You Can Bet on the Olympics Online in 182 Countries, But Not the Land of the Free
The Associated Press reports on the wide variety of betting options gamblers with their eyes on the Olympics will have. Some of the longer odds:
1,000-to-1 that a flying saucer will appear over Olympic Stadium during Friday's opening ceremony. Tough luck, presumably, if aliens don't make first contact until the next day.
Other longshots get slightly better odds, like 250-to-1 that every team in the 4x400-meter relay final drops the baton, or 33-to-1 that flamboyant London Mayor Boris Johnson accidentally lights his hair on fire with the Olympic torch.
And this being famously soggy London, of course they are taking bets on the weather, paying even-money that rain will mar the opening night. If that's not enough to make an Olympic fan cry, Ladbrokes will pay $50 on a $1 bet that it will rain every day, and 10-to-1 that a strike by transit workers will halt train service on the London Underground.
Gambling in Britain is a $9 billion a year industry, and the London Olympics are an event to capitalize on:
"We try to cater to most people's tastes," said Joe Crilly, a spokesman for William Hill, a gambling house that encourages punters -- the U.K. term for gamblers -- to contact them with any bet they can dream up. They also offer online gambling in 182 countries, though not in the United States or in other countries where it is prohibited.
Reason on America's online gambling ban, and more Reason on gambling
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Hellishly abhorrent, absolutely immoral, and utterly unjustifiable prohibitionism -- it's what's for breakfast, brunch, lunch, and dinner!
Needs a side of gambole.
Don't you dare. You'll unintentionally summon Elizabeth Warren's smarter cousin, the irrepressible White Indian.
Gambole, gambole, across plain and desert and forest . . .
SILENCE!!!!
GAMBOL LOCKDOWN IS IN FULL EFFECT. STOP RESISTING.
I'm shocked that the odds that a flying saucer lands are only 1000 to 1. I would go as high as a billion to one.
You would put up $4 billion against my $4? Why bother - do you really want my $4 that much? Perhaps you would rather put up $100 billion to win a chance at my $100?
In a 'sure thing' bet, the difference in the actual odds and the gambling odds is the cost of attracting someone to bother betting on the other side.
Almost all of those oddball bets mentioned above would be legal throughout the USA. Laws against gambling more specific than that; they don't ban all contracts of the form, "Pay X if Y", or insurance would be illegal. What they do ban is betting on certain specific classes of things, usually the outcome (not whether it will rain, etc.) of sporting contests, games of chance, and elections for public or party office.
So they can't bet in Taiwan?