Vladimir Putin's Tarnished Comeback

Is the former Russian president's political power on the decline?


Last September, after the news that Russia's Prime Minister Vladimir Putin was set to return as President in the March 2012 election, Russian writer Dmitry Bykov penned a satirical poem about winning a bet with a political analyst who had insisted that there would be no Putin comeback. The poem ended with a twist: Maybe it's not over yet—after all, Putin could still lose! (Then, Bykov wrote cheekily, he would gladly buy the winner not just the wagered case of cognac but a case large enough to house a think tank.) This conclusion was clearly meant to be a bitter joke with a dash of wish fulfillment. But what if Putin's expected victory is shakier than commonly thought?
This question received a sudden prominence after a startling incident in Moscow a few days ago. On Sunday, November 20, after a mixed martial arts fight at the Olimpiysky ("Olympian") Sports Arena between Russian fighter Fedor Emelianenko and American Jeff "The Snowman" Monson, Putin stepped out into the ring to congratulate Emelianenko, the winner. The crowd responded with loud boos and whistles. In one video filmed by a member of the audience, there is a clearly audible shout, "Go away!"

The embarrassing moment was broadcast live on one of Russia's main news channels, Rossiya-2. When the time the footage was replayed on a later news program, the offending sounds had been muted. But it had already become a case of boos heard 'round the world. The clip from the original broadcast quickly showed up on YouTube, followed by amateur videos.

The government's heavy-handed attempts at damage control kept the story alive—and made it worse—as official and semi-official spinmeisters tripped over each other with conflicting explanations: People weren't really booing, they were cheering. Or maybe grumbling loudly because the exits were closed and they needed to go to the toilet. Or, better yet, they were really booing Monson. This last version, from Putin press secretary Dmity Peskov, was a particularly bad faux pas: Many Russians were offended not only by the blatant spin but by the implication that Russian fans would insult a sportsman in honorable defeat.

In a fascinating manifestation of Internet-age politics, thousands of Russians converged on Monson's Facebook page to express sympathy. More than a week later, messages still poured in, some saying simply, "Respect!", others making openly political statements in often broken English ("Putin is KGB thug and will always and forever be KGB thug. Free Elections in Russia!") or in Russian (a recent one translates roughly as, "Putin-scum get out!").

Interestingly, two days later Putin abruptly canceled a widely advertised appearance at an anti-drug rock concert in St. Petersburg after a group on Russia's leading social media site, VKontakte, called for heckling the prime minister. Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Kozak, a top candidate for the ruling United Russia party, attended in Putin's stead—and was, in fact, heckled by activists who chanted anti-United Russia slogans, echoed by many young people in the audience.

The perception of Putin's vulnerability may be spilling over into Russia's usually lifeless official politics. On November 23, when Putin visited the Russian parliament, the Duma, to thank its members for "working together over the past four years," many MPs—members of the Communist Party and of the left-leaning Fair Russia faction—did not rise to greet him.

What does it all mean? Some dissident Russian bloggers and commentators quickly proclaimed the Olimpiysky incident to be the beginning of the end for the authoritarian regime identified with Putin. "After the boos and the shout, 'Go away,' the end of Putinism may be very near or very far; it is pointless to speculate about the timing," political satirist Victor Shenderovich wrote in the online magazine "But the point of no return has been passed—that's a fact. Everyone's had it up to here with the 'savior of the nation.'"

Such analysis may be part wishful thinking. Other observers, such as journalist Nikolai Troitsky and Alexei Venediktov, editor-in-chief of the Ekho Moskvy radio station, believe that the boos were less a political protest than an "apolitical" one: Russians are fed up with politicians and politics of all stripes, particularly with politicians exploiting sports and entertainment to enhance their image. Troitsky notes that any opposition leader who tried to intrude on a sports event would have been booed as well. Still, he adds, in the past "the masses made an exception for Putin" in their general apathy and mistrust toward all things political; not anymore. Moreover, Putin's visibility means that "people are more fed up with him than with anyone else, and in the next six years he'll run into this repeatedly."

This disgust has been undoubtedly exacerbated by the "trading places" farce in which Putin skirted the constitutional ban on a third (consecutive) presidential term in 2008 by making Dmitry Medvedev his appointed successor/placeholder and staying on as prime minister. The announcement that Medvedev would step aside next year to make way for Putin's return to the presidency made the farce all the more obvious, and Putin all the more obnoxious.

Perhaps most startlingly, a poll released on November 25 by the Levada Center, Russia's most respected polling company, found that only 31 percent of Russians said they would vote for Putin if the presidential election were held right now. This is not quite the writing on the wall: most respondents said that they had no idea for whom they would vote or that they wouldn't vote at all. Seven percent said they would vote Medvedev; roughly as many favored the Communist candidate.

Unless a capable and charismatic opposition leader steps into this vacuum, Putin is certain to win. But he may also find out the truth of the old saying that one cannot step into the same river twice. Chances are, President Putin will  not return as a national hero but as an obnoxious politician who has overstayed his welcome. And this will likely affect his ability to wield power effectively—and perhaps create opportunities for a viable opposition leader to emerge in the next few years.

Cathy Young is a contributing editor at Reason magazine and a columnist at RealClearPolitics, where this article originally appeared.

NEXT: Boston Bans E-Cigarettes in Workplaces, Just Because

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. On one hand, I am glad Cathy is back. On the other, I wonder where she has been for the past, like, two years.

  2. Apple is a symptom of society’s crusade against women’s health!

    No one owns the Internet, and we tend to assume that no one can control it. But this issue with Siri does show how easily a piece of code can shape our choices by limiting or controlling our options. Siri is amazingly adept at finding what you’re looking for. Ask it for the nearest hardware store, reservations for two at your favorite Italian restaurant, where to buy Viagra, and presto — you’ve got names, maps and phone numbers. Yet the trusty little wizard suddenly gets amnesia when asked about birth control or abortion care.

    While this may be nothing more than a programming glitch, it is a modern-day example of the historic struggle women have always faced in getting access to health care and health information. The episode underscores the importance of being vigilant about the availability of information and services, especially critical health information, as new technologies emerge.

    BTW: What the fuck is “emergency” contraception?

    1. Programming glitches are sexist? Anthropomorphism is so sexy.

    2. I am unaware of any other kind.

    3. The morning after pill is emergency contraception.

      Pro Lib nailed it though.

    4. “What the fuck is “emergency” contraception?”

      Day after pill?

      1. I know that’s exactly what they meant, but to categorize the day after pill as “emergency” anything is disingenuous to say the least.

        It’s more like “I was too lazy/stupid/much in a hurry to get fucked that I simply decided that protection was too much of a hassle” contraception.

        Only in rape cases could the day after pill be considered emergency contraception, and I would imagine that those kinds of cases are so few and far between that calling it that is simply linguistic gymnastics so that people who might otherwise disapprove can’t argue.

        1. Or Horny? Or the guy said he had some and it was in his other pants? It takes two to tango and the woman is the one that pays a big price.

          Sex is an impulse, so you can expect impulsive behavior.

          Would you settle for urgent contraception?

        2. Sometimes condoms break.

    5. “Abortion care”? I am about as pro-legal abortion as one can be, but what the fuck?

  3. If we’re looking for how the Russian government would respond if Putin somehow lost the election?

    We should look to how the the Russian government reacted to a Russian backed candidate losing a recent election in South Ossetia.

    “South Ossetia Election Results Anulled”
    by Alina Lobzina at 29/11/2011 19:04

    The Supreme Court of South Ossetia declared invalid the presidential election in the self-proclaimed republic, having upheld the complaint filed by a losing candidate, who was tipped as a Moscow’s prot?g?.

    Former Education Minister Alla Dzhioyeva who got 56.74 percent of votes in the second round, won’t be able to participate in the new election, scheduled for March 25.

    “She’s been denied of this right by law, because the court has found violations on her part during the passed election,” Supreme Court’s chief justice, Atsamaz Bichenov, told RIA Novosti.”…..44410.html

    So, if we use that as an indication of what would happen if Putin were to lose, then we might have to assume that the courts would then rule against Putin.

    It’s encouraging if the people of Russia are more dissatisfied with Putin than they were before.

    Unfortunately, however, elections in Russia aren’t there to express the will of the Russian people–they’re there to legitimize whoever’s gonna impose his will on the Russian people…

    …which makes them a lot like elections here in the United States.

    I’d rather have Obama than Putin, but Romney or Obama? The Russians didn’t get to choose between Medvedev or Putin, but I’m not sure Romeny or Obama is much of a choice either–even if we do get to make it ourselves.

    1. Obama or Romney is like choosing between a shit sammich or a turdcicle.

      1. What kind of condiments can we get on the sandwich?

        1. Bidenbits or Hilachips.

          Possibly both.

          With a second helping of one of them in 2016.

  4. It doesn’t matter who these people vote for – only who counts their votes.

  5. Putin is bad, but are there really any good alternatives to him? From my (very) limited knowledge of Russian politics I thought that United Russia had the most reasonable (note: most reasonable =/= reasonable) economic platform and second most reasonable social platform of the four major parties.

    1. Russia suffers from Australia Syndrome — the most freedom-friendly thing you’ll hear at any significant political level in Russia is “well, you know, 100,243,422,547 different permits for employment might be a little excessive, so we’re planning to lower it by 1.”

  6. Don’t call it a comeback, he’s been there for years.

    1. What do you call a presidential sock-puppet?

      I bet Medvedev is secretly hoping for Putin to contract lead poisoning.

  7. I say we need more Muppet Courts if you ask me.

  8. Could this explain the recent dearth of Vladimir Putin Action Comics?

  9. Boo-yurns?

  10. my roomate’s aunt made $189458 so far just working on the internet for a few hours. Read more on this site…

  11. my roomate’s aunt made $189458 so far just working on the internet for a few hours. Read more on this site…

  12. my roomate’s aunt made $189458 so far just working on the internet for a few hours. Read more on this site…

  13. my roomate’s aunt made $189458 so far just working on the internet for a few hours. Read more on this site…

  14. Moregov’$ cybera$$y METRIK$ stopping (can’t post)/even (have had erasing comments from TEA allied cyberfleet of…
    thanks again hitandrun
    for re-transmit this message…
    Since the Moregovfirebreathing balrak, bhorK paralegal a$$yMETRI CAL’$ bring you into a sex thing too, even with ‘accuser$ IN LONG UNSTOPPABLE N E E D $??!! can bring you into a Morgovorth $pell… thru drivebymediarrea beltway$, then… TEA popular TEAragorn, from TEA realm of Iberia emerging from the (ayatoland-castrocuba gov copy machine’s ussr’us neolibland(&rinolifants;) sea of social (bombings) INN”ju$tice” (to help the enemy to hate America and TEA allies…
    a silver white mini-iceage spell as a (natural, old, believe me) cure: (a few sWords:)
    (youtube) Sexual Democracia – Sudaecuaciones

    1. What the fuck is this shit?

      1. I’ll play:

        Dada on LSD?

  15. you wanted me to tell (repeat G.C. Patton-Scoth) sWords?! to.. appologize?, in times of war!!??
    do I believe something you do not?, no…
    then, I’m standing here, totally unafraid… why?
    because I remember, you neolibtiCAL sob are preffered by the enemy

  16. the blogs is good !thank you !

  17. winner not just the wagered case of cognac but a case large enough to house a think tank.) This conclusion was clearly meant to be a bitter joke with a dash of wish fulfillment.…..-c-83.html But what if Putin’s expected victory is shakier than commonly thought?

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.