Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

A.M. Links: Boehner May Be Facing Leadership Cliff, Jobless Claims Up 10K This Week, Israel Bans Skinny Models

Ed Krayewski | 1.3.2013 9:00 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
  • The fiscal cliff deal's done nothing to rein in runaway spending, but it may have made John Boehner's hold on the Speaker's gavel more tenuous.

  • New jobless claims jumped to 372,000 last week.
  • Christina Kirchner, Argentina's president, writes to the British prime minister, David Cameron, demanding the Falkland Islands be surrendered.
  • Chinese censors appear more interested in shutting down social media than websites that sell guns and drugs.
  • Meanwhile in France, the socialist president promises to keep pushing more taxes on the wealthy.
  • Israel has set a minimum Body Mass Index of 18.5 to work as a model in the country.

Follow Reason on Twitter and like us on Facebook. You can also get the top stories mailed to you—sign up here.

Have a news tip? Send it to us!

The updated Reason app for Apple and Android now includes Reason 24/7!

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Websites that Sell Meth and Guns Stay Online in China

Ed Krayewski is a former associate editor at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (458)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    ...but it may have made John Boehner's hold on the Speaker's gavel more tenuous.

    Not much of a silver lining.

    1. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

      I checked out the idiots at Free Republic to see who they were pushing to replace Boehner.

      Louis Gohmert, Newt Gingrich, and Allen West came up most often. They are the comedy gold standard.

      1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

        I think the Speaker of the House actually has to be a member of the House of Representatives.

        1. Bee Tagger   12 years ago

          You lack the imagination of a Newt Gingrich, then.

        2. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

          It doesn't stipulate that in the Constitution (according to FR).

          1. protefeed   12 years ago

            Link to the relevant article of the Constitution?

            If you're gonna make claims about easily googled stuff, make sure you have your facts correct.

            1. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

              The House of Representatives shall chuse [sic] their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.

              Section 2 Clause 5

              1. Tulpa (LAOL-PA)   12 years ago

                If only you were as scrupulous about the literal meaning of some other parts of the constitution.

          2. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

            Huh, by gum they're right. I've wasted all this time when I could have been promoting myself for the job! I can golf with Obama and cry on demand with the best of them.

            1. T   12 years ago

              Can you turn your skin an odd shade of orange?

              1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

                Probably. And if the unfortunate were to happen, I could end up being the greatest unelected president in history!

                1. NeonCat   12 years ago

                  You've got my non-vote!

          3. Tulpa (LAOL-PA)   12 years ago

            Hmm. In A1S2 we have

            The House of Representatives shall choose their speaker and other officers; and shall have the sole power of impeachment.

            While it doesn't literally say so, in the parliamentary tradition the officers always came from the membership of the house.

            1. robc   12 years ago

              But the chief officer of the senate doesnt come from that house, so their is precedent in the US.

              1. robc   12 years ago

                there

              2. ChrisO   12 years ago

                Except that the Constitution expressly states that the Veep is president of the Senate. No such express description is given for the Speaker of the House.

                In the absence of an express provision, where language could be ambiguous, statutory and constitutional analysis then moves to the intent of the drafters. Since they were coming from the British parliamentary system, it's pretty obvious they meant the Speaker to be a member of the House.

            2. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

              While there's likely a lot of truth in that implication, what's to stop the House from allowing an outsider as Speaker if a majority says it's okay? Provided that the Speaker doesn't get a vote or otherwise circumvent the Constitution, I suppose it could be done.

              The courts defer quite a bit on internal questions like this, so the real question is whether an outside Speaker could come in without somehow violating other aspects of constitutional law.

              1. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

                Why elect someone outside their club?

                That would be like Survivor contestants awarding the million $ to one of us.

        3. Charlotte Falcon   12 years ago

          Not true

  2. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

    NHS nurse suspended after giving patient Lucozade instead of glucose drip. This is not her best cock-up, however

    more

    1. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

      We can so look forward to O!care stories like that, come 2014.

      1. MP   12 years ago

        That's simply a ridiculous statement.

        1. Randian   12 years ago

          How so?

          1. MP   12 years ago

            Because it's a classic extrapolation of anecdotal evidence.

            I happen to live near the hospital where a habitual Hepatitis C infector was finally brought down. After many years across many hospitals and many states.

            But I'm not going to extrapolate that into a mass failure of US health care.

            1. Randian   12 years ago

              LTC John was making a comparison between two systems of government run health care and saying "If this happens a lot in one, it's probably going to happen a lot in the other"

              1. MP   12 years ago

                If this happens a lot in one

                Except there was no evidence presented of "a lot".

                Anecdotal stories are worse than useless when it comes to predicting the efficacy of large scale systems.

                1. Randian   12 years ago

                  If this discussion were being held in a vacuum, you would be right.

                  But it isn't - the NHS's incompetence and perfidy is well documented, even through studies.

                  I just read something the other day where only 22% of their doctors even bothered washing their hands. This is in 2010.

                  1. MP   12 years ago

                    But it isn't - the NHS's incompetence and perfidy is well documented, even through studies.

                    Irrelevant in regards to this particular anecdote.

                    The large scale studies are useful. Anecdotes are just good copy.

        2. Atanarjuat   12 years ago

          Yeah. Lucozade isn't sold in the US.

          1. Restoras   12 years ago

            That is ridiculous.

    2. Groovus Maximus   12 years ago

      - Checking a patient's temperature instead of blood pressure;

      - Assessing a patient with Parkinson's disease as being independent and needing no care or support;

      - Attempting to give drugs which had already been given;

      - Preparing drugs for oral administration for a patient who was nil by mouth;

      - Being unfamiliar with equipment on the resuscitation trolley;

      - Making four errors in relation to giving Heparin;

      - Giving prescription eye drops, when not authorised, and giving them to the wrong patient;

      - Failing to register patients and putting the wrong hospital number on a patient's wristband.

      Magnificent. Simply magnificent.

      1. Tim   12 years ago

        What? No : "Feeding the wrong end"?

      2. Brett L   12 years ago

        Thank God for sovereign immunity, eh?

        1. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

          Doesn't apply to the NHS - it can be sued for negligence.

          http://www.nhsla.com/Pages/Home.aspx

          1. Groovus Maximus   12 years ago

            Yes, IFH, but the standard of proof to bring a claim is quite staggering; this is also assuming that your claim will be heard. It is extremely difficult to sue the NHS for damages, and even harder to win.

            1. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

              but that's true for all medical negligence claims, not just claims against the NHS

              1. Brett L   12 years ago

                Haha. You've never experienced the American way. Anyone who can convince a lawyer that they can take 46% of the winnings can sue and probably find standing.

              2. Groovus Maximus   12 years ago

                Not quite; I've been dragged into court on a total bullshit claim for no other reason than to get a settlement (I won. Bench trial and summary judgement FTW.)

                The NHS (and way centralized medicine is designed) purposefully sets up the system to discourage lawsuits, and barring res ipsa loquitur cases (such as amputating the wrong member or botching a delivery), your case has a less than stellar chance of getting heard, and this is straight from a few NHS docs that are currently in UKR on medical tour. Governments hate losing money.

                1. Groovus Maximus   12 years ago

                  And FTR, this is one of the reasons I expy'd to UKR, as medical law, even for those in private practice, sets the burden of proof bar very high for standing. Otherwise, from what I saw of the State-Run clinics I saw, every single person would have standing to make a claim of some kind. I am a very ethical practitioner with the record to prove it (I had one of the lowest rates of surgical site infection in OK when I left), which is why the private hospital that hired me found my CV so desirable.

                  Though I absolute despise the TORT system of the USA, this is the main reason I hate socialized medicine more. I would simply change the USA system to a "loser pays" and eliminate punitive damages. Actual damages only.

                  1. Tulpa (LAOL-PA)   12 years ago

                    Loser pays is going too far. Non-rich people couldn't risk even a legitimate suit if that were implemented.

                    1. Groovus Maximus   12 years ago

                      Loser pays is going too far. Non-rich people couldn't risk even a legitimate suit if that were implemented.

                      Too fucking bad. I didn't say anything about eliminating % of damages awarded. The slimy ambulance chasers will still have incentive to file a claim if merit permits.

                    2. Night Elf Mohawk   12 years ago

                      Too fucking bad.

                      So someone harmed by a doctor and with a 75-25 shot of prevailing at trial should be forced to roll the dice on basically a 1 in 4 chance of probably having to go bankrupt in a loser pays scenario? Spoken like someone with a med-mal insurance company going to bat for him.

                    3. Groovus Maximus   12 years ago

                      So someone harmed by a doctor and with a 75-25 shot of prevailing at trial should be forced to roll the dice on basically a 1 in 4 chance of probably having to go bankrupt in a loser pays scenario?

                      Medical care is a not a right. Caveat Emptor, no? You want your licenseless panacea? Then I want to be able to write on my operative consents in big letters: YOU CAN'T SUE ME NO MATTER WHAT. And that goes double for pharma, too, with the "make everything OTC" business.

                      Spoken like someone with a med-mal insurance company going to bat for him.

                      And a big, fat target on his back every time he picks up a scalpel, writes a 'script, and agrees to treat a patient.

                      My potential mistakes are the kind that can take a life very easily and can never be taken back. If you think I take that responsibility lightly, then you don't know me very well.

                    4. Night Elf Mohawk   12 years ago

                      Medical care is a not a right. Caveat Emptor, no? You want your licenseless panacea? Then I want to be able to write on my operative consents in big letters: YOU CAN'T SUE ME NO MATTER WHAT. And that goes double for pharma, too, with the "make everything OTC" business.

                      Not sure what that has to do with loser pays, but OK.

                      I don't think writing it on your operative consents would be enough. If you can video people when you tell them that no matter how badly you fuck up, they can't sue you -- and, I'm guessing they can't sue the hospital or anyone else, because it's hard to imagine a hospital leaving itself on the hook for your use of its facilities -- and you get their agreement to that, good for you. I wonder how much of a competitive advantage contractual immunity from liability would be for you, long term.

                    5. Groovus Maximus   12 years ago

                      Not sure what that has to do with loser pays, but OK.

                      Liability. Full stop.

                      If you want a procedure done under the magical "no licensing" scheme, then you take your chances. Otherwise, do it yourself.

                      Video doesn't help, actually. Juries (laymen juries, to be precise) can see anything they want in the presentation and award a judgement for no other reason than they hate doctors. I can spam this thread for the next day with colleague anecdotes and links testifying to that.

                      Hospitals are not on the hook for what occurs in OR: that's totally 0 my responsibility. Surgery is a case where shit rolls uphill. A scrub tech fucks up, my ass. Circulating nurse, my ass. Physician first assistant, their ass and my ass. That is my OR, and I assume the risk for everything that happens in it.

                      I wonder how much of a competitive advantage contractual immunity from liability would be for you, long term.

                      How qualified are you to perform herniorraphies, colostomies, and lap bands? Lap appies? You want to be your own doctor, fine. You want any bozo to practice medicine with the licenseless system? Awesome. I'll put my 12 years of surgical experience against some newbie, and good luck to them getting underwritten. I'll get a much better rate since I am demonstrably a better risk. Even in a free market there will be TOP. MEN. meaning one will be better qualified than another.

                    6. robc   12 years ago

                      So someone harmed by a doctor and with a 75-25 shot of prevailing at trial should be forced to roll the dice on basically a 1 in 4 chance of probably having to go bankrupt in a loser pays scenario? Spoken like someone with a med-mal insurance company going to bat for him.

                      If its 75-25, the lawyer who is going to take 50%, in case of victory, would be more than willing to cover it himself.

                      Cost of doing business.

                  2. Rasilio   12 years ago

                    Loser pays is not the answer and it really only takes a few seconds to see why.

                    Just because you lost the case does not mean you were wrong in bringing it.

                    Further there is a standard that is possible between loser pays and file anything you like with no reprocussions.

                    You can have a system where there are 3 possible outcomes of a Tort.

                    Judgement for the plaintiff, the defendant pays for the damages as well as the plaintiff's expenses.

                    Judgement for the defendant, the defendant is acquited of responsibility for the harm but the case is deemed to have had sufficient grounds to warrant bringing the case therefore nobody pays anybody anything.

                    Judgement against the defendant, the case is deemed to have been groundless on it's face and the plaintiff and their legal representation are jointly responsible for covering the legal expenses of the defendant.

                    Then with punitive damages, I see no reason to eliminate them, however I also see no reason why the plaintiff should benefit from them, I would change it such that punitive damages were still assessed but that the proceeds from them were directed towards a charity of some sort and the plantiff and their legal representation would be barred from recieving them.

                    1. Groovus Maximus   12 years ago

                      Judgement for the defendant, the defendant is acquited of responsibility for the harm but the case is deemed to have had sufficient grounds to warrant bringing the case therefore nobody pays anybody anything.

                      My malpractice premiums will take a hit, even if I get the judgement in my favour, therefore punitve.

                      Then with punitive damages, I see no reason to eliminate them

                      See above, and premiums will definitely go up, and the the added bonus of board review and notations and even restrictions added to the medical license. This will affect the practice negatively, therefore punitive and no need for the awarding of punitive damages. Incidentally, this is precisely why medical, nursing, dental, and allied health licensing exists.

                    2. Rasilio   12 years ago

                      "My malpractice premiums will take a hit, even if I get the judgement in my favour, therefore punitve.

                      "

                      So?

                      If my home is burglerized and I file a claim against my insurance my homeowners rates go up.

                      If I am in an accident and sued and found not liable my auto insurance rates still go up.

                      If any other business owner gets sued and found not liable his insurance rates still go up.

                      Why should you be any different.

                      Don't like the price your malpractice insurance carrier charges you then you should certainly feel free to drop them and not carry malpractice insurance asnd realistically in a world where there are no punitive damages bonanza's and truely frivilous lawsuits cost both the plaintiff AND their lawyers a good doctor probably would suffer very little risk from not carrying malpractice insurance, just have a legal retainer agreement with a law firm to ensure you have the ability to defend yourself should you get sued.

                    3. Groovus Maximus   12 years ago

                      Why should you be any different.

                      Immediate (and spectacular) risk.

                      You didn't ask for your home to be burglarized. You don't have to drive. Other businesses, not necessarily so. If someone gets sued for fraud, like if they knowingly sell a knockoff iPAD, that won't kill the customer. Once again, every patient encounter I have does have that risk exposure, and quite concentrated.

                      I operate on Baby Reason, and something goes wrong and she dies, even if not my fault, I can pretty much kiss my career goodbye (and probably eat a self-administered bullet). The argument that medical care as a "weird" commodity has some teeth.

                      Your last paragraph would be acceptable, though the Trial Lawyers' Assn., therefore both stategov and fedgov, will never permit it.

                2. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

                  I'm pleased you won.

                  I think you're conflating a few things, and perhaps missing my point (which isn't that interesting, to tell the truth).

                  Granted: The US system is not identical to the Anglo-Australian one. In both, there are bullshit claims which are instituted to get walk-away money. And the UK Government certainly has some quirks to protect itself with respect to The Best Health System In The World.

                  But: my point was simply medical negligence claims (if litigated) are often bloody hard to prove, wherever you are, but especially in the UK/Australia. That stems from the complexity of the issues (blatant cases get settled), the cost (which is huge), the fact that the UK and Australia don't allow lawyers to recover % of damages (so lawyers have a disincentive to take bullshit no-win, no-fee cases to trial) and doctors' unwillingness to testify

                  1. Groovus Maximus   12 years ago

                    You're point is well taken, spunky sheila.-) Apologies. I was just shaken by what I witnessed at the State-Run clinics, and apparently is still a sore spot with me.

                    1. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

                      Mate, I'm still slightly shaken by what i experienced in the state-run system. I can't have injections in my left arm, and a nice doctor wrote a big message in texta on my arm to that effect (after another doctor who had read my notes still tried to do it!). Sure enough, nurses ignored the message and kept going for the arm...

                      And no apologies are ever required

                    2. Groovus Maximus   12 years ago

                      I can't have injections in my left arm

                      I am assuming you cannot have BP taken from it either, correct?

                      a nice doctor wrote a big message in texta on my arm to that effect (after another doctor who had read my notes still tried to do it!). Sure enough, nurses ignored the message and kept going for the arm...

                      I just gritted my teeth and sprung a RAGEBONER! You have no idea how angry that makes me. I should have been an acountant...-(((

                      I have my assistants well-trained though, as I have very exact and specific orders on how I want my theatre arranged and set up. Any deviations will be met with a very unhappy Dr. Groovy and I will make you break it down and start over.

    3. GILMORE   12 years ago

      hardy herp. Yeah, we're all going to die.

      McKenzie was also found to fail at:

      - Checking a patient's temperature instead of blood pressure;

      - Assessing a patient with Parkinson's disease as being independent and needing no care or support;

      - Attempting to give drugs which had already been given;

      - Preparing drugs for oral administration for a patient who was nil by mouth;

      - Being unfamiliar with equipment on the resuscitation trolley;

      - Making four errors in relation to giving Heparin;

      - Giving prescription eye drops, when not authorised, and giving them to the wrong patient;

      - Failing to register patients and putting the wrong hospital number on a patient's wristband.

  3. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

    Moody's Anticipates Further US Fiscal Action Following "Fiscal Cliff" Deal
    http://www.moodys.com/research.....dysratings

    Moody's Investors Service said that the fiscal package passed by both houses of Congress yesterday is a further step in clarifying the medium-term deficit and debt trajectory of the federal government. It does not, however, provide a basis for a meaningful improvement in the government's debt ratios over the medium term. The rating agency expects that further fiscal measures are likely to be taken in coming months that would result in lower future budget deficits, which are necessary if the negative outlook on the government's bond rating is to be returned to stable. On the other hand, lack of further deficit reduction measures could affect the rating negatively. Notably, yesterday's package does not address the federal government's statutory debt limit, which was reached on December 31. The need to raise the debt limit may affect the outcome of future budget negotiations.

    1. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

      The rating agency expects that further fiscal measures are likely to be taken in coming months that would result in lower future budget deficits

      Moody's = damned fools.

    2. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

      Market don't care. Treasuries remain low and the S&P 500 and Dow are points away from all-time highs.

      1. protefeed   12 years ago

        Apparently investors are relieved that most of the tax increases didn't happen, if I'm reading the current mini-rally correctly.

        1. GILMORE   12 years ago

          protefeed| 1.3.13 @ 9:21AM |#

          Apparently investors are relieved that most of the tax increases didn't happen, if I'm reading the current mini-rally correctly.

          Uh, probably not.

          Markets have strong quarterly/seasonal technical behaviors, as funds take profits in winners end-of-year then engage in buying sprees early on in 'cheaper' assets...which they may then dump by end of Q1 if there's no legs to the secular buying.

          There's also just short-term headline-trading... sure, the fiscal cliff provided some artificial kickers and headwinds...which traders love. on the more important "volume of cash flow trading", many funds are still quite defensive in bonds (high yield corporate *& EMB)

      2. R C Dean   12 years ago

        Of course, as Plugs has been told many times, the low Treasury rates aren't the result of markets, but of Fed manipulation.

        This isn't some conspiracy theory either. Its the Fed's overt policy.

        Anyone who regards the current equity markets as a reflection of actual economic reality is delusional. Given the liquidity pumping, high frequency trading, and various other forms of fraud and manipulation winked at by the SEC, that is.

        1. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

          Yes, Operation Twist was designed to affect the long bonds.

          But corporate profits are at all-time highs and manufacturing activity is robust. The market is reflecting economic reality.

          I know, the preppers and ZeroHeads won't agree until there is a Republican in office.

          1. Tulpa (LAOL-PA)   12 years ago

            There was a Republican in the presidency in 2007-08 and they didn't agree then.

            1. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

              Our economy was literally falling apart then. It was apparent to anyone with a pulse.

              Now even the big banks are talking up the economy.

              1. Kant feel Pietzsche   12 years ago

                Yet, despite the numbers on the big board, stock sales have exceeded stock purchases for the FIFTH YEAR in a row.

              2. Michael S. Langston   12 years ago

                & that was a problem with having very cheap money loaned to money hungry Americans. A great deal of which was used on housing.

                & the US government is solving this problem by keeping money cheap and introducing more of it. For instance, there are still tax breaks for first time homebuyers (incentives to buy homes) even though the housing market has yet to really show the bottom in most places.

                Yeah, I might not be an economist of note, but not sure how smart one needs to be to understand that the cause of and solution to our fiscal problems cannot be the exact same policy.

          2. R C Dean   12 years ago

            manufacturing activity is robust

            Oh, really?

            Of the 18 manufacturing industries, seven are reporting growth in December in the following order: Furniture & Related Products; Paper Products; Petroleum & Coal Products; Wood Products; Primary Metals; Computer & Electronic Products; and Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products. The nine industries reporting contraction in December ? listed in order ? are: Nonmetallic Mineral Products; Chemical Products; Miscellaneous Manufacturing; Plastics & Rubber Products; Fabricated Metal Products; Transportation Equipment; Machinery; Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components; and Apparel, Leather & Allied Products.

            http://www.ism.ws/ismreport/mfgrob.cfm

            1. Randian   12 years ago

              Fuck you, cut troll responding.

              1. R C Dean   12 years ago

                Sorry, couldn't resist.

            2. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

              "I am delighted to see the PMI above 50, closing out the year in positive territory," said Bradley J. Holcomb, CPSM, CPSD, chair of the ISM Manufacturing Business Survey Committee, in an interview. "And all of the 'anchor' indices?New Orders, Production, Employment, Supplier Deliveries [up 4.4 percent to 54.7]?were all above 50. The only one down was Inventories [down 2.0 percent to 43.0 to its lowest point since September 2009], which is really not a bad thing. You generally see inventories down at the end of the year as manufacturers try to reduce costs. It means that they will go back up and also set the stage for a good beginning to 2013."

              http://www.scmr.com/article/is.....high_note/

              1. Tulpa (LAOL-PA)   12 years ago

                RTFAing reveals he's putting lipstick on a pig. Manufacturing has been down four of the past 7 months. Hardly "robust".

        2. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

          I don't get you Doom/Gloomers.

          Interest rates are fantastic, inflation is contained, exports are at all-time highs, energy prices are cheap and falling, innovation is high, the Europe is stumbling around as a poor second to us.

          We are on the cusp of a tremendous boom.

          The S/P was 806 when Obama was elected and is 1460 now and will be 1800 plus in Jan 2017.

          1. mad libertarian guy   12 years ago

            We are on the cusp of a tremendous boom.

            We could have been on one all along were it not for government intervention at every turn and in to every facet.

            1. Tulpa (LAOL-PA)   12 years ago

              Well, the media has been saying we're on the cusp of a boom for four years now.

              1. el esc?ptico   12 years ago

                Palin's Buttplug| 1.3.13 @ 10:02AM |#|?|filternamelinkcustom

                I don't get you Doom/Gloomers.

                I guess when you're stuck up a MILF's ass, blissful ignorance is one of the results.

          2. Tulpa (LAOL-PA)   12 years ago

            Question, PB: how long ago did those things become true? And yet unemployment is still high and it's nearly impossible for SBs to get loans.

            You might also want to look at gold, silver, gun and ammo price behavior since BO took office.

            1. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

              We still have overcapacity (CE, RE, plant, and labor).

              A non-political issue.

              1. Michael S. Langston   12 years ago

                Ummm.... so.... you're stating overcapacity is a good thing huh?

                Then why should we stop at 10% UE - wouldn't 25% be that much more overcapacity?

          3. Jersey Patriot   12 years ago

            Natural gas prices are cheap; coal and oil are not. Labor force participation is at 30 year lows and is not rising. Median income continues to stagnate or decline.

            The S/P...will be 1800 plus in Jan 2017.

            Well, this thread just got bookmarked.

            1. Tulpa (LAOL-PA)   12 years ago

              I could see it being 1800+ by the end of the year. Of course gold would be around 3000 an ounce.

              1. Bobarian   12 years ago

                Bread could be $20 a loaf...

            2. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

              Coal and oil are at least 40% off their highs. Cheap is relative and solar is maturing.

              Face it, in today's global workforce 10% of Americans are unemployable. They are just not worth it when garment companies or FoxConns can pay less than $1 a day.

              1. Tulpa (LAOL-PA)   12 years ago

                So your boom includes 10% unemployment?

              2. Way Of The Crane   12 years ago

                Face it, in today's global workforce 10% of Americans are unemployable. They are just not worth it when garment companies or FoxConns can pay less than $1 a day.

                Are you saying that minimum wage laws are hurting our competitiveness in the global market?!?!? Blasphemy!

              3. R C Dean   12 years ago

                Here we see Plugs' favorite trick: cherrypicking the time frame for his data so that it supports his conclusion-o-the-day.

                1. Randian   12 years ago

                  and look who enables him.

                  1. Tulpa (LAOL-PA)   12 years ago

                    An anti-troll concern troll is just too meta for my brain to comprehend.

              4. iggy   12 years ago

                I like that you say 'in today's global workforce 10% of Americans are unemployable' when 5 years ago we had unemployment around 5%. What happened in the intervening 5 years to magically make twice as many Americans unemployable?

                1. Kant feel Pietzsche   12 years ago

                  You know......stuff!!

          4. R C Dean   12 years ago

            energy prices are cheap and falling

            Oh, really?

            http://chartsbin.com/view/oau

            http://www.steelonthenet.com/k.....rices.html

          5. Red Rocks Rockin   12 years ago

            Yeah, and the labor participation rate is STILL at 30 year lows, you fucking moron.

            You can't have a booming economy if people aren't working.

          6. Red Rocks Rockin   12 years ago

            The S/P was 806 when Obama was elected and is 1460 now and will be 1800 plus in Jan 2017.

            Keep in mind this is the same idiot who said the deficit was going to be less than a trillion in FY 12.

            1. R C Dean   12 years ago

              If the rest of the fiscal year plays out like the first quarter, our deficit will be north of $1.4T this year.

          7. Tulpa (LAOL-PA)   12 years ago

            PB, I think you belong back in February 2010.

          8. Sam Grove   12 years ago

            Interest rates are fantastic,

            How were interest rates in the 1020's?

          9. Rasilio   12 years ago

            "We are on the cusp of a tremendous boom.

            "

            Oh we are on the cusp of something alright but Boom is certainly not the right word for it.

            I suppose it just barely may be possible that we are on the cusp of one final bubble before the end of the road is reached and one could certainly mistake that for a boom.

            More realistically however we are already in the bubble and we've just reached the point where even inflationary bubbles just look like stagnation.

            No matter how you slice things however there is no way you can project anything but a total fiscal collapse of the American economy at some point in the next 20 years because there is no level of taxation which could produce the revenues needed to meet the pension and medical care obligations all levels of government have committed themselves to paying out and with the political clout of seniors and near seniors, and their useful idiots like yourself who stick your heads in the sand claiming the problem can be solved with small increases in tax rates on the rich and small cuts to defense spending, there is just no realistic way to expect that any meaningful cuts to those benefits will occur soon enough to matter.

          10. GILMORE   12 years ago

            http://mediaserver.fxstreet.co.....75aa57.pdf

            "We are on the cusp of a tremendous boom."

            Uh, the trend on margins is lower now, and cash-flow conversion is slowing...

            So where did you get your fantasy-economics degree?

      3. Tulpa (LAOL-PA)   12 years ago

        the S&P 500 and Dow are points away from all-time highs.

        in Zimbabwe dollars?

        1. R C Dean   12 years ago

          Apparently.

          http://www.aboutinflation.com/.....n-adjusted

        2. R C Dean   12 years ago

          Certainly not in constant US dollars.

          http://www.aboutinflation.com/.....n-adjusted

          1. robc   12 years ago

            Is that CPI inflation adjusted or M2 inflation adjusted? Because Im betting the former and the latter would look even worse.

          2. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

            Have you noticed that really elite investors don't fixate on the money supply?

            1. Tulpa (LAOL-PA)   12 years ago

              I made 200% returns in silver in three years. Does that make me an elite investor?

            2. iggy   12 years ago

              In this thread, Buttplug gets called out for being wrong about the Dow being percentage points away from all time highs, since those numbers are almost entirely inflation funded. Buttplug ignores the point and changes the subject.

              1. Kant feel Pietzsche   12 years ago

                Join us tomorrow for "As the Stomach Turns" when Buttplug will call for MOAR BUZTED WINDOWS....

        3. robc   12 years ago

          Our dollars arent that bad...yet.

          How close is NASDAQ to an all-time high? Yeah, thats what I thought.

  4. generic Brand   12 years ago

    Israel has set a minimum Body Mass Index of 18.5 to work as a model in the country.

    John books his ticket and plans his ex-patriation immediately.

    1. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

      Doubt it - he looks lousy in a bikini

      1. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

        So....you've seen that, have you?

        1. Ted S.   12 years ago

          I didn't know John was a black mayor.

  5. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

    Israel has set a minimum Body Mass Index of 18.5 to work as a model in the country.

    Finally, a reason for sarcasmic to post another Bar Rafaeli story

    1. nicole   12 years ago

      They're "stories"?

      1. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

        No - more than stories, they're literature:

        See Bar Rafaeli.

        See Bar Rafaeli jiggle.

        See sarcasmic drool.

      2. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

        No - more than stories, they're literature:

        See Bar Rafaeli.

        See Bar Rafaeli jiggle.

        See sarcasmic drool.

        1. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

          Of course you could swap out sarcasmic with just about any living male commenter at H&R.

          1. Certified Public Asskicker   12 years ago

            I do keep scrolling up to look at the picture.

          2. Groovus Maximus   12 years ago

            I'm glad you said just about, as Bar does little to nothing for me. I have seen much better.

            1. protefeed   12 years ago

              She has nothing TO jiggle.

              Tons of better looking, non-anorexic babes at any beach on Oahu.

              1. tarran   12 years ago

                Plus, she's not that great of a conversationalist...

                It puts me in mind of a bit of grafitti:

                "There is nothing so overrated as a bad fuck."

            2. Brett L   12 years ago

              She clears my minimum effective attractiveness bar by a good margin. Even knowing that Leo hit it.

      3. Restoras   12 years ago

        Well, sure...a single picture is worth one thousand words, right?

    2. mr simple   12 years ago

      Like we need a reason.

      While it's ridiculous for the government to regulate an industry like this, I'm ok with using Bar as the standard model.

    3. protefeed   12 years ago

      Israel has set a minimum Body Mass Index of 18.5 to work as a model in the country.

      Likely response -- models going to the gym to pack on muscle.

      Saw an anorexic model-ish woman at the gym yesterday, hardly able to do anything from what appeared to be low blood sugar. Pretty face, but wanted to order her a burger, stat.

  6. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    Meanwhile in France, the socialist president promises to keep pushing more taxes on the wealthy.

    Hollande wouldn't be much of a socialist otherwise.

    1. Certified Public Asskicker   12 years ago

      I am surprised there is no exit tax in France. That has to be coming, right?

      1. Jerry on the road   12 years ago

        They cannot impose exit taxes on people moving to other EU member states.

        1. Ted S.   12 years ago

          At which point the EU starts calling for tax "harmonization" which is always pressuring the low-tax states to increase their tax rates.

  7. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

    David Malpass: Nothing Is Certain Except More Debt and Taxes
    The Senate fiscal-cliff bill still means higher taxes on every working American. So much for just going after 'the rich.'
    http://online.wsj.com/article/.....on_LEADTop

    No wonder many House Republicans balked at what was presented. The New Year's Day legislation is breathtaking in its largess. The Senate bill extends 52 tax credits, mostly for one year, ensuring huge annual lobbying fees and political contributions. Section 206 provides a juicy capital-gains tax exemption for contributions of property for conservation, meaning wealthy environmentalists with extra acreage will be able to take a tax deduction for the appreciated property and have the environmental organization preserve it, adding to the value of the primary property. Section 312 provides faster tax deductions for "motorsports entertainment complexes." Section 317 allows expensing of film and television productions, meaning lower taxes for Hollywood.

    1. MP   12 years ago

      I'm sorry, but as much as this "GOP Obstructionist" spin is bullshit, so is the spin of the "tax hike on working Americans", regardless of its technical accuracy.

      1. Translucent Chum   12 years ago

        Technically accurate = bullshit. I don't see what you did there.

      2. T   12 years ago

        Yeah, but when everybody sees their first paycheck this year, it'll stick.

      3. Randian   12 years ago

        Did taxes not go up or what?

        1. Tulpa (LAOL-PA)   12 years ago

          Technically it's not a tax hike, it's the expiration of a temporary tax cut.

          When Walmart has an advertised sale from 5am to 10am on Black Friday, it would be silly to say they raised their prices at 10am.

          1. MP   12 years ago

            Agreed.

          2. Way Of The Crane   12 years ago

            it's the expiration of a temporary tax cut.

            HA HA HA

            When Walmart has an advertised sale from 5am to 10am on Black Friday, it would be silly to say they raised their prices at 10am.

            If I don't pay full price for shit at Walmart, they can't take me to prison or garnish my wages.

            And while you may think it's silly to say that they raised their prices at 10am, it doesn't change the fact that the price customers paid at 10am is higher than the price they paid at 9:59am. Deny it all you want, that is an increase.

          3. Emmerson Biggins   12 years ago

            Not agreed. The price went up between 9:59 and 10:01. This action was done purposefully by Walmart. Therefore, Walmart raised prices.

      4. Fatty Bolger   12 years ago

        So it's... accurate but fake?

  8. Bee Tagger   12 years ago

    Israel has set a minimum Body Mass Index of 18.5 to work as a model in the country.

    That seems barely legal.

    1. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

      There, what you did, I saw it.

      1. mnarayan   12 years ago

        This is the shittest meme ever.

    2. shamalam   12 years ago

      +17 years, 11 months, and twenty nine days.

  9. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

    "it's not wrong if you get a best-selling erotic novel out of this"

    Oh Prudie!

  10. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    Chinese censors appear more interested in shutting down social media than websites that sell guns and drugs.

    Chinese officials know that information is more dangerous to their power than anything else.

    1. Bee Tagger   12 years ago

      Finally, a market for my invention.

      Bulletgrams: When you want someone to get the message.

  11. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

    Al Jazeera Seeks a U.S. Voice Where Gore Failed
    http://mediadecoder.blogs.nyti.....urrent-tv/

    Al Jazeera, the pan-Arab news giant, has long tried to convince Americans that it is a legitimate news organization, not a parrot of Middle Eastern propaganda or something more sinister.

    It just bought itself 40 million more chances to make its case.

    Al Jazeera on Wednesday announced a deal to take over Current TV, the low-rated cable channel that was founded by Al Gore, a former vice president, and his business partners seven years ago. Al Jazeera plans to shut Current and start an English-language channel, which will be available in more than 40 million homes, with newscasts emanating from both New York and Doha, Qatar.

    1. Bardas Phocas   12 years ago

      Al takes the Blood Carbon money and runs.

      1. db   12 years ago

        Yeah, pretty much. Gotta love that irony.

        1. Bobarian   12 years ago

          "has long tried to convince Americans that it is a legitimate news organization"

          And it then buys Current?

          EPIC FAIL

      2. Brett L   12 years ago

        Nah. He's actually helping to bankrupt the oil industry by selling them a worthless business at way over market value.

    2. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

      The only time I watched Al Jazeera was during their coverage of the "Arab Spring". I thought it was quite good.

      1. Timon 19   12 years ago

        Their coverage of the Haiti earthquake and Japan tsunami was fantastic.

        It's especially sad that their coverage of something that happened in the US' backyard kicked the crap out of any US-based coverage.

        They actually gave information, while Anderson Cooper cried.

    3. Timon 19   12 years ago

      This makes some sense. They've been trying hard to get into the US market (outside of DC and, for some reason, Toledo). Last year they went and bought themselves a whole ton of English-language US rights to various soccer leagues and essentially replaced GolTV in its entirety, including grabbing its main commentary talent.

      They launched the channel late last year, just as the European leagues were starting up. They call themselves BeIn Sport, which is fairly retarded-sounding, but whatever. Interestingly, it's exactly the same name as their network in France, also launched last year.

      1. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

        Time Warner Cable just dropped Current in response to the deal, so it will be interesting to see what others do once it actually starts putting out Al Jazeera content

        1. Timon 19   12 years ago

          I'm not totally certain where CRNT even is on DirecTV.

          I know where largely-lefty Free Speech TV and LinkTV are (they seem to be on a KOCHTOPUS!!!! kick lately), but no idea about Current.

          1. Ted S.   12 years ago

            Current is channel 358, I believe.

            I don't have it in my favorites. I liked Newsworld International before Current bought the slot out from under them. When Current first appeared, I wondered how long it would take before the Ernie Guevara image showed up. It was sometime on the first weekend, and I was only flipping back and forth.

            1. Timon 19   12 years ago

              Yeah, that pissed me off. NWI was good.

      2. Ted S.   12 years ago

        This is the country that won the rights to host a World Cup, after all.

        [fights urge to laugh uncontrollably]

        1. Timon 19   12 years ago

          Shut your whore mouth!

          (The US was absolutely screwed on that, as was England for 2018 - hell, Oz would have been a vastly superior choice for 2022).

          Interestingly, that criminal Bin Hammam resigned from FIFA after managing to fight off several strong corruption allegations.

          1. Ted S.   12 years ago

            You couldn't figure out from my italicized stage directions that I don't quite agree with FIFA's decision?

            1. Timon 19   12 years ago

              And you couldn't figure out that I wasn't actually telling you to shut your whore mouth?

              Just filling in blanks for others while having a bit of a laugh.

      3. SugarFree   12 years ago

        and, for some reason, Toledo

        Nearby Dearborn has the second highest concentration of Arab immigrants in America.

        1. Timon 19   12 years ago

          Good point.

      4. Enough About Palin   12 years ago

        "or some reason, Toledo"

        There is a massively huge mosque and Muslim presence in Toledo.

        1. Enough About Palin   12 years ago

          http://www.emptywheel.net/wp-c......33-PM.png

          http://www.icgt.org/

          1. Timon 19   12 years ago

            Thanks, got it a half hour ago.

  12. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

    Japan's Population Falls by Record in 2012 as Births Decrease
    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/.....rease.html

    Japan's population last year declined by 212,000, the biggest drop on record, according to an estimate by the nation's health ministry.

    That's the largest reduction since the ministry started recording the data in 1947 and a sixth straight year of declines. The number of births fell by 18,000 to a record low of 1.03 million last year, the ministry said.

    1. T   12 years ago

      I know somebody here will be willing to go to Japan and attempt to make as many babies as possible to help out.

      1. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

        Warty? STEVE SMITH?

      2. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

        so an American goes to Japan version of GTO? (Great Teacher Onizuka)

    2. db   12 years ago

      I would think Japan had experienced several larger drops in population before. Say, in the mid 20th century?

      I wonder how the tsunami figures into the current decline?

      1. generic Brand   12 years ago

        They still have decreasing births every year. Even with no major catastrophically deadly events (like H-bombs or tsunamis or earthquakes), they would still be on the decline.

        1. Rasilio   12 years ago

          You really have to wonder how long it will be before they start paying people to emigrate there just so they can maintain their industrial base, and who they'll want to come in?

          My guess is ~30 years and they'll prefer Americans to the Chineese or Phillipino alternatives (can't imagine very many South Koreans would want to bother)

    3. Enough About Palin   12 years ago

      "Japan's Population Falls by Record in 2012 as Births Decrease"

      You know if they would just come in the schoolgirl's vagina instead of her mouth...

      1. el esc?ptico   12 years ago

        I don't know what the hell you're talking about. There's more Japanese creampie vignettes than any other ethnicity!

        I mean, someone told me something to that effect...

        I mean, I don't even know what a creampie is... or a vignette.

  13. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    Christina Kirchner, Argentina's president, writes to the British prime minister, David Cameron, demanding the Falkland Islands be surrendered.

    Just like a woman to nag.

    1. Translucent Chum   12 years ago

      At least she isn't constantly calling.

      1. T   12 years ago

        Only because Cameron changed his mobile number. Otherwise, his phone would be blowing up with insane text messages about the Malvinas.

        1. Raven Nation   12 years ago

          Uh-uh: it's the Maldives according to our fearless leader.

    2. Drake   12 years ago

      Nobody pay attention to the complete failure of Peronist socialism - let's all get worked up about the Falklands again instead.

      1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

        That dog needs wagged.

      2. Gladstone   12 years ago

        It worked well for the 70s Military Junta.

  14. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

    What could have entered the public domain on January 1, 2013 under the law that existed until 1978?

    Hint: Readers of Mad will just get madder

    more

    1. robc   12 years ago

      Dammit, that means I still cant publish my Forbidden Planet fan fic!

  15. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

    Jonah Goldberg: What Is the Future of Conservatism?
    http://www.commentarymagazine......servatism/

    For good and bad reasons, liberalism has managed to cover itself with a patina of libertarianism. Some of this stems from changing attitudes about sexuality. Conservative opposition to gay marriage sends a powerful cultural signal that makes the GOP seem Comstockish and scary, at least to the elites who shape the culture and to younger voters.

    That argument is familiar enough. But what allows the Democrats to seem more libertarian isn't just cultural marketing, but a widespread acceptance of the idea that positive liberty is more important than negative liberty. The former, an idea near to Franklin Delano Roosevelt's heart, is that you can't be free unless the state gives you the material aid necessary to enjoy life to its fullest. This was the point of his "economic bill of rights." Negative liberty, an idea dear to the Founders, defines freedom as independence from government intrusion and meddling.

    1. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

      positive liberty is more important than negative liberty

      Who has said this (elected official only)?

      JG making shit up again.

      1. Jordan   12 years ago

        Wake me up when pro-regressives fight as hard to oppose the NDAA as they fought to pass Obamacare (HEALTHCARE IS A RIGHT!!!1)

    2. nicole   12 years ago

      what allows the Democrats to seem more libertarian isn't just cultural marketing, but a widespread acceptance of the idea that positive liberty is more important than negative liberty

      Does...not...compute. I see what he means but that's sure not how I would put it.

      1. SugarFree   12 years ago

        Jonah Goldberg is an idiot. He convinced us long ago, but I guess he secretly fears that we don't know he's an idiot, and so has to prove it again and again.

        1. nicole   12 years ago

          He just doesn't want you to forget about him with all the Jezebel writers competing for your idiot-attention.

          1. SugarFree   12 years ago

            True, it is a very crowded marketplace of moronic ideas.

            1. T   12 years ago

              May the best moron prevail!

              1. Groovus Maximus   12 years ago

                Talles midget?

      2. Dweebston   12 years ago

        I'm not altogether certain what's wrong in stating this (tbh I didn't rtfa, fwiw). I can't think of a single hot-button issue in the past decade in which the democratic punditry or media have insisted on a level-headed, back-to-basics approach to qualifying government's proper role in addressing it. Instead, it's ever the wailing cry of SOMETHING MUST BE DONE.

    3. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

      Ooo, libertarianism has made the big time. The progressive left in recent years had been working to grab the mantle of Christianity, now maybe they'll try to usurp libertarian messages (but not on civil liberties, of course).

      1. protefeed   12 years ago

        Civil liberties are the only way Democrats could appear remotely libertarian-ish. I mean, what -- economic liberties? From DEMOCRATS??!?

        1. nicole   12 years ago

          No no, protefeed, the way that it works is you redefine libertarian to mean progressive.

          1. Dweebston   12 years ago

            I thought they're redefining libertarian as hacky right-wing loonies.

          2. mad libertarian guy   12 years ago

            No no, protefeed, the way that it works is you redefine libertarian to mean progressive.

            Yep.

            Many of the left's successes is that the left controls language. Even when they aren't the vaunted experts in something, firearms for example, they control the language.

            In order to combat this, I'll have to go grab my assault rifle and load in the clip. Even though I own neither, everyone understands exactly what I "meant" by it, because the left has ensured that they control the language on everything.

            Things mean what the left wants them to mean.

            1. SweatingGin   12 years ago

              Don't let them control the word "clip", too. Magazine, magazine, magazine!

              1. Brett L   12 years ago

                Let them ban 30 round clips -- IIRC, the Garands don't have much market for them. As long as I can have magazines of at least that size.

  16. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

    The lethal lap-dance

    1. BigT   12 years ago

      A nice rack is a terrible thing to waste.

  17. Certified Public Asskicker   12 years ago

    I noticed this little gem before I left work last night.

    For 2013, the 35% tax bracket for single individuals projects to be $398,350 to $400,000.

    Good job congress, a tax bracket that spans a whopping $1,650.

    1. robc   12 years ago

      With the way they are monetizing debt, it will expand in size rapidly.

  18. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

    Crony Capitalist Blowout
    A tax increase for everyone but the favored wealthy few.
    http://online.wsj.com/article/.....on_LEADTop

    In praising Congress's huge new tax increase, President Obama said Tuesday that "millionaires and billionaires" will finally "pay their fair share." That is, unless you are a Nascar track owner, a wind-energy company or the owners of StarKist Tuna, among many others who managed to get their taxes reduced in Congress's New Year celebration.

    There's plenty to lament about the capital and income tax hikes, but the bill's seedier underside is the $40 billion or so in tax payoffs to every crony capitalist and special pleader with a lobbyist worth his million-dollar salary. Congress and the White House want everyone to ignore this corporate-welfare blowout, so allow us to shine a light on the merriment.

    1. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

      Obama paying off his NASCAR pals!

      1. mad libertarian guy   12 years ago

        That ought to make the KULTUR WARRIERZ on Team BLUE really fucking happy.

  19. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

    The HHS Mandate and Judicial Theocracy
    If we are to preserve our First Amendment rights, judges must refrain from telling plaintiffs challenging the HHS mandate that they've got their theology wrong.
    http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2013/01/7403/

    These decisions set a dangerous precedent by arrogating to government officials the authority to make determinations about what a religion does, and does not, require its followers to do or refrain from doing. If we continue down this path, soon judges will be telling Jews that their religion does not require male circumcision, devout Muslims that wearing the hijab is merely optional, or Catholic doctors and nurses that their religion permits them to perform or assist in abortions. To put such power in the hands of the government is to eradicate the separation of church and state and to deal a death blow to the free exercise of religion. If we are to preserve our First Amendment rights, Judge Heaton's ruling must be overturned. More generally, as these HHS mandate cases make their way through the appeals process and eventually reach the Supreme Court, judges must scrupulously avoid deciding them based on theological claims.

  20. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

    Cliff Deal Only Whets Obama's Appetite For More Taxes
    http://news.investors.com/ibd-.....-taxes.htm

    But as the fiscal cliff agreement looked increasingly likely, Obama started talking more specifically about additional tax hikes. On Monday, he told a White House rally that "revenues have to be part of the equation in turning off the sequester."

    Translation: If Republicans want to prevent devastating defense cuts from automatically kicking in two months from now, they'll have to choke down another round of tax hikes.

    1. gaijin   12 years ago

      Devastating defense cuts? I don't think devastating means what it used to.

      1. el esc?ptico   12 years ago

        It will be devastating to the companies that have been leeching off of the "military industrial complex" for decades, whilst being a boon to the actual economy. I guess it depends on whose perspective you're taking. For me, not so devastating, for many a lazy asshole on the gov't dime... how would you feel if you had to actually do something productive for a living after free-loading for all these years? Devastated, maybe?

        1. gaijin   12 years ago

          perhaps. But my understanding was that all the cuts were actually just cuts in growth. So the lazy teat suckers would continue to do so...just with smaller raises....kind of like most of the rest of the people in the non dotGov world.

          1. el esc?ptico   12 years ago

            Perhaps it is devastating to the brother-in-law that was promised the cushy job at some defense contractor this year and wouldn't get it. And can you imagine the pie on the face of the guy who made that promise. How devastated would you feel having to tell your wife that the job you promised her lazy ass brother would not be materializing because of cuts in growth? It's shameful.

      2. DJF   12 years ago

        The same with the word 'Defense".

  21. SugarFree   12 years ago

    You might want to have a seat...

    Jezebel screams and rends clothing when BMI is used to determine who is over weight, approves when it is used to determine which models are too skinny.

    Israel's ban on models with a B.M.I. of under 18.5 goes into effect this week. Don't hold your breath for similar legislation or even voluntary industry regulation in the U.S. "We never had an approach of mandate or enforce," says the Council of Fashion Designers of America's Steven Kolb. "We create awareness and education."

    Did I just blow your mind?!?

    1. Certified Public Asskicker   12 years ago

      Yeah that's right, fuck those skinny bitches.

    2. Groovus Maximus   12 years ago

      Mind blown...

    3. tarran   12 years ago

      You want to really blow your mind? Replace Jezebel with Al Jazeera which is how I originally parsed it.

      1. SugarFree   12 years ago

        Al Jazeera? The cable news network that Al Gore just sold his American TV network to?

        1. tarran   12 years ago

          Yes....

          Although I question whether it's a real news network;

          On Verizon Fios, all the cable news channels are in a band between 90 and 110. Current TV is in the 190's sandwiched between Chiller and some station I can't remember - the kind of channel where there might be a monster, or some kind of weird mirror. These are just examples; it could also be something much better.

          1. Way Of The Crane   12 years ago

            Sadly, if you want the Cooking channel on Verizon, you have to sign up for a package that includes Current TV.

    4. Ted S.   12 years ago

      Did I just blow your mind?!?

      Didn't I?

      Well, let's blow your mind some more!

      1. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

        you were doing so well with the Delfonics, and then you had to go and do that. Damn you to hell

        1. Ted S.   12 years ago

          That's because I've got the right stuff, baby.

          Seriously, I have my brower set not to automatically play plug-ins, so when somebody includes a Youtube link, the video doesn't start up; I only get the title, which 99% of the time is enough information.

    5. Warty   12 years ago

      I recently discovered that my BMI is 33. FUCK YEAH

  22. Matrix   12 years ago

    Girl with no name

    Possible brickbat? Iceland won't allow her to have her given name.

    1. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

      a list of approved names?! yikes.

      1. Groovus Maximus   12 years ago

        This is actually very common in Euro-landia. UKR has a list of approved baby names, and I believe Czech-sylvania does as well, for example.

    2. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

      You know who else's name isn't allowed to be given?

      1. T   12 years ago

        Voldemort?

      2. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

        Shikelgruber?

      3. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

        All I said was this fish is good enough for Jehovah

        1. Restoras   12 years ago

          Halibut!

      4. Kaptious Kristen   12 years ago

        White Indian?

      5. Way Of The Crane   12 years ago

        Mxyzptlk? or was it Kltpzyxm?

    3. Ted S.   12 years ago

      I've been through the desert on a girl with no name
      It felt good to be out of the rain.

      1. T   12 years ago

        Fuck you for making me think of America. Goddamn but the 70s had some terrible dreck.

        1. Ted S.   12 years ago

          They made they 80s pretty lousy too.

        2. Shmenge   12 years ago

          Say what? Tin Man and Sister Golden Hair are both great songs.

    4. generic Brand   12 years ago

      Her mother is hoping that will change with her suit, the first time someone has challenged a names committee decision in court.

      How used to statism do you become that no one challenges a "Names Committee" in the country for decades? Is America heading this way? I hate being paranoid, but I think we are.

      1. gaijin   12 years ago

        no way...that would be racist

        1. Rich   12 years ago

          The list would contain formation rules rather than actual names, so "FridChik'nisha" would still be allowed.

    5. mad libertarian guy   12 years ago

      There goes the theory that all Icelandic women are hot.

      1. tarran   12 years ago

        I don't know, those eyes communicate a certain mischievousness and with.

        1. mad libertarian guy   12 years ago

          Ugly chicks MUST be mischievous. Otherwise they get nowhere.

          1. T   12 years ago

            There's always ice cream, cats, and ranting on Jezebel.

    6. shamalam   12 years ago

      +1 Sheniqua

  23. Groovus Maximus   12 years ago

    In former Soviet Russia, Gerard Depardieu YOU!

    More on Rasputin, from the archives of The UK Fraudian.

    1. Jerry on the road   12 years ago

      Damn you!

  24. Jerry on the road   12 years ago

    Putin gives tax exile Depardieu Russian citizenship. Talk about executive order power.

    1. Groovus Maximus   12 years ago

      PWND, gospodin.

  25. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

    The nerve of some people...

    "Save us from saviours" is the piercing refrain of a growing human rights movement demanding that sex workers be recognised as more than victims to be rescued or strategic populations to be targeted for public health campaigns. It's likely to strike a nerve among some in the traditional aid and development industry, often criticised for top-down, paternalistic projects.

    1. mad libertarian guy   12 years ago

      How about we recognize sex workers as people using an asset for financial gain in a transaction that takes place between two (or more) consenting adults?

      Weird, I know.

      1. Enough About Palin   12 years ago

        It also takes place between adults and 12-year-olds, so there's that.

        1. shamalam   12 years ago

          Pedophiles exist, therefore adults can't have consensual sex?

  26. sloopyinca   12 years ago

    If a "civilian" leaves a dog in the car for an hour, they're likely to get charged with a crime. If a police officer leaves a group of minors in a police van for 14 hours with no food, water of communication with the outside world, they get a few days vacation.

    Ain't unions swell?

    1. Ted S.   12 years ago

      Procedures were followed.

    2. Tim   12 years ago

      THEY KILLED KENNY! YOU BASTARDS!

  27. SugarFree   12 years ago

    HAHAHAHA.... OK... HA!... get this...wait a minute, need to catch my breath... woo, OK, OK... get this:

    Gawker derides Narcissism Masquerading as Journalism

    Oh, man. I didn't think I could get that out. Oh, shit! And it's cross posted on JEZEBEL!

    THE CLUELESSNESS IS DELICIOUS! MOAR! WANT MOAR!

    1. T   12 years ago

      I think we've truly reached peak irony with that one.

      1. SugarFree   12 years ago

        Where else can it go?

        1. nicole   12 years ago

          Is that a dare?

          1. SugarFree   12 years ago

            No way, nicole. You take dares too seriously. Someone's going to get hurt.

    2. BigT   12 years ago

      Shapiro is, in essence, telling her students that they only way they will get published and sell stories and books and have careers as professional writers is to exploit every last tawdry twist and turn of their own lives for profit. Why, she could be the editor of any number of popular websites! Her takeaway from editors' and agents' demands for interesting stories is, "Sharing internal traumas on page one makes you immediately knowable, lovable and engrossing." She is teaching a gimmick: the confessional as attention-grabber.

      She advises politicians to write not one, but TWO autobiographies.

      1. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

        Did it work for this guy?

        1. Bobarian   12 years ago

          It would have blown up in his face, if anyone had actually read them.

      2. Way Of The Crane   12 years ago

        "Sharing internal traumas on page one makes you immediately knowable, lovable and engrossing."

        So only the most dysfunctional individuals (or the best liars) should be writers?

        1. Enough About Palin   12 years ago

          A Million Little Cups of Tea?

    3. Ed   12 years ago

      To Hamilton's credit he does include Gawker Media as a place to find the kind of first-person essays he's lamenting.

  28. mr simple   12 years ago

    Los Angeles photog killed shooting Bieber's car

    The kicker:
    Bieber says he hopes the tragedy will inspire legislation to protect the lives of celebrities, police, bystanders and photographers themselves.

    If only someone had legislated against this.

    1. gaijin   12 years ago

      More shooting violence?

    2. Ted S.   12 years ago

      The guy was exercising his 1A right to film the cops. Any legislation Bieber wants is going to violate the 1A.

    3. AuH2O   12 years ago

      If that ever happens to me, spare me the pain and tell my family I died of auto-erotic asphyxiation

      1. Brett L   12 years ago

        Actually, that's better than what I came up with in the PM links last night.

    4. generic Brand   12 years ago

      Couldn't the answer just be to stop giving a shit about celebrities?

      1. SugarFree   12 years ago

        Paying attention the Alpha Apes got us fed, keep us warm, and got us laid for millions of years. Your pleas will fall on deaf ears.

        1. mad libertarian guy   12 years ago

          Paying attention the Alpha Apes

          We're defining Da Beebs as an alpha male now? The fuck?

          1. SugarFree   12 years ago

            He's rich, desired and famous. If he liked having sex with women he could get more tail than a toilet seat in a stadium during the Superbowl and sire 10,000 children.

            Alpha Ape.

            1. Enough About Palin   12 years ago

              Our alpha apes are becoming feminized. See Johnny Depp.

    5. Way Of The Crane   12 years ago

      If only someone had legislated against this.

      I agree... how can our government continue to allow the Biebster to roam free? He and his Ferrari should be locked up for the safety of the paparazzi.

  29. Groovus Maximus   12 years ago

    Meanwhile, in Brazil,things are going bumbum. (You're welcome.-)

    1. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

      I give you a nurse who fills in forms rather than staunch a patient's bleeding, and I get an arse shot in return? Where is the love?

      1. Ted S.   12 years ago

        You're not the only person to wonder where is the love, you know.

        1. mr simple   12 years ago

          Please make it stop!

          1. Ted S.   12 years ago

            Mr. Simple just wants to stop.

    2. Ted S.   12 years ago

      Things going bumbum, Finland-style.

    3. gaijin   12 years ago

      I don;t speak Ukranian or whatever, but it's heartening to see that bumbum would seem to be a universal term.

  30. AuH2O   12 years ago

    5 things not going away in 2013

    #1. The NDAA Will Remain, as Liberals Continue to Sleep on the Job

    So come 2013, we will have the NDAA again. None of the abuses to our due process have been remedied. And do you know the worst part? No one cares. You can find testimonials on YouTube, but the subject is ignored by mainstream media, and most people still don't believe that a "liberal" like Obama could sign such a bill. All my liberal friends were correctly up in arms when Bush pursued such wrong-headed measures, but it seems like as long as you're not pushing church-based legislation (like banning abortion and gay rights), a whole bunch of liberals don't seem motivated to keep watch over our Constitution. The apologists will come forth in the comments, and before they explain why our president's hands were tied on this one, I hope they read the first NDAA column and the court decision linked above. Their arguments, which were overly optimistic and flimsy, are even more tenuous now. It's not that I want to be right. I just want to remove some of the calming rationalizations that enable the present liberal apathy, because this apathy means that 2013 and beyond will see no shortage of abuses to our basic freedoms.

    It's sad when a website like cracked, meant to be funny, is better on this shit than the MSM

    1. Ted S.   12 years ago

      Is the list all on one page, or as cracked normally does, split up into multiple pages?

      1. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

        TWO PAGES! TWO!

        1. AuH2O   12 years ago

          Thanks, Count von Count.

        2. R C Dean   12 years ago

          Two, as always.

          [hold up three fingers]

      2. AuH2O   12 years ago

        2 pages

    2. Randian   12 years ago

      The Cracked Commentariat is sure to go apeshit, especially given that they got called out about it.

  31. sloopyinca   12 years ago

    Sex, intrigue and physical assaults. Just a day in the life of a Lowell, MA police officer.

    Too bad the victim of the assault wasn't a city planner named Joe.

  32. RG   12 years ago

    Peak stupid?

    "For many of the Republican Party's Tea Party insurgents, the choice is even more fundamental: whether there should be a government at all. Their unbending position, demanding an ever-diminishing role for the federal government, has levied an enormous unnecessary cost on everyone else."

    http://blogs.reuters.com/nicho.....overnment/

    1. Jerry on the road   12 years ago

      Ghosts from the eighteenth century are preying on our school-children, abetted by those who believe that compromise on amending our gun laws is surrendering to the forces of big government. Such unbending absolutism costs human lives.

      1. RG   12 years ago

        But government controlled drones or drug warriors with badges don't.

    2. DJF   12 years ago

      """demanding an ever-diminishing role for the federal government"''

      Yes, the government has withered away to almost nothing. Washington DC is a ghost town with vacant government buildings everywhere. The military does not have troops enough to guard the tomb of the unknown solder. The President, Congress, and Supreme Court have to stand on street corners begging for food. When will this madness stop and the all powerful Tea Party allow the government to do its job.

      1. RG   12 years ago

        Just think of the costs those demands have on us and ignore the actual deficit and accumulated debt.

    3. KMA Too   12 years ago

      I dunno....those commenters certainly were gobbling up that horse shit and regurgitating it easily enough.

  33. AuH2O   12 years ago

    This might be the most revealing paragraph Jezebel has ever written

    In most if not all contexts, I don't really think wearing makeup is a "choice." At least, it's not a choice in the sense of a decision where the branching options are neutral and equally weighted and carry few, if any, negative social consequences, the way making a ham sandwich or a veggie wrap for lunch is a choice. Culturally speaking, the playing field is tilted pretty heavily in makeup's favor.

    Emphasis added, because holy shit does that explain their world view on shit like why I should pay for their abortions.

    1. tarran   12 years ago

      Aren't you supposed to be out at sea, mister?

      1. generic Brand   12 years ago

        I think that's Auric that went on the cruise.

    2. MP   12 years ago

      Those douchebags could really use an editor. I could condense that to two words...

      PEER PRESSURE

    3. nicole   12 years ago

      Wow. That is a hell of a find, Goldwater.

      1. nicole   12 years ago

        We're only supposed to appreciate or be interested in makeup as a form of play and personal expression; we're supposed to ignore the social and political contexts of makeup. I'm not interested in that narrative.

        This is so sad. Also, the entire post is really classist, which she like, sort of realizes, but also not. She says, "I wear makeup because I recognize that I live in a culture where makeup is normalized for people of my sex, age, and profession," which is true, but then she also says she has "no illusions about the fact that makeup is, for women, considered standard in 21st Century America" when what she means, again, is "21st Century Professional New York."

        And the saddest part is that makeup is really fun, and if all you're willing to allow for is a political narrative of makeup you are probably not having fun.

        1. Rasilio   12 years ago

          I thought that not having any fun was part of the defining traits of a radical feminist?

          I mean if you were actually having fun somewhere then you might just miss the oppression you are obviously being subjected to at that moment.

      2. Randian   12 years ago

        This is what liberals like Tony have been pimping for a while. Any choice that has negative social consequences but is based on what they deem to be irrational or superficial criteria should be equalized through the use of force via the State.

        1. SugarFree   12 years ago

          Leftist only express concern about coercion in trivial matters or a narrowly defined slice of behaviors. Otherwise, they are the first to get their face-boots on.

          Faceboot: The Social Media Site for Statist Shitbags

        2. AuH2O   12 years ago

          It actually explains their culture war bullshit really well.

          We can't just have legal abortion. We must also approve of the abortions- no one should protest or ever make anyone feel any negative consequence, including emotional ones, about abortions.

          We can't just tolerate gays. We have to actively like them and accept them into societal institutions like churches.

          Etc.

          1. Randian   12 years ago

            Precisely. For Jezebel in particular, you could add "we can't just tolerate overweight / traditionally unattractive women. We have to make it illegal to discriminate against them"

            "We can't just tolerate sex. We have to subsidize it."

            Part of it is driven by a childish impulse to stick it to the old fogies and the other half is driven by a bad case of "gimmie".

            Progs have arrested development.

            1. Red Rocks Rockin   12 years ago

              Part of it is driven by a childish impulse to stick it to the old fogies and the other half is driven by a bad case of "gimmie".

              Pretty much all of Gawker media is one big cesspool of "FUCK YOU, DAD!"

          2. John   12 years ago

            We can't just have legal abortion. We must also approve of the abortions-

            That is because they are totalitarians. That is what it means to be a totalitarian. Non totalitarians just want their own freedom. Totalitarians want to control everything. It is not enough for totalitarians to win politically. It is not enough for them to get their own freedom. They must control people's thoughts. The fact that anyone anywhere is doing something they object to is what drives totalitarians.

    4. R C Dean   12 years ago

      So, its only a choice if nothing is at stake?

      If your decision has actual consequences, you shouldn't have to make it?

      If its a meaningful choice, its not a choice at all? The only choices are the trivial ones?

      1. JD the elder   12 years ago

        Yup. See, if the choice would have real, meaningful consequences, it's too important to be left up to us, because we might choose the wrong thing. We're allowed to choose things without any obvious impact, like which TV show to watch, in order to keep us happy and give us the idea we can still make choices.

    5. db   12 years ago

      Those women who complain that you have to wear makeup to be accepted in the world are completely full of it. I prefer women without makeup. I know lots of women who don't wear it and I can't see that it's held them back professionally nor romantically.

      1. Brett L   12 years ago

        There is a time and a place where tastefully applied makeup gives a woman a confidence and a sparkle. Like a dress they know makes them look great. I won't knock it, but I have reliably dated women who didn't wear makeup to work or going out every time.

        1. db   12 years ago

          That's the thing. When worn sparingly and infrequently, it can be a treat. But everyday use and excessive use make it drab and uninteresting.

      2. mr simple   12 years ago

        Are you sure they're actually not wearing any or is it just a natural look? I've known lots of guys who think the know women who don't wear makeup and are surprised when they find out they're wrong.

        1. Randian   12 years ago

          Women look better in makeup. The end.

          1. Night Elf Mohawk   12 years ago

            Makeup is basically a physical Photoshopping. It's almost certainly going to help if it's done well but, even then, it can be more a case of "different" than "better."

        2. nicole   12 years ago

          Yeah, I was going to suggest that at least some of these women actually were wearing makeup.

          I agree with Randian, although his statement probably shouldn't be limited to women.

          It just baffles me why anyone would think of this differently from how they think of dressing in general. Some people are comfortable going out and about in sweatpants and tshirts; others aren't. Some people think foregoing makeup is acceptable in some contexts and not others; other people draw different lines. Big fucking deal.

          Of course, the whole point of this is that it somehow does have to be a big fucking deal because someone might judge you for going out in sweatpants, and we can't have that!

          1. SugarFree   12 years ago

            I think that the idea that women can wear or not wear makeup as they prefer and men can like it or not like it as they prefer leaves men with an uncomfortable amount of agency for Marcotte and the Jezebellians.

          2. Brett L   12 years ago

            I agree with Randian, although his statement probably shouldn't be limited to women.

            What? They put makeup on actors because it makes them look better? Fuck me. Next you'll tell me Rock Hudson was gay.

          3. db   12 years ago

            No, they're actually not wearing makeup.

    6. Emmerson Biggins   12 years ago

      so a choice isn't actually "choice" if it actually matters which option you choose.

      that makes total sense.

  34. AuH2O   12 years ago

    Is it just me, or is the Benghazi thing starting to resemble a bad political thriller?

    Petraeus about to testify? Mistress.
    Clinton? Blood clot.

    EVERYONE WHO KNOWS ABOUT THIS FILE IS DEAD!

    1. Tim   12 years ago

      Benghazi? What are you talking about?

      1. Tim   12 years ago

        Anybody know what he's on about?

        1. Jerry on the road   12 years ago

          Ben Ghazi, wasn't he a famous actor?

          1. Bobarian   12 years ago

            a famous actor?

            Sure, he played the bad guy in Road House.

            1. Enough About Palin   12 years ago

              Everyone was bad in Roadhouse.

          2. GILMORE   12 years ago

            I thought Ben Ghazi was like, sports cream for cramped muscles...

        2. KDN   12 years ago

          It's a glorified Republican witch hunt. Move along, nothing to see here.

          1. DJF   12 years ago

            My TV told me that it was all some film makers fault.

  35. SugarFree   12 years ago

    The Neverending War on Men Stating a Preference; Or, You Can't Win So You Might As Well Stop Playing Their Game

    I fully support Amanda Marcotte wearing all the makeup she wants, up to and including a plastic dry cleaning sack over her head.

    I especially like the part where she mocks the guy who finds his wife beautiful with or without makeup. That disgusting pig-fucker. How dare he!

    1. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

      I especially like the comment which says Amanda Marcotte looks like a rodeo clown

      1. SugarFree   12 years ago

        You don't think every man longs for the raspy caress of her lipless beak?

        1. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

          you make it sound so damn sexy

          1. SugarFree   12 years ago

            When you stare longingly in to Amanda's beady, close-set eyes, you get as close as anyone can to pure exultation.

            1. Groovus Maximus   12 years ago

              *BARF*

    2. nicole   12 years ago

      I read that poor sap's piece yesterday amid wailing and gnashing of teeth, and couldn't find anything at all wrong with it. And neither can Marcotte, in reality--she's complaining about some fantasy version she read in her own head, about how "It's not liberating to hear a man who has never had to live a day as a woman tell us that we're silly bunnies who don't know what we're doing with that powder brush."

      1. Brett L   12 years ago

        "How DARE men tell me this cage is of my own making!"

      2. SugarFree   12 years ago

        That's her whole game. Rather than respond to A, she responds to B, C, D, E, and F. Which would be fine if she provided all the way to F and then made a comment. But that you take too much work. She only preaches for the choir, and most of that singing is only going on in her head.

        1. nicole   12 years ago

          I need to remember not to get depressed purely about the state of essay and argumentation because it seriously doesn't fucking matter.

          1. SugarFree   12 years ago

            because it seriously doesn't fucking matter

            I don't think your fully developed your argument enough to support this conclusion.

            1. nicole   12 years ago

              You did that part for me.

              1. SugarFree   12 years ago

                That's what she said.

        2. AuH2O   12 years ago

          Imagine grading her papers in college.

          "In this paper about Thomas Aquinas, I will be deconstructing how The Merry Wives of Windsor reinforces 1500s patriarchal institutions from Shakespeare's time into our present day."

      3. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

        Her paraphrases sometimes boil down to "how dare you say I'm stupid," even if that's not what they said.

    3. Randian   12 years ago

      I especially like the part where she mocks the guy who finds his wife beautiful with or without makeup.

      In fairness and not to defend She Who Shall Not Be Named, but I do see that crap on Facebook and elsewhere from guys who are saying that shit just to get laid.

      1. SugarFree   12 years ago

        Well, of course. But Marcotte could have made the argument that it is a trend rather then dredging up a single .jpg of a pathetic emo kid.

        And imputing a wider trend onto a person writing about their personal experience is fundamentally dishonest. The guy is 58. I doubt he has much to do with a bunch of tweener sad-sacks.

        1. Randian   12 years ago

          Yeah, she shoehorned that one in there.

      2. Brett L   12 years ago

        Where's that PM link from earlier this week with the two creepers talking about how much they "respected and worshipped the feminine"?

        1. AuH2O   12 years ago

          They respect the feminine so much that they have vaginas preserved in jars!

          Just don't ask where, or rather who, those vaginas came from.

          1. T   12 years ago

            You can get anything on eBay.

  36. AuH2O   12 years ago

    Well, SF, it looks like we are playing duelling retard banjos of Gawker/Jez/Marcotte. With that in mind...

    DA NA NA NA NA NA NA! VAWA is no more

    Hear that ladies? The beatings will continue until I get some GODDAMN MEATLOAF!

    1. nicole   12 years ago

      Shoulda been here last night, THIS HAS BEEN COVERED. Who even likes meatloaf?

      1. MP   12 years ago

        I love meatloaf. Second favorite homemade meal after tacos.

        1. nicole   12 years ago

          I know a lot of people like it, actually. My mom was a terrible cook, and my dad wanted everything to be overcooked, so you can imagine what meatloaf was like when I was a kid.

        2. Ted S.   12 years ago

          You know who else likes tacos? Hennifer Lopez.

      2. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

        Meatloaf?
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9NTDHjVKQyo

        1. mr simple   12 years ago

          *uncontrolled vomiting*

          You had to pick that song. Why would I even click that link?

      3. SugarFree   12 years ago

        I like meatloaf. I form it in a loaf pan, turn it out on a cast iron griddle and then smoke it on the grill.

        1. T   12 years ago

          Interesting. I may have to experiment, but this weekend I have a 5 pound ribeye (bone-in) that's going on the smoker after some dry-rub.

      4. KDN   12 years ago

        Who even likes meatloaf?

        Meatloaf is fantastic. Leftover meatloaf is even fantasticker, especially when put on a sandwich with leftover gravy and too much mayo.

        I'll eat meatloaf prepared in any manner: plain, onions, stuffed with cheese, "Italian", hell I'll even accept mushrooms even though I hate them. The awesomeness of the loaf is more than enough to make up for the terribleness of the fungi.

        1. SugarFree   12 years ago

          Use a coffee grinder on dried mushrooms and add to the meat. You get the glutamate flavor boost without having to actually eat them.

          1. SIV   12 years ago

            Mushrooms through a coffee grinder?
            Just use Accent.

            1. Randian   12 years ago

              MSG FTW!

              1. SIV   12 years ago

                Kikunae Ikeda

                1. Randian   12 years ago

                  Don't give me that umami crap. I don't buy into Eastern mysticism.

        2. Ted S.   12 years ago

          Mayonnaise is disgusting.

          1. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

            not the artisanal type

            1. sloopyinca   12 years ago

              Easy now. This is getting dangerously close to going where we don't want it to go.

            2. mr simple   12 years ago

              Yeah, but just think of how long they have to study and practice to get good at making artisanal mayo, as well as the hours put in making it.

      5. AuH2O   12 years ago

        nciole, it is covered. Under the 1956 AM-PM Links Treaty, which brought an end to the Great Links War. It allows for a reposting in the next link, provided they are of a different time classification. I could not, however, post it in the next PM links. Obviously.

        God, learn fake international internet law sometime.

      6. AuH2O   12 years ago

        To be fair, meatballs are better, but they are dago food, and therefore not really fit for human consumption

        1. KDN   12 years ago

          Sweden disagrees! Everything's better with brown gravy.

        2. nicole   12 years ago

          See, you forget that I am a dago. And I make fucking amazing meatballs.

          1. Randian   12 years ago

            See, you forget that I am a dago. And I make fucking amazing meatballs.

            I swear this is how I read it at first.

            1. nicole   12 years ago

              Wow, Randian, guess I did traumatize you last night. Sorry.

              1. Randian   12 years ago

                I live as a slave to the matriarchy.

                1. el esc?ptico   12 years ago

                  Get a room!

            2. Kant feel Pietzsche   12 years ago

              She just left out the comma. Should have read: "And I make fucking amazing, meatballs.

  37. Suthenboy   12 years ago

    Been kinda busy this morning so playing catch up here. Reading the links here....and catching up some past articles I missed I have decided that I fucking hate people.

    There are a few individuals I love and will spend the rest of my life pouring myself out to, fewer that I actually like, but the bulk of humanity I fucking hate.

    1. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

      If the choice is between being hated by you or being poured onto by you, then I'll go through Door A

      1. Suthenboy   12 years ago

        I said 'out to' not 'onto'. I see where your mind is.

        But hey, what is wrong with a little kink now and then?

    2. Brett L   12 years ago

      I've long said that I love individuals and hate people.

      1. gaijin   12 years ago

        Which probably explains why collectivists always see teh legislations as the way to purify humanity.

        1. T   12 years ago

          I know how to purify humanity: cleansing nuclear fire. Short of that, I got nothing.

  38. Groovus Maximus   12 years ago

    Hopping in The Wayback Machine, an interesting look at Soviet medicine circa 1970.

    1. db   12 years ago

      I love the picture of the guy getting a "medical exam" at his work station. Nothing like maximizing online time of all the cogs in the State machinery. How dehumanizing!

    2. Ted S.   12 years ago

      The comments, on the other hand, leave something to be desired.

      1. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

        Free Medical Care! FREE!

  39. Brett L   12 years ago

    As an aside, I'd just like to thank the University of Florida Gators for making my night and costing me nothing in the Bowl Pick'em standings. Delicious.

    1. John   12 years ago

      Remember, other teams just can't compete with that SEC talent.

      1. Brett L   12 years ago

        Just ask LSU!

      2. KDN   12 years ago

        Nothing like that Big East speed. They're like track stars out there!

      3. Brett L   12 years ago

        Fuck. I might have to cheer for Oklahoma. Although, given how hard a time I had typing that sentence, I doubt it will happen. However, it won't pain me if A&M loses. Texas Exes really have a pretty good deal for the Cotton Bowl. No matter who loses, we get to feel good.

        1. Ted S.   12 years ago

          Cut Alaska in two and make Texas the third biggest state.

        2. John   12 years ago

          I am totally rooting for OU. And I hate OU. But I really want to see aTm reminded of what a loser middle of the pack program they were in the Big 12.

          1. T   12 years ago

            Yup. It pains me greatly to even think I want OU to win a game, but fuck aTm and fuck the SEC.

            And my wife hates aTm, like all right-minded college graduates from Texas. But she's especially bitter, since she has two degrees from UH and Sumlin leaving crippled that program.

            The Cotton Bowl is gonna be a fun game at our house.

      4. Drake   12 years ago

        I laughed out loud when the commentators talked about the awesome schedule Florida had played (SEC Teams and a few joke games against Div 1A teams).

        The SEC is so awesome, they shouldn't have to play other conferences to prove it.

        1. AuH2O   12 years ago

          It's actually a really smart con-game. You play 6 top 10 teams- they all just come from in-conference. You play a cupcake schedule otherwise, and then all you need to do is go .500 in December bowls and the media will buy your crap next year.

          1. robc   12 years ago

            Florida hasnt left the state of Florida for an OOC road game in over 20 years.

    2. AuH2O   12 years ago

      BUT THE SEC IS THE BEST CONFERENCE IN FOOTBALL!

      Despite their performance in bowl games (BTW, thanks for that, Michigan. Couldn't have fucking won that one to make the SEC look bad, huh?)

      1. Randian   12 years ago

        I think this is making my ND pick look better and better.

        1. Brett L   12 years ago

          Can't root for ND, no matter what. Much as I hate seeing the SEC win yet another national title, I can't stomach ND winning instead.

      2. sloopyinca   12 years ago

        That scUM game was a tough one to watch. On the one hand, I hate Michigan more than almost anything in the world. But the SEC fans are just unbearably smug and assholish (yeah, this coming from a Buckeye may be odd). I actually found myself cheering for the stadium to implode during the 4th quarter.

        1. Brett L   12 years ago

          I actually found myself cheering for the stadium to implode during the 4th quarter.

          My dream finish to the Cotton Bowl is meteor strike late in the 3rd of a 0-0 tie.

        2. KDN   12 years ago

          I was openly rooting for Michigan in the end, as dirty as it made me feel. The hogs fans' conduct on gameday at the Sugar Bowl two years ago and having to endure a one wrecked season and a bowl-less one following it because of the successfully covered up malfeasance of an SEC member has sullied my attitude towards that conference forever.

          Similarly, I will be rooting for ND even though I'll have to deal with scores of Irish fans and bandwagoneers crowing about it for the next 7 years if they win.

    3. AuH2O   12 years ago

      Charlie Strong pulled off two stunners: He spurned the SEC, then he beat it up.

      That's the ESPN byline.

      Yes, this foolish fool of a coach- why wouldn't he want to coach in the best conference in football? And how did he ever assemble the talent to beat such an amazing conference?

    4. robc   12 years ago

      My comment from last night on last night's game:

      The better team kept shooting themselves in the foot, which allowed the weaker team to make the score close.

      1. mr simple   12 years ago

        Exactly: Florida didn't show up to play and Louisville played their best game of the year. This gives them a good shot at being national title contenders next year, if they can hold it together.

        1. Brett L   12 years ago

          I think you've misread that.

  40. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

    I think I'm disturbed by this

    Tom Waits (ANTI-) ?@tomwaits
    Tom Waits guest stars on The Simpsons Sunday, January 6 on Fox. Check your local listings. http://ow.ly/i/1k4JS

  41. sloopyinca   12 years ago

    Sexual intrigue, physical assaults and back-biting investigations are the order of the day if you're a Lowell, MA police officer. Link: http://www.lowellsun .com/local/ci_22302841/lowell -police-officer-charged-assault

    All the story needed was a guy named Joe in it to make me smile.

    (take out the space after lowellsun and lowell in the link to make it work. Fuck you, spamfilter!)

  42. sloopyinca   12 years ago

    Sexual intrigue, physical assaults and back-biting investigations are the order of the day if you're a Lowell, MA police officer. Link: http://www.lowellsun .com/local/ci_22302841/lowell -police-officer-charged-assault

    All the story needed was a guy named Joe in it to make me smile.

    (take out the space after lowellsun and lowell in the link to make it work. Fuck you, spamfilter!)

  43. sloopyinca   12 years ago

    Sexual intrigue, physical assaults and back-biting investigations are the order of the day if you're a Lowell, MA police officer. Link: http://www.lowell sun.com/local/ci_22302841/lowell -police-officer-charged-assault

    All the story needed was a guy named Joe in it to make me smile.

    (take out the space of lowell sun and after lowell in the link to make it work. Fuck you, spamfilter!)

    1. Tim   12 years ago

      You fool. Don't anger the Spam Filter, you'll get us all killed!

      1. sloopyinca   12 years ago

        Fuck the spam filter.

        Do you hear me?
        [looks around into the void]
        Fuck youuuuuuuuuuuuuuu, spam filter!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

        1. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

          shut up you fool you'll get us all killed

    2. Rasilio   12 years ago

      Hey, Lowell Ma, I grew up there.

      And yes, it is just as much of a shithole as it sounds like.

      The one really good thing it has going for it is the food because every wave of immigrants for the last 150 years has settled there is mass numbers

  44. AlmightyJB   12 years ago

    Not sure if this has already been thrown out there but noticed that the Pennsylvania governor is suing the NCAA for their sanctions.

    1. Ted S.   12 years ago

      Part of me would like to see them win the suit, if only to watch the reaction of the Nancy Grace types who were calling for ridiculously severe sanctions just so they could show their righteous indignation.

      1. Drake   12 years ago

        I'd like to see him win because I hate the NCAA. If the President of Penn State had any guts, they would never have accepted the sanctions. (Of course, if Penn State hired Presidents with guts, none of this would ever have occurred.)

        1. sloopyinca   12 years ago

          If Penn State hired Presidents with guts, the term "Man-made climate change" would be heard more often on the comedy club circuit than the evening news shows.

          1. Tulpa (LAOL-PA)   12 years ago

            University presidents don't control the research activity of the professors. Which is a good thing more often than not.

            1. sloopyinca   12 years ago

              No, but I bet they have the power to have one removed or at least put them before the Board of Regents, especially if they're involved in what basically amounts to a fraudulent enterprise.

          2. tarran   12 years ago

            Yes, it was kind of funny reading their investigative report, where they failed to interview anybody other than the accused and a couple of his friends, willfully excluded all but the evidence the accused wanted considered and concluded that Michael Mann must be a good scientist because bad scientists wouldn't get government grants and he gets lots of government grants.

            I was quite unsurprised when a year later it turned out the very same people who looked the other way from Mann because he brought them money were looking the other way from Paterno as well.

        2. Randian   12 years ago

          If PSU doesn't like the way things are run by the NCAA, then it can leave the NCAA.

          1. Drake   12 years ago

            Or not submit to voluntary sanctions for activities not covered by their contract with the NCAA.

          2. sloopyinca   12 years ago

            Agreed. And I'm curious, what would keep all of the big schools from removing football from their NCAA membership and making it a club sport where they are able to pay players a stipend and set their own eligibility rules? It's not like the NCAA could stop them, as there are several Div 1-A schools that don't have a football program.

            1. robc   12 years ago

              what would keep all of the big schools from removing football from their NCAA membership and making it a club sport where they are able to pay players a stipend and set their own eligibility rules?

              Nothing at all, except it makes them look bad.

              1. Drake   12 years ago

                That and a whole shitload of NCAA TV cash they don't have to share with the players.

            2. mr simple   12 years ago

              I thought they might actually do that when all the talk about the move to 4 super conferences was going on.

          3. tarran   12 years ago

            I love how PSU is claiming that they have nothing to do with the Attorney General's lawsuit.

            So if the Attorney General loses, they can pretend they never caused problems, if he wins they get the benefits, and the taxpayers foot the bill!

            PSU. A sleazy university of mendacious fucks.

        3. John   12 years ago

          If he had had any guts, he would have fired Paterno years before he did and they would have reported Sandusky in 2002. No one in that program had any guts.

          Fuck Penn State. If you are letting your football team serve as a honey trap to a monster, you don't deserve to have a football team. They should have given them the death penalty.

        4. Tulpa (LAOL-PA)   12 years ago

          Unfortunately, the president of a university is essentially a fundraiser. It's the gazillions of vice presidents who actually make the decisions.

    2. Spoonman.   12 years ago

      That's ridiculous. If he had any balls he'd have eliminated PSU's sports programs.

  45. sloopyinca   12 years ago

    Did anything happen with the NHLPA last night? I'm wondering if they decertified, because if not the owners can force them back to work by law.

    1. Drake   12 years ago

      Aren't they all playing in Europe and not paying attention?

      1. sloopyinca   12 years ago

        A few are, but not enough to destroy the NHL for good...yet.

        1. John   12 years ago

          Just sad. Hockey is a great sport. And the players are generally much less loathsome than your typical pro athlete. Hockey should be in the teens what NASCAR was in the 00s. Instead they are destroying it.

          1. sloopyinca   12 years ago

            Hockey will be in the teens what NASCAR was in the 00's. They'll begin to lose the interest of their fans and will slip int irrelevancy.

            NASCAR was awesome in the 80's and 90's, but once they got the sweet TV deals and multicar teams and the ability to look good in front of a camera became paramount, the sport lost a lot.

            Hell, I can remember sitting in Turn 4 of North Wilkesboro throwing chicken bones at Rusty Wallace's #2 MGD Ford Thunderbird in 1993 (as he won his third race in a row) and getting cartons of cigarettes before the race from the ticket-takers. That shit all died in the 00's.

            1. John   12 years ago

              True. I missed my decades. NASCAR of the 90s is what I should have said.

              And they are similair in that they both are regional sports who ruined themselves by over expanding. There shouldn't be NASCAR tracks in Chicago or hockey teams in Nashville.

              1. Kaptious Kristen   12 years ago

                Also sad that Old Dominion Speedway closed down. After the national part of the NASCAR went all Vanilla Corporate Big Time, the only good, real racing was to be found at local tracks.

    2. Drake   12 years ago

      What is the benefit of an union to the players? De-certifying would make player pay a case of contract law in every instance.

  46. nicole   12 years ago

    So I saved the Jezebel makeup link for my BFF, who was all ready to pass me this. Thought Catalog is truly crap as a rule, but this is a gem of especial idiocy. Credit card debt is a "horrible burden to bear," not your own fucking fault for buying too much shit, and getting to college is super dehumanizing, because no one cares about your little snowflake self anymore, and who on earth would ever want to work for an insurance company if they weren't CRIPPLED BY DEBT?

    1. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

      Actually, the most dehumanizing thing in the first world is the constant barrage of bad articles written by entitled little shits who piss on your life choices of education, frugality and hard work.

      Oh, and here's someone who wanted to work for an insurance company: Franz Kafka

      1. nicole   12 years ago

        A+, would read again

      2. Brett L   12 years ago

        Don't forget Wallace Stevens.

    2. mr simple   12 years ago

      The person has been replaced with a job title; the personality and soul with a job description. A man/woman is no more. There is only a collection of sad jobs and menial "skills" like proficiency in Microsoft Word.

      You're writing your resume wrong. No wonder he can't find a job.

  47. John   12 years ago

    And sorry but BMI girl Lobster Girl. BMI girl is awesome.

    1. mr simple   12 years ago

      Well, it is Bar Rafaeli.

      1. John   12 years ago

        I didn't recognize her. But it is. I guess I never got around to really looking that closely at her face.

  48. ChrisO   12 years ago

    Oh, Krayewski posted text? Didn't notice it.

  49. nannasin28   12 years ago

    If you're gonna make claims about easily googled stuff, make sure you have your facts correct. ICL7107CPL

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Palantir Is Expanding the Surveillance State

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 6.2.2025 12:00 PM

The Gutting of the National Park Service

Liz Wolfe | 6.2.2025 9:30 AM

In Dangerous Times, Train for Self-Defense

J.D. Tuccille | 6.2.2025 7:00 AM

Welcoming Anti-Trump Liberals to the Free Trade Club

Katherine Mangu-Ward | From the July 2025 issue

Brickbat: Armed, Elderly, and Dangerous

Charles Oliver | 6.2.2025 4:00 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!