Prenatal Gene Scans Pick Up More Health Problems
Uncover more than current testing
A new study sets the stage for wider use of gene testing in early pregnancy. Scanning the genes of a fetus reveals far more about potential health risks than current prenatal testing does, say researchers who compared both methods in thousands of pregnancies in the U.S.
A surprisingly high number — 6% — of certain fetuses declared normal by conventional testing were found to have genetic abnormalities by gene scans, the study found. The gene flaws can cause anything from minor defects such as a club foot to more serious ones such as mental retardation, heart problems and fatal diseases.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Eugenics! Brave New World! Nazis!
Just thought I'd take care of that for the Luddites.
Likely in the next 5-10 years, full genetic evaluations of a fetus will be available. We're already getting close to $1k genomes. At that priceMaybe in petri dishes, so the "best" fetus can be selected. Get over it.
Ha! Here it is.
http://www.slate.com/articles/.....yway_.html
In June, a team at the University of Washington in Seattle announced a new technique that enables the construction of a comprehensive genome sequence?a genetic "blueprint," as they described it?of the developing fetus from as early as the first trimester (Science Translational Medicine, vol 4, p 137ra76). The test could be available in clinics in as little as five years.
Then, in July, a team at Stanford University announced a slightly different technique for obtaining the same information (Nature, vol 487, p 320).