Obama's Sputtering "Sputnik Moment": Last Year's SOTU Promises Mostly Unfulfilled (Thank God For Small Favors)
On the eve of President Obama's latest State of the Union address (SOTU), the Wash Post remembers all of yesterday's promises in last year's ridiculous ode to the need for our very own "Sputnik Moment":
Among the initiatives Obama promoted then that have yet to come to fruition a year later: eliminating subsidies to oil companies; replacing No Child Left Behind with a better education law; making a tuition tax credit permanent; rewriting immigration laws; and reforming the tax system.
The list of what he succeeded in accomplishing is considerably shorter, including: securing congressional approval of a South Korea free trade deal; signing legislation to undo a burdensome tax reporting requirement in his health care law; and establishing a website to show taxpayers where their tax dollars go.
One of Obama's pledges from last January's speech — to undertake a reorganization of the federal government — he got around to rolling out only this month. And other promises are vaguer or more long term, such as declaring a "Sputnik moment" for today's generation and calling for renewed commitments to research and development and clean energy technology; pushing to prepare more educators to teach science, technology and math; promoting high-speed rail and accessible broadband; and seeking greater investments in infrastructure.
With the exception of ending subsidies to oil companies, we can breathe easier that the president failed in his quest to, say, turn Solyndra-style subsidies into the equivalent of the Cold War frenzy stoked by the launch of Sputnik. For instance: Does anyone believe that Obama, the Dems more broadly, and the Republicans would actually craft a "better education law" than the expensive and demonstrably useless No Child Left Behind law? Only if they scrapped the federal Department of Education, which has had zero effect on the scores of high-school seniors since coming online in the early 1980s (under Ronald Reagan, who had once promised to kill the department created in the very late Carter years)? Do you trust Obama - who has deported record number of immigrants during his years in power? - to craft immigration laws that would either be humane or workable? Surely it says something that one of his accomplishments in the past 12 months has been the undoing of a rule that he implemented via his own disastrous health care reform package (whose negative impacts on the economy are not yet fully cacluable).
Matt Welch's great take on Obama's Sputnik talk from the February 2012 issue of Reason.
Return to the thrilling SOTU speech of yesteryear with Reason's live staff blog coverage.
A couple years back, Reason.tv took a short look at the "Doublethink Doubletalk" in Obama's 2010 SOTU. Yes, all these claims were in the same speech:
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Thanks for reminding me not to turn on the TV tomorrow evening, lest I break it.
With great hope, I always watch the first minute or two of his speeches, but once it becomes apparent that he is not announcing his resignation I change the channel.
Happy New Year reason!
Gong xi fa cai!
Isn't Suki a Japanese name?
Nitpicker.
It is a name found throughout Pacific Asia.
And I shall celebrate as many new years as I like. Molotov!
It's pronounced "Suck-y".
Shut up Suki, you're still dead.
Morning links before 10:00AM, maybe.
Suki make maybe toooo much yaki.
One should be more surprised when a politician keeps a promise, as opposed to breaking one.
I hate the SOTU but Obama has raised it to new heights of vileness.
YOU LIE !
YOU SUCK!
BLOW ME!
I said lie not suck.
How the fuck does that bloated idiot Newt Kuan Yew get away with referring to himself as an "outsider"?
It's as ridiculous as pretending the Ascended One is qualified to be the Venture-Capitalist-in-Chief.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/expd/6742921477/
DREAMBOAT-in-Chief, mother-fucker. Don't you be screwin' up Dear Leader's titles now, you hear?
Why is Obama re-enacting the D-Day scene in Saving Private Ryan? Is this supposed to be a Friday funny?
"We choose to hump the beach. We choose to hump the beach in this decade and do the other things, not because we are easy, but because we are hard."
You know damned well ya gots Michelle buried in the sand under you, face down.
Take a trip to the Love Zoo.
Our Lord Overseer is a man of many talents, a man of many hats.
Do not attempt to impost the limitations of your puny imagination upon Him!
State of the Union address (SOTU)
Shouldn't it be called the STFU?
SOTU Drinking Game: see how long you can listen to it without needing a drink.
I'm out.
I can never go more than 30 seconds without needing a drink for any of his speeches, but with SOTUs it's more like 5 seconds.
The applause when he walks in will be drink #1 for me.
What's the over/under on how many Justices will show up?
What subsidies to oil companies are we talking about, again?
Because if its just deducting depreciation from gross income, that ain't a subsidy.
It's far worse than a subsidy: it's spending through the tax code.
I think it's as simple as Exxon can look for oil all they want, but the tax payer won't pick up part of the tab (effectively) but if Unicorn Power wants to look for, ummm, wind or, umm, sun we'll help pay for it?
So we're subsidizing 'free' now?
R C Dean
I though the "offending" tax break that oil companies got was that they could deduct 100% of their exploration costs in the same year instead of having to expense them over the life of the discovery.
IIANM in some industries R&D costs are given the same teatment.
It seems to me a reasonable treatment considering the number of dry holes that oil companies drill and the amount of R&D that goes up blind alleys.
If any one can point any errors on my part, I will stand corrected.
But AFAIK, this tax treatment is the "subsidy" everyone is complaining about.
Sorry, I also meant to include that the oil companies also get to accelerate the deduction of depletion allowances as well.
I'm not sure how their treatment compares with other resource extraction industries.
Any time anyone wants to make tax treatment more rational and alike is fine wirth me.
The question is, is drilling for oil enough like real estate investing 9for example) that rules for deducting depreciation/depletion costs should be exactly alike?