As Pundits Try To Read the Polls, the Response Rate Plummets
Good luck calling this one, especially with most Americans hanging-up the phone
Five firms released national polls of the presidential election over a couple of days late last month, and the results were a head-scratcher for politics buffs: Mitt Romney was winning by a percentage point, losing by a percentage point, winning by five, and losing by five.
Who was right? Who can be trusted amid the welter of conflicting data?
The country could be less than a day away from being able to judge, but at least two conclusions arise from looking at the 2008 presidential election: Some firms were clearly better than others at nailing the final result, and a particularly accurate reading could be gleaned by averaging all the polls together.
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?