through the TV set.
There are a few people who do.
Mostly those who have the TV set to turn on automatically for Monday Night Football and can't find the remote to change the channel.
It's a decent excuse to convince other people to bring snack foods over to your house, drink, talk over the television and then complain that they got it all wrong. That being said, I can't remember the last Oscars I actually watched.
The Tony Awards are the true cosmotarian Superbowl.
Surprising fact: 95% of cosmotarians don't live in urban areas, but rather the wasteland that is SIV's imagination.
It's not a complete wasteland in there. Parts of it have shag carpet.
With knotty pine paneling and black lights.
Go on...
Curtis Mayfield's Superfly is playing on the quadraphonic hi-fi. Cone-shaped incense smolders in a small brass statue of Buddha.
Cone shaped boobs inside vintage bras...
My imagination isn't that old.
NSFW Linda Blair
How about Linda Blair getting curious in prison.
Go ahead, play it at work. It's friday, fuck it.
Miss Blair rejects Sybil Danning. Now that is just gay.
Just let her give you the damn titty rub, Jesus. It'll make your time go much faster...
I've always hated this carpet. Stained and frayed in such distinctive ways. But very definitely made of wool. Right now... I'm lying on polyester. Which means, I'm not lying on my carpet in my apartment. You have lived up to your reputation, Mr. SIV. I'm still dreaming.
What about the T O N Y Awards?
That's a contest that everyone loses.
Gay men using it to organize a party so they can get laid.
I think that this is the second time this week I've seen Gillespie use the word 'grok'. I understand that reading Heinlein is considered some rite if passage shared by many around here. But whenever I see that word, the image that comes to mind is a couple of D&D nerds snorting over some inside joke.
I know right? People who drape themselves in inside literary references are the absolute worst.
You're just pissy because Reardon isn't towing the lion.
Wait. Is that some inside joke I'm not privy to?
This sort of thing never happened when Virginia Steigerwald was the Reason editor.
Don't you mean Virginia Steigerwald Lobster Dondero?
God - that was a Golden Age, wasn't it?
*drinks, and drinks, and drinks*
Yes, the Commentariat used to gambol for hours and hours.
They talked high-brow philosophical libertarianism then, none of this Captain Kirk shit that goes around now is the bollocks.
Blue or Party?
Blue's all for liberty, but Party is more fun.
I see what you did there.
I'm glad someone finally did.
It's even worse when they can't spell them.
Yeah, everybody knows it's spelled grek.
Except for the word "blurn" that was complete gibberish.
Ha. I never claimed to be a good typist or proofreader. I am embarrass.
The word came into common usage in the late 60's and early 70's. Nick might not even be aware of the origin beyond his slightly older boomer uncle who used it a lot and who also taught him how to roll a joint. BTW, you should get better mental imagery. See how awesome mine is? That could be you someday if you put your mind to it.
No one uses that term except the people on this forum.
Outside of the novel, it's the only place I've seen or heard it.
I just googled 'grok'. Not a single entry can be found from this site in the first ten pages. So, does that make you a liar, or just uninformed about what other people are doing on this planet?
You have me figured out. I am quite uninformed about what other people are doing on this planet. Tell me, is 'grok' a commonly used word among the people with whom you converse?
Just old hippies and magazine editors, and middle aged programmers. Seriously, I could be wrong, but I don't think Nick is a Heinlein fan. He likely got it from the hippies.
And, I was calling B.P. a liar. He sounded certain the word is only used here.
Yes, I conducted a thorough analysis of the use of the term in everyday life, found it to be a very commonly used term, and then turned around and told you otherwise. I am a liar.
You're the lyingest whore who ever talked her way out of a speeding ticket, B.P. You never had any intentions of going on a date with that nice cop.
I would tend to say, "to drink this more fully," instead, just to confuse even more people.
But in a way that kind of counts.
It is actually moderately common in the IT world.
Not something you'd hear every day but not uncommon either.
At one time I visited groklaw on a near daily basis.
It seems that I have struck a nerve.
Nope. I'm too sexy to fit your stereotyping. I just hate banality.
That the point I was making.
That I'm sexy? Thanks, I find you quite dashing too!
No. But send me a photo of yourself holding a copy of Stranger in a Strange Land and I'll let you know.
Unless I can find the large sized reissue from the eighties, I have absolutely nothing in my wardrobe to match it. Would you settle for The Number of the Beast? I have a grey leather jacket with brown trimming that would complement it without going too monotone pretty well.
Who said anything about clothing?
Usually I would be game, but I woke up this morning recalling the dream I just had where Amy Sedaris gives my mom a lap dance. Clothes are staying firmly on for the next few days.
Consult you doctor for erections lasting longer than 4 hours.
When people asked me what their dreams meant, I'd tell them they don't mean anything. You have a sentient entity in your head that just likes to fuck with you. I guess mine is just saying hello.
Most people who use it, use it inappropriately.
In Martian, it means to drink.
So to grok something is to understand it at a level where it becomes part of you.
..... I never read Starship tropper.... i... watched the movies..sorry.. i have failed you reason. Also, fuck heinlein, Phillip K. Dick was a better science fiction writer..
Some of his ideas were very original, and I do like him, but most of his literature is practically incomprehensible. It's like reading something someone wrote from inside an opium hallucination or acid trip.
Heinlein ranks with Clarke and Bradbury as being one of the giants of sci-fi, people who actually appeal to those not of the sci-fi bent. Dick has never been one of those guys, though his movies have broad popular appeal (especially when they have almost nothing to do with the source material, like Blade Runner).
I really have to wonder if you've really committed to read Heilein as "grok" was never used in Starship Troopers. Like your criticism of Rand, I strongly suspect you are basing your opinions of his writing based on shit you heard from somebody else (likely a leftist).
What Faulkner said about the American South's uniquely regional inability to move into the future ?
You know who else has a uniquely regional inability to move into the future?
The American northeast?
You know what's as annoying and silly as constant stereotyping of the south? Constant stereotyping of the North East.
The kulaks?
You know it's funny, my mother being of eastern Eurpean breeding, I know a little something of the Kulaks. Fun fact: Do a google image search of 'kulaks' and one is presented with unmistakable impression that it's a culture that's suffered... a lot.
And don't forget that 's', or else you'll come away thinking that Kulaks are people with some weird ear fetish...
Faulkner said that?...Pfft. Cosmotarian.
Do any black people read Faulkner and does that make him racist?
Jim Tressel?
+nice
I actually had to google it. Nice one. Would have been better had I been more up to speed on Tressel.
I should have added, "and saying so makes you racist?"
Africa
Libraries are no longer relevant because the *American* people no longer enjoy reading.
Detroit?
Damnit, so many correct answers that never crossed my mind. I love this game!
Penguins?
Just that fucking pussy Sidney Crosby
Blah, blah. I used to hear that about Gretzky all the time. That he was a pussy and all that crap.
Crosby and Gretzky are master hockey players. End of story.
The players that put an end to careers are the ones that can shove it.
Don't let's make this personal, $parky.
Shouldn't you be providing stuff for Radar?
This year, the Academy is banking on Seth MacFarlane, the very unfunny and irrelevant poseur
FIFY.
Man praising Seth MacFarlane and bashing John Carter of Mars. Such an iconoclast is Nick.
John Carter was actually pretty good.
Well it was a bomb and was unfortunate in that its source material was ripped off hundreds of times in the last century so it deserves snark from Nick.
Yes it was.
It's actually made $282,778,100 since last summer (according to boxofficemojo), but the reason it is considered a "bomb" is because it cost more than that to make it.
Read the book. You can pick it up at the library. 😉
Well I can get Princess of Mars off of Gutenberg.
As a person who works in a library...I can tell you, that book reading is down, but internet usage is WAY up. Now whether you believe we should be providing internet for free....well...eh.
Libraries should provide internet for free so they can use the high # of card holders (who need a card to use free internet) as proof that they need multimillion dollar taxpayer funded expansions. At least that's the strategy for every library in the cities I've lived.
Maybe, but as to Nick's other assertion that kids get their learning in school books. That's only if they're in a district with school books. Many of the students here don't return the books, thus they don't give them out. They make photo copies of the books for the kids to use for their homework. And all of the school libraries are closed in schools.
You don't have to have a library card to use the computers where I work.
The best part of the Oscars is the following week's Fashion Police episode.
Which I watch.
Fashion Police is awesome, except for when Joan said Michelle Obama was the best dressed woman of the week.
Not sure what the point of this article is except to reveal that Nick is a hipster douchebag who mindlessly worships modern technology as if it means the US is heading to some libertarian breakthrough.
I'm sorry but... libertarianism is pretty hipster now, go read some Vice magazine and you'll see.. but it's kind of a good thing, it means it's about to become super-duper popular and all the hipsters will become.. fuck i dunno Integralists or some shit.
No, it's more like the writers (and editor) of Vice are hipsters who happen to be libertarian.
They are very small portion of the actual libertarian movement, and libertarians are an even smaller part of hipster culture.
I don't see why MacFarlane being the host is such a mystery to you people.
The Oscars clearly wanted someone who can:
1. Tell jokes
2. Sing.
It's that simple, really.
They're jealous of the work Doogie Howser does for the Tonys, where he puts on a fucking clinic of how to host an awards show. In a pathetic attempt to duplicate that, they went out and got someone who could sing.
If they weren't afraid of Amy Ryan getting nominated in any particular year, they probably would get her to co-host.
Pretty sure it's a much more simple case of trying to appeal to TEH YUTE.
MacFarlane can definitely sing. He'd have a much more rewarding career singing pop standards or even satirical pop standards.
And anybody can tell jokes. But most people (including MacFarlane) can't tell funny ones.
You're saying McFarlane needs better writers?
There's news.
Those manatees can only push so many balls.
"Professional athletes" are simply entertainers, no more no less. They are not nor have ever been role models for anyone with an IQ over 3. Who cares about them any more than about Michael Jackson or Lady Gaga?
The guy with a g-note on the line for a big point spread.
Public libraries serve a continuing useful purpose for many communities. Where else can you have free access to Internet, job resources, books in several formats, videos, DVDs, music, lectures, children's programs, etc?
Whatever your personal opinion of libraries, to say they serve no practical function to anyone else is to admit you are an egocentric jerk who believes the world revolves around him and only things that are relevant to YOU are relevant PERIOD.
http://www.geekthelibrary.org/
For the record, I agree with the rest of this piece and some of the commenters. Seth MacFarlane is a talentless douche who is absolute proof that the Devil exists and still makes deals for people's souls; the Oscars are nothing more than a Hollywood butt-kissing party; and Hoarders is an interesting (if depressing) show.
Where else can you have free access to Internet, job resources, books in several formats, videos, DVDs, music, lectures, children's programs, etc?
TANSTAAFL(ibrary).
Eh, most libraries aren't that expensive. In our small, rural community, the library gets less tax money than the cemetery does and still somehow manages to actually provide services for living, breathing taxpayers. My own personal property taxes just to support the library are *much less* than what I pay to have DSL in my home, so for most families here, it's sensible to pay the taxes for the library rather than having home DSL, even if the only thing the library offered was Internet service. I don't know about the library budgets in y'all's urban environments, but for small town people, it's usually a pretty good bargain, no matter how much libertarians think we should just give up on pooling resources and instead send all our monies to Jeff Bezos.
What load of shit.
We aren't opposed to "pooling resources," we're opposed to people being forced to pool resources with the threat of violence. And how nice it is for you that you get to make other people pay for your reading proclivities.
Of the real purpose the Oscars exist was because of labor problems in 1920s and 1930s Hollywood.
It's funny how politicians want us to be moved by Hollywood endorsements, and many are, given that Hollywood seems to be shot full of addicts, child abusers, killers, rapists, and candidates for anger management. What do Whitney Houston, Chris Brown, Alec Baldwin, Michael Jackson, etc etc have to commend them?
I fucking hope Chris Brown endorses Biden in 2016.. I FUCKING HOPE...
before I looked at the paycheck ov $9684, I be certain that my father in law woz actualy making money part time from there pretty old laptop.. there moms best frend haz done this for under twenty one months and recently paid for the depts on there place and got a new McLaren F1. read more at, WOW92.COM
Kickoff to you with the online store 2013
whose primary patrons these days seem to be the employees who work there, homeless people looking for a crash pad, and porn watchers whose home internet connections have been choked off by concerned family members.http://www.flickr.com/photos/92553764@N05/
Things have changed dramatically and drastically for Oscar Pistorius since the trial date has been rescheduled to August 19th, the date of what would have been Reeva Steenkamp's 30th birthday. On the 22nd of July, he will enter a parlous and perilous numerological cycle, which will continue through to the 22nd of November, 2013. The trial date falls within that time frame, and this does not bode at all well for Oscar. If you would like to read my updated ebook, (which also includes my unique findings hidden within Reeva's paintings which eerily forecast not only the tragedy but the calendar date and geographical location of it as well) "Oscar Pistorius Reeva Steenkamp A Double Tragedy", please either go to Lulu and type in my name, Pamela Lillian Valemont or follow this link: http://www.lulu.com/shop/pamel.....90838.html Also available in hard or soft cover. Thank you.
I have just edited my book Oscar Pistorius Reeva Steenkamp A Double Tragedy, to include a numerological analysis of Judge Masipa and Barry Roux as they relate to Oscar Pistorius. I have been unable to obtain birth details for Gerrie Nel so far. Working with what I have, it would appear that there is a correlative "full house" you might say, numerologically speaking, operating for the defence team, and the prosecution would have to come up with a "royal flush" to beat it.
Pistorius ebook
http://www.lulu.com/shop/pamel.....07089.html
Pistorius paperback
http://www.lulu.com/shop/pamel.....07237.html