Montebello Meltdown
Redevelopment corruption
A pair of state audits recently found new troubles for Montebello, a city in eastern Los Angeles County that has been mismanaged for decades.
California Controller John Chiang's September audits of Montebello's redevelopment agency (RDA) and a municipal gas tax identified "$31 million in questionable spending, loans, and fund transfers." Chiang, who is leading a broad investigation of RDAs across the state, also revealed that a former city manager in the highly politicized city was reimbursed for a lunch meeting with a former city councilwoman at a Chuck E. Cheese's restaurant.
Montebello has cycled through four city manager/administrators in recent years. A 2010 recall election purged many members of the local political class. The current city administrator, Larry Kosmont, a real estate developer, says the city has been getting its finances in order, acknowledging that some practices are "not acceptable and need correction." Kosmont disputes the $31 million figure, however, claiming the city faces only $1,067,842 in "legitimate obligations."
This dispute is playing out in a region of Los Angeles County where several towns have witnessed public spending scandals. One, the industrial city of Vernon, this year survived an effort by state Assembly Speaker John A. Pérez (D-Los Angeles) to revoke its charter.
But it was the Chuck E. Cheese's angle that caught the attention of the Los Angeles Times and other local media outlets. The Whittier Daily News caught up with former City Manager Richard Torres, who told the paper "the council's preference, more than others, was to meet for breakfast or lunch." A large pizza at the popular kids' chain boasts 2,040 calories.
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?