Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

A.M. Links: 46 Percent of Americans Think Obama's Second Term Will Be Better, Minimum Wage Going Up in Ten States, Israel Easing Gaza Blockade

Ed Krayewski | 12.27.2012 9:00 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
  • 46 percent of Americans think Obama will perform better in his second term, 22 percent think it'll be worse.

  • The minimum wage in ten states will be increasing in 2013. It will be highest in Washington State, at $9.19 an hour.
  • Hawaii's governor named his lieutenant, Brian Schatz, to replace the late Senator Daniel Inouye. Inouye had indicated a preference for someone else before he died.
  • Cop deaths in the line of duty are down 20 percent.
  • EA is removing links to gun store websites from the website for their game Medal of Honor.
  • Israel's defense ministry says it will be easing the blockade of Gaza.
  • George H.W. Bush remains in hospital.

Follow Reason on Twitter and like us on Facebook. You can also get the top stories mailed to you—sign up here.

Have a news tip? Send it to us!

The updated Reason app for Apple and Android now includes Reason 24/7!

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: New Hampshire Democrat: 'Free Staters are the single biggest threat the state is facing today'

Ed Krayewski is a former associate editor at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (348)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    46 percent of Americans think Obama will perform better in his second term...

    He lost a percent somewhere.

    1. wareagle   12 years ago

      "perform better" means something different to the 46% than it does to the rest of us.

      1. Drax the Destroyer   12 years ago

        There's the rub.

      2. AuH2O   12 years ago

        No, I think they are just thinking he can clear a very low bar...

    2. Kaptious Kristen   12 years ago

      There are only a limited numbers of ways he could have done worse, so it's just a simple matter of odds.

      1. R C Dean   12 years ago

        I'm sure he has Top. Men. on it, though. Their ability to underperform is unmatched.

      2. Night Elf Mohawk   12 years ago

        Pretty much this.

        I liken it to the Tampa Bay Buccaneers fans thinking the would do better in their second season. Which, technically, they did.

      3. Drake   12 years ago

        On the other hand, he can double down on his failures for 4 years without any concern about losing the next election.

    3. Atanarjuat   12 years ago

      I got the "47%" reference, even if no one else did.

  2. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    Cop deaths in the line of duty are down 20 percent.

    Speeding on the way to work with a hangover doesn't count as line of duty anymore?

    1. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

      No, but choking on a doughnut still does

      1. $park?   12 years ago

        What is a doughnut? Is that anything like yoghurt?

        1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

          Boom. Foreign weird speller finally gets comeuppance.

          1. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

            Tough talk from someone who used "spelt" this very day

            1. Raston Bot   12 years ago

              I had pb&j on spelt bread for breakfast.

        2. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

          I assume it's a walnut or something that you put in bread before cooking it.

    2. Ted S.   12 years ago

      But but but WAR ON COPS!

  3. Enough About Palin   12 years ago

    Third!

    1. Ted S.   12 years ago

      Being first after Fistbot isn't so bad.

      1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

        Never thought of it taht way dude! LOL

        1. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

          One Order of the Golden Monocle awarded.

  4. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

    Finally, Slate answers the big question:

    How did the monocle become a symbol of wealth?

    1. generic Brand   12 years ago

      If anything they should be a symbol of poverty; you can only afford half a pair of glasses!

      1. DJF   12 years ago

        Or only able to hire a street urchin to polish one lense.

  5. generic Brand   12 years ago

    Questions: What is a cosmotarian, what is a yokeltarian, and more importantly, should I care?

    1. $park?   12 years ago

      The fact that you should not care removes any necessity for answering the first two.

      1. generic Brand   12 years ago

        Okay, that's what I figured. 3-9

        1. $park?   12 years ago

          Just think of them as other words for troll depending on which side of the divide is using them.

    2. Chris Mallory   12 years ago

      "Yokeltarian" is what the cosmotarians call anyone who actually works for a living, doesn't live in an urban hellhole and doesn't think that food trucks and gay marriage are the uppermost symbols of freedom.

      1. wareagle   12 years ago

        so which one of those are you, or are you the house librarian?

      2. $park?   12 years ago

        "Cosmotarian" is what the people who work for a living call anyone who doesn't agree with them.

      3. Pound. Head. On. Desk.   12 years ago

        I thought they were against immigration.

      4. Ted S.   12 years ago

        First they came for the food trucks, but I said nothing because I live next to 1000 acres of state forest and no food truck would ever come near here.

        1. robc   12 years ago

          Sure they would, you just need a larger population living on your compound.

      5. robc   12 years ago

        Food trucks ARE the uppermost symbol of freedom.

        I honestly cant think of a better one.

        1. Brett L   12 years ago

          Home 'stills?

          1. robc   12 years ago

            Lets call it a draw.

          2. NeonCat   12 years ago

            Moonshine trucks.

            1. Enough About Palin   12 years ago

              Win^^

            2. sloopyinca   12 years ago

              Moonshine and foie gras trucks FTW!

      6. Kaptious Kristen   12 years ago

        All this talk of food trucks made me look at the food truck tracker for DC. Not a single fucking food truck is in my work neighborhood today. Sonofabitch.

      7. Thane of Whiterun   12 years ago

        "Cosmotarian" is what yokeltarians call anyone who thinks that being a racist, homophobic, xenophobic fuck is still a bad thing even if said fuck supports libertarian policies.

    3. Quetzalcoatl   12 years ago

      I'm dunno about yokeltarians, but I'm pretty sure cosmotarians are the bad guys in the new Thor movie.

    4. hamilton   12 years ago

      You know who else used to talk about arians...

      1. Brett L   12 years ago

        Hellenic Catholics?

      2. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

        Opera singers?

    5. Ted S.   12 years ago

      I kindly request that you not summon the trolls.

      1. generic Brand   12 years ago

        Sorry, I just wanted a quick response. Fortunately Sparky provided the one I was already leaning towards.

        I don't understand the Commentariat's inclinations towards ad hominem attacks. Isn't that what we hate about liberals and conservatives? The idea that our beliefs about individual liberty and freedom shouldn't be heard because we're "crazy libertarians"? I know I hate that form of condescension.

        Some people are gonna troll; such is the state of the internet. But either address people's ridiculous comments thoughtfully or ignore them; I don't think it does any good simply to fling verbal poo at them like common monkeys.

        1. $park?   12 years ago

          It's just the nature of human beings. (Most of) The left-leaners and right-leaners don't come here to have their minds changes, they come to change minds. And if you don't change to their point of view, or even validate is as possible, they get nasty about it.

        2. robc   12 years ago

          Isn't that what we hate about liberals and conservatives?

          No. We hate that they are fucking slavers.

          1. nicole   12 years ago

            +1

          2. generic Brand   12 years ago

            Excellent point

  6. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    The minimum wage in ten states will be increasing in 2013.

    WHAT COULD POSSIBLY BE THE DOWNSIDE?

    1. KDN   12 years ago

      Short term: increased unemployment amongst minorities, youth, and (most of all) young minorities.

      Long term: further erosion of the intangible capital needed to keep this country afloat.

      But somehow I think you knew that already.

      1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

        WRONG. More money for the 99% to spend on not savings, less money for greedy corporate millionaires to spend on sending jobs overseas.

      2. BigT   12 years ago

        Short term: increased unemployment amongst minorities, youth, and (most of all) young minorities.

        Causing outrage and thus giving cause to raise minimum wage still further. Rinse, repeat.

    2. $park?   12 years ago

      Next stop, LIVING WAGE!!!!

      1. Ted S.   12 years ago

        Higher and higher baby
        It's a living wage
        It's a terrible thing to lose

        1. Randian   12 years ago

          It's like maaaaagic

          1. Ted S.   12 years ago

            Strange magic?

            1. $park?   12 years ago

              It's a kind of magic.

              1. Ted S.   12 years ago

                For those who want a different genre of music, could it be magic?

    3. wareagle   12 years ago

      proponents of ever-higher minimums never consider that, in most businesses, the rest of the pay scale moves upward, too, so the new minimum has no more power than the old one.

      1. Drax the Destroyer   12 years ago

        I think what they want, even though they are too economically illiterate to comprehend it, is a higher minimum wage combined with PRICE CONTROLS so, in theory the new minimum wage should be able to buy more shit at the controlled price. I'm assuming the wonks on that side think this could be achieved by eating the rich as always. Regardless, this shit always hurts the people they claim to want to defend.

        1. wareagle   12 years ago

          I keep wondering, and there was some rhetoric during Obama's first term, how long before govt believes it can mandate a maximum wage. A govt powerful enough to set a floor is surely one that is powerful enough to determine a ceiling, too.

          1. $park?   12 years ago

            More likely than that is the government just determining a wage. Your wage will be determined by the job you do and its usefulness to society.

          2. R C Dean   12 years ago

            A maximum wage would be a godsend for accountants, attorneys, and consultants. An avalanche of high-paid work figuring ways around it.

            And there would be half a dozen in place before the maximum wage law took effect.

            1. Quetzalcoatl   12 years ago

              "This surgeon actually holds down three jobs at maximum salary! He's an Open-'Em-Up specialist, a Fix-the-Innards specialist and a Sew-It-All-Back-Together specialist!"

              1. Drake   12 years ago

                Then he hops in his company car, drives back to his company supplied McMansion, and enjoys a nice dinner from the company chef.

          3. Ptah-Hotep   12 years ago

            how long before govt believes it can mandate a maximum wage.

            Isn't this how we got employer paid health care, as a work-around of the max wage? Do these people not know and/or understand history?

            1. Drake   12 years ago

              Yes - when the incremental tax rate got so high that companies had to find non-monetary rewards, health insurance became an expected employment benefit.

    4. Red Rocks Rockin   12 years ago

      Related: What minimum wage buys you, by decade

      Now look at the minumum wage when adjusted for inflation:
      1950--$7.16
      1960--$7.78
      1970--$9.49(!)
      1980--$8.66
      1990--$6.69
      2000--$6.89

      Note that, for the most part, the minumum wage isn't all that different from current levels when adjusted for inflation--but it buys increasingly less as time goes on.

      Perhaps the problem isn't that people aren't being paid a "living wage," it's that things are a lot more expensive now than they were 60 years ago.

      1. Night Elf Mohawk   12 years ago

        I wonder what things actually are a lot more expensive, in an apples-to-apples comparison, than they were 60 years ago.

        I'd guess that gas probably is.

        1. Red Rocks Rockin   12 years ago

          Housing for sure--median prices were around $45,000 for a new home in 1950, inflation-adjusted.

          http://www.census.gov/hhes/www.....alues.html

          1. NeonCat   12 years ago

            That house was typically a lot smaller than what most people buy today. You'd probably have to have something like a price per square foot chart.

          2. Night Elf Mohawk   12 years ago

            You think that's apples-to-apples? How big were homes in the 50s? How many had central heat or air? How many were energy efficient? How much of the price is the land -- we, with some volcanic exceptions, aren't making any more of it -- versus the house itself?

            It's entirely conceivable that houses are, apples-to-apples, more expensive, but comparing a house built today to one built in 1950 is borderline silly. Hell, the one I grew up in, built in the early 60s, was an epic POS, and tiny, compared to my generic tract home built in the 90s.

            1. Red Rocks Rockin   12 years ago

              You think that's apples-to-apples? How big were homes in the 50s? How many had central heat or air? How many were energy efficient? How much of the price is the land -- we, with some volcanic exceptions, aren't making any more of it -- versus the house itself?

              My, aren't we being pedantic.

              This NPR story from the housing bubble puts the average home size at 2,350 square feet, which was double the size of the ones in the 1950s.

              http://www.npr.org/templates/s.....Id=5525283

              So, going off of the 2000 median home price, average price per square foot was $51; if one in 1950 was half that size(call it 1200 square feet), it was $36 per square foot in 1950.

              If this "apples to apples" comparison isn't accurate, you're welcome to do one yourself and show me what the actual figure is.

              Anyway, the point is that the minumum wage hasn't changed all that much when adjusted for inflation, but it's a lot harder to live off of those wages now than it was 60 years ago. That points to higher prices on consumer goods as the culprit(and, I suspect, people wasting money on iShit, vidya games, cable teevee, and other non-necessities).

              1. Night Elf Mohawk   12 years ago

                I don't think distinguishing a 2000 square foot house with central air and heat, wood floors, ceramic tile, and/or carpet, double pane windows, etc., etc. from a 1200 foot one with maybe a box fan and linoleum floors is pedantic.

                Maybe a crappy wooden box with windows would still be more relatively expensive today than in 1950 but I don't think that's a given. Hell, people complain about food prices but we spend about a third less on food as a percentage of income than we did in 1950, and that doesn't even take into account that a much higher percentage of food now is more expensive pre-packaged crap.

                I don't know that there is a good way to evaluate the value of an average house with central air compared to one when central air was something only the rich could afford, but it's not pedantic to recognize that there are differences.

                I tend to think that a lot of the expense problem is related to how much crap it takes to be "normal" now more so than the prices, as such. My family could live pretty damned cheaply in a two bedroom house with no car and a radio as our only in home entertainment. It might look like poverty, but it was middle class not too terribly long ago.

                1. Red Rocks Rockin   12 years ago

                  I don't know that there is a good way to evaluate the value of an average house with central air compared to one when central air was something only the rich could afford, but it's not pedantic to recognize that there are differences.

                  And that's fair, but the price differences are what they are. I can look at prices in my hometown of Broomfield, CO just as a comparison--homes in the first filing went for about $10,000 when they were first built in the 1950s, which is about $85,000 inflation-adjusted. Those same homes are now upwards of $175,000. Yeah, some of this is due to location, since it's always been a bedroom community, and renovations like dishwashers and tile installation--but that's still a huge differential.

  7. Kaptious Kristen   12 years ago

    I have a feeling we'll be having a Presidential funeral here soon. Old people + pulmonary issues + hospitals = not good.

    1. $park?   12 years ago

      Old George I is getting up there in age, I give him another month or two.

      1. Kaptious Kristen   12 years ago

        88 years old, I think. I doubt he'll go home.

        1. John   12 years ago

          Charles Durning, Danial Inouye and now George Bush. The World War II generation is vanishing before our eyes.

          1. AuH2O   12 years ago

            Does that mean we can finally talk about how shitty a president FDR was and how fucked up Japanese internment was?

            1. db   12 years ago

              What, and disgrace the memory of the GREATEAT GENERATION by questioning their dearest-held beliefs?

            2. nicole   12 years ago

              Don't be ridiculous, Goldwater. Japanese internment was A-OK; after all, it was ruled constitutional. Think of it as a penaltax for being the wrong ethnicity at the wrong time. I know I love ending a discussion with statists with the single name "Korematsu."

              1. AuH2O   12 years ago

                Korematsu is the worst SC decision of all time. And I am including Dredd Scott.

                1. nicole   12 years ago

                  Definitely. And yet, you know, I never ever learned about it in government school.

            3. NeonCat   12 years ago

              No, Bill Murray's new movie has him starring as FDR so we can all learn to love America's Great Helmsman again.

            4. protefeed   12 years ago

              Does that mean we can finally talk about how shitty a president FDR was and how fucked up Japanese internment was?

              Ironically, not if you're an AJA in Hawaii.

          2. Rhywun   12 years ago

            Charles Durning

            I had to look that up to be sure it wasn't Roc.

      2. R C Dean   12 years ago

        I wonder if they'll let Obama give another one of his patented "Its all about ME!" eulogies at HW's funeral.

        1. DJF   12 years ago

          Let? If he is there that is what he will give.

        2. NeonCat   12 years ago

          He'll find a way to blame HW's death on W. If only the Republican obstructionists had let Obama save HW!

        3. Drake   12 years ago

          Obama will celebrate HW's tax compromise (long planned surrender) as the high-water mark of Republican statesmanship.

    2. DJF   12 years ago

      I am sure that the MSM is working on their stories about how wonderful it was during Bush 1 administration when in a spirit of bi-partisanship it was agreed the only sensible thing to do was to raise taxes.

      1. db   12 years ago

        And gun control was done by executive order.

        1. robc   12 years ago

          And look what it got him. Sent home after 4 years.

    3. wareagle   12 years ago

      no one wants to say pneumonia, which to old folks is a death sentence.

      1. Kaptious Kristen   12 years ago

        Especially if the patient remains in the hospital germ factory. A hospital is no place to recover from an infection.

        1. wareagle   12 years ago

          that's the hidden irony - a hospital is the absolute last place you want to get an infection because the germs there have survived man's every effort to kill them.

          1. $park?   12 years ago

            Plus they smell bad. Who wants to die in a smelly place?

  8. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

    Swiss drink-driver plays a blinder

    more

    1. $park?   12 years ago

      More of your Australianisms. Why you don't speak like a normal person?

      1. Restoras   12 years ago

        Why do you think they were banished to Australia in the first place?

      2. Quetzalcoatl   12 years ago

        Yeah, what on earth is a drink-driver?!

        1. AuH2O   12 years ago

          He drives a motorized beer mug!

          1. Quetzalcoatl   12 years ago

            I was picturing a Coke version of the Wienermobile.

          2. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

            @#$%ing Swiss are ahead of us in motorization of alcohol!

          3. db   12 years ago

            This could be a promising career move for some here...

  9. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    "Of course Sen. Inouye's views and his wishes were taken into account fully, but the charge of the central committee, and by extension then myself as governor, was to act in the best interests of the party ... the state and the nation," Abercrombie said.

    In that order. (The ellipsis signifies an afterthought.)

    1. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

      At least he didn't go all affirmative action like Nicki Haley did.

      1. John   12 years ago

        Because any black man is automatically unqualified. Take your racists shit elsewhere shreek. That shit is not welcome here. You know that.

        1. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

          A first term House member is most qualified? You are full of shit as usual.

          1. wareagle   12 years ago

            really, PB? Your side decided that a first-term Senate back-bencher with a history of voting present was qualified to be POTUS. By that reckoning, Scott is overqualified.

            1. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

              He was elected as a US Senator, then won a national primary, then won the Electoral College and popular vote handily twice over a war hero and a slippery Mormon.

              1. wareagle   12 years ago

                whatever. He was a black guy who didn't sound like all the other black guys who fancied themselves president, and because he had gone to the right schools and believed all the right things, a slobbering press corps gave him a total pass.

                As to slippery, Obama is the same guy who called debt unpatriotic, vowed to close Gitmo, and was against gay marriage before he was for it. You keep sucking that BHO cock, however.

              2. BigT   12 years ago

                He won the election, therefore he was qualified to be in the election.

                Shriek logic. No wonder this country is in the shitter.

              3. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

                So you're saying you base "qualified" to govern on "ability to campaign"?

          2. John   12 years ago

            Yes. Obama hadn't even been in the House when he ran for Senate. Never heard you say he wasn't qualified. Actually you probably did think that because you are a racist piece of shit who thinks every black person is inferior. Take it elsewhere shreek. We tolerate a lot of your bullshit. But we will not tolerate your white supremacy crap.

            1. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

              Admit it, he was chosen because of his race, you idiot.

              Politically it was a good PR move.

              1. John   12 years ago

                No Shreek. I am sure he is a qualified good guy. I trust Haley's judgement. I see a person. You see a N*gg*R getting an affirmative action hire. Like I said, take your racist bullshit elsewhere. You are gross enough without it.

                1. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

                  John projecting his views onto me. A new low for sure.

                  1. John   12 years ago

                    Yeah Shreek, you are the one automatically assuming any black person who gets hired is unqualified. But I am the one who is racist. Face it shreek, you are a white supremacist lefty.

              2. Ted S.   12 years ago

                Look at how many people voted for Obama solely because of his race.

                1. Marshall Gill   12 years ago

                  Well, when you vote for him because of his race, it isn't racist.

              3. Citizen Nothing   12 years ago

                Wait. We still talking about Obama?

              4. DJF   12 years ago

                """Politically it was a good PR move.""

                Yes that is why the Democrats picked Obama. He was after all the first bright and clean African American they had seen even if they thought it was just a work of fiction.

                "I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy," Biden said. "I mean, that's a storybook, man."

          3. protefeed   12 years ago

            A first term House member is most qualified?

            Ummm, change that to "four term state House member" and you're describing Brian Schatz, who is now Inouye's replacement.

      2. wareagle   12 years ago

        wow. Could you be any more condescending and patronizing? Of course, not; you're a lefty, totally lacking in self-awareness in such areas.

        1. John   12 years ago

          Shreek is on one of his white supremacy benders.

          1. wareagle   12 years ago

            he provides today's example of projection.

          2. Citizen Nothing   12 years ago

            The Plug isn't even a good lefty. Far too wishy-washy for that.

    2. Bee Tagger   12 years ago

      In that order, we'll be very very lucky.

    3. Ted S.   12 years ago

      That Senate seat wasn't Inouye's to decide what to do with it.

      1. Citizen Nothing   12 years ago

        Didn't he have a child, or even a first cousin, to pass it on to?

      2. Seamus   12 years ago

        As long as he didn't try to sell it (like Blago with Obama's seat), the constitution makes it his to do with as he pleases, at least until the next election.

        1. robc   12 years ago

          or his death or his resigning.

          Upon death, it was the governor's job to pick the new guy.

      3. Copernicus   12 years ago

        Inouye and Akaka are poster boys for term limits.

  10. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

    Man drives drunk on AA co-founder's lawn

    more

    1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

      His tire tracks spelled (spelt) out, "Hi, my name is Donald Blood and I'm an alcoholic."

  11. Bee Tagger   12 years ago

    46 percent of Americans think Obama will perform better in his second term

    Mandate!

  12. Bee Tagger   12 years ago

    It will be highest in Washington State, at $9.19 an hour.

    The wages, they're alive!!! They're living wages!

    1. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

      Why do you hate States rights?

      1. Bee Tagger   12 years ago

        Admittedly, I like individual rights more.

        1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

          As stated before, I am better than everyone else here because I am for nucleotide rights.

          1. $park?   12 years ago

            That sounds like splitter talk to me.

            1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

              Fuck off, lumper!

              1. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

                RNA-ist!

          2. Quetzalcoatl   12 years ago

            I am for farandolae rights.

            1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

              Why not go for midi-chlorian rights, or do you hate the religious?

              1. db   12 years ago

                The Jedi Council is the center of a conspiracy to keep people downtrodden by prohibiting genetic engineering of midichlorians that can thrive in any host. They do anything to keep the power of the Force out of the hands of regular folks like you and me. Down with the 1%!

      2. Ptah-Hotep   12 years ago

        Why do you hate States rights?

        States don't have rights, they have powers. Only individuals can have rights.

        1. robc   12 years ago

          Thank you.

        2. BigT   12 years ago

          States have powers, not rights.

          The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

      3. R C Dean   12 years ago

        States don't have rights.

        They have power.

        Why do you love state power, Plugs?

    2. Drax the Destroyer   12 years ago

      So they reallllllyyyyyy reaalllllllllyy don't want anybody to hire inexperienced dumbass high-schoolers ever again right? Guess I'll have to teach my spawn how to flip burgers at home so they can at least avoid lying on their Carl's Jr. applications.

      1. John   12 years ago

        Or anyone who has been out of the work force or is trying to get themselves back on their feet. You see drax, Americans don't work those jobs, they go on welfare. Those jobs are worked by illegal aliens.

        1. AuH2O   12 years ago

          The longer I go, the more I'm impressed with immigrants to this country. They're like super Americans.

          Seriously, one hard-working, pro-liberty immigrant makes up for about 10 lazy, entitled asshole natives

          1. John   12 years ago

            In fairness, we make it illegal for Americans to work like immigrants. That is what minimum wage laws do. Get rid of the minimum wage and welfare, and Americans will work like that too.

            1. Ptah-Hotep   12 years ago

              Get rid of the minimum wage and welfare, and Americans will work like that too.

              That or starve.

              1. Restoras   12 years ago

                Win-Win!

            2. robc   12 years ago

              we make it illegal for Americans to work like immigrants.

              It is illegal for immigrants to work like immigrants too. But they still find a way.

        2. R C Dean   12 years ago

          Pish, John.

          Welfare is for losers.

          Disability is where its at these days.

          1. db   12 years ago

            "I get my disability check and POW! Down to Pants 'n' 'At."

      2. Mike M.   12 years ago

        It has been years since the last time I last saw a high schooler working at McDonald's, even in the summer.

        1. wareagle   12 years ago

          and it's been even more years since someone there was being paid minimum. I have four kids; not a one ever worked for minimum even though each, for a time, held the sort of job associated with the wage.

          1. Rhywun   12 years ago

            Where I'm from, these jobs are all MW, unless there's a union involved it might be a dime or two more. That's upstate NY where the cost of living is like, nothing.

        2. robc   12 years ago

          I have, although it does seem that McDs skews older than the other fast food places around me.

  13. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    Better than WHAT?

    1. Quetzalcoatl   12 years ago

      I'm sure that SugarFree's fecund imagination can come up with something that Obama's second term will be better than...

      1. wareagle   12 years ago

        depends on how many new golf courses The Obama discovers. Shaving a stroke or two off one's game is a slow process.

        Sideways to topic: I saw a shot of Limbaugh on the sideline of the college bowl game played in Hawaii. What are the odds he and Obama played a round.

  14. KDN   12 years ago

    Joyce Lee Malcolm: Two Cautionary Tales of Gun Control

    Great Britain bans handguns: no positive results, tremendous negative ones.

    Australia bans shotguns and semiautomatic rifles: minor positive results, seemingly major negative ones all in the ways you'd predict.

    But hey, letting emotion guide policy is totally the right way to run your country. Only intentions matter!

    1. John   12 years ago

      But this time will be different. We have the right people in charge.

      1. Drax the Destroyer   12 years ago

        Besides we're Americans, and somehow everything we touch/implement works out better in the end. Right? RIGHT?!!

        1. AuH2O   12 years ago

          That's why we won in Afghanistan too!

    2. Suthenboy   12 years ago

      "The results have not been what proponents of the act wanted."

      Says who?

  15. Mike M.   12 years ago

    Only five days until we all mourn our Taxey New Year.

    1. $park?   12 years ago

      Why will 'we' be mourning?

      1. Mike M.   12 years ago

        OK, those of us who work and pay taxes will be mourning.

        1. $park?   12 years ago

          Again, why? I work and pay taxes, do I have to mourn this coming year?

          1. Mike M.   12 years ago

            Oh, so you enjoy having your money stolen from you? Sorry, but I don't believe you.

            1. $park?   12 years ago

              I don't enjoy paying taxes. However, I have some small hope that something like this will wake up enough people that things might start to change. Change generally doesn't come unless pain is involved.

              1. RBS   12 years ago

                Yep, this is what I keep telling my wife.

              2. nicole   12 years ago

                My bf, who follows this stuff somewhat less closely than I do (he's a foreign policy nerd instead) and makes just a bit more than minimum wage, had a definite "you've got to be fucking kidding me" reaction when he found out that the tax increases would be affecting not just millionaires, and not just millionaires and myself, but even him. Unfortunately, I think when most other people in a similar situation find that out (if they haven't already), they'll just blame the evil Republicans for caring about the rich more than "working families."

                1. $park?   12 years ago

                  It is unfortunate that stupid people will play the blame game. However, booting the Rs out of Congress to pack the building with Ds pretty much guarantees that things will get even worse. And when that happens, people might finally start to get a clue.

                  1. Night Elf Mohawk   12 years ago

                    Yes, Democrats are getting all the blame in, say, California because of all the control they have, right?

                    1. $park?   12 years ago

                      Yes, Democrats are getting all the blame in, say, California because of all the control they have, right?

                      Meh. Maybe I'm wrong, and the country is just doomed to failure and/or total collapse. I can't really say that would be a bad thing either.

          2. RBS   12 years ago

            You sound like some cosmotorian faggot $park?

  16. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    Questions: What is a cosmotarian, what is a yokeltarian

    THEM'S FIGHTIN WORDS!

  17. Restoras   12 years ago

    2013: The War on Socks.

    1. $park?   12 years ago

      I'm hoping for the war on Band-Aids Adhesive Bandages.

  18. John   12 years ago

    http://www.readability.com/rea.....c-20-2012/

    It does sort of ring of Pearle Harbor doesn't it?

    1. Restoras   12 years ago

      I take comfort that our Navy has apparently forgotten all the lessons that should have been learned on December 7, 1941.

      Full employment is right around the corner!

      Of course, doubling the national debt to fund that employment would be unwise at this juncture.

      1. John   12 years ago

        50 years of complete air supremacy has made us very lazy.

    2. R C Dean   12 years ago

      Yeah, I'm thinking if I'm an Islamoterrorist and I ever get my mitts on a genuine WMD, I'm waiting for the holidays and heading for Norfolk.

      As a semi-major shipping port as well, it wouldn't be hard to get something nasty on site.

  19. John   12 years ago

    http://www.independent.co.uk/n.....31443.html

    2013 will be the year of the comet. Let's hope the ancients had it wrong about omens.

    1. R C Dean   12 years ago

      Awesome. I love comets. I'll have to schedule a trip to the Nascent Dean Compound in New Mexico in November, which has a very nice view to the West. Should be optimal.

    2. Brett L   12 years ago

      John Kerry is nominated for SecState. The end is already here. Its too late for repentance.

  20. AuH2O   12 years ago

    George H.W. Bush remains in hospital.

    In this country, we use definite articles, you limey bastard!

    1. Kaptious Kristen   12 years ago

      Good catch...I also think I saw an unnecessary "U" in a word a few days ago. We're doomed, I tel you! DOOMED!

      1. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

        soon, you will all write and spell funny like wot I do

        1. RBS   12 years ago

          You always make me think of one of my favorite Simpsons episodes, Bart vs. Australia. I love the part where the Prime Minister is floating on aninnertube drinking a beer.

          1. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

            at least i bring pleasure to someone around here 🙂

            1. AuH2O   12 years ago

              I thought using emoticons was a bootable offense?

              1. nicole   12 years ago

                Not for the wimminz.

                1. Jordan   12 years ago

                  WAR ON WOMEN

            2. Ted S.   12 years ago

              Not the kind of pleasure we want, though. :-p

          2. Ted S.   12 years ago

            The writers shoud have had him drown.

      2. Ted S.   12 years ago

        Wait until she starts moving R's around when she speaks.

        1. Thane of Whiterun   12 years ago

          I once fucked around with a Brit professor of mine by doing a presentation on "metaRanalyses" straight-faced.

      3. AuH2O   12 years ago

        Let's look at the Big Book of British Smiles!

  21. John   12 years ago

    It looks like we are going off the cliff. I know the spin is that Obama will be able to use his rhetorical genius to blame the whole thing on Republicans. First, I have yet to see any evidence of his rhetorical genius. Second, even if he can so what? There isn't an election for two years. If we go over, undoing it will completely dominate the news cycle. It will prevent Obama from doing much of anything except beg Congress to undo it so he can get on with his second term. I really don't see how this works out well for him, especially when you consider that it is his supporters who are going to be suffering the most under it.

    1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

      You seem to be forgetting that he doesn't need to blame the Republicans. That what he has the media for.

      1. John   12 years ago

        So what if he does? The election is over. There will not be another one for two years. So what does that buy him? It is not Republican voters who are going to be facing RIFs at the federal government.

        1. wareagle   12 years ago

          So what if he does? The election is over.

          john,
          you underestimate The Obama; the election is never over. Campaign mode is all he knows. And his acolytes are still blaming the evil Booosh. All this does is give them more gasoline for their eternal partisan flame.

          1. RBS   12 years ago

            Do you think, when this is all over and he's retired from office, that Obama is just going to keep on campaigning? Like all of his speaking engagements will nothing but stump speeches from 2008-2012.

            1. wareagle   12 years ago

              campaign mode is all he knows.

      2. AuH2O   12 years ago

        Yeah. I can pretty directly trace my declining interest in The Economist to their whole scale embrace, during this financial crises, to the idea that the government can never spend less.

        Every time they write about Europe now, they talk about how the Germans and the ECB need to ease up and let the PIIGS focus on "growth" instead of "austerity". In articles about the US, they seem completely unable to deal with the ideas of Republicans who would like to cut spending right now, as opposed to agreeing to some grand bargain of tax raises in return for medium and long-term entitlement reform. Also, Democracy in America now has WAY too many posts from Matt Steniglass or whatever it is that MS stands for.

        1. John   12 years ago

          If avoiding recession requires running a trillion dollar deficit, maybe the economy in its current state is a bit unsustainable?

          1. AuH2O   12 years ago

            John, that's just silly. Of course Greece eventually has to cut spending, but until confidence is restored, the ECB should just back up their crappy debt and banks! Then, when there is utterly no need to cut, can they cut.

        2. Brett L   12 years ago

          The Economist went all in on the Euro and EU. That magazine needs its editorial board sealed in a room and set on fire, then bring actual economists in to replace them. I think that's the only way I could ever read that once decent publication again.

          1. DEG   12 years ago

            I agree, though I still keep an eye on The Economist. It's a good way to know what the statists are thinking.

          2. Gene   12 years ago

            I never more than skim through the crappy articles, just like Reason the real fun is the comments, the Chinese trolls who lurk there make a good stop for quick giggles.

            1. Thane of Whiterun   12 years ago

              I remember some Chinese trolls at war with Indian trolls in a thread there. It was epic.

            2. AuH2O   12 years ago

              French trolls are the best

              1. Thane of Whiterun   12 years ago

                Swiss rolls are better.

    2. Mike M.   12 years ago

      Obama is no fool, he sees that the average moron in this country has decided that they're going to blame the republicans for every horrible thing that happens during his entire eight years.

      Now, not only can he carry out his agenda of destroying the country, but he can do it without even getting blamed for it. We're screwed beyond belief.

      1. John   12 years ago

        That is why the Republicans are smart not to deal with him. Any deal is going to be a bad one. So don't make one.

        1. Francisco d Anconia   12 years ago

          It's almost to the point where the Reps should publicly state they will give the left everything they ask for. Let it crash with no one to blame but the left.

          I mean, it's inevitable at this point anyway. Might as well get it over with. With omnipotent Dems we could see full blown depression within 3-4 years with no republicans to blame. Proof positive socialism can't work and we can start to rebuild.

          All is lost. Might as well get a good seat for the show.

      2. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

        The Senate has passed a bill extending the 2001/03 tax cuts for all workers - 100% in fact.

        Let the House pass it and this is over.

        1. John   12 years ago

          But I thought those tax cuts were for the rich. Why does Harry Reid love the rich so much?

          1. Ted S.   12 years ago

            Shriek said "all workers". Everybody knows that once you get above a certain level of income, it's proof that you don't actually work.

            1. Mike M.   12 years ago

              One of my New Year's Resolutions, which I think I'll put into effect a few days early, is to completely ignore this fucking griefer piece of shit. His endless lies have gotten old and tiresome.

              1. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

                You are already in the anti-reality GOP bubble, Mike M. You might be able to double up if you try.

        2. R C Dean   12 years ago

          The Senate has passed a bill extending the 2001/03 tax cuts for all workers - 100% in fact.

          From this morning:

          Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid, in a brief written statement, urged Republicans to pass a Senate bill that raises taxes for households making above $250,000 and preserves current rates for everyone else.

          http://www.foxnews.com/politic.....hike-rise/

          Do provide us a link to this Reid bill that is even more generous to the 1% than the Boehner bill, Plugs.

          1. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

            The Senate bill does not raise taxes on ANYONES first $250,000 in income.

            Therefore all workers retain a tax cut (just not on income beyond $250,000).

            1. Red Rocks Rockin   12 years ago

              That's not 100%, you moron.

              1. Kaptious Kristen   12 years ago

                It's 100% to the mental midget....anyone making over $250k is not a "worker" in its fevered commie brain.

            2. R C Dean   12 years ago

              You're wrong, though, when you say that the Senate bill extends the Bush/Obama tax rates for all workers.

              Those rates include a lower rate on earnings over $250K, which is not extended.

              Try not to lie, Plugs. You won't get away with it, and you only embarrass yourself.

              Under the Obama proposal, a married couple making around $280,000 breaks even, and their tax bill goes up from there. A married couple making around $250,000 sees a whopping savings of about $750 from the Obama proposal.

              Check it out:

              http://interactive.taxfoundati.....calculator

    3. RBS   12 years ago

      Seriously, how fucking stupid is "it's the other side fault"? This, from someone who, according to his supporters, is supposed to be so brilliant. Yet again he proves to be in way over his head and completely clueless.

      1. John   12 years ago

        Part of the job of being President is being able to bargain with the other side. And the Republicans in Congress won their elections too. I don't think he is going to be able to successfully blame this on the Republicans. If he actually had a plan, he could. But he doesn't. And even the media can't cover that up forever.

        1. Red Rocks Rockin   12 years ago

          And even the media can't cover that up forever.

          Bullshit. If the media has demonstrated anything over the past eight years, it's that it doesn't matter one bit what this two-bit huckster says or does--they will do anything and everything to cover for him if they believe it might reflect negatively upon him. And that's because they're the ones who made him.

          Holding Obama to the same level of scrutiny that Dubya was held to would be an admission that they fucked up in pushing this guy as a "rock star," and if there's one thing the media doesn't like to do, it's admit they fucked up.

    4. NoVAHockey   12 years ago

      The press has forgotten that spite is a factor in these things. At least boenher grew a pair and said the house was out until the senate dioes. something. He should have done that after thanksgiving.

      1. R C Dean   12 years ago

        As usual, even when Boehner is right, he's only half-right.

        He could have gotten a bill extending current rates for everybody through the House, and then adjourned (sine die would have been my preference; leave the Dems with a take it or leave it offer).

        But no, his testicles still haven't dropped.

  22. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    Michigan passes Right to Work.

    Ford announces an expansion of production in Michigan plant.

    Coincidence?

    1. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

      none dare call it conspiracy. Unless you're Michael Moore and you've got a film to promote

  23. DEG   12 years ago

    Your tax dollars at work

    In news unrelated to the Daily Fail link, I got a letter from my health insurance company. My plan, which is through my employer, will be cancelled in early 2013 as way to control costs. The company claims they are offering new, more competitive plans which my employer might or might not choose to offer. I don't know anything more at this point, but I suspect Obmaneycare is involved.

    1. $park?   12 years ago

      My company switch insurance carriers for next year. The costs are about the same but I have to pick a whole new set of doctors because my current ones aren't covered under the new plan.

      1. wareagle   12 years ago

        but but but but - you can keep your doctor. The Obama said so.

        1. $park?   12 years ago

          I'm sure once I pick a new doctor I'll be able to keep him/her.

        2. DEG   12 years ago

          How can you tell when a politician lies?

          His lips move.

    2. DEG   12 years ago

      I got e-mail from one of the executives today. The health insurance company sent the letter in error. Oh well, I can't blame Obamneycare, but there's still plenty of things to pin on Obamneycare.

  24. John   12 years ago

    Can someone explain to me the Timmy hate on ESPN? Timmy didn't even get to play this year. No other time have I ever seen so much hatred focused on a backup quarterback. Maybe he is a bad quarterback. I don't know since we never saw him play. But there are a lot of bad quarterbacks in the league. Yet, none of them inspire the has beens on ESPN to dislike much less hatred. Matt Cassel and Blaine Gabbert are both horrible and will cost their coaches and GMs their jobs and have alienated two fan bases. That is a lot worse than anything Timmy has ever done.

    1. Ted S.   12 years ago

      What do you think the reaction would be if Cam Newton had quit on his team the way Tebow did?

      1. John   12 years ago

        How can a guy who doesn't play "quit"? And there is no evidence that is what happened anyway. Just unnamed sources whoever they are. Oh, let me put on my surprised face that the most unprofessional team in sports would put out lies to throw him under the bus.

        1. AuH2O   12 years ago

          the most unprofessional team in sports

          John, as far as I know, Tim Tebow has not been signed by the New York Mets.

          1. John   12 years ago

            BURN!!

    2. wareagle   12 years ago

      I think a lot of it comes down to an inordinate amount of focus on a guy whose qb skill set is marginal, at best, for the NFL. He's athletic enough to play other positions and probably be good at them, but his ego will not allow the switch.

      Tim had the good fortune of being qb for a team with a solid running game and very good defense, and you see this year just how good the Broncos are with a genuine qb. No 4th quarter miracles because the game is in hand before then.

      1. John   12 years ago

        And I bet Denver wins one playoff game and goes to New England and gets killed just like last year.

        1. $park?   12 years ago

          I don't think so. I have a feeling NE is not going to beat Denver this year.

          1. John   12 years ago

            They beat them once already. Belichek owns legoneck just like Eli owns Brady.

            1. $park?   12 years ago

              We'll see. Brady is no good if his receivers can't catch a ball and the Pats secondary leaves much to be desired.

              1. John   12 years ago

                Brady is no good if you hit him. The Giants and 49ers proved that. But we will see.

                1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

                  Brady is no good if you can hit him with a four man rush (which is really a stupid point to make- all QBs suck in that case). The past 2 years (at least) he has a QB rating in the 130s versus a 5 man rush or higher.

        2. wareagle   12 years ago

          Denver has a better record than the Pats; such a game would only happen in the Rockies.

          NE beat Denver early in the regular season. Rematches tend to favor the team that lost the first one. But like Herman said - that's why you play the game.

          1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

            It's not quite "only". A Denver loss this week and a Pats win would bring up the possibility of a match up in Foxboro. But that's pretty unlikely because, like their last dozen games, the Broncos play pure shit this week.

        3. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

          Sadly, Denver likely won't be coming to Foxboro this year.

          1. John   12 years ago

            That is right. But I doubt it will matter. Belicheck owns Manning.

            1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

              It matters because if it's in Denver I don't get to go to the game.

      2. Ptah-Hotep   12 years ago

        He's athletic enough to play other positions and probably be good at them, but his ego will not allow the switch.

        I have heard many say he would be an outstanding TE, but won't because he wants to be a QB.

        1. wareagle   12 years ago

          and that's exactly it. We know he can run with the ball and can probably catch. My guess is he could be a good blocker, too. But ego will not allow the switch.

      3. Brett L   12 years ago

        Its not like Ryan even gave him a shot.

        1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

          So a whole season of practice time, as well as various plays in game time doesn't count?

          1. robc   12 years ago

            What Denver did didnt even really count, IMO.

            If you are going to play Tebow at QB, you have to restructure your entire offense.

            Personally, I think whoever signs Vick as their QB for next year, should also sign Tebow to be the backup.

            1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

              I was actually referring to this year, suggesting that if he sucks too much in practice to get on the field that might be his own fault, and not the coach for not "giving him a chance."

              1. Randian   12 years ago

                I doubt very much that's the issue.

              2. robc   12 years ago

                Im saying that the day they signed him, they failed to "give him a chance" by failing to restructure their entire offensive strategy.

        2. Ted S.   12 years ago

          Perhaps Ryan determined that Sanchez gave the team the least bad chance to win. Even a 10% chance is better than a 5% chance.

          1. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

            The from office bet on Sanchez when they gave him the big contract extension.

          2. KDN   12 years ago

            Hey, 10% chance to score. Credit where it's due, the Jets have managed to win 43% of the games Sanchez started despite his chronic ineptitude.

      4. AuH2O   12 years ago

        He would be an insane as a FB. He could move up to play Tight End, carry the ball for a few power yards, or be shifted into a trick play (including... would it be legal to somehow audible the qb out so he would be in the pistol?). The guy is a weapon, but he is just paid to much to be used properly (teams are to worried about injury for him to be an FB or an option QB)

        1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

          You can do a direct snap to a non QB, so that should be fine. When they motioned they would have make sure it wasn't an illegal shift, but it's doable.

          1. AuH2O   12 years ago

            Ideal team/position for Tebow then: Redskins H-Back, shifting into the backfield often to be the FB.

            Think of it: At any time, you could motion out RGIII as a reciever, and have Tebow in the pistol, with Morris behind him (and the Skins already use the pistol!).

            Seriously, that offense would be unstoppable.

            1. Red Rocks Rockin   12 years ago

              That's basically the old single-wing, which is really the offense Tebow works best in.

    3. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

      Obviously it is anti-Christian bigotry - since that is what you want to hear. Never mind all the other many Christians in the NFL.

      1. John   12 years ago

        Most of them are black. Most sports writers are lefty racists like you, so they don't hold black people to the same standards of conduct and therefore ignore their Christianity where they wouldn't in a white person.

        1. RBS   12 years ago

          Hmmm, I think we Jemele Hill to investigate.

          1. Ted S.   12 years ago

            How sad is it that I had to look up whether Jemele Hill was a man or a woman?

            1. AuH2O   12 years ago

              Did the same thing.

              See also: LZ Granderson

        2. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

          Right, John. Liberals are secret racists who give black people a free pass and vote for food stamps because they hate all blacks.

          You're on your full retard game this morning.

          1. John   12 years ago

            ho give black people a free pass and vote for food stamps because they hate all blacks.

            They vote for food stamps because they think black people are lessor human beings and incapable of providing for themselves like white people. Just like you think any black man who is appointed to the Senate is unqualified and was only appointed because they are black.

            Liberals are the inheritors of America's white supremacist past. They view black people as inferior humans who cannot function without the help of the benevolent white man in the form of big government.

            Admit it shreek, you think black people are inferior and that is why you think they need so much help.

          2. wareagle   12 years ago

            Liberals are secret racists

            and the War on Poverty put that sentiment into law. Nice job on decimating the black family, creating the phrase "generational welfare", and making sure that black neighborhood schools are the worst in any district.

            1. John   12 years ago

              And don't forget the drug war. If Lincoln was the great emancipator, Clinton, Bush and Obama were the great jailers.

              1. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

                Reagan cooked up the crack sentences that gave extra years for how cocaine is formulated. That was racist to the core.

                1. John   12 years ago

                  And so was the Democratic House that passed the law, at the behest of the Congressional Black Caucus. And so was Clinton who enforced it and locked more black men than any President since slavery.

                  Face it Shreek, you have a racism problem.

          3. KDN   12 years ago

            It's really pretty obvious that the national newsmedia finds white religiosity to be at best weird and at worst insane while completely ignoring it amongst blacks. And since national sportswriters are just like their cousins in the regular media only moreso (probably due to the contempt their j-school brothers hold for them), you're actually quite a bit closer than you think.

            And I say this as an atheist brought up by an apathetic mainline Protestant father and an anti-Christian Jewish mother. I'm not exactly in a rush to defend bible thumpers.

            1. John   12 years ago

              Reggie White was an ordained minister who practically thanked God for helping him defeat the unbelievers after every win. No one said a word. Tebow crosses himself and does a "hey I am glad I wasn't aborted" TV commercial and the entire sports media establishment goes insane.

              1. Red Rocks Rockin   12 years ago

                The only time I ever saw anyone ding Reggie White on his religiosity was in an SI article when he said that God directed him to sign with Green Bay, and lost his temper when some GM snarked that the money didn't have anything to do with it.

              2. wareagle   12 years ago

                Reggie took a lot of heat after remarks about the gayz. He got a pass for being a star, not just for being black. Tebow is, first, a marginal player and second, his overt displays smack of "look at me."

                He NEVER did the Tebow thing at UF; he had a bible version on the eye black and did some Reggie talk but, again, he was a star at that level and it was excused.

          4. bostonaod   12 years ago

            Right, John. Liberals are secret racists who give black people a free pass and vote for food stamps because they hate all blacks. are paternalistic fucktards who instinctively think blacks are inferior and are to be held to lower standards.

            FTFY

    4. hamilton   12 years ago

      It's not Timmy hate. It's just the latest "angle" from the Tebow Sports Network. Probably came out of their latest focus group. Once he moves over to the Jaguars look for them to shift the talking heads to a different course.

    5. Kaptious Kristen   12 years ago

      Cassel and Gabbert don't have whole legions of PR flacks and marketing gurus working for them, forcing them into the national spotlight.

    6. KDN   12 years ago

      Can someone explain to me the Timmy hate on ESPN? Timmy didn't even get to play this year. No other time have I ever seen so much hatred focused on a backup quarterback.

      ESPN wants the NFL to remain a pass-happy, big play league; it's more exciting and better for highlights and their ratings. Whenever asking the question, "why is ESPN doing ___?" the answer will always go back to how ___ affects ESPN.

      1. KDN   12 years ago

        Blegh, cropped my sentence. should have added at the end of the first, "but if Tebow is successful, you might see a larger shift back towards the running game in the NFL, something that neither ESPN nor their master Goodell wants."

  25. AuH2O   12 years ago

    Speaking of RTW in Michigan, did you know that their reactionary politics are driving away young grads?

    What liberalism Michigan has has been mostly in the labor/economic sector, and it's always been fairly conservative ? even compared to other Upper Midwestern states ? when it comes to women's and LGBT rights. But now the degree to which has now Michigan gone to the right is unprecedented. With the vote in favor of "right to work" ? a policy which claims to give workers "rights" by not requiring them to pay union dues, but actually just hurts them by reducing the bargaining power of unions (which benefit workers regardless of membership) ? it seems the Michigan I knew growing up is no more.

    As far as LGBT rights, why would students who have left Michigan to go to school in more liberal states choose to return to a state that will severely restrict their rights? ...As for women's rights, the list of excessive reproductive health restrictions passed by the MI legislature in recent years is endless...

    Younger Michiganders have reason to be repulsed by the state's backwards stance towards social issues, and older citizens are feeling betrayed by the right-to-work vote. Yet, this factor seems to get rarely discussed about why so many young Michiganders are abandoning the state.

    1. wareagle   12 years ago

      that's a pretty good example of manipulating the evidence to support the hypothesis. I doubt any college graduate anywhere is basing decisions on where to live on gay marriage. Oh, sure; they have opinions on it, but they're not turning down offers in the states that have voted against it.

      1. nicole   12 years ago

        I started reading a book last night--only just started, so I haven't gotten very far--called "Rust Belt Chic," which is mostly about Cleveland. One of the first essays in it is about Richard Florida's whole creative class business, which I guess first started when he was in Pittsburgh trying to get young Yinzers to stay at home and not move away to Austin. The actually interesting thing in the essay, though, is it claimed that there was actually hardly any out-migration at the time of young adults, and it was actually older adults without a college education who were making up most of Pittsburgh's population decline. I'd like to look into it more, but it would be pretty hilarious if the whole "we have to be hip to keep/attract hip young people" is just completely based on nothing.

        1. John   12 years ago

          That makes sense. People go where the work is. Most of that stuff is just people who live there making their town more to their liking, which is fine. But it is hardly some economic panacea.

          1. Brett L   12 years ago

            Yeah. The fact that places like Seattle and Austin doubled (or more) in size between 1990 and 2000 probably had more to do with grads moving to those places than any hipness. I'm trying to convince people in Tallahassee that good jobs will bring the "cool factor" that people so desperately want. But no. If they can just save the state/university jobs and wish hard enough some magical thing will happen.

            Trying to explain liquid capital and its ability to create jobs and businesses in a non-linear fashion to bureaucrats (or educrats) is an interesting exercise. But fuck it. I'm starting a Makerspace anyhow. We'll see. We could definitely use a sugardaddy, but I may just have to go out and work hard to recruit for it.

            1. wareagle   12 years ago

              I just wrapped up a Master's at FSU's PC campus. What are you trying to do?

              1. Brett L   12 years ago

                I've been in programming for a decade. Did a ChemE degree and went into consulting for that last year. A bunch of us got together and decided we wanted to open a Maker-/Hackerspace in Tallahassee because we like messing with electronics/woodworking/metalworking/robotics/etc. Right now we've got a 501(c)3 non-profit started and a space rented. We've got at least one small 3D printer and a shit ton of tools. Hopefully, after the holidays end we can start getting recruits, because we've only got enough money to run for about 6 months right now.

                But I have a couple of friends at the county government level and sat in on a "how do we get tech from the uni to the biz" forum that was, well, interesting. Everyone wanted to be Austin/Seattle/Research Triange/Silicon Valley. Nobody has any clue how to get there. No, correction, some people have a clue, but its not going to get done by the county or universities. But they sure do want to "do something".

                1. wareagle   12 years ago

                  used to live in NC. The RTP leveraged the presence of three well-known universities and several lesser-known ones, along with the state capital, in attracting interest. The universities were a definite value-add but, you're right, they were not the end-all.

                  After the first couple of companies, it built on itself much like the other areas. Lot to like about the Gulf Coast but it doesn't always help itself.

                  1. Brett L   12 years ago

                    I told them if we just had an HP, Dell, or Microsoft, the problem would solve itself. We'd have a ton of young people with money to spend supporting the things young people like and starting their own businesses that need young people to stay and work. I know it wasn't particularly helpful, but they were off in the fantasy land of "if we just had the right incentives or co-working spaces or incubators". They got the cause and effect backwards. Money has to be in the system first.

      2. Ted S.   12 years ago

        Perhaps some of the gay college graduates do base their decision on it.

        1. wareagle   12 years ago

          maybe, but which of the more liberal states do they move to? CA? Oregon? Can't be either of those since gay marriage referenda were soundly defeated. Maybe NY where the legislature approved it but this article does a lot of projecting. Graduates tend to move to places where they can be employed.

          1. robc   12 years ago

            Atlanta has a very large gay population, so apparently the liberal state of GA is the answer.

            Its solidly blue, right?

            1. wareagle   12 years ago

              somewhere yesterday I saw a story on how the evil GA legislature is stripping away welfare benefits to propagate the GOPs war on the poor.

    2. Jordan   12 years ago

      That is some atrocious editing.

    3. John   12 years ago

      What will Michigan do without a strong supply of gay and lesbian studies majors. The place will turn into Somalia with that supply of vital skilled labor.

  26. Sevo   12 years ago

    "Drug shortage, cancer recurrence linked"
    From the article:
    "Drug shortages throughout the country have been attributed to various factors, including problems in production, difficulties in getting raw materials, federal recalls and enforcement actions, and corporate decisions to discontinue making certain medications for lack of profit or other reasons."

    Just a guess on my part, but if a drug was (freely) offered which which kept cancer in remission, a LOT of people would pay enough for the mfgr of that drug to make a profit, so I'm calling bullshit on the last speculation.
    Pretty sure the helping hand of government figures heavily in this.
    http://www.sfgate.com/health/a.....147866.php

    1. wareagle   12 years ago

      at this point, it is fair to ask if the cure for most cancers is not already in hand. There is so much money in treatment and so much power to be had in political demagoguery, however, that it remains out of view. Conspiracy or potential reality?

  27. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    I suspect Obmaneycare is involved.

    Nonsense. This is merely standard-issue kkkorporate profits-before-people skullduggery.

    If not for the caring beneficence of our Shining Beacon of Hope, the insurance company would send somebody to shoot you just like a horse with a broken leg in order to keep their costs down

    1. R C Dean   12 years ago

      [Makes mental note to forward suggestion for cost control to self-insurance administrator.]

    2. DEG   12 years ago

      Awesome

  28. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    As far as LGBT rights, why would students who have left Michigan to go to school in more liberal states choose to return to a state that will severely restrict their rights?

    What the fuck?

    severely restrict their rights

    "Rights" to do what, specifically? Why are these people so completely obsessed with getting the government to validate their fucking lifestyle choices?

    1. John   12 years ago

      Good question. You can live as an open gay in any state in the country. Hell, flyover states like Oklahoma have really big gay communities.

    2. R C Dean   12 years ago

      Why?

      Perhaps because they've been offered a job there?

      I know: its Michigan, so its unlikely. But you can be sure the fact that people don't come back to Michigan will be blamed on the Rethugs, not on the shitty job market.

    3. AuH2O   12 years ago

      According to the article:

      According to this infographic from The Guardian, Michigan is tied with Mississippi and Utah for the least protections for LGBT people in the country. Not only are LGBT people in MI denied marriage equality and employment and housing protections, same-sex couples aren't even able to adopt kids under current Michigan law. Some state legislators have even attempted to introduce legislation that would nullify protections from local governments.

    4. nicole   12 years ago

      Yeah, this is serious BS. Here's the text of the bill she links in the complaint about gay rights:

      A public degree or certificate granting college, university, junior college, or community college of this state shall not discipline or discriminate against a student in a counseling, social work, or psychology program because the student refuses to counsel or serve a client as to goals, outcomes, or behaviors that conflict with a sincerely held religious belief of the student, if the student refers the client to a counselor who will provide the counseling or services.

      So, if you're studying to be a counselor, you can refuse to counsel gay people about being gay. Also, you can be fired for being gay, companies aren't required to offer gay domestic partners benefits, and some anti-bullying bill has the language, "This section does not prohibit a statement of a sincerely held religious belief or moral conviction of a school employee, school volunteer, pupil, or a pupil and parent or guardian." Or, in her words, Michigan "ALLOWS BULLYING BASED ON MORAL CONVICTIONS." Sigh.

      1. R C Dean   12 years ago

        Michigan "ALLOWS BULLYING BASED ON MORAL CONVICTIONS."

        Isn't most of the proggy agenda bullying based on moral convictions?

        How is threatening to prosecute people if they don't conform to your moral agenda by being nice to gay people not bullying?

        Once again, proggy = projection.

        1. nicole   12 years ago

          Once again, proggy = projection.

          It's starting to creep me out how true this seems to be.

  29. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    Harry Reid is on my teevee right now, doing his bestest Droopy Dog imitation right now. I expect him to begin sobbing piteously at any moment.

    REPENT! THE END IS NIGH!

  30. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    Now he sounds like a wounded parent who has just opened the front door to discover the cops have brought his kid home, after the kid took the car without permission, got slobbering drunk, and wrecked it on the courthouse steps.

    "Son, I am disappoint."

    1. John   12 years ago

      I don't buy this "oh we can't wait for the cliff so we can blame the Republicans" bullshit. The cliff is going to really stick it to Dem voters.

  31. John   12 years ago

    http://pjmedia.com/instapundit/160440/

    Classic.

  32. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    I have been subjected to those Acura holiday season ads for weeks. The Suze Orman one was just on. Who would watch one of those ads and think, "By golly, I think I'll go buy an Acura today!"

    The person responsible for them should be burned at the stake. How did they ever get past a management review?

    "Haha, that's great; we'll run an ad campaign based on telling our target market they're idiots! Let's wrap this up and go get drunk!"

    1. John   12 years ago

      Since they, along with Lexus, make the world's most boring cars, you have to try something.

    2. Kaptious Kristen   12 years ago

      It's not worse than a Chevy commercial from last year where a Chevy salesman was prank calling another dealership (where he supposedly used to work) and generally acting like a douche. Why anyone would want to buy a Chevy from such a fucking asshole is beyond me.

      1. John   12 years ago

        I do like the Chevy commercials with Santa Claus in a suit and tie hawking trucks.

        1. Kaptious Kristen   12 years ago

          Those are cute - if Santa was trying to sell me a car, I might even consider a Chevy. Ok, no. But Santa selling cars is cute.

        2. R C Dean   12 years ago

          The Mercedes campaign, especially the "naughty or nice" one, is also a winner.

        3. Night Elf Mohawk   12 years ago

          "How much is that in reindeer power?"

    3. wareagle   12 years ago

      by contrast, VW has quite a clever campaign underway.

    4. Brett L   12 years ago

      Eh. After seeing Justin Bieber and Busta Rhymes on the NBA on ESPN intro and commercial lead-ins on Christmas, I can only muster a "meh" for burning others at the stake. We were trying to figure out the demographic targetting. Gay men who like rap? 40 year olds with daughters in the house? What the fuck?

      1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

        The only thing more confusing to me than what their target audience was, was why Bieber would try to look tough with his pose at the end of the song.

    5. Enough About Palin   12 years ago

      A
      Car
      Undoubtedly
      Relocating
      Assholes

      1. John   12 years ago

        +100

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

New Ruling Moves Oregon Closer to Legal In-Home Psilocybin Use

Autumn Billings | 6.4.2025 11:40 AM

A First Amendment Right To Preach Orgasm?

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 6.4.2025 11:25 AM

Schumer Attacks Trump for Repeating Obama's Iran Diplomacy

Matthew Petti | 6.4.2025 10:17 AM

Buyer's Remorse

Liz Wolfe | 6.4.2025 9:43 AM

Growing Ranks of Military Homeschoolers Get Defense Department Support

J.D. Tuccille | 6.4.2025 7:00 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!