Restrictive Copyright Treaty Back In Play
Broadcasters and Webcasters round the world would be included in the agreement
As we noted last June, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Broadcast Treaty—which is a restrictive copyright treaty that aims to create and extend expansive rights to signals of broadcasters and webcasters—is back. Although it has been revamped, it still incorporates the two most controversial proposals from the original treaty text. The last WIPO meeting in July firmed the course of the negotiations, proceeding on the basis of a single draft text released on July 24th called the "chair's non-paper" [pdf].
The treaty will apply to "traditional broadcasters", but what that actually means is still a source of disagreement. Japan, for instance, wants "traditional broadcasters" to include TV and radio but not webcasts. Japan says these proposals are supported by Brazil and India. However, the US position reaches back to 2005, and once again pushes for a "technologically neutral" approach, which would expand the definition of traditional broadcasting to include cablecasters and webcasters.
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?