When Reason Met Eldridge Cleaver
Former Reason staffer Bill Kauffman remembers some interviews he did for us in the '80s:
My first interview was back in 1985, when Lynn Scarlett, an engaging New Leftist who wound up in G.W. Bush's subcabinet, and I traveled to Berkeley to spend the day chatting with Black Panther Eldridge Cleaver for Reason. When Eldridge—a loquacious and fascinating guy—got up to take a whizz, we glanced at his files. The two I remember were devoted to "Sperm" and whether Jim Morrison was extant or extinct.
I also interviewed a one-time Panther sympathizer, Clarence Thomas, who impressed me as friendly and intellectually curious. I liked the Booker T. Washington/Marcus Garvey/Malcolm X self-help streak in Thomas, then EEOC chairman.
Ted Kennedy later used that interview in the Thomas hearings to paint the nominee as a radical libertarian. If only!
You can read Kauffman's Cleaver interview here and his Thomas interview here. For more about those pants in the picture, go here.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
My GF put the ixnay on the ongday antspay, sadly.
So, I learn from reading that article in Jet that Eldridge Cleaver was crazier than I ever suspected. Nice to know.
The Reason interview is interesting. Cleaver really did develop a more nuanced view of politics than I would have given him credit for. He certainly had more perspective than Thomas Friedman.
Ted Kennedy later used that interview in the Thomas hearings to paint the nominee as a radical libertarian. If only!
If only? The purists really do get tiresome.
The real shame is Clarence Thomas is as good as it gets for libertarians and given presidents choose candidates based on executive branch supremacist views, will likely be as good as it ever gets.