Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

MSNBC Reacts to Walker Victory: "He may be indicted" and "You can't say anything about this other than that big money won" and "Obama is really the big winner"

Mike Riggs | 6.6.2012 12:34 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

The fine folks at the Washington Examiner have put together a montage of MSNBC's coverage of the Wisconsin recall election. It is…fascinating: 

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: David Harsanyi on the Paycheck Fairness Act

Mike Riggs is a contributing editor at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (98)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Joe M   14 years ago

    I wish I could watch this right now. I need a laugh.

    1. sarcasmic   14 years ago

      ditto

    2. Kaptious Kristen   14 years ago

      It ain't all that. Certainly doesn't come close to salty tears Wisconsin Red Sox fan.

      1. Karl Hungus   14 years ago

        Certainly doesn't come close to salty tears Wisconsin Red Sox fan.

        Was that some sort of man-in-the-street interview they did with someone who was despondent that Walker wasn't recalled?

        1. Karl Hungus   14 years ago

          Never mind, I just saw Red Sox guy on TV - fucking AWESOME. They also just showed a clip where some woman bitch-slapped Tom Barrett. Even awesomer.

          1. Apatheist ?_??   14 years ago

            Try scrolling down the blog sometime. 😉

            1. Karl Hungus   14 years ago

              Try scrolling down the blog sometime. 😉

              I can't, the wheel on my mouse is broken 😉

  2. VG Zaytsev   14 years ago

    "You can't say anything about this other than that big money won" and "Obama is really the big winner"

    Doesn't that make Obama the big money candidate?

    1. freeAgent   14 years ago

      Obama already is the big money candidate.

  3. og barfman   14 years ago

    *barf*

  4. cw   14 years ago

    Progressive: "It's only Big Money when they do it!"

    1. 35N4P2BYY   14 years ago

      Oh and Union money doesn't count, 'cause unions are the voice of the worker struggling under teh yoke of the oppressive bourgeois, or something.

      1. GILMORE   14 years ago

        35N4P2BYY|6.6.12 @ 1:11PM|#

        Oh and Union money doesn't count

        well, it's not *BIG* money... its the combined dues of thousands of "middle class", hardworkin, rent-seekin' Average Americans...

        The whole, "big money" thing is clearly going to be the talking point going forward. The idea that all Progressive failures are a consequence of the opposition 'stealing it' from them is all over the place.

        Re: "Big Money" - A friend of mine who worked in commercial real estate investments for Bear Stearns in the late 90s was asked to come look over the headquarters building of the "Local 32BJ of the Service Employees International Union" (doormen elevator workers - 28,000 members).

        Keep in mind this was a guy who regularly did deals of hundreds of millions, buying office towers...

        He told me afterward the place had security like nothing he'd ever seen (biometrics on every floor, radio tags to track people, armed guards everywhere), had a conference room that would have made Dr Evil proud (solid marble, wall-sized video conference, overlooking Times Sq), and had the equivilent facilities of a small hospital across a few floors.

        Point is, "big union" aint no joke.

        1. 35N4P2BYY   14 years ago

          And that would be my satirical point.

    2. db   14 years ago

      LOL, the funniest part is that if the Walker legislation hadn't freed WI workers from paying mandatory union dues if they work in union shops, the unions would have had tons more money to spend o this. Thworkers voted witg their wallets and showed the unions just how much they appreciate their "representation."

  5. juris imprudent   14 years ago

    Did we really need [more] proof that progressives are the most delusional people on the planet? Yeah, more than the crazy old guy on the street corner.

  6. Restoras   14 years ago

    The denial the left is wallowing in is fascinating. Unless the economy improves rapidly in the next several months, and Obama manages to sharply ratchet back the deficit spending the Congress and the Administration are heaping on future generations, he is going to get crushed in November. It will be epic to behold.

    I don't know how anyone can sit through all that video. 10 seconds of these hacks has me flipping back to the Red Sox game.

  7. RBS   14 years ago

    So what is he going to be indicted for?

    1. tarran   14 years ago

      Obstruction of justice?

      Apparently some of his aides were using a charity fund for veterans as a personal piggy-bank, and Walker might have covered for them in order to avoid being embarrassed.

      1. RBS   14 years ago

        I don't know, that's pretty weak. One thing did stand out though, the Justice Department has a "Public Integrity" division? Oh the irony.

        1. Pippers   14 years ago

          They've granted close to 30 people immunity over this so far. When this happens, something rather wicked this way comes.

  8. NoVAHockey   14 years ago

    It's the old "we-won-by-losing" trope that's used after a shellacking.

  9. Episiarch   14 years ago

    "We can change reality through force of will if we just try hard enough!"

    Sorry, assholes, only Episiarchs can do that.

    1. John   14 years ago

      Episiarchs are shaggy quadrupeds that have the ability to temporarily alter reality by force of will,

      And to think you have been making fun of Warty all of these years. You nothing but an extra dimensional Steve Smith.

      1. Episiarch   14 years ago

        Don't make me rape your mind, John.

        1. Groovus Maximus   14 years ago

          QUAD PED SASQUATCH PWN'D

    2. albo   14 years ago

      We'll each remove a head for your trophy case.

    3. joshua corning   14 years ago

      really?

      The only other scifi names here are Shrike and Hyperion....

      Why do you have to suck like them Epi?

      1. protefeed   14 years ago

        The only other scifi names here are Shrike and Hyperion....

        Only if you inexplicably define "1984" as not being science fiction.

        From NewspeakDictionary.com:

        "prolefeed - Rubishy "Entertainment" and spurious news which the Party handed out to the masses. This includes written literature, movies, porn, music, and other various propaganda created for the proles. (For a modern example of prolefeed, just turn on your television or radio. With the exception of some scientific programming, everything else is prolefeed.)"

  10. 35N4P2BYY   14 years ago

    A 54 percent to 45 percent margin is a "narrow win" hmmm.. So remind me how exactly Obama's 52.9 percent to 45.7 win a "landslide" and a sweeping mandate?

    1. Auric Demonocles   14 years ago

      Cause of sample size or something.

      1. Pro Libertate   14 years ago

        You have to take into account the standard disputation.

        1. Groovus Maximus   14 years ago

          What about the standard dispensation?

          1. Pro Libertate   14 years ago

            Well, there's standard disinformation, but that's a technical term.

            1. Groovus Maximus   14 years ago

              I understand. It's like standard disgronification.

              1. Pro Libertate   14 years ago

                Very like that. And standard dissembling.

    2. JW   14 years ago

      Something something not bush something something.

    3. Somalian Road Corporation   14 years ago

      For the same reason that elections had consequences in 2008 but in 2010 election winners were hostage-taking Tea Party terrorists.

  11. Brett L   14 years ago

    MSNBC really has descended to the level of one of the old party organ newspapers of the 19th century.

    "Its just a flesh wound."

  12. sage   14 years ago

    Rachel Maddow sure is a handsome woman.

    1. albo   14 years ago

      I bet she dominates the dorm room posters at Yale.

      1. 35N4P2BYY   14 years ago

        or Vassar.

        1. Pip   14 years ago

          Or Smith.

          1. Groovus Maximus   14 years ago

            How could you forget Oberlin?

            1. John   14 years ago

              Wellsley and Bryn Mayr are on the line and would like speak to you.

              1. Groovus Maximus   14 years ago

                I have NYU on hold; speaking to Meredith now, and they are not happy.

            2. Restoras   14 years ago

              Don't forget Brown and Skidmore.

              1. fish   14 years ago

                West coast representin wit Mills College!

            3. alittlesense   14 years ago

              At Oberlin, they roll up the posters of Maddow and smoke them.

        2. Kuze   14 years ago

          I've had just about enough of your Vassar bashing young lady!

      2. sage   14 years ago

        Well, sure. You can't use poison on rats anymore. Bad for the environment or something.

    2. Alex   14 years ago

      Professional stylists can do wonders.

      1. fish   14 years ago

        Looks like Warren Beatty melted.

  13. 35N4P2BYY   14 years ago

    Images of "Baghdad Bob" in 2003 came to mind when I watched the coverage when the polls were open. Declaring victory as enemy artillery rounds are detonating in your capital is kinda funny to watch.

    1. Dr. Frankenstein   14 years ago

      This was just what I was thinking. What ever happened to him? My theory is that he's Blogger Bob for the TSA now.

  14. Emmerson Biggins   14 years ago

    I was expecting MSNBC to refer to Walker "restricting rights" of union members to collectively bargain early and often. That's their schtick. That's what they do.

    Usually CNN tries harder to appear to be the "middle ground" network, but they did that a couple of times too. I was, for some insane reason, actually slightly pissed at that.

    1. John   14 years ago

      CNN just pretended it didn't happen and covered the Queen's jubilee. Recall election? What recall election?

    2. albo   14 years ago

      Walker is indeed "restricting rights."

      He's restricting the right of progressives to win every election or else they'll stamp their tiny feet and whirl themselves into butter.

      1. John   14 years ago

        He restricted their "right" to forcibly deduct union dues from employees' paychecks.

  15. John   14 years ago

    The left's reaction to this is fascinating and disturbing. First, make no mistake like most things this is about money. The Left has been using public sector union money to fund itself for decades. And the funding has been good. There are thousands of professional leftists out there who make a nice living thanks in large part to this money. Brett Kimberlain is a convicted terrorist and drug dealer, yet still manages to have a six figure income and live in a nice DC suburb.* If states follow Wisconsin's lead and take away collective bargaining rights and the ability of unions to forcibly take union dues from members, that money dries up. And thousands of professional leftists will be out of work.

    Not only will they be out of work, they will nearly all have convinced themselves that democracy is dead and the political process is a sham. Now lets see, thousands of angry out of work ideological fanatics who are convinced the political process is irredemably broken who have tons of fellow travelers and enablers in government and the media. Yeah, that sounds like a recipe for a domestic terrorism movement to me.

    *Kimberlain's money does not come directly from unions. But money is fungible.

  16. albo   14 years ago

    Why isn't that dark-haired anchor dude wearing a tie?

    1. Ben the Duck   14 years ago

      Marshall Crenshaw stopped wearing ties back in the '90s, actually.

  17. Bee Tagger   14 years ago

    Wtf is going to happen on MSNBC if Obama loses?

    1. John   14 years ago

      I think Special Ed Shultz will have some kind of medical break down. Over under on how many MSNBC anchors cry? I think Crazy Larry and Chris Matthews are sure bets. So it is at least two and a half.

      1. fish   14 years ago

        John I think you've stumbled on to a nefarious plot to do away with the majority of the MSNBC male on air staff.

        1. Killazontherun   14 years ago

          Rachel is more handsome than all of them put together anyway. Seriously though, she is attractive, but not in any traditional feminine sense so handsome is as close to an accurate word as you'll get.

    2. Pro Libertate   14 years ago

      Violent insurrection against Fox News. Suicide reporters, poorly crafted bombs, the works.

      1. John   14 years ago

        Considering 60s leftists record of making bombs, I would not want to be on the MSNBC staff when that happens or at least not in the building.

        1. BarryD   14 years ago

          But I sure hope that it's on live TV!

      2. Pi Guy   14 years ago

        I'm thinking maybe something like full-contact Steal the Bacon b/w Fox News and MSNBC.

        When Maddow and Steve Douchie are tussling over the pork, my money's on the handsome guy from MSNBC.

    3. 35N4P2BYY   14 years ago

      I think that they will pretend in never happened lest the harm the fragile psyches of their loyal sycophants and themselves.

    4. Drake   14 years ago

      I am going to have to record MSNBC on election night. The cognitive dissonance, the waves of their delusions crashing on the rocks of reality... It will be hilarious.

    5. Pip   14 years ago

      "Wtf is going to happen on MSNBC if Obama loses?"

      We're all racists now.

      1. GILMORE   14 years ago

        Pip|6.6.12 @ 1:36PM|#

        "Wtf is going to happen on MSNBC if Obama loses?"

        Duh!

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pSWN6Qj98Iw

  18. Bee Tagger   14 years ago

    Maddow said something smart when she pointed out that people see mandates when they want to see them, but I can't say I got the impression she was aware of the irony of saying that on MSNBC just a few years after Obama won his election by a lesser margin (popular vote)

    1. John   14 years ago

      Bill Clinton never got to 50%. But won a huge mandate in both cases. LOL

      1. BarryD   14 years ago

        According to people like Madcow, of course.

        Man, who in hell would have her as an anchor? She's repulsive, definite "change the channel!" material. I've always found her to be so.

        1. John   14 years ago

          At least hacks like Ashley Banfield or Campbell Brown were easy on the eyes. What exactly does Maddow bring to the table? I mean is there really that big of a market for a butch lesbian sex symbol newsbabe?

          1. Alex   14 years ago

            She's trying hard to be a masculine version of Jon Stewart.

            1. Groovus Maximus   14 years ago

              *flips coin*

          2. ant1sthenes   14 years ago

            Know your audience, I guess.

        2. Pip   14 years ago

          I thought she had great chemistry when she was a guest on the PBS show Carlson Tucker had several years back. But as an anchor? Meh.

          1. BarryD   14 years ago

            Haven't really looked at PBS since Firing Line went off the air, except when I channel-surf into a travelogue of some sort.

          2. joshua corning   14 years ago

            Yeah i liked her on that show. Far less of a hack then she is now.

            She would make leftist arguments from first principles rather then cheer-leading team blue. Also the show focused on more libertarianish items such as the drug war or gay marriage...I often found myself agreeing with her over Tucker.

    2. Pro Libertate   14 years ago

      That word is almost always misused, as we rarely see more than a majority, at the very best.

      In 2006 and in 2008, there was an "Okay, the GOP has sucked with all of this war crap, so let's try the only possible other option in a world of only two options" moment. That was realized to be a stupid plan sometime in 2009, as hardly anyone was signing up to become Greece.

    3. protefeed   14 years ago

      Maddow said something unself-aware when she talked about "people having man dates when they want to".

  19. BarryD   14 years ago

    "If I were a Republican governor, I wouldn't want to do that, I wouldn't want that to happen to me."

    Uh, yeah, no governor wants to go from being first-term "Walker who?" from a "flyover" state to a hero to a huge chunk of the electorate, in less time than it took even for Obama's myth to be spread?

  20. Romulus Augustus   14 years ago

    A friend in Wisconsin reported he saw David and Charles Koch driving school buses through neighborhoods announcing
    voters could get $100 if they climbed abroad and were driven to the polling station. Other monocle-wearing, striped-pants types were seen letting the air out of the tires of registered Democrats. Other corporate types were
    turning street signs around in Democrat neighborhoods so it was harder
    to find one's polling place. At least one location reported that three piece suited CPAs were stationed outside intimidating voters with their deathly white pallor.

    1. NoVAHockey   14 years ago

      Reminds me of that Far Side about accountant street gangs.

    2. Loki   14 years ago

      Remeber: it's only voter fraud when the wrong TEAM wins.

    3. Pi Guy   14 years ago

      Wait - I need to have striped pants now to hand $100s?

      Well, never mind then.

      1. GILMORE   14 years ago

        tophat, tails and spats, are acceptable replacement for pinstripes

        1. Pi Guy   14 years ago

          Spats it is!

        2. Romulus Augustus   14 years ago

          Look at the "Monopoly Man" for required uniform of the 1% and us bought and paid for libertarians.

        3. 35N4P2BYY   14 years ago

          Don't forget the ladies! Mink stols, floppy hats, cigarette holders, and all around!

          Oh wait women can't be libertarian because they would then be required to be self-haters.

  21. Alex   14 years ago

    O'Donnell on Ron Paul taking second in the NH primary: "Huntsman is the real second here."

    I sense a pattern with him.

    1. Killazontherun   14 years ago

      That the matter in his head is not grey but brown?

  22. Old Mexican   14 years ago

    Grasping at straws - See: MSNBC.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Trump's Responses to Kimmel and Comey Highlight His Contempt for Freedom of Speech

Jacob Sullum | 5.6.2026 12:01 AM

Elizabeth Warren Wrongly Implies Jeff Bezos Isn't Paying Enough Taxes

Robby Soave | 5.5.2026 5:40 PM

The People vs. CEQA

Christian Britschgi | 5.5.2026 3:25 PM

How the Slaveholding Founders Really Felt About Slavery

Timothy Sandefur | 5.5.2026 1:20 PM

Can We Ever Trust the Government To Be Honest About War?

Alexander Langlois | 5.5.2026 12:27 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks