Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Is It Possible to Outsmart TSA's Body Scanners?

Mike Riggs | 3.7.2012 8:24 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

One man says he's found a way to get unapproved objects through TSA's backscatter x-ray machines: 

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Ron Paul Finishes Third in Alaska

Mike Riggs is a contributing editor at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (40)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. gaijin   13 years ago

    Guess who just got placed on the no-fly list...

    1. TSA   13 years ago

      we skipped the no-fly list and put him straight onto the full-body-cavity-no-lube search list

      1. Matrix   13 years ago

        I figured you'd just take him out with a drone.

        1. TSA   13 years ago

          Union rules - no drones may substitute a human being for the performance of any task

        2. invisible furry hand   13 years ago

          Don't be ridiculous. All hits on US Citizens must be approved by the President. If the TSA does it, it could get whacked. Not that it would know. If you're part of a crew, nobody ever tells you that they're going to kill you, doesn't happen that way. There weren't any arguments or curses like in the movies. See, your murderers come with smiles, they come as your friends, the people who've cared for you all of your life. And they always seem to come at a time that you're at your weakest and most in need of their help.

          1. Don Coyote   13 years ago

            They'll come at you sideways. It's how they think. It's how they move.Sidle up and smile. Hit you where you're weak. Sort of man they're like to send believes hard. Kills and never asks why.

            1. toddb   13 years ago

              "It will happen this way. You may be walking. Maybe the first sunny day of the spring. And a car will slow beside you, and a door will open, and someone you know, maybe even trust, will get out of the car. And he will smile, a becoming smile. But he will leave open the door of the car and offer to give you a lift."

              1. Gray Ghost   13 years ago

                When they send for you, you go in alive, you come out dead, and it's your best friend that does it.

                I think it fits better with invisible furry hand's quote.

              2. Dave E.   13 years ago

                Heh...it had to be said.

    2. real   13 years ago

      My neighbor just met a bisexual man on ---datebi*cOMit's where for men and women looking
      for bisexual and bi-curious individuals to meet in a friendly and comfortable environment.
      It's a nice place for the people who have the same sexual orientation.

  2. GILMORE   13 years ago

    I'm not so crazy of his constant point of saying, "teh terrorists can get through this! We in danger!"

    I'm with him 99% of the way, but just reiterating that we are all in perpetual danger seems to provide just enough rope for any "critic" to go = "Yeah! Scanners don't work! We need MORE BETTER security!"... allowing the TSA to persist in the false notion that they provide any value *at all*.

    I know its necessary to bring in the pants-wetting crowd as well, but overselling it is a little annoying.

    1. Jerryskids   13 years ago

      I think his claims that he is doing this as a public service is just a form of "legal disclaimer" to cover his ass. He knows full well that Obama can assassinate him for demonstrating just how useless the TSA is.

    2. jasno   13 years ago

      Maybe you should watch it again. What he's saying is that we need the old metal detectors because they're better - something a lot of us have been saying for a while.

      The underwear and shoe bombs failed because they lacked detonators. They lacked them because the perps doubted the metal-cased detonators would make it through security. It would be trivial to get a detonator through the rape-scanners('prison-purse' it).

  3. Radioactive   13 years ago

    too ugly to pat down?

  4. Abdul   13 years ago

    So this is what the guy from Flock of Seagulls is doing now.

  5. sarcasmic   13 years ago

    Dammit. I was going to put that in the links.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new.....phole.html

  6. Bam!   13 years ago

    What about my batteries?

  7. Night Elf Mohawk   13 years ago

    Yeah, I don't think his capture is feasible.

  8. sloopyinca   13 years ago

    Damn! Is that Christina Ricci's twin brother?

    That's some serious forehead.

  9. sloopyinca   13 years ago

    Is that Christina Ricci's twin brother? He's got more forehead than Vince Vaughn.

  10. Nathan   13 years ago

    I agree with the guy, but why aren't his lips synced with his words?

    1. Barely Suppressed Rage   13 years ago

      Side effect of going through so many backscatter x-ray devices. Another unreported hazard of those machines.

    2. *   13 years ago

      Because he's talking out of his butt?

      1. wondering   13 years ago

        What falsehood did he aver?

        1. *   13 years ago

          Oh nothing he said, but whenever someone's voice is out of sync with their lips, it might be because they're talking out of their ass:

          http://www.youtube.com/watch?f.....YGrs#t=51s

  11. MANGO PUNCH   13 years ago

    I watched Old School last night and was amazed that the airport security scene at the beginning seemed so far fetched that it was comical in 2003... Owen Wilson didn't even get strip searched!

    1. robc   13 years ago

      Imagine trying the Spinal Tap airport security scene with the TSA.

  12. DK   13 years ago

    Now we'll just get scanned twice (front and side), taking that much longer to get through security. Of course, implementing it will be an admission that TSA is incompetent.

  13. Bam!   13 years ago

    This Wired article talks about a study in the "Journal of Transportation Security" that points out the same "side of the body" flaw:

    The report said an explosive, such as pentaerythritol tetranitrate, "would be invisible to this technology, ironically, because of its large volume, since it is easily confused with normal anatomy." The report found that "a wire or a box-cutter blade taped to the side of the body, or even a small gun in the same location, will be invisible."

    1. AlmightyJB   13 years ago

      Small gun would set off the metal detector.

      1. Barely Suppressed Rage   13 years ago

        I have gone through airport security several times where they send me through the body scanner, but not the metal detector, just like the guy in the video did.

  14. AlmightyJB   13 years ago

    I was traveling with co-workers last week from Columbus to Chicago and back. One of my co-workers thought he could take as much Scotch as he wanted as long as it was in 3oz bottles. Evidently he was correct. He had at least 8 bottles distributed in 3 ziplock bags (you're only supposed to have one baggie). So basically he takes 24oz of a flammable liquid in his carry on. Still had more than one baggie with Scotch on the return flight from O'Hare. Didn't get looked at either time. Good thing they make me us all go through all this stupid BS.

    1. Coeus   13 years ago

      It always works. I've done that 8 or 9 times in the last 3 years. I've developed a ritual where I toast my seat mate when the wheels leave the ground. Not all are appreciative of my ingenuity.

      1. Gray Ghost   13 years ago

        It's always "mouthwash", the very few times that I've had to fly since 9/11. 3 oz = two shots. If I need more than that, there's always airport bars. The one in Philly had a great selection of PA microbrews, and you can taste a large selection of NC wines in Charlotte's.

  15. Drunken Scot   13 years ago

    Sshssh! Don' tell the ossifers tha' I have a wee drinky in my bag, else the Theft from Suitcases Administration will take 'em... Yah, thass right...

  16. Gerholdt   13 years ago

    I fly only when absolutely necessary. Last time while waiting in line, I amused myself by coming up with half a dozen ways to get a weapon past the clowns. Since the bad guys undoubtedly have the same (or more recent) manuals I used at [I'd have to kill you] forty years ago, the TSA is about as much protection as a flak jacket made of toilet paper. Zero out their budget NOW!

  17. shoes online store   13 years ago

    Christian Louboutin Shoes outlet

  18. jerseys   13 years ago

    i like it very much!Christian Louboutin Shoes outlet

  19. shoes online   13 years ago

    l like it so much.

  20. SHOES   13 years ago

    FREAHTJNHDHNXFM NN

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

The Supreme Court Said States Can't Discriminate in Alcohol Sales. They're Doing It Anyway.

C. Jarrett Dieterle | 5.24.2025 7:00 AM

Cocaine Hippos, Monkey Copyrights, and a Horse Named Justice: The Debate Over Animal Personhood

C.J. Ciaramella | From the June 2025 issue

Harvard's Best Protection Is To Get Off the Federal Teat

Autumn Billings | 5.23.2025 6:16 PM

Trump's Mass Cancellation of Student Visas Illustrates the Lawlessness of His Immigration Crackdown

Jacob Sullum | 5.23.2025 5:30 PM

Come July, Keys Will Be De Facto Illegal In Minnesota

Christian Britschgi | 5.23.2025 5:00 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!