Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

A.M. Links: Obama Favorability Ratings Highest Since 2009, Hillary Clinton "Not Inclined" to Run in 2016, Aide to Egyptian President Calls Holocaust Hoax Perpetrated by U.S.

Ed Krayewski | 1.30.2013 9:00 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
  • President Obama is at his highest favorability ratings since he started his first term.

  • Hillary Clinton is "not inclined" to run for president in 2016. So she's running then?
  • A CUNY study shows that Occupy Wall Street was largely populated by rich young white men.
  • The South Dakota House overwhelmingly passed a bill that would allow teachers to be armed, and it will now be considered in the Senate.
  • Russia is ditching an anti-drug, anti-crime agreement with the United States that saw U.S. money go to crime fighting in Russia.
  • Fathi Shihab-Eddim, a senior aide to Egypt's Mohammed Morsi who appoints the editors of the country's state run newspapers, called the Holocaust a hoax perpetrated by the United States.
  • South Korea says it's launched its first satellite into space.

Follow Reason 24/7 on Twitter!

Follow Reason on Twitter too, and like us on Facebook. You can also get the top stories mailed to you—sign up here.

Have a news tip? Send it to us!

The updated Reason app for Apple and Android now includes Reason 24/7!

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: South African Billionaire Pledges to Give Away Half His Wealth

Ed Krayewski is a former associate editor at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (287)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    ...called the Holocaust a hoax perpetrated by the United States.

    Done by that same guy who did all those racist WW2 Bugs Bunny cartoons.

    1. Way Of The Crane   12 years ago

      Mel Blanc?

      1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

        Blanc? As in white??? Figures. Or wait, maybe not.

        1. Frank_Carbonni   12 years ago

          Mel Blanc was Jewish. Okay, that is still white, but not WASP white.

  2. Way Of The Crane   12 years ago

    "I'm rich and I'm a famous actor... look me up, bitch'!"

    Guess what you find when you google Jason london now.

    1. sarcasmic   12 years ago

      Who?

    2. Ted S.   12 years ago

      Maybe he can claim Jeremy did it.

    3. RBS   12 years ago

      Speaking of actors, our favorite ex-reasoner can't figure out why nobody like him...

      "Being blown off by an actor you like, when he's obviously decided that you're not worth talking to, is a strange and meaningful experience. It retcons all their prior performances -- you see them and instead of seeing the character you see the guy who took an instant disinterest in you. Anyway, I met Kevin Spacey tonight.

      1. Randian   12 years ago

        Is that Weigel?

        1. Quetzalcoatl   12 years ago

          I can't imagine Balko whining about it.

        2. Enough About Palin   12 years ago

          Shorter Weigel:

          It's all about me!!!!111111

          Stupid. Cunt.

          1. mnarayan   12 years ago

            shut up ratfucker

        3. RBS   12 years ago

          "Is that Weigel?"

          Yeah, for some reason we're facebook friends.

          1. Randian   12 years ago

            This is why you fail.

  3. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

    Zimbabwe Is Down to Its Last $217
    http://www.theatlanticwire.com.....217/61562/

    There are cash-strapped governments and there are broke governments. And then there's Zimbabwe, which, after paying last week's government salaries, has just $217 left in the bank. No, we didn't forget any zeroes to the end of that figure. Zimbabwe, the country that's home to some of the world's largest plutonium and diamond reserves, literally has the same financial standing as a 14-year-old girl after a really good birthday party. The country's finance minister admitted as much in a press conference on Tuesday. "Last week when we paid civil servants there was $217 [left] in government coffers," Tendai Biti told reporters. "The government finances are in paralysis state at the present moment. We are failing to meet our targets."

    1. gaijin   12 years ago

      That's $217 more than the US has...until the toner is resupplied anyway.

    2. Bee Tagger   12 years ago

      I appreciate their honesty.

    3. Spoonman.   12 years ago

      Plutonium reserves, huh? Opening up a plutonium mine?

      1. Ted S.   12 years ago

        Damn you!

    4. Ted S.   12 years ago

      Plutonium reserves?

    5. Quetzalcoatl   12 years ago

      Nah, they just need Krugabe to come advise them.

    6. Timon 19   12 years ago

      If only plutonium were a naturally-occurring element...

      1. Ted S.   12 years ago

        And I thought I was late to the party.

        1. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

          this is one party we're all invited to.

        2. Randian   12 years ago

          DAMMIT WHAT IS THE JOKE

          1. BakedPenguin   12 years ago

            Seriously? Plutonium isn't naturally occurring. It only comes about after uranium is used in a nuclear reaction.

            They meant platinum.

            1. Randian   12 years ago

              I thought I was missing a movie quote reference.

              #sciencefail

            2. Nuked   12 years ago

              Well you probably could find some of it in nature in Oklo, Africa where a natural nuclear reactor was found.

      2. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

        Plutonium is a naturally occuring element, albeit not in quantities large enough to be commercially exploitable:

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plutonium#Occurrence

    7. Romulus Augustus   12 years ago

      Nothing that minting a couple trillion dollar coins can't fix in a jiffy.

      1. Zeb   12 years ago

        They've done it before.

    8. Jerryskids   12 years ago

      Yeah, that's pretty sad about Zimbabwe. I got an e-mail from a former official in the Zimbabwean government wanting to know if he could use my bank account to transfer some forgotten government funds back into the country.

  4. Rich   12 years ago

    Zimbabwe is down to its last $217.

    1. Rich   12 years ago

      And Lord Humungus agrees!

    2. hamilton   12 years ago

      Tonight on 'It's the Mind', we examine the phenomenon of d?j? vu. That strange feeling we sometimes get that we've lived through something before...

      1. sloopyinca   12 years ago

        Agents are coming.

  5. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    The South Dakota House overwhelmingly passed a bill that would allow teachers to be armed, and it will now be considered in the Senate.

    I would like to see a Venn diagram of public school teachers and gun owners.

    1. Ken Shultz   12 years ago

      Seriously, why should the people of South Dakota have to live under the same rules as the people of New York City?

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vgrGyR6EYbY

      I've had friends and family who've worked on Wall Street, and they say that living there for a while, you forget that you're living in a shit hole, and the rest of the country isn't.

      I'm sure it's the same thing in Boston, except in Boston, it's not that they don't realize they're living in a shit hole. In Boston, they think they're living in paradise.

      1. sloopyinca   12 years ago

        Seriously, why should the people of South Dakota have to live under the same rules as the people of New York City?

        Um, because the Second Amendment is supposed to apply to all of us.

        1. oncogene   12 years ago

          2A applies to fedgov.

          1. Nuked   12 years ago

            And state government.

    2. Brett L   12 years ago

      Depends on where you are. In rural areas, the overlap is pretty significant.

      1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

        I live in a rural area and I'm still surprised by the number who are hardcore liberal. Part of it is the ingrained notion that the Democratic Party can do no wrong, I think.

        There are hick gun owners I know (not teachers) who, because the Dems are for it and the NRA against it, are all for an assault weapon ban.

        1. Quetzalcoatl   12 years ago

          Probably because their guns have wooden stocks, not black ones.

          1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

            They're sure those won't be next.

          2. NeonCat   12 years ago

            Or they have wooden heads?

  6. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

    Most of What You Think You Know About Grammar is Wrong
    And ending sentences with a preposition is nothing worth worrying about
    http://www.smithsonianmag.com/.....40351.html

    You've probably heard the old story about the pedant who dared to tinker with Winston Churchill's writing because the great man had ended a sentence with a preposition. Churchill's scribbled response: "This is the sort of English up with which I will not put."

    It's a great story, but it's a myth. And so is that so-called grammar rule about ending sentences with prepositions. If that previous sentence bugs you, by the way, you've bought into another myth. No, there's nothing wrong with starting a sentence with a conjunction, either. But perhaps the biggest grammar myth of all is the infamous taboo against splitting an infinitive, as in "to boldly go." The truth is that you can't split an infinitive: Since "to" isn't part of the infinitive, there's nothing to split. Great writers?including Chaucer, Shakespeare, Donne and Wordsworth?have been inserting adverbs between "to" and infinitives since the 1200s.

    1. Way Of The Crane   12 years ago

      My favorite quote from my high school English teacher:

      "A preposition is a terrible thing to end a sentence with."

      1. robc   12 years ago

        My favorite quote from my college linguistics prof:

        "Language is description not prescriptive."

        Not as funny as yours, but straight to the point.

      2. Rich   12 years ago

        "OK, where's the library at, *asshole*?"

        1. Anomalous   12 years ago

          That's MISTER Asshole to you!

    2. robc   12 years ago

      Almost all the bogus grammar "rules" were created in the 19th century by latinophiles who tried to push latin rules onto a germanic language.

      Which is exactly as fucking stupid as it sounds.

      1. Way Of The Crane   12 years ago

        ...who tried to push latin rules onto a germanic language.

        Because that worked so well for the Roman Empire.

        1. db   12 years ago

          Sounds like today's EU.

    3. Night Elf Mohawk   12 years ago

      Oh, bullshit.

    4. $park?   12 years ago

      Great writers?including Chaucer, Shakespeare, Donne and Wordsworth?have been inserting adverbs between "to" and infinitives since the 1200s.

      Just another guy referring to so-called experts to shore up his position without any actual evidence.

      1. Bee Tagger   12 years ago

        Yean and what is it with these symphonies? Don't they realize that great musicians have been using distortion for years?

    5. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

      from the article:

      We can't end this without mentioning Raymond Chandler's response when a copy editor at the Atlantic Monthly decided to "fix" his hard-boiled prose: "When I split an infinitive, God damn it, I split it so it will remain split."

      1. anarch   12 years ago

        "Would you convey my compliments to the purist who reads your proofs and tell him or her that I write a sort of broken-down patois which is something like the way a Swiss waiter talks, and that when I split an infinitive, God damn it, I split it so it will stay split and when I interrupt the velvety smoothness of my more or less literate syntax with a few sudden words of bar-room vernacular, that is done with the eyes wide open and the mind relaxed and attentive. The method may not be perfect, but it is all I have." ~ Raymond Chandler

        1. Ted S.   12 years ago

          If only Chandler could have made the plot to The Big Sleep intelligible.

          1. Enough About Palin   12 years ago

            I've seen that film at least six times and still have a hard time following it.

            1. Brett L   12 years ago

              Its actually 3 mysteries all wrapped together. By a neat trick, the 3rd gets wrapped up in the other 2. Also, he gets to slap around rich bitches and queens. (I don't remember if the gay pornographer's boyfriend was in the movie.)

              1. Citizen Nothing   12 years ago

                I recently wrote a review about some hard-boiled detective books in hard-boiled detective style. Some copy editor tried to fix it, going so far as to transmogrify "toot sweet" into "tout de suite."
                But, as I learned years ago in this business, whatever they do to your copy, the pay's the same.

  7. generic Brand   12 years ago

    Hillary Clinton is "not inclined" to run for president in 2016. So she's running then?

    Her "exit interview" was on CNN last night while I was at the gym. Of course they had two women interviewing her, and of course they were obnoxiously infuriating.

    1. db   12 years ago

      How in the hell could she run for President? The questions about her health would overwhelm her candidacy.

      1. Rich   12 years ago

        Nice.

  8. Longtorso   12 years ago

    Just NBC Yet Another Deceptive Edit
    ... It has everything a fair-and-balanced gun-control advocate/reporter could want: An eminently sympathetic victim calmly making the case for more regulations while the ogres known as "gun-rights supporters" try to silence him by shouting him down. It's a passion play, the supreme manifestation of what Obama was trying to achieve by having kids onstage when he signed his executive memoranda on gun control a few weeks ago. If you oppose new gun regs then you're basically in favor of murdering children. Heckling the father of a boy killed in Newtown is simply the logical conclusion of that impulse.

    Except that's not what happened....

    1. Slammer   12 years ago

      Only Code Pink and Moveon.org are allowed to heckle/shout people down. Haven't you learned yet?

      1. RBS   12 years ago

        I though Code Pink disappeared when Obama ascended to the throne?

    2. a better weapon   12 years ago

      The father of the victim posed a question to those in attendance. He said something to the effect of "I'm all for the right to bear arms, but why does anyone NEEEEEEED an AR15?" That's when the shouting happened as dozens of people answered his question.

      1. R C Dean   12 years ago

        why does anyone NEEEEEEED an AR15?

        Ask the cops. They seem to feel a powerful need for them.

      2. Zeb   12 years ago

        And it was after he asked the question several times and then pretended to interpret the silence as lack of an answer to his question.

  9. Way Of The Crane   12 years ago

    A CUNY study shows that Occupy Wall Street was largely populated by rich young white men.

    I about wet my pants when I first read this... Thought the "Y" was a "T".

    1. Chinny Chin Chin   12 years ago

      I'm curious whether other regions' Occupy groups had similar demographics.

      In my town, the most persistent Occupiers (Occupoids? Occupists? Occupetitans? Occuparians?) certainly weren't wealthy young men.

      1. Zeb   12 years ago

        Who were they?

        1. Chinny Chin Chin   12 years ago

          A mixture of homeless and middle-aged ex-hippie types.

          1. Way Of The Crane   12 years ago

            Do you live in Tampa?

            1. Chinny Chin Chin   12 years ago

              No. Portland, Maine.

              Does my description fit Tampa, too?

              1. Way Of The Crane   12 years ago

                Yes, but to be fair, there weren't very many occupiers in Tampa to begin with and there were always more homeless people than residents after sunset downtown.

      2. EDG reppin' LBC   12 years ago

        In Long Beach, the movement may have been started by some community activists communist agitators who were some rich white kids. But by week two, the whole occupy space consisted mostly of junkies, the homeless, and other reprobates.

      3. Jerryskids   12 years ago

        From my limited knowledge, a large part of the Occupy group were the professional college student types. The ones who think they can identify with the poor because they themselves are just scraping by.

        Yeah, asshole, you aren't poor just because you're barely scraping by while enjoying the luxury of getting an education you hope will provide a future big paycheck. Poor is just barely scraping by while you bust your ass at a job that'll never ever qualify you for a future big paycheck. You, on the other hand, are one of the richest people in the world but are too stupid to appreciate it.

  10. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

    How President Obama Lost His Shirt to John Boehner
    http://www.forbes.com/sites/ra.....n-boehner/

    In retrospect, at the Battle at Fiscal Cliff, Boehner took President Obama to the cleaners. He did it suavely, without histrionics. While Obama churlishly, and in a politically amateurish manner, publicly strutted about having forced the Republicans to raise tax rates on "the wealthiest Americans" Boehner, quietly, was pocketing his winnings.

    Dazzled by Obama's Ozymandias-scale sneer most liberals failed to notice that Boehner quietly made 99% of the Bush tax cuts permanent. As Boehner himself dryly observed, in an interview with The Wall Street Journal's editorial board member Steve Moore, ""Who would have ever guessed that we could make 99% of the Bush tax cuts permanent? When we had a Republican House and Senate and a Republican in the White House, we couldn't get that. And so, not bad.'"

    1. Jerry on the boat   12 years ago

      suavely, histrionics, churlishly?

    2. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

      There was mutual agreement not to raise taxes on the lower 99%.

      Straw man Obama lost.

      1. Way Of The Crane   12 years ago

        If you earn a paycheck, your taxes were increased this year.

        1. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

          Back to 2009 levels. The Obama FICA cut was always meant to be temporary as tax cut stimulus to negate the depressed economy (-8.9% GDP q4/08)

          1. $park?   12 years ago

            So taxes went up.

          2. T   12 years ago

            Great. Return speding to 2009 levels and maybe we'll have something. In the meantime, my take home is less because the feds are taking more.

        2. Mike M.   12 years ago

          And the Obamacare taxes have barely even started to kick in yet, but they will over the course of this year when everyone's premiums really start to go through the roof. Hope there aren't too many people out there who get dropped by their employers.

  11. SugarFree   12 years ago

    The Wit and Wisdom of Mayor Bloomberg

    The Royal family?what a bunch of misfits?a gay, an architect, that horsey faced lesbian, and a kid who gave up Koo Stark for some fat broad.

    The three biggest lies are: the check's in the mail, I'll respect you in the morning, and I'm glad I'm Jewish.

    If women wanted to be appreciated for their brains, they'd go to the library instead of to Bloomingdale's.

    I know for a fact that any self-respecting woman who walks past a construction site and doesn't get a whistle will turn around and walk past again and again until she does get one.

    Garrison further stated that Bloomberg antagonized her even before she became pregnant, asking her of her engagement ring, "What, is the guy dumb and blind? What the hell is he marrying you for?" and, a week later, "Still engaged? What, is he that good in bed, or did your father pay him off to get rid of you?" In a deposition, Bloomberg is reported to have conceded saying "I'd do her" in relation to Garrison, but he insisted that he thought "do" meant to have a personal relationship with someone. Other reports from the deposition say Bloomberg almost stormed out of the proceedings when the opposing attorney asked him if he thought the porn film Debbie Does Dallas meant Debbie has a personal relationship with everyone from Dallas.

    1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

      The mayor has no use for flat shoes.

      He's like five-foot-three. You would think he'd appreciate the ladies photographed around him not going for heels.

      1. SugarFree   12 years ago

        I assume he likes his boobs at eye level.

    2. Zeezrom   12 years ago

      The Royal family?what a bunch of misfits?a gay, an architect, that horsey faced lesbian, and a kid who gave up Koo Stark for some fat broad.

      Nothing is higher than architect.

      1. Coeus   12 years ago

        Vis a vie!!! Concordantly!!!

    3. gaijin   12 years ago

      As Tom Robbins might plagiarize: there's rich assholes and there's poor assholes. But at least the rich assholes can pay for their own [big gulp] drinks!

    4. EDG reppin' LBC   12 years ago

      Bloomberg should go do himself.

  12. Bee Tagger   12 years ago

    Russia is ditching an anti-drug, anti-crime agreement with the United States that saw U.S. money go to crime fighting in Russia.

    I'm starting to think my business that adopts Russian babies and turns them into an unstoppable SWAT team is never going to succeed.

    1. Quetzalcoatl   12 years ago

      U.S. money go to crime fighting in Russia.

      With Russia's ambient radiation levels, they're our best hope for producing a real superhero. Otherwise, all we have is Australia!

      1. Way Of The Crane   12 years ago

        Otherwise, all we have is Australia!

        Well, they did give us Mel Gibson.

        1. Quetzalcoatl   12 years ago

          And nobody wants to see him with superpowers. Except maybe Jodie Foster.

          1. Way Of The Crane   12 years ago

            And nobody wants to see him with superpowers.

            Have you seen "What Women Want"? As far as I'm concerned, that man already has superpowers!

  13. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    President Obama is at his highest favorability ratings since he started his first term.

    So this is the real reason we have inaugurations? To sucker public opinion into the notion we bought something of value?

    1. Way Of The Crane   12 years ago

      So this is the real reason we have inaugurations? To sucker public opinion into the notion we bought something of value?

      Why else would we have a parade?

      1. EDG reppin' LBC   12 years ago

        I love a parade!

    2. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

      What the hell is wrong with the people in this country?

      1. RickC   12 years ago

        My instinctual reaction was, "What the fuck, people!"

  14. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

    It's Time To End Japan's Defense Dependence On The United States
    http://www.forbes.com/sites/do.....ed-states/

    America's war in Afghanistan is winding down, but the U.S. must worry about conflict elsewhere. Once viewed as inconceivable, war between China and Japan now looks possible, though thankfully still unlikely. Tokyo should get serious about its own defense.

    The U.S. used its power as occupier after World War II to impose a constitution on Japan which forbade possession of a military. But America lost its enthusiasm for that arrangement early during the Cold War. When Washington subsequently pushed Tokyo to rearm, the latter hid behind its constitution.

    1. Tim   12 years ago

      The Chinese only need to wait about twnety years, Japan is aging and emptying out very quickly.

      1. Way Of The Crane   12 years ago

        The Chinese only need to wait about twnety years, Japan is aging and emptying out very quickly.

        With a population growth rate of just .29%, it may be sooner than that.

        1. Ted S.   12 years ago

          Of course, mainland China has its own demographic time bomb.

          1. Restoras   12 years ago

            All those young men without any prospect for marriage will make a nice conquering army.

            1. T   12 years ago

              I'm hoping for Boxer Rebellion 2.0, personally.

              1. $park?   12 years ago

                I don't think Barbara has any desire to start it.

                1. Enough About Palin   12 years ago

                  That's SENATOR Boxer, asshole.

      2. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

        The Japanese will use robots!

        1. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

          and tentacles.

          1. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

            Robots with tentacles, or robotic tentacles?

            1. Rasilio   12 years ago

              Both of course, it is Japan afterall

      3. db   12 years ago

        That would be sad. I found Japan, in large part, to be very refined and pleasant. China was generally brash and loud. Not a judgment but a preference on my part.

      4. VG Zaytsev   12 years ago

        The Chinese only need to wait about twnety years, Japan is aging and emptying out very quickly.

        If I was Japan, I'd worry more about Korea evening the score out, than China.

    2. Drax the Destroyer   12 years ago

      How about ending Europe's, South Korea's, and any middle eastern hell-hole's dependence on Senile Bankrupt Uncle Sam once formidable Popeye forearms while we're at it?

    3. Brett L   12 years ago

      Sweet. Let's let the Japs be Japs, the Germans be Germans, and the Russians be Russian while we sell them all arms and practice non-intervention, while de-occupying Japan and Germany.

  15. Quetzalcoatl   12 years ago

    I know we all have reason (drink!) to hate the squirrels, but things could be worse!

    I was enjoying this charmingly pearl-clutching piece (don't know how I missed it in August), wherein the author gets the vapors at the very concept of womens' sports, when I noticed his byline: "Andrew M Brown edits The Sunday Telegraph's Comment pages."

    Good grief.

  16. sarcasmic   12 years ago

    Justin Bieber did not grope that young girl, despite what your lying eyes may tell you!
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvs.....photo.html

    1. SugarFree   12 years ago

      Girls touch each other's boobs all the time in a non-sexual way. Get over it.

      1. Tim   12 years ago

        She's not mad he grabbed her boob, she's mad he stopped there.

        1. SugarFree   12 years ago

          He?

          1. Tim   12 years ago

            Er ist ein jungen nicht war?

            1. SugarFree   12 years ago

              We speak American in this house, young man.

        2. Ted S.   12 years ago

          What kind of freak would want to be touched by Justin Bieber?

    2. robc   12 years ago

      I dont understand PR people.

      Why not say, "Hey, he likes groping chicks, his fans dream of being groped by him, he made her day and maybe her life."

      It really seems like PR people are so use to lying that they cant tell the truth when the truth would work just fine.

      1. SugarFree   12 years ago

        Lindsay Lohan's PR had one of the dumbest covers I've ever seen. She showed her freckled hoo-ha and her people released the same photo latter the day with a crudely Photoshopped pair of panties and claimed the original was the Photoshopped image.

      2. Quetzalcoatl   12 years ago

        Exactly, it's not like he's trying to be a Disney Channel star or anything... his marketed image is relentlessly sleazy.

      3. KDN   12 years ago

        The truth is usually just an excuse for lack of imagination.

    3. Way Of The Crane   12 years ago

      Obviously they're trying to tell you the poor girl had a mastectomy and had nothing to grope.

  17. Bee Tagger   12 years ago

    President Obama is at his highest favorability ratings since he started his first term.

    It's a weird time of the year for people to stop paying attention. It's literally the only week without NFL games in months.

  18. sarcasmic   12 years ago

    I'm hot for teacher!
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new.....-high.html

    1. robc   12 years ago

      She is very blurry. She should have that lucked into, that cant be healthy.

      1. Jordan   12 years ago

        She must be part Japanese.

    2. Brett L   12 years ago

      Sigh. I thought there would be good shit on that. None of that seems like something a young, healthy 23 year old shouldn't be doing. I'd like to be the one taking the pictures, but that's a minor quibble.

    3. Drax the Destroyer   12 years ago

      Not going to read it, but she looks pretty good to the Destroyer who spent high school learning calculus and playing guitar instead doing worthwhile things like fucking teachers. Sigh...where's my damn time machine?

    4. generic Brand   12 years ago

      I thought this part was pretty good:

      The explosive allegations came to light after 9News was tipped off about the Twitter account by a viewer Monday. McKinney later admitted to the TV station that she was behind the tweets.

      One post read: 'Naked. Wet. Stoned,' while another said: 'Watching a drug bust go down in the parking lot. It's funny cuz I have weed in my car in the staff parking lot.'

  19. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

    Ramesh Ponnuru: Why Republicans Should Ignore Obama
    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/.....obama.html

    They spent four years trying to discredit him with the public. They need to accept that they failed.

    It's still in Republicans' interest for the public to turn on Obama, as it was in Democrats' interest for the public to turn on President George W. Bush the way it did in his second term. But if that happens, it will be because Obama's health- care plan becomes an undeniable failure, or the economy gets worse, or events overseas make his foreign policy look naive. It won't be because Republicans keep denouncing him.

    1. VG Zaytsev   12 years ago

      Republicans are too stupid to learn new tactics.

  20. Tim   12 years ago

    I think the Obama Administration will be credited by historians as the one that presided over the entire middle east melting down into a puddle of radical shit.

    1. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

      Only by those who can't spell Iraq.

      1. Tim   12 years ago

        Junior Bush lit the fuse, that was the training academy in Iraq. I grant you.

        1. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

          Tim, its always Booosh! Every time, every thing, every way and always.

          1. Tim   12 years ago

            But Clinton failed to kill Bin Laden, so it is his fault. Except Bin Laden was radicalized by Daddy Bush's Operation Desert Storm, so it is Bush's fault. Except Bin Laden learned to fight in Afghanistan so it is Reagan's fault. Except Jimmy Carter let the Soviets invade so it is Carter's fault.

            Maybe Ford gets a pass?

            1. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

              Nope, not if you have an "R" after your name.

              1. Zeb   12 years ago

                Oh, but everyone likes Ford, don't they?

        2. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

          Saddam kept the Shiite/Shia bastards in check. What we see is a Shiite awakening. Bush was too stupid to know this.

          1. Rasilio   12 years ago

            Yeah, the whole region is a piece of shiite

          2. Proprietist   12 years ago

            He also kept the Kurds nice and dead.

          3. ant1sthenes   12 years ago

            Bullshit. The shiites are on the defensive, its the Sunni radicals that are on the move.

  21. Rich   12 years ago

    The Right to Bear Arms Protection Act

    It's two pages long, self-contained, and written in English.

    Wonder if it'll pass ....

    1. robc   12 years ago

      From section 1 of the KY constitution:

      All men are, by nature, free and equal, and have certain inherent and inalienable rights, among which may be reckoned:

      ...

      Seventh: The right to bear arms in defense of themselves and of the State, subject to the power of the General Assembly to enact laws to prevent persons from carrying concealed weapons.

      Not perfect, obviously, but much shorter than 2 pages and really fucking clear. And being in the state constitution, much harder to change.

      1. Rich   12 years ago

        State constitutions are so *cute*!

    2. Brett L   12 years ago

      It seems like the clear language of the 2nd Amendment... bah. Should've been written like the 1st: "Congress shall make no law, abridging the possession or acquisition of..."

    3. Spoonman.   12 years ago

      I would call my representative, but there's just no way. Has a nice list of sponsors though.

  22. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

    Man Got Replacement Candy 60 Years Later
    http://www.neatorama.com/2013/.....ars-Later/

    Better late than never! A then 14-year-old Dave Bell bit into his Pearson's Salted Nut Roll and found a twig. Angry and disappointed, Bell sent a letter demanding a replacement candy.

    Sixty years later, he got it: The company, which has been around for about 103 years, usually sends candy if a customer has an issue. It didn't matter whether the complaint was from 60 years ago.

    The candy arrived Friday. Bell received five Mint Patties, two Buns (one vanilla and the other caramel), one Nut Goodie and one Salted Nut Roll.

    1. Elspeth Flashman   12 years ago

      not Bun! Aren't those filled with bugs? /childhood rumor.

  23. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

    Gomer Pyle marries.

    http://omg.yahoo.com/news/jim-.....AAMpbQtDMD

    1. Rich   12 years ago

      Surprise, surprise, surprise!

      /Captain Obvious

    2. T   12 years ago

      I'm actually more startled that Jim Nabors is still alive.

    3. Enough About Palin   12 years ago

      "Gay Marries" Does he also "gay shower" and "gay mow the lawn"?

      1. mr simple   12 years ago

        I think you missed a comma.

        1. Enough About Palin   12 years ago

          think you didn't read the link

          Jim-nabors-gomer-pyle-star-gay-marries-partner

  24. sarcasmic   12 years ago

    The new blimp!
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sci.....ation.html
    Seriously, this is pretty cool. Instead of releasing ballast to lift off and releasing gas to descend, it uses a compressor to control elevation by turning the gas to a liquid and back. Pretty nifty.

    1. db   12 years ago

      I don't think that's a new idea...I seem to remember discussing this possibility in high school physics.

      1. Quetzalcoatl   12 years ago

        Maybe so, but now they've built it.

      2. sarcasmic   12 years ago

        The idea isn't new, but this is the first implementation of it that I know of.

        1. db   12 years ago

          I don't want to diminish the coolness-- it is a great idea.

          1. EDG reppin' LBC   12 years ago

            You know what else is a "cool" idea? Jetpacks. Jetpacks are cool. But we don't have them. Do you know why? Because all the eggheads spent the last 15 years developing this stupid blimp. That's why we don't have jetpacks. I want my jetpack.

            We were promised jetpacks!

            1. Randian   12 years ago

              Coachella? Dude.

              1. EDG reppin' LBC   12 years ago

                I just prefer to post live footage, and this was handy on youtube.

            2. Brett L   12 years ago

              Here's your damn jetpack.

              Until, however, they get a rate-of-descent override that will keep people from breaking their legs/backs/killing themselves, jetpacks are just a pipedream.

              1. EDG reppin' LBC   12 years ago

                It's not the fall that kills you; it's the sudden stop at the end.

  25. sarcasmic   12 years ago

    Dreamliner nightmare.
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new.....cerns.html

  26. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

    For 40 Years, This Russian Family Was Cut Off From All Human Contact, Unaware of World War II
    http://www.smithsonianmag.com/.....43001.html

    Things had only got worse for the Lykov family when the atheist Bolsheviks took power. Under the Soviets, isolated Old Believer communities that had fled to Siberia to escape persecution began to retreat ever further from civilization. During the purges of the 1930s, with Christianity itself under assault, a Communist patrol had shot Lykov's brother on the outskirts of their village while Lykov knelt working beside him. He had responded by scooping up his family and bolting into forest.

    That was in 1936, and there were only four Lykovs then?Karp; his wife, Akulina; a son named Savin, 9 years old, and Natalia, a daughter who was only 2. Taking their possessions and some seeds, they had retreated ever deeper into the taiga, building themselves a succession of crude dwelling places, until at last they had fetched up in this desolate spot. Two more children had been born in the wild?Dmitry in 1940 and Agafia in 1943?and neither of the youngest Lykov children had ever seen a human being who was not a member of their family.

    1. Zeezrom   12 years ago

      Didn't M. Night What's-His-Face base a movie on this?

      1. Quetzalcoatl   12 years ago

        I believe you're thinking about Hannah.

        1. Rich   12 years ago

          Or Nell.

  27. Mike M.   12 years ago

    President Obama is at his highest favorability ratings since he started his first term.

    Conclusive proof that the lefty vermin who make up about 90% of the so-called "mainstream media" still wield enormous power to manipulate and deceive the masses, even though more people than ever claim not to trust them.

    1. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

      I watch CNBC in the mornings and the wingnut attacks from the likes of Ken Langone and Donald Trump have stopped as the market pushes to new highs, home values increase, companies expand, profits grow, and inflation fades.

      But you can blame the media since that is all you have.

      1. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

        GDP Shows Surprise Drop for U.S. in Fourth Quarter
        http://www.cnbc.com/id/100419252

        1. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

          No, no you wingnut - All is well!

        2. Mike M.   12 years ago

          We're going to hear the term "double-dip recession" a lot over the next couple of months, but the truth that the vermin in the government/media complex almost never admit to is that most of the world has been in a global depression for more than four years now.

          It may not be as severe everywhere as the Great Depression was (though it is worse in some places in Europe), but an ongoing depression it is.

        3. mr simple   12 years ago

          defying expectations for slow growth and possibly providing incentive for more Federal Reserve stimulus.

          Yes, because it's worked so well so far. Though they're surprised by every move in the economy, these experts can never be wrong.

      2. Way Of The Crane   12 years ago

        I watch CNBC in the mornings ...

        This explains so much.

      3. Jordan   12 years ago

        It's just another house of sand. Only a matter of time until the next debt-fueled crash.

      4. VG Zaytsev   12 years ago

        the wingnut attacks from the likes of Ken Langone and Donald Trump have stopped as the market pushes to new highs, home values increase, companies expand, profits grow, and inflation fades.

        What country do you live in?

        1. Virginian   12 years ago

          He might live in DC. Thinks are fucking awesome in DC right now. Shiny cars, bars packed every night. Huge houses in the suburbs, I mean really massive ones.

  28. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

    What is this, 2009 again?

    One Investment That Can Reduce Our Long-Term Debt
    http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/.....aspx#page1

    Suppose we could enhance our long-run growth prospects, reduce our long-term unemployment problem, and reduce our expected future debt at the same time. Would that be a policy worth pursuing?

    Infrastructure spending in an economy such as ours, one with high and persistent unemployment and considerable infrastructure needs, has these features. It puts people to work on projects that promote economic growth ? economic growth is one of the best ways to reduce the long-run debt burden ? and money spent on infrastructure maintenance and repair saves us money in the long-run.

    1. gaijin   12 years ago

      We've been investing in the DoD's infrastructure of war for the last decade and look where we are...

      1. Drax the Destroyer   12 years ago

        We've got more enemies than we had a decade ago. That's progress right?

    2. Rasilio   12 years ago

      Lol the keynesians will never learn.

      Infrastructure spending can only spur economic growth if it is NEW infrastructure and it is in a place and of a sort which stimulates new or at least more efficient economic activity.

      Maintaining existing infrastructure cannot create economic growth, it can merely prevent it's destruction.

      For example, you have 2 cities seperated by a river. Trade between them is a pain because you either need to use a slow ferry that only runs a couple of times an hour or you need to travel 30 miles out of the way to a fordable spot. So you build a bridge.

      Now with the bridge in place trade becomes easier and faster so both cities see economic growth.

      However as long as that first bridge is capable of handling all of the traffic between the 2 cities building a second bridge will not add any further economic activity, the infrastructre needs are already being met.

      Further, maintaining that bridge will not cause economic growth in either city, the bridge is there and the trade which relies on it is being conducted.

      This does not mean that maintaining the bridge is a bad idea, if you do not maintain it then eventually it will collapse and economic activity between the 2 cities would revert back to it's original level causing economic contraction, but you get no growth out of the maintenance, merely the prevention of a depression.

    3. Rasilio   12 years ago

      The problem that these modern keynesians have is that they thing the infrastructure in and of itself is an end, not merely a means to an end. Right now there is little need for new roads or bridges in America and where there is the benefits would be almost entirely localized providing little to no benefit to the national economy meaning that infrastructure spending in the traditional sense has no stimulative value whatsoever

      If they REALLY wanted to embark on building program that put people to work today and resulted in a larger economy when it was done then it would need to be something big and transformative that either opened up new avenues of economic activity or resulted in massive increases in efficiency in existing economi activity.

      There are really only 2 things available to us with existing technology capable of doing this.

      1) We build 100 Nuclear reactors over the next 10 years.

      2) We spend public money to build a robust private space infrastructure to begin industrialization of space

      1. NeonCat   12 years ago

        I hesitate to suggest this, but we could build modern infrastructure throughout the western hemisphere, which (I hope) would improve the economy of all the countries, making it less necessary for illegals to come here searching for a better life while improving our markets and market access.

        Make the Pan American Highway a real highway.

        1. EDG reppin' LBC   12 years ago

          But most of the Pan American Highway is not in anybody's Congressional district. Therefore, it will never happen.

        2. Rasilio   12 years ago

          Wouldn't work.

          Those countries do not by and large suffer from a lack of infrastructure, they suffer from a lack of institutions. As long as they are run by corrupt governments and lack clear property rights and rule of law no amount of infrastructure will help them.

          That said, if you could find some country with a functioning government and institutions that merely needed help on the development front then yes, improving their infrastructure would benefit us in the long run.

      2. Dr. Frankenstein   12 years ago

        I vote for High Speed Monorails

    4. NeonCat   12 years ago

      Wasn't this what Obama's shovel-ready BS was about back in 2009? As I recall all that money was borrowed but most of it wasn't spent, is that correct?

  29. SugarFree   12 years ago

    Perpetual Bonds! Free Money! Yay!

    Oh, SadBeard... first the tardcoin and now this? Can't you just settle into a gentle haze of denial like Kruggy and Ezra?

    1. EDG reppin' LBC   12 years ago

      What the fuck? Stupid idea from a stupid man, Matthew Yglesias

      1. Drax the Destroyer   12 years ago

        Matthew Yglesias...

        I see his fucking face in all the goddamned Pabst blue-ribbon-sippin' "The GOVERNMENT IS US, NOT SOME ALIEN MONSTER" hipster shits when I'm at a bar.

        I don't like going to bars that much anymore.

  30. Rich   12 years ago

    An "American by choice" eloquently provides his position on gun violence

  31. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    The South Dakota House overwhelmingly passed a bill that would allow teachers to be armed, and it will now be considered in the Senate.

    How nice of them, to "allow" those inclined to do so to take responsibility for their own security (as if the danger of a shooting rampage in a school is in any way significant).

    Still vastly better than paying some thumbsucking cretin to sit on his ass all day staring lustfully at the little girls and boys.

  32. db   12 years ago

    Here's a question about Bitcoin I wanted to ask yesterday...

    If Bitcoin relies on "miners" to authenticate transactions, and pays miners in bitcoins, and the number of bitcoins possible is limited to 21,000,000, once that limit is reached, what incentive remains for miners to continue supporting the authentication network? A savvy miner might, as the limit is approached, divest himself of bitcoin and cease mining operations.

    I understand that the idea of transaction fees is probably supposed to keep things going after the limit is reached, but I think this might not work as smoothly as is hoped. If the bitcoin network is not to grind to a halt, the miners must keep mining. Mining is energy intensive, and hence absorbs real-world resources that have application to other valuable endeavors. At some point, the present value of continuing to be a "miner" may be exceeded by some other opportunity.

    Obviously, there will be a market price for transactions, but what if that price (defined by the energy required to support the transaction network) becomes too high, and the currency is limited too much? If the price of energy required to support the network exceeds the value to a client of making a transaction, the minimum value of transactions will have to increase, and the number of transactions will drop. The Bitcoin could therefore become a curiosity used only for extremely high value transfers.

    1. db   12 years ago

      It seems to me that the founders of bitcoin chose to implement the "mining" aspect partly because it requires miners to expend real-world resources tocreate bitcoins, hence creating a pseudo "intrinsic value" to the bitcoin. Once this becomes pointless in terms of creating more value in the currency, where does the network go?

      1. Also Ran   12 years ago

        The same thing that happens to gold when it has all been mined?

        1. db   12 years ago

          Fair enough, but all bitcoins are likely to be mined out well before gold will.

          1. Also Ran   12 years ago

            Probably, and I don't know much about Bitcoin, but from what I understand, the algorithm to mine gets more complex as more coins are mined. So the more coins that are mined, the harder it is to mine new ones. I could wrong on that, though. Doesn't really change the end result, but it would definitely drag it out, similar to when new gold finds become more rare.

        2. db   12 years ago

          Also, a gold economy would not be dependent on miners continuing to dig in the ground futilely to support gold transactions.

        3. Rasilio   12 years ago

          They build a rocketship and go tow a gold heavy asteroid to the Earth Moon L5 point and start mining it from there?

  33. Matrix   12 years ago

    Man shot dead after GPS leads him to the wrong house

    Sad situation...

    1. Way Of The Crane   12 years ago

      Apple Maps strikes again?

    2. $park?   12 years ago

      "He is very distraught over the loss of life from the defense of his home. This incident happened late in the evening hours when he was home with his wife and he assumed it was a home invasion and he maintains his innocence."

      I'm not sure you can call shooting someone who is driving away from your home defense.

      1. Matrix   12 years ago

        someone in the comments mentioned that his lawyer claimed in another article that they were driving at the gunman. I'm not sure. But if they were driving away from the shooter, then yeah... clearly a criminal matter on his part.

  34. Rich   12 years ago

    Better put Nerf guns on Dianne's list.

    The NYPD conducted a sweep of the schools Tuesday morning after the principal of P.S. 4 called in a report of a student possibly carrying a gun. A student told the school aide that he heard another student had a weapon inside the school on Fulton Ave. The student did not actually see a gun, said police.

    Better put the hero who "heard another student had a weapon" next to Michelle at the SOTU.

    1. Matrix   12 years ago

      we have gone full retard in this country.

      from suspending a kid for having a paper gun and a bubble gun...

      a few years ago, a kid was suspended for bringing a picture, of his brother serving in Afghanistan holding a gun, to school

      drawing pictures of guns are now banned.

      We're fucking doomed.

      1. Way Of The Crane   12 years ago

        Hate to kick you while you're down (not really), but now they want to suspend kids for making guns with legos in class.

        1. Slammer   12 years ago

          Legos are awesome:
          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kSfRp3Vm_Z4

      2. Rich   12 years ago

        Serious question: Do any schools prohibit uttering the g-word?

        1. $park?   12 years ago

          They certainly punish kids who write it.

          1. Rich   12 years ago

            "Begin, began, ..."

        2. Quetzalcoatl   12 years ago

          I know that whoever censors songs sometimes censors it.

        3. VG Zaytsev   12 years ago

          Serious question: Do any schools prohibit uttering the g-word?

          The do if the kids are deaf.

    2. Quetzalcoatl   12 years ago

      To be fair, I think that schools should take reports of a weapon seriously. And it doesn't say whether the nerf-owning student was punished (though he definitely was).

      1. Rich   12 years ago

        I hear ya, Q. Even so, it's an *awesome* way to get out of that test you didn't study for!

      2. Matrix   12 years ago

        one article mentioned the school is looking into punishing the student.

      3. R C Dean   12 years ago

        I think that schools should take reports of a weapon seriously.

        Nerf and Lego guns are not weapons, and should not be treated as such.

        Double hearsay should be tracked down and confirmed/debunked before any action is taken.

        Hysterical teachers and administrators should be fired.

        That is all. Carry on.

        1. Quetzalcoatl   12 years ago

          I dunno, man, my reading of the situation is that the kid told an adult "Jimmy told me that Bobby brought a gun to school today", then they proceded to "track down and confirm/debunk" the alert.

  35. Numeromancer   12 years ago

    11 yo London, OH girl kills herself rather than go to public school.

    Apparently she was bullied. London's schools are notoriously horrible, btw.

    1. Quetzalcoatl   12 years ago

      Terrible... 🙁
      I went to school in western Ohio and it really is one of the most depressing places in the world.

      1. Quetzalcoatl   12 years ago

        Err, I meant Eastern Ohio.

    2. Drax the Destroyer   12 years ago

      Not to judge one way or the other, but I do think the social network aspect to life that exists now has helped fuel this type of stuff. Kids are fucking cruel (in public school...maybe in general), and if you can't even escape them when you go home, there are only several avenues of retribution/absolution. The hardest of which is just saying "Fuck 'Em" and doing your best to survive in the prison. It's easier just to jump in the pit or strike out in violence.

      That is not to say that any sort of legislation should be passed in any way to curb this unless said legislation makes it easier for people to get out of publicly controlled schools/defend themselves physically if need be/ etc. In other words, said legislation would probably be repealing other legislation.

      1. $park?   12 years ago

        Yes, kids are and always have been cruel to each other. Yes, the apparent NEED of kids to be involved in stuff like Facebook probably makes it worse. The third problem these kids have is parents who are pussies and don't teach them how to either defend themselves or ignore the bullies.

        In any case, the kid is probably better off dead if she can't handle school bullies.

        1. Drax the Destroyer   12 years ago

          I don't think the defacto prison atmosphere helped. Adults fucking rape and shank each other in similar situations. Being locked up with monsters all week long can't be the best thing for a young person...

          But she's the one who couldn't take it. Oh well...one less person driving on these shitty roads in a couple of years.

          1. $park?   12 years ago

            Being locked up with monsters all week long can't be the best thing for a young person

            That's surely another factor.

            But she's the one who couldn't take it

            I get the feeling that this world is gonna be a rather tough place for the fragile butterflies in another decade or so.

        2. VG Zaytsev   12 years ago

          The environment of large schools exacerbates any natural nastiness of kids.

          They really are mini prisons and breed the same kind of fucked up culture as actual prisons.

    3. Ted S.   12 years ago

      Poor Sloopy can't blame this one on Michigan. 🙁

      1. EDG reppin' LBC   12 years ago

        Fuck Michigan, anyways!

    4. Citizen Nothing   12 years ago

      I do have to wonder if there was a lot more than "bullying" going on behind the scenes.

      1. Citizen Nothing   12 years ago

        This is one school district over from mine. Quite a sleepy little county seat in a mostly rural county (but an easy commute to C'Bus). There are also two prisons in town -- my understanding is that many of the prisoners' families move to London to be close to Pa. Not that this has anything to do with this particular tragedy -- just setting the scene.

  36. SugarFree   12 years ago

    Oh, Daily Mail... There's so much wrong with this article. So much.

    Morbid gallery reveals how Victorians took photos of their DEAD relatives posing on couches, beds and even in coffins

    Now I know how Thomas Friedman feels when he reads a poorly written article on self-fisting.

    1. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

      "Now I know how Thomas Friedman feels when he reads a poorly written article on self-fisting."

      That is just...I mean... I don't...gah!

    2. Randian   12 years ago

      This was pretty common practice in the Victorian era. It was normally children who were posed post-mortem, IIRC.

      1. SIV   12 years ago

        There is nothing so rare as a Victorian photo of a sleeping baby.

      2. SugarFree   12 years ago

        I mean in the facts-about-photography sense.

        1. Randian   12 years ago

          Ah. Well, I was surprised that you weren't aware. I should have been more cognizant of your intelligence.

          1. SugarFree   12 years ago

            I didn't write out my objection well. I could nit-pick the article to death on the reporting. For example:

            or the pupils were painted onto the print to give the effect they were alive. In early images, a rosy tint was added to the cheeks of corpses.

            Painting pupils and adding color to cheeks or even dots of gold on button of uniforms was incredibly common in daguerreotypes, tintypes, and albumen cartes de visite. To make it out like it was invited and used for post-mortem photos exclusively is mindbogglingly wrong.

            Finally I have something to nit-pick within my demonstrable skill set! Woot!

            I feel like the luckiest girl in the entire world!

            1. Zeb   12 years ago

              I've got some old family pictures (not sure what kind, they are on metal plates). The eyes that weren't touched up are really weird. It seems like they were good at keeping their bodies still, but couldn't keep their eyes from moving, so the eyes look really weird and blank, or like they aren't there at all.

              1. SugarFree   12 years ago

                They are either daguerreotypes or tintypes. If there is a mirror finish under the image, they are dags.

                Tintypes were far, far more common.

    3. SIV   12 years ago

      The great thing about post-mortem photography is how the subjects remain still to make up for slow cameras and inadequate lighting.

    4. db   12 years ago

      Did they teabag their dead relatives for the camera?

    5. R C Dean   12 years ago

      In a time when photographs were rare/unusual, I wouldn't be a bit surprised if a lot of people died without having a portrait made. So this was the only way to do it, once they died.

      1. SugarFree   12 years ago

        In places to rural to have a studio, they would store their dead relatives in snow banks or meat houses until the travelling studio got to them.

    6. SIV   12 years ago

      the pupils were painted onto the print to give the effect they were alive

      I have a tin-type where it looks as if someone carefully scratched open eyes into the plate.

      1. SIV   12 years ago

        It is probably etched by the now absent ink or paint but the effect is really cool.

      2. SugarFree   12 years ago

        Because tintypes are a direct positive, and due to the fact that they cannot expose almost the entire red spectrum, just about anything red or orange (freckles, bloodshot eyes) come out white. It might have been a white-eyed monster and they photographer tried to scratch the iris away to expose the black enamel underneath.

        1. SIV   12 years ago

          It is a dead toddler slung under a grieving mother's arm. It looks like the photographer was trying to anticipate Margaret Keane in animating the lifeless child.

          I have a shitload of old photos from before I was priced out of the market.
          I have a very nice Dag of a Mexican War soldier someone traded me who thought it was a tintype of a Yankee.IIRC, it is sealed so I haven't checked for a plate mark but the mat puts it contemporary with the uniform.

  37. Solanum   12 years ago

    Is the ATF criminally stupid or just evil?

    1. Matrix   12 years ago

      they can't be both?

      1. Drax the Destroyer   12 years ago

        I think in practice those two usually coincide.

  38. a better weapon   12 years ago

    Reagan's childhood home being razed for parking lot of Obama library

    Is it a dick move? Sure. But I kind of admire the brass balled gumption of whichever ChiCity fucker thought this one up.

    1. Matrix   12 years ago

      I love this comment:
      FarmerJack
      Obama library? What for? All of his voters can't read.

      I had serious lolz after.

      1. a better weapon   12 years ago

        Lulz. Reason is the only place I read the comments. Maybe I'm not giving other sites a chance.

    2. Rich   12 years ago

      the brass balled gumption of whichever ChiCity fucker thought this one up

      The article indicates it may be Valerie Jarrett.

    3. Drax the Destroyer   12 years ago

      I'd care less if it was being razed to build something of value. Anything. A bordello. Crack house, whatever.

      Or if the house was being rented out. Or sold. Or anything.

    4. Tim   12 years ago

      The Barrack Obama Presidential Liberry?

  39. db   12 years ago

    What would everyone here say to changing Presidential terms to five years, imposing a single term limit and prohibiting a vice president from campaigning for the Presidency in the next election ( they would be eligible after a five-year waiting period).

    1. R C Dean   12 years ago

      Throw in a prohibition on family members of elected federal officials running for federal office, and you've got a deal.

    2. Rasilio   12 years ago

      My preferred election reform is a law (preferably a Constitutional amendment) stating simply...

      "No person elected to Federal Office may be eligible to hold any Federal elected or appointed office until 24 months after the expiration of the term for which they have been elected has expired"

      This means, no campaigning while in office, you go you do your job and when your term is up you go home for 2 or 4 or 6 years and if you're still popular and feel up to it you can run in the next election you are interested in.

      1. R C Dean   12 years ago

        Let's see (counts on fingers) that would mean we would just be starting Bill Clinton's third term (1992-1996, 2000 - 2004, 2012 - 2016).

        Could be worse.

        1. sloopyinca   12 years ago

          OK, I should have refreshed.

      2. sloopyinca   12 years ago

        All that would happen are husband/wife teams (think Clinton) that would alternate terms until their popularity ran aground.

        Bill/Hillary 1996
        Hillary/Bill 2000
        Bill/Hillary 2004
        Hillary/Bill 2008
        ...

        1. Rasilio   12 years ago

          While I agree that could happen to some extent I highly doubt that Bill/Hillary would have won in 04 and in reality there just aren't that many families with 2 electable personalities in them at the same time.

          It would probably be more of a concern at the Senate level but really since 90% of Senators serve for as long as they feel like it I don't really see that as a huge drawback.

          1. sloopyinca   12 years ago

            They don't hve to have two. It's a "wink and a nod" candidacy for the spouse. Hell, I could see Michelle Obama getting elected if she ran with a platform saying she "would have Barack as her personal adviser who went with her everywhere, if you know what I mean." Bill could have done it in 2000 with Hillary and would have beaten Gore's brains in in the primary and likely would have done the same with Bosh in the general election.

            You don't need competent people. You just need craven ones.

            1. Virginian   12 years ago

              This. See Ma and Pa Ferguson of Texas.

            2. Rasilio   12 years ago

              Yes, and then in 2004 being left holding 100% of the blame for 9-11 and the dot com crash they would have been clobbered by Bush (presumably).

              A Bush could have won in 2008 with the booming economy but I really don't think anyone was going to vote for Laura so it would have been Jeb probably but then it would have been highly unlikely that George could have won reelection in 2012 given the state of the economy (and the entirely likely fact that the Bushes would not have been any better for it that the Obamas). That has Obama presumably winning his first term this year and who knows where things would go from there

      3. Jerryskids   12 years ago

        My preferred election reform is a law that - since lawyers are technically officers of the court and therefore part of the judiciary - no lawyers shall be eligible to serve in the legislative or executive branch.

        Laws should be written and carried out as if they were intended to be used by people with an ounce of goddam common sense.

      4. crashland   12 years ago

        Who wants them to do their job? It would be better to cut reps down to a single year and senators to two, if they are campaigning at least they aren't legislating more bullshit.

      5. ant1sthenes   12 years ago

        Shit, if we're amending the constitution, let's get rid of a singular executive. It's too much power in one person's hands. Let POTUS run the military and state department, but take away domestic power to separately elected offices.

    3. Zeb   12 years ago

      Sure, why not?

    4. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

      I wouldn't be opposed to that, but I don't expect it'd fix much.

  40. Kaptious Kristen   12 years ago

    Hello from tropically balmy Stowe, VT! Hope you bastards are not behaving yourselves while I'm on vacation.

    I have an unexpected job interview in Vergennes tomorrow.

    1. $park?   12 years ago

      Tomorrow, when the temps should be back in the low to mid 20s. Fucking New England weather.

      1. Kaptious Kristen   12 years ago

        Since the skiing will still be for shit tomorrow, I don't feel too bad about missing another day to do the interview. Hopefully Friday will see some fresh pow and some man-made coverage on the slopes (RACIST!)

      2. Zeb   12 years ago

        And last week it was below zero.

    2. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

      Vacationing in Stowe? You're the worst kind of Vermonter!

    3. Enough About Palin   12 years ago

      "I have an unexpected job interview in Vergennes tomorrow."

      Make sure to let them know that you want the job, that you can do the job and that you'd fit in.

      /Robert Half

      1. Rasilio   12 years ago

        But what if I didn't want the job and was just taking the interview to keep by unemployment claim active?

  41. Enough About Palin   12 years ago

    "Fathi Shihab-Eddim, a senior aide to Egypt's Mohammed Morsi who appoints the editors of the country's state run newspapers, called the Holocaust a hoax perpetrated by the United States."

    Well you have to admit it's an odd coincidence that most of the evidence just happened to "burn up".

  42. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    The real victims of Sandy Hook.

    Tuesday's edition of the New York Times features a lingering piece about the untold victims of the Newtown massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School: the first responders.

    Seven Newtown police officers, who were among the first to arrive at the scene of the horrible aftermath, describe their experiences upon arriving at the scene, as well as grappling with paralyzing post traumatic stress disorder symptoms in the days and weeks following the massacre.

    Those poor, poor, traumatized cops.

    Who weeps for them?

    1. R C Dean   12 years ago

      Let's see a story about the poor bastards who actually had to clean up the school.

    2. Virginian   12 years ago

      Reminds me of this little gem:

      "Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat." -Hillary Clinton

    3. sloopyinca   12 years ago

      Who weeps for them?

      Honestly? I do. Coming upon a horrific bloodbath like that has got to have lasting psychological effects on anybody. The people that saw the carnage and dealt with the hysterical parents, families and other students, not to mention the dying cries of young children, will never recover from it. It can't be imagined by those of us that have never experienced it.

      I hope those people get the help they need to cope with what they are going through. I really hope they overcome the lasting images that will probably eat them up inside for quite some time. And I hope it doesn't wreck their lives in ways we couldn't begin to grasp unless we've been in a similar macabre environment.

      There's plenty to despise cops for. This isn't one of them.

      And yes, R C Dean is right. We should also be hearing about the poor bastards that had to clean up the place afterwards. I'm sure they're suffering equally.

  43. Jam   12 years ago

    Texas Alcoholic Beverage Division...er mob bosses
    http://blogs.houstonpress.com/.....avenue.php
    steel the bars safe

    1. Brett L   12 years ago

      Fuck The Heights trendy hipster bars.

  44. Proprietist   12 years ago

    Are the latest "economic contraction" a result of defense spending cuts? Since government spending counts directly towards GDP, advocates for real spending reduction have to make sure they aren't using every GDP drop for political gain when in effect we really want temporary GDP reductions for long-term GDP gains. There's a delay for cut-related growth to take effect. I was just noticing some people criticizing Obama for the GDP drop when there may be a silver lining.

    http://money.cnn.com/2013/01/3.....?hpt=hp_t3

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Campaign Finance Laws Institutionalize Corruption

David Keating | 6.23.2025 5:45 PM

Iran's Warning Shot Gives Trump a Way Out of Israel's War

Matthew Petti | 6.23.2025 5:00 PM

This Military Wife and Mom Is Part of the 65 Percent of ICE Detainees With No Criminal Record

Autumn Billings | 6.23.2025 4:43 PM

Vance Says Bombing Iran Is Different From Other 'Dumb' Presidents' Military Actions

Joe Lancaster | 6.23.2025 3:15 PM

A Brief, Bloody History of All the Times the U.S. Caused Chaos in the Middle East

Matthew Petti | 6.23.2025 2:47 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!