Breaking: Obama's SOTU Will Be Same-Old, Same-Old, with Cliched GOP Response
From Politico, a vague preview of the speech that will itself be a vague preview of the next year:
Obama aides have already forecast that the president's message will describe a sharp philosophical divide on the proper role of government in the modern economy, with Obama leading Democrats in insisting that government promote greater opportunity and fairness. …
Democratic strategists say Obama has been laying the groundwork for months for an election-year agenda — and possibly a second term — that is focused squarely on the economy and the middle class.
What is this, 2000? 1980? I don't know what is more frustrating and tedious: All the talk about the "middle class" or the pretense of a grand divide over the "role of government in the modern economy."
Lest we forget, last year, Barack Obama laid out a vision for the next decade of federal spending. At the end of that term, he wanted the feds to be spending $5.7 trillion a year, up from about $3.8 trillion. The GOP passed a budget in the House that covered the same time frame. It envisioned spending $4.7 trillion a year. Each proposal relies upon completely delusional levels of government revenues.
The idea that there is a "sharp philosophical divide" between the GOP and the Democrats when it comes to the "proper role of government in the modern economy" is not simply false. It helps to explain how all DC does is talk about spending less and all it keeps doing is spending more.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Let me be clear: We have always been at war with Eastasia.
Morning links by 9:30AM or so. Evening links: maybe.
It's not even 9 AM yet.
Yes it is.
The operative word, coming a you from School House Rock.
cutie, I wouldn't mind propositioning a sweet thing like you. How does 't' bill sound?
I am tired of the middle class. Can we just nuke them so we can focus on other things?
We're on it.
Us too!
Bipartisanship, at last!!
How, exactly, will the same MSNBC that raved about the wonders of the economy last night also support the President in his effort to push blame for the poor economy onto the "do-nothing" Congress?
We don't understand what you mean.
"The economy is improving, think about how much more it would have improved by now if it weren't for the Republicans."
"The economy is improving, think about how much more it would have improved by now if it weren't for the Republicans Teabaggers."
MSNBC: Teabaggers = Especially insane Republicans.
insane or inane?
"The economy is improving. We will make more progress without racism."
This time will be different.
But... but... I want to believe!
"What is this, 2000? 1980?"
Party like its 1999!
Every time I see that painting, all I can think is: Suppurating Taint Rash.
So what do you think when you see this one?
Hep C Bouquet
oh you romantic fool
Taco Underwear Wonderland
Mixed-race Mexican Chalupas For Everyone!
And clean undies too
Is that black/white/red/yellow/green woman holding a gyro?
What's with the green skin? Is Obama representing the Martians too?
Lizard People, bro, Lizard People.
What, me worry?
"Damn it feels good to be a gangster."
He's resting his pimp hand.
My grills are the shizz
Are those onions on the tacos, or pieces of clean underwear?
They're the Jocko's? of Freedom
A little from column A, a little from column B.
It looks like his balls are so cold, they're freezing the river.
Looks more like Tiger Woods than B.O.
I prefer sculpture.
So what do you think when you see this one?
P-Diddy in da haus!
If Obama is fool enough to expose his bare taint to a unicorn's poisonous guard hairs, he deserves whatever rash he gets.
It's not often you can see the front and back of the unicorn at the same time.
For the record, that is a very disturbing picture. What sick individual created it in the first place?
When will the Lies end?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmgcjRu1s-8
Is that SOTU or STFU?
STFU
Valerie Jarret is on Bloomberg right now, spouting the official Party gibberish.
"A chicken in every pot!"
Despite what you've heard I'm not the foul spawn an space aliens and a Muppet.
True story!
Not only can government protect your right to your property, it can also protect your right to the property of others!
Woohoo!
Fear not, America; I have it on good authority from the Ministry of Plenty the chocolate ration will be raised.
Hurray!
LOL
Will Obama be led in riding a donkey?
No, but he might walk in while holding Mrs. Obama's hand.
Anything to get the bestiality vote
Mr. hand, were you replying to the Coxswain or the Mulatto?
Ms Hand, actually, and yes, it was to the Coxswain
My apologies. Could have gone either way (your reply, that is).
That'S true, and if Obama did that he'd win another section of the voting public
Rush 2112!
He hates Ron Paul so much that if Paul gets the nomination he might actually run as an Independent.
You are a retard.
Your thoughtful commentary has caused me to reconsider my previous position. You have convinced me your position is correct.
Like I said, you are a retard.
Your thoughtful commentary has caused me to reconsider my previous position. You have convinced me your position is correct.
Rush was a Canadian prog-rock band in the 70s-80s, and their magnum opus was an album called 2112.
Uninformed in the prog-rock arena? Yes, you are. "Retarded" is a word I would only reserve for the likes of...I don't know...people who enjoy listening to the band Rush?
I'm partial to "Permanent Waves," myself.
is for losers, and that radio guy sucks too.
Hopefully he'll wait that long, too.
You too are a retard.
I got the joke, thus rendering your comment null.
Getting a joke and being a joke are not the same thing.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQEgZNqa8jE
Let me be clear: Hope for change.
We are - we are hoping the occupant of the White House will change - and we don't mean with one of your clones like Gingrich, Romney or Santorurm.
That's good too, but I was more referring to his economic policy.
Hope is a good thing, maybe the best thing.
All SOTUs are same-old, same-old, no matter who's President. Why do we have them anymore?
We can't live without the media and it's more humane than kidnapping another pretty white girl. Although, don't quote me on that last part.
needs kidnapping? The city of Davos, Switzerland. No greater contribution could be made than to send their asses away to a hidden island penal colony.
Why do we have them anymore?
Stamps are too expensive.
What we need is a better talker like Ron Paul, but without the flies (racist newsletters).
Must be a spoof.
Relax Max! We're going to win again no matter how much in tax dollars we have to promise! All good!
Saw the first Obama election advertisement on TV yesterday. And Obama is coming to Iowa tomorrow to give a speech the follows up on "new plans for the future" as delivered in the SOTU tonight -- so officially it's presidential business, but unofficially it's the first campaign stop of the season.
So this means that Iowa must be in play for 2012. I think I'm going to go hide under a rock until the election is over.
to fuck with your morale, and it is working.
I hope the Repubs are keeping track of the enormous expense of Obama's taxpayer-funded campaigning. There's a heck of an ad to be made there.
Yup, they'll rail on it and then of course once elected continue to use it to their own advantage. They must burn. All of them.
And Obama is coming to Iowa tomorrow to give a speech the follows up on "new plans for the future"
Rumor has it he'll describe his plans to collectivize the farms and purge the Kulaks in this speech.
I think the "sharp philosophical divide" they're refering to is the divide between the government (both R's and D's) and the people they seek to control.
I saw that David Plouffe fellow on the Today Show this morning saying the president would be talking about jobs in manufacturing and energy. I wonder which energy data point will be brought up -- green jobs (Solyndra) or the Keystone pipeline?
"Pres. Obama, what is inappropriate about cannabis legalization questions? Why is your YT channel censoring any questions regarding cannabis?"