What Pope Benedict Did for the Catholic Church
The Petrine ministry is more than work.


When Jesus established the papacy, the gospels report that he told St. Peter: "Amen I say to you: You are Peter, and upon this Rock I will build my Church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it." These words are emblazoned in Latin across the front of St. Peter's Basilica. St. Peter's successors have incorporated his name to describe their work, the Petrine ministry, and refer to themselves as Papa Petrus.
But the Petrine ministry is more than work. And being Papa Petrus is not a job; it is a calling in which a man has been chosen by the direct descendants of the 12 apostles as agents of God to be the Vicar of Christ on Earth. One becomes the pope not as one becomes the president, but as one becomes a Catholic priest or the father of a child. The papacy, like ordination and fatherhood, is a life-changing and irreversible imprint—and hence, my sadness at the abdication of Benedict XVI. It shook my soul to the core.
The present pope is cognizant of the burdens of office and the needs of his enormous flock. The present pope is also a brilliant theologian whose pre-papal and papal published works have instructed the faithful and others in a manner and with a level of confidence and erudition that surpass his modern predecessors. Surely, no modern pope, not even the rock star who preceded him, who opened the eyes of millions to the Catholic Church's salvific mission, has written as many books, monographs and essays with the level of timeliness, encyclopedic knowledge, clarity and authority as Benedict.
When Benedict was elected to the papacy in 2005, I wept with joy that such a faithful custodian of the Church's teachings and traditions and such a worthy bridge to Christ in heaven had been chosen by the cardinals. But it was not always so. Like many of us, the youthful Benedict evolved with the passage of the generations. Fifty years ago, as a young priest and scholar, he preferred wearing civilian clothes in public to a Roman collar—truly a statement in the mid-1960s—and he relished his role as an adviser to the less orthodox members of the Catholic hierarchy at Vatican II. He has said recently that at that time he was filled with hope, enthusiasm and good will.
But his papacy has been spent attempting to return to the level of Catholic orthodoxy that the somewhat misguided and largely misunderstood teachings of Vatican II have been used to assault. At some point in his career, the future pope recognized that Vatican II made the Church worse, not better, and that the Catholic teachings, traditions and liturgy that the world believed Vatican II had watered down needed to be restored. He knew that his public mission was to reverse the trivialization of the liturgy, the lax clerical discipline, and the weakened sacramental safeguards from which the Church has been suffering since Vatican II. And he knew that Vatican II divided, rather than united, Christendom.
The Holy Spirit must have recognized all of this, as well, as He sent us Pope John Paul II, the rock star, to blaze a path where no pope had gone before—touching millions of youths with language they understood—and then He sent us Pope Benedict XVI, the lion of orthodoxy, to lay down the intellectual mechanisms for travels along that path. The path is the bridge to heaven. The way to travel upon it is personal sanctity. The first traveler is the Holy Father.
But some, like Benedict, are called to more than just personal sanctity. Benedict was called to carry a cross of personal sacrifice, as well. That cross consists of the weight of the world and the power with which to endure that weight. Jesus Himself carried that weight and possessed that power. Surely, as the Son of God, He could have stopped His executioners with the tiniest exercise of His divine will, but He freely chose not to exercise that will, no matter His personal gain. In a similar way, Benedict has freely chosen to surrender his power and forgo his temporal glory so one stronger than he can exercise it, no matter his personal loss.
The essence of Jesus' suffering was His decision to eschew the exercise of power and submit to His Father's will. The greatest restraint in human history was His conscious decision to permit His own crucifixion, knowing as He did that it would involve the termination of His temporal ministry, extreme human torment and certain human death. Even as His human body was suffering egregiously and as He was approaching the hour of death, Our Lord proclaimed that He would have preferred to live. Yet He submitted to the will—the plan—of His Father. This most unique act in human history represented both the affirmation of an informed conscience and the free submission to divine will.
When Benedict decided that the mystical body of Christ needed another bridge to heaven, he, too, gave up power and glory that he, too, could easily have exercised and retained. He, too, searched his conscience in a supreme effort to elevate submission to divine will above personal preference.
This is the essence of Benedict's gift to us: He used his very existence on Earth near the end of his days to teach others to reach and correspond to a personal relationship with God, driven by conscience and consistent with Church teachings, via the sacraments and personal sacrifice, no matter what the world thought.
Such a quiet, personal, Christ-like submission of the will is not the essence of a rock star; it is the essence of a Rock. Human salvation has been advanced immeasurably because the Church had both popes at its helm—each to complement the other in ways we could not have imagined.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
You know who else was in the Hitler Youth?
Junior Schmidt?
Better.
Henry Gibson?
I hate Illinois Nazis.
Speaking of Henry Gibson, I found his last film to be pretty funny.
George Soros?
Me in a previous life?
Isn't this publication famous for its use of evidence and logic in coming up with solutions for problems? This article draws on neither of those and is almost an affront to reason/Reason. C'mon guys you can do better than this. Also, I bet all those kids abused by this Pope's ministry are pretty pissed about what this guy did for the Catholic Church.
This article draws on neither of those and is almost an affront to reason/Reason.
Holy shit, don't you know how early it is? DRINK!
Yeah, seriously. I'm sure Ratz is/was a pious guy, but he still represents what many religious and nonreligious find utterly offensive. Perhaps the Judge meant to submit this article to FoxNews instead.
It's a column, by someone who is a Catholic and is not directly employed by reason. Get over it.
Shorter atiwari3: "OH NOES!!! AN ARTICLE ABOUT TEH EVUL RELIGIONZEZ!!!! I HATES THEM, FILTHY LITTLE BELIEVERS!!!! *HSSSSS*"
If it bothers you that much, why did you read the fucking article? I'm not a Catholic, but I really don't care if The Judge wants to write a column about the pope, or if reason decides to publish it on its website.
Screw the kids! (Copyright 33AD-2013AD, Catholic Church)
Judge, do you think Pope Benedict's abdication eliminates his eligibility for canonization as the Patron Saint of Child Molestation? If so, I suppose Catholics can continue to pray to St. John Paul II, the Patron Saint of Buggery Concealment.
Junior Schmidt?
Damn, wrong button,
Judge Napolitano on Pope Benedict
Worst slashfic idea ever.
Well thanks for putting that image in my head.
I knew an old german who claimed to be in the HY with Ratzinger. He had nothing good to say about the guy.
I should clarify.
I am an athiest, but I respect the Judge and his faith and have no intention of denigrating it.
I would like to point out more clearly that those who reach the pinnacles of power are of the same breed. Ladder climbers. The politics of the church are no different than national politics. Same shit, different bag.
Why don't you want to denigrate his faith? He has no problem with denigrating your beliefs and viewing you as a second class human.
You got that from this article? Did I miss the small print?
Why do you respect his belief in an invisible Sky Fairy who hates foreskins?
You are a bit lax with what you grant respect to.
I think Sky Fairy changed his view on foreskins after he had kids.
"such a worthy bridge to Christ in heaven had been chosen by the cardinals"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C.....buse_cases
http://www.slate.com/articles/.....verup.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hEn0px0uJZQ
Well, obviously God wants priests to molest kids. Who are you to question God?
Sorry, why is this in Reason?
Because DA JUDGE! Other than that, I got nothin'.
Just be glad he didn't tell us how we're all a bunch of baby killers and start another abortion debate.
That's what I say about every Shikha Dalmia post.
+10 million immigrants
That's what I say about every Judge post.
'Published more books than the previous Pope'?
Citation needed.
"brilliant theologian"... And I'm a master of Grimm's Fairy Tales. Meh.
"brilliant astrologer"
The Catholic Church is intrinsically opposed to liberty, and this pope has been hostile to individualism, liberty, and religious freedom. His bad moral choices have caused enormous human suffering. This man, his church, and his choices deserve our condemnation and reprobation.
I was reading J.S Mill's "On Liberty" the other day. He specifically calls out the Catholic Church and talks about how its teachings can never be compatible with a respect for individual rights. Just found that interesting in light of your comment.
I was reading js mill's 'on non-intervention' the other day. Dude is a utilitarian asshole.
JOOO....err...CATHOLICSSSSS!
No kidding, I'm waiting for someone to post links to stories of how the Catholics use the blood of children to make communion wafers.
No, the blood is in their ritual cannibalism rite.
I have no doubt Pope Benedict is as intelligent, well-read, and cultured as this article suggests. But his economic ideas and his views on capitalism usually sound like they were taken from the lecture notes of a Sociology professor at NYU. Not good. I suppose in that sense he's typically European. I would just like the next pope to avoid throwing around terms like "finance capital" the way people used to say "blaspheming Jew" and perhaps once or twice say something about the soul crushing entity that is government. Do it for Jesus.
Considering Jesus preached against usury during the first Occupy Jerusalem protest (1 B.C.), I wouldn't hold your breath.
Jus' sayin'
Jesus was protesting at 5? I always figured Mary and Joseph were dirty hippies, what with their manger-squatting ways.
Jesus preached against usury IN THE TEMPLE. He protested the racket the priests set up to extract payments for meaningless sacrifices.
"meaningles sacrifices"
I don't know. Look what happened when they stopped the sacrifices.
And more seriously, wasn't the story that there was actual lending going on in the Temple, not just some scam about sacrifices?
And he also told you to shut up and pay your taxes.
Thats the neocon interpretation for sure. I know plenty of storing guns for the end times types who interpret that line as "you dont have to give a shit, because the Kingdom of Heaven is your goal."
It is interesting how men and women of faith can be useful partners in the battle against the iron fists of government and corporate domination while at the same time they are obeisant to the iron fist of orthodox religious institutionalism which is replete with corruption and historic brutality.
Certainly, the odd man and woman in this strange spiritual universe seems to be able to act counter the mental corruption inherent in their faith but I tend to believe they are still crude and intellectually unfinished much like the gay Christian. It's hard not to appreciate Napolitano's views on liberty and justice but I seriously fucking cringed when I read that he wept over the papacy in 2005. What a bizarre cognitive state with all due respect.
Ultimately, tho, I did like the divergence of opinion from the norm. There's no reason to stay fixated on a single conceptual vector. After all, this where we reason and deviation is simply an opportunity to assess alternatives.
The bonus about religious folks is that they have something other than the government they're a slave to, so they get a little huffy when government worshippers try to force them to pray at their idol instead.
At least most Christian societies have a decent separation of church and state. Took them a thousand years of theocratic tyranny to get their, but at least they're there now.
Oooh, just messed up on one of those 'theres'. so close! But in all seriousness I consider myself spiritual, I attend church, I like the community and the volunteer elements, and I'm an anarcho-libertarian. I don't think my views are crude or unrefined.
"Took them a thousand years.." Good point: although many Christians today accept a good degree of separation of church & state and some even see it from a biblical perspective, the impetus for the separation came from secularists.
The one distinction I would make between religious submission to God & statist submission to government is that Christians voluntarily submit to God while statists are quite willing to compel submission to the state.
...Christians voluntarily submit to God...
You're sure about that?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbcyiFt5VEs
This is a lame article. I'm not sure what it's doing on this website either. Hardly the stuff of reason. Pope tweets on real reasons for stepping down ? "no one was listening to me." Read http://sorrysods.com for his full confession. See http://rationalexaminer.com for why the world shouldn't miss Pope Benedict.
Wow. I had no idea that such a high proportion of libertarians were homosexual.
What is this, a sermon?
I don't want a bridge to Christ any more than I want a bridge to Vishnu or Thor, and I don't find it impressive that someone spent a long time thinking about his imaginary friend.
Good. You can only cross the Bridge to Thor by crushing all Skraelings and making their women and children your thralls.
I was not fully convinced of Benedict. More interested I am now to see whats going to happen and who will be the new pope. I hope its going to be someone from South America
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MNbRIx2rsrk
This article needs a counterpoint.
http://www.chick.com/reading/t.....057_01.asp
Jack Chick is also a counterpoint to Poe's Law.
Another counterpoint
http://www.jhuger.com/kissing-hanks-ass
I don't have a problem with the Judge writing an article solely on religion. It's when he relies on dubious religious premises to make political arguments about human liberty that I shake my head.
But historically, that's how many American concepts of liberty developed.
"Endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights..."
The Creator is unnecessary for determining that basic human rights extend from one's humanity.
I only suggest that, historically, American concepts of liberty developed from ideas of God-given dignity and rights.
"One becomes the pope not as one becomes the president, but as one becomes a Catholic priest or the father of a child. The papacy, like ordination and fatherhood, is a life-changing and irreversible imprint?and hence, my sadness at the abdication of Benedict XVI."
This is not true. If a person is Pope is just means they are a bishop who have the position of bishop of Rome. One is not ordained Pope. There is no imprint on the person's soul or anything like that. There are only three sacramental orders, deacon, priest, and bishop. A person can quit the job of Pope, but can't quit *being* a bishop (although they could stop acting as one, but would nonetheless remain a bishop). As soon as Benedict steps down, he is no longer Pope and has no powers or anything left over in any way. He of course remains a bishop, just as he was before he was Pope, since one does *become* a bishop.
The Pope isn't just another bishop. He claims to have a hotline to God that gives him special powers. Much of Catholic theology and claims to universality are based on that. It's stupid, intolerant, and offensive, but that's the Catholic Church for you.
and offensive
Only to the extent that you choose to be offended. Just like the personal beliefs or practices of any other person or group. Until I came to reason.com, I used to think respecting religious liberty and leaving people the fuck alone was a big part of libertarianism.
Only Judge N could get an article like this in Reason. I wondered what the commenters would say, and it was what I would expect.
But it underlines the reality that, whether you like it or not, a lot of "Sky Fairy" worshippers are opposed to arbitrary government - not just the Judge, but many of the "Social Justice" Catholics who, in contemporary debates, are standing up against the Leviathan state, particularly with the HHS mandate - their court victories against this mandate are so far getting a better record than the victories against Obamacare itself.
And then there's the fact that the way Westerners, even secularists, visualise the relation of humans and the state is derived from Christian concepts which (a) make a distinction between the things of Christ and the things of Caesar, and (b) focus on the moral responsibility even of high-ranking officials, rather than divinizing them as in some systems.
He wept with joy...
As much as I respect and admire Judge Napolitano, libertarian theists are so busy attempting to rid themselves of state tyranny, they completely miss the target of celestial tyranny. So much so in fact, they mistakenly embrace their contentment with theocracy as a liberating virtue. Government and God: Two big Gs that are flip sides of the same con. Oops, I meant coin.
I'm new to Reason and I have to say the comments section is just as useful as the article which is an AMAZING change from fox/cnn/usnews etc. I'm not Catholic but I am religious and I can perfectly understand why many people on here despise religion, so many indefensible things, even actions committed by leaders in my own church on occasion. But I feel no need to defend them or even my own bad choices when I've failed to do something. Or Doctrines that I don't understand completely for that matter. Just figure stuff out for your self. Anyways, I have to love Reason.
I don't have a problem with religion in general. I do have a problem with a my religion that claims it has absolute moral authority, in particular when it gets basic science wrong.
A religion that didn't claim moral authority would be kind of pointless though, wouldn't it? That's sort of like saying, "I don't have a problem with political parties, I just hate political parties that claim to represent the interests of groups of people".
People who despise religion have an ax to grind, that's all. They are the same people who talk about tolerance but who they them selves have no tolerance for others' beliefs. They are scum and a detriment to all society.
"They are the same people who talk about tolerance but who they them selves have no tolerance for others' beliefs. They are scum and a detriment to all society."
Tell me more about how everybody who thinks differently than you is intolerant scum, detrimental to society.
It's funny, but it's almost like atheists and theists both do exactly the same things they accuse each other of.
No Pope was more understanding of the pressures put upon the priesthood to be celibate. He gave them a long leash with the understanding that they would cover their tracks and avoid scandal. But his kindness was not rewarded; thousands have been caught with their pants down, or instead of on their knees in prayer giving a BJ to a horny choir boy.
"The Holy Spirit must have recognized all of this, as well..." Love the judge's constitutional wisdom, but surprised to see this faith based article in Reason magazine... Let's not water down our Reason.
Oh noes! Divergent personal beliefs among people I otherwise agree with entirely! BURN THE HERETIC. Oh, and fuck those intolerant religious cunts!
This is why the freedom movement will fail.
"The Holy Spirit must have recognized all of this, as well, as He sent us Pope John Paul II, the rock star, to blaze a path where no pope had gone before?touching millions of youthsPERIOD.
FTFY
Righteous men of courage should never suffer a tyrant. Neither should such men possess the ideal of a heavenly tyrant as presented in the religion of Jesus. One would assume of a creator the foresight to reflect the finer traits in the best of his creation. A righteous and courageous creator could never be a tyrant and it is incumbent upon all men of logic and virtue to cast off any idea to the contrary. For if such a creator should endow his creation with the desire for greater good yet restrict him from securing them, he is a god worthy only of the devotion of lesser men. True as it is, a tyrant of the ideal is the stage upon which Earthly tragedy will play.
Thanks to you for posting this and to Thomas Jefferson for being logical enough to write it.
my neighbor's step-mother makes $64 hourly on the computer. She has been without work for seven months but last month her pay check was $17761 just working on the computer for a few hours. Read more on this site http://WWW.FLY38.COM
Well reasoned, written synopsis of The Papacy.
Two time periods divide1) The Son of God, delivered miraculously to mankind and 2)one whereby mere mortals are borne by humans with all of humankinds foibles and imperfections, into a world experience fraught with daily challenges and mankinds failings.
This is The Papacy. Its reality is a conflicted one.It defends:1)Jesus establishing the papacy, telling St. Peter, "You are Peter, and upon this Rock I will build my Church." Jesus' words appear across the front of St. Peter's Basilica. St. Peter's successors have used this to describe their work, the Petrine ministry, referring to themselves as Papa Petrus and 2) reality in mankinds world experiences fraught with daily challenges and mankinds failings.
Enter Paedophilia. Past Popes, including current astute theological thinker of The Papacy, all brushed aside a humankind modern-day cancer, reasoning the sanctity of Petrine Ministry (Papa Petrus) had to be protected at all costs from this cancer eating away at Jesus' Church innards. Protection of Papa Petrus was The Papacy's First and foremost Order of Business since early 1970's when this cancer had its origins in American seminaries until this sad day of this Pope's forced resignation where HE presided over a Divided Church of God. A New American Catholic Church will rise to replace this broken, pathetic excuse of "Papal Infallibility." Protect Our Children - The Alter Boys and Hearing Impaired.Pray. Amen.
Apparently there is a Libertarian movement in the Vatican that overthrew this corrupt Pope.
So REASON quotes a conservative know-nothing.
The Libertarian International Organization announced there was a Libertarian group there several years ago.
I guess they have to move carefully since Vatican City IS a dictatorship and annti-Libertarian.