Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Friday Funnies

The sinking of the U.S.S. Economy

Henry Payne | 1.20.2012 7:00 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: GOP South Carolina CNN Debate Open Marriage Thread, Post-Rick Perry Edition!

Henry Payne
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (75)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Lurker   13 years ago

    HA

  2. Nathan   13 years ago

    No, he doesn't. This isn't even a little bit accurate.

    First, Obama says the economy is improving. Second, when has he EVER blamed the Arab Spring?

    1. Almanian   13 years ago

      First "derp" of the day! Yay!

      1. anon   13 years ago

        Damnit, it's not Thursday anymore.

    2. F Hart   13 years ago

      The Arab Spring? Isn't that an oasis in the desert?

      1. Bucky   13 years ago

        a new deodorant soap for those close up moments during hajj?

        1. Francisco d Anconia   13 years ago

          Manly yes, but my camel likes it too.

    3. Live Free or Diet   13 years ago

      Second, when has he EVER blamed the Arab Spring?

      It's in the first 15 seconds of the video:
      http://www.realclearpolitics.c.....rowth.html

      1. Tim Cavanaugh   13 years ago

        And he didn't just say "uncertainty created by the Arab Spring" but the A.S.'s "effect on oil and gas prices" ? a phenomenon for which there is no evidence.

  3. COXSWAIN HARDY   13 years ago

    Too soon. Not because of the deaths. Always too soon for a Payne cartoon.

  4. Fist of Etiquette   13 years ago

    Talking boomerangs?

    1. F Hart   13 years ago

      Dicknose

      http://www.collativelearning.com/PICS FOR WEBSITE/ACO expanded/dvd stills 2/cat paintings.png

  5. Almanian   13 years ago

    So the US(S) economy is white? And a black hole sank it?

    RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACIST!

  6. Black Ho   13 years ago

    Don't you be blamin' me, honkey.

  7. William Walsh   13 years ago

    I heard it was ATMs.

    1. William Walsh   13 years ago

      . . . And Bush.

    2. Joe Mamma   13 years ago

      I heard it was ATMs.

      Anal tickling machines?

    3. anon   13 years ago

      Don't forget the internets that Al Gore invented.

      1. Sopapilla   13 years ago

        Al Gore invented and that is why the guvmint is gonna figger out how to take it away, since they own it. And it really is just one thing, ya know?

  8. Suthenboy   13 years ago

    ...and it was the dastardly republicans fault he had to nix the xl pipeline.

    Poor guy, everything he tries to do is thwarted by some evil, conservative, bible clinging knuckle-dragger. Nothing that goes wrong is ever his fault. If only he could rule china-style with dictatorial powers. It would be blue skies all the way then, everything coming up rainbows and butterflies.

    1. WWNGD?   13 years ago

      That is what they would tell us.

    2. anon   13 years ago

      . If only he could rule china-style with dictatorial powers. It would be blue skies all the way then, everything coming up rainbows and butterflies.

      This is closer to becoming reality than you realize.

      1. Suthenboy   13 years ago

        I wish I could say you are correct, I could live in blissful ignorance. I said those things because I realize how close it is and how bad he wants it.

      2. Laoshi   13 years ago

        He would never want to rule China style because here in China the Communist Party is the only game in town and when things go wrong it has to take the blame and come up with some solutions that work. It's much better to rule American style where everything that goes wrong is the fault of George Bush, Wall Street, or Republicans.

  9. Colonel_Angus   13 years ago

    What a topical generic metaphor.

    1. Bucky   13 years ago

      it should have said "Captain Owebama, I am ordering you to stop campaigning and get back on the ship!"

    2. Bucky   13 years ago

      or "The news is reporting that he purposely did this to 'salute' the environmentalists...

  10. MANGO PUNCH   13 years ago

    SUPER TANKER AMERICA!!!!!!

    1.   13 years ago

      eff yeah!

  11. Aaar!   13 years ago

    Property-stealing site shut down, thieves arrested, anonymous thugs unhappy, demand right to free stuff.

    1. anon   13 years ago

      "Theft" implies taking something that does not belong to you. Copying does not deprive the owner of their property.

      Should a print of the Mona Lisa be considered theft?

      1. heller   13 years ago

        Yes and you owe Leonardo da Vinci $100 million every time you sell one.

      2. You are boring.   13 years ago

        Copying deprives the owner of his profits. Property without the right to use and disposal is a sham concept.

        1. anon   13 years ago

          Profits aren't a right. Copying does not prevent the use and disposal of said property.

        2. heller   13 years ago

          Deprives how? The artist never made the copy, so the artist could never have sold it.

          1. anon   13 years ago

            "Depriving" assumes the owner had a "right" to those profits in the first place, which no owner has a "right" to any profit. He only has a right to sell for what the market is willing to pay.

            1. Francisco d Anconia   13 years ago

              anon

              Are you kidding me? So I suppose I should be able to "copy" and sell a patented product as well?

              Anyone can profit from the fruits of my labor? That's ridiculous.

              I'm all for eliminating online piracy. It's just that SOPA isn't the answer.

              1. heller   13 years ago

                +11

              2. slutmonkey   13 years ago

                http://aynrandlexicon.com/lexi.....ights.html

      3. JohnD   13 years ago

        Hey Anon, Try selling copies of Movie DVDs or Music and see what happens.

        1. anon   13 years ago

          You've obviously never been to NYC.

        2. Colonel_Angus   13 years ago

          What happens and what is right are not the same thing.

        3. Apatheist   13 years ago

          I'm sorry who is selling stuff on pirate bay? The better analogy is "try giving a mixtape to your girlfriend and see what happens." What happens is you get laid if you do it right.

          Not only does a copy not deprive the owner of anything but the person delivering the copy isn't making money off of it. Taking your position to it's logical conclusion would outlaw dvrs, copying cds for friends (really just playing those cds for friends they didn't pay to listen to it!), etc.

          1. slutmonkey   13 years ago

            The problem is that no one (to my knowledge) has been able to articulate a principle to differentiate "fair use" from "infringement". The term fair is up for grabs every time. How much sharing should be acceptable? How much can be prevented without excessive negative consequences anyway?

    2. Colonel_Angus   13 years ago

      One of the indicted has the last name Dotcom.

  12. Fist of Etiquette   13 years ago

    Will you look at that? Did the movie Titanic teach us nothing? Only three penises in a lifeboat built to hold a total sausagefest. And where are the women and children penises?

    1. anon   13 years ago

      And where are the women and children penises?

      They had to eat. Also, monocles.

      1. Bucky   13 years ago

        they were off the ship first...

  13. SugarFree   13 years ago

    I wonder...

    See, that how you do a funny. Boner jokes.

    1. heller   13 years ago

      http://25.media.tumblr.com/tum.....o1_500.jpg

  14. anon   13 years ago

    OT: Infowars criticizes Google for doing whatever it damn well pleases with its own property, fails to recognize the difference between private property and government coercion.

    1. heller   13 years ago

      Infowars? Really?

      1. anon   13 years ago

        A "news source" according to google news, ironically.

    2. PapayaSF   13 years ago

      They have a point. Google ranks pages in part according to how popular they are. When an extremely popular website no longer gets indexed (and not because it's being punished for black hat SEO or something) it smells like a political decision.

  15. kilroy   13 years ago

    Ugh. The Friday pain.

  16. daveed   13 years ago

    Obama! Scendere dalla nave cazzo!

  17. eyeball   13 years ago

    Ironically, Obama's ship looks like the head of a golf club.

  18. heller   13 years ago

    Befitting this site, I present The Worst Comment of the Day?.

    Drum roll, please.

    "No owner has a 'right' to any profit."

    Thank you, "anon," for that eloquent example of ethical nihilism.

    1. Brandon   13 years ago

      So you think the government should be guaranteeing profit margins to selected industries by use of force?

      1. slutmonkey   13 years ago

        Neither of you are using precise terms, and you're obtusely using different definitions of "right" and "profit".

        No one may require others give him success, but everyone has the right own the results of his trades, whether profit or loss.

        Any principle of copyright isn't necessarily about profits anyway (although profit is definitely a driving factor in recent enforcement attempts). Copyright is about whether you have a right to control re-creation of your designs and to what extent.

        Electronics have brought the cost of this re-creation down so low that many people can no longer distinguish between the actual cost and free. This results in a similarly close to zero perception of the actual value of the products and from there it's a small step to not feeling guilt for taking and then to feeling entitled to getting. After all if something really is free, and we have an unlimited supply, there's no reason everyone shouldn't get as many as they want.

        At the same time many copyright owners have not adjusted their own perceptions of their work's value. They often don't realize that the value of their products is no longer $24.99. iTunes style pricing, say $1, is close enough to the actual value of the product that most people will pay it and not feel ripped off.

        1. plusafdotcom   13 years ago

          i addressed some of these issues back in '03... see http://www.plusaf.com/lessons/dearriaa.htm

          and yes, slutmonkey, you're spot on and those other folks don't have a grip on the concepts of copyright.

          but look what i wrote over eight years ago... LONG before iTunes and their ilk brought the market price of record cuts down to where they should have been...

          cheers!

      2. Org   13 years ago

        Force is not necessary to profit. However, it is necessary to the transfer of a commodity upon terms other than those acceptable to the owner.

        The owner has the right to set the terms for the transfer of his property. If these terms are unacceptable and the owner will not change them, the government must come to the aid of the property owner who is threatened with a forcible transfer of his property.

        1. slutmonkey   13 years ago

          That's easy to apply to tangible property, but it's a little more complicated with copyrighted property because the knowledge of how to duplicate the property is necessarily transferred with a sale of the property. So is it really "force" for the recipient to make further copies at that point? Debatable.

  19. Brandybuck   13 years ago

    Why are there three ducks in that lifeboat?

  20. Scott Cameron   13 years ago

    And he would be right. He's only trying to save a ship that was unmercifully driven upon the rocks by the Fascist leader of the prior 8 years. The one who started us down the slippery slope of destroying the Constitution with his UnPatriot Act, UnReal ID Act and unlawful warring against foreign nations instead of the real culprits, just to line the pockets of his friends in the "Military Industrial Complex" to quote President Eisenhower.

    1. slutmonkey   13 years ago

      They've been driving onto the rocks for a lot longer than 8 years. Try a century.

  21. first   13 years ago

    Mercedes continues to be a huge hit with her followers on the Live Cams service. Now she is also fulfilling her ambition to be an erotic model.

    Ukrainian girls have a fantastic reputation for their beauty. When you add in Mercedes' dash of Armenian heritage the result is an exotic mix. This long haired brunette with the petite body is blessed with rich, full breasts. Her eyes have a mysterious charm. She has a vibrant personality and takes genuine pleasure in everything erotic.

    Maybe that is because of her interest in the human body. Mercedes is a final year medical student. She is looking forward to putting her knowledge of anatomy to use.

    Now is your chance to give the doctor an all-over physical examination. This is the time to join Mercedes' very private practice.

    http://www.hegre-art.com/models#action=show&id=227

  22. Sam   13 years ago

    ^^^ If you don't understand this, or don't admit it, you're a partisan fuck and need to shut up.

    Obama, Bush, Clinton, et al are guilty.

  23. ????? ??? ??????   13 years ago

    http://www.zain1.com/vb
    http://www.iraq-7b.com

  24. Coach Outlet   13 years ago

    http://www.coachoutletonlinepick.com/ Coach Outlet http://www.coachoutlettousa.com/ Coach Outlet online

  25. ????? ????   10 years ago

    friv 1000
    friv 3

  26. ????? ????   10 years ago

    hguhf
    friv 2

  27. ????? ????   10 years ago

    friv 4
    friv3

  28. ????? ????   10 years ago

    hguf
    al3ab banat

  29. ????? ????   10 years ago

    tt4
    http://www.al3abmix.com/

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Making GLP-1s Available Over the Counter Can Unlock Their Full Potential

Jeffrey A. Singer | From the June 2025 issue

Bob Menendez Does Not Deserve a Pardon

Billy Binion | 5.30.2025 5:25 PM

12-Year-Old Tennessee Boy Arrested for Instagram Post Says He Was Trying To Warn Students of a School Shooting

Autumn Billings | 5.30.2025 5:12 PM

Texas Ten Commandments Bill Is the Latest Example of Forcing Religious Texts In Public Schools

Emma Camp | 5.30.2025 3:46 PM

DOGE's Newly Listed 'Regulatory Savings' for Businesses Have Nothing to Do With Cutting Federal Spending

Jacob Sullum | 5.30.2025 3:30 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!