Hollywood Asks FAA For Permission to Use Drones
E.T. drone home? (Sorry…) The movie industry has asked the Federal Aviation Administration for permission to operate camera-carrying-drones during the film production process. Via the Hill:
Hollywood's lobbying group is pressing the Obama administration to allow filmmakers to use drones for aerial shots.
The Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) revealed in a lobbying disclosure report this week that it had urged the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to allow filmmakers to fly unmanned aircraft in U.S. airspace. The group had previously disclosed lobbying on the issue in a report last October.
Howard Gantman, a spokesman for the MPAA, explained that putting a camera on an unmanned aircraft can be cheaper, safer and more useful than relying on a helicopter or a crane to get a difficult shot.
"You can innovate in a number of different, interesting ways to shoot a scene [using unmanned aircraft]," Gantman said.
The FAA is currently drafting rules to allow private groups to apply to fly drones. The agency aims to begin issuing private drone licenses by 2015.
According to the article, the FAA estimates that some 30,000 private drones could be in the air by 2020. If Hollywood gets camera drones, can Tacocopters and Burrito Bombers be far behind?
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
We have movie filming helicopters flying over downtown Chicago all the time. These little things have to be safer.
I was under the impression Hollywood has been using RC helicopters as camera platforms for years, if not decades.
Maybe they now want something large enough to fall under the purview of the FAA.
"That's a great overhead shot, but why is your lead actor's hairpiece flying off?"
"That's a great overhead shot, but what's that whirring sound?"
"That's a great overhead shot, but the camera operators union is suing the fuck out of you."
Pretty soon, we'll be hearing about how important government is because without drone technology, we wouldn't have all these new wonderful panoramic shots in movies.
Wow. I bet these assholes aren't gonna like this one bit.
From the link:
Man (Danny Feld, Still Photographer) with camera flanked by two police officers with shotguns: "There are consequences for not reporting your job. Be one of the good guys."
So, my deployable cable net fired from t-shirt cannon is a go, then.
I first read that as "My cable-knit t-shirt", and started to worry about you, T.