Damon Root on How Florida's Property Rights Abuse Landed at the Supreme Court
In January the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in the case of Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management District. At issue is a legal battle dating back to 1994 where a Florida regulatory agency refused to permit the commercial development of a small piece of property unless the owner first agreed to transfer the title to 75 percent of the lot to the government and also fund costly and unrelated improvements to 50 acres of public land located miles away. Had the owner agreed to pay up, the agency admits, "the exact project [he] proposed would have been permitted." But the owner refused to pay what he saw as an extortionate demand and instead brought suit, charging the agency with violating his rights. Reason.com Managing Editor Damon Root reports on the case.
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?