Krugman Doesn't Want Never-Offered Treasury Secretary Gig
That's a relief
In a blog post on the New York Times website, columnist Paul Krugman says no to serving as treasury secretary. Which is clarifying, even though he was never offered the job anyway.
"Yes, I've heard about the notion that I should be nominated as Treasury Secretary. I'm flattered, but it really is a bad idea," writes Krugman.
The first reason Krugman lists is, he admits, that he's "indeed the World's Worst Administrator — and that does matter."
The second reason: "Oh, and there's not a chance that I would be confirmed."
But the foremost reason, according to the guy who was never offered the job in the first place, "is that it would mean taking me out of a quasi-official job that I believe I'm good at and putting me into one I'd be bad at."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
..."is that it would mean taking me out of a quasi-official job that I believe I'm good at"...
Yeah, well, he's an ignoramus so no one cares what he believes.
I'd be hard pressed to find a job Krugman is good at.
He's not a very good writer, nor a very good economist.
Fast food worker maybe?
Professional leftist.
I guess his massive ego didn't make the top two.
Douche-nozzle, thy name is Krugman.