Elena Bonner's Rich Legacy
Remembering the life and accomplishments of a Soviet dissident
There was a time when moral giants walked the earth. One of them, Soviet dissident Elena Bonner—widow of the great physicist and human rights activist Andrei Sakharov—left us on Sunday at the age of 88. A model of courage and principle, Bonner was one of my heroes from the days when I was a teenager in the Soviet Union and my parents listened to news of Sakharov and Bonner on banned foreign radio broadcasts. She was also a personal hero I had the privilege to meet: Four years ago, we had a long talk at Bonner's apartment in Brookline, Mass., when I interviewed her for a feature for The Weekly Standard.
A devoted partner to her husband, Bonner was much more than his helpmate. A former World War II army nurse, the daughter of a father executed in Stalin's purges and a mother who endured 10 years in the Gulag camps, Bonner was already active in Soviet Russia's budding human rights movement when she met Sakharov in 1970. Her influence likely helped radicalize his opposition to the Soviet regime.
After their marriage in 1972, Bonner became the Kremlin propaganda machine's scapegoat for Sakharov's scandalous fall from grace as a top Soviet scientist. She was attacked, with blatantly anti-Semitic and misogynist overtones, as a wily Zionist and a gold-digging seductress. Bonner remained unbowed. In the 1980s, she served as her husband's link to the world during his exile in the town of Gorky, until she herself was forced to share that exile.
In 1986, Mikhail Gorbachev's reforms brought the couple back to Moscow. Sakharov died of a heart attack three years later at 68—leaving Bonner to fight the good fight for both of them. And that she did, to the very last.
After the dissolution of the Soviet Union, Bonner was one of many former dissidents involved in the democratic transition under Boris Yeltsin. Yet in 1994, she resigned from Yeltsin's Human Rights Commission in protest against the war in Chechnya. She later came to see the early 1990s as a badly missed opportunity: Putting all their eggs in the Yeltsin basket, Russia's pro-democracy forces endorsed a government-crafted constitution that eventually allowed an executive power grab to trample the parliament. Another major mistake, she told me in 2007, was to let much of the Soviet-era communist elite seize power in the guise of born-again "democrats."
The chicken came home to roost with the rise of Vladimir Putin and his neo-authoritarian regime. Bonner, by then spending much of her time in the Boston area for family and medical reasons (her two children from her first marriage have lived in the United States since the mid-1970s), once again found herself the target of officially sponsored smears. In 2004, after she co-signed a letter criticizing Putin's Soviet-style attempts to portray human rights activists as Western stooges, a commentator on Russia's leading television channel lambasted her for spewing anti-Russian libels and always backing "the U.S. and NATO" against Russia. The stench of the bad old days hung in the air.
In her 80s, in failing health after several heart operations, Bonner had to watch from a distance as the freedoms for which she had fought were squashed one by one in the country she still called home. The attitude of the West, too, was a bitter disappointment. To Bonner, the tendency of both the European powers and the United States to turn a blind eye to the emergence of what she saw as fascist-style statism in Russia reflected both naiveté (exemplified by George W. Bush's infamous statement that he had looked Putin in the eye and "was able to get a sense of his soul") and oil- and gas-based cynicism. A strong supporter of the war against radical Islamic terror, she bristled at the acceptance of the Kremlin regime as a partner in this war: "By passing off the tragedy of Chechnya as a part of the struggle against global terrorism," she told me in 2007, "Russia has deceived the West and persistently pushed the Chechen population into the radical Islamist corner."
The relative neglect of Sakharov's legacy in the West was another source of disappointment. Bonner fondly recalled Ronald Reagan, who mentioned Sakharov in several speeches, including his 1987 New Year's Day radio message to the Soviet people broadcast over the Voice of America. She told me wistfully that "Reagan had a soft spot for Sakharov and regarded him as a like-minded man"—an attitude that she felt had given way to "an insulting indifference" among American politicians after the Cold War.
Among Bonner's greatest fears was that, once she was gone, the Kremlin regime would claim Sakharov as its own by recasting him as a champion of Russian nationalism and populism rather than liberal values. Her tireless work to prepare Sakharov's diaries for publication was not only a labor of love but an effort to preempt such a hijacking.
Too frail to leave her apartment unassisted, Bonner still found the strength to travel as far as Strasbourg and Oslo to speak on causes she held dear. These causes included not only the fate of freedom in Russia but the defense of Israel, which she saw as another integral part of the fight for freedom in the modern world. Always frank, Bonner had harsh words for human rights activists who showed more concern for terror suspects held at Guantanamo than for Hamas-held Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit.
Bonner was a woman of crusty temperament and strong, even stubborn will (evidenced, for one, by her refusal to quit smoking despite multiple health problems). During our first meeting, I asked if she had read a recent book by a Russian writer on a subject we were discussing, and was startled by her steely "No, I have not"; later, I learned that she had had a falling out with the author over a minor disagreement. Yet she was also capable of remarkable caring. Despite her prickly relationship with Gorbachev, who frequently clashed with Sakharov when the latter served in the Soviet Congress of People's Deputies and rudely chastised him in a televised session the day before Sakharov's death, she spoke warmly of a telephone conversation she had had with him after he lost his wife, Raisa, to cancer.
Ironically, in death, Bonner was finally honored in her own country, with state-run TV airing pious tributes that conveniently omitted her activism after Sakharov's death. It's the sort of hypocrisy Bonner would have viewed with wry amusement. Yet she never lost the hope that someday, freedom in Russia would thrive—though she knew she would not live to see it.
The world is a poorer place for Bonner's passing. It is also richer for her legacy of speaking truth to power—a legacy relevant under any system.
Cathy Young writes a weekly column for RealClearPolitics and is also a contributing editor at Reason magazine. This article originally appeared at RealClearPolitics.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I wonder if Putin sometimes sits back watching CNN reporting on our WOT adventures and says, "Who's the Evil Empire now, bitches?" He would not be entirely wrong.
I know. We need to do the decent thing and just die.
I think the decent thing would be to stop occupying and bombing other countries and killing, disappearing, indefinitely detaining, and abusing their citizens. If you are suggesting that doing these things would result in the terrorists killing us all then you should look to the lion from the Wizard of Oz for some guidance.
In other words the decent thing would be to tell the world,"please come to America and kill as many of us as you like because no matter what you do we are not going to do anything about it".
Not at all. We should have used Reagan's response to terrorist acts as a model; targeting the people who were actually responsible.
Yeah, worked real well after the Beruit bombing didn't it? We really got the people responsible for that. And I would say the Taliban, by allowing Bin Ladin and company to operate in the country and then refusing to turn them over are responsible. How could they not be?
I wish I could live in the fantasy world that peaceniks live in. The world where everything is about America's evils and if we were just nice enough no one would ever bother us. Sadly, we are stuck in the real world where most of the world is tribal, hates everyone else's guts and would gladly kill or steal from anyone not in the tribe.
And I said for years the peaceniks would turn on Afghanistan. And I was right. In the 00s it was the just war as opposed to the evil Iraq war. Now that Iraq is over Afghanistan, despite the fact that the Taliban allowed people to plan and execute the murder of 3000 Americans and shows no regret and every intention to do so again, is now the new Iraq. Just this innocent nice country that Bushhitler attacked for fun.
Just be honest and tell Americans that it is their duty to die for world peace.
Now that Iraq is over
I must have missed that.
And now we have to occupy Afghanistan forever so the Taliban never come back? Prolonged occupation nearly always leads to the insurgent forces ruling the country.
Sometimes life is like that. We don't have any good alternatives. If we leave, they will take over the country and claim victory.
But we're Team America!
We even have a theme song!
America...
America...
America, FUCK YEAH!
Coming again, to save the mother fucking day yeah,
America, FUCK YEAH!
Freedom is the only way yeah,
Terrorist your game is through cause now you have to answer too,
America, FUCK YEAH!
So lick my butt, and suck on my balls,
America, FUCK YEAH!
What you going to do when we come for you now,
it's the dream that we all share; it's the hope for tomorrow
FUCK YEAH!
McDonalds, FUCK YEAH!
Wal-Mart, FUCK YEAH!
The Gap, FUCK YEAH!
Baseball, FUCK YEAH!
NFL, FUCK, YEAH!
Rock and roll, FUCK YEAH!
The Internet, FUCK YEAH!
Slavery, FUCK YEAH!
FUCK YEAH!
Starbucks, FUCK YEAH!
Disney world, FUCK YEAH!
Porno, FUCK YEAH!
Valium, FUCK YEAH!
Reeboks, FUCK YEAH!
Fake Tits, FUCK YEAH!
Sushi, FUCK YEAH!
Taco Bell, FUCK YEAH!
Rodeos, FUCK YEAH!
Bed bath and beyond (Fuck yeah, Fuck yeah)
Liberty, FUCK YEAH!
White Slips, FUCK YEAH!
The Alamo, FUCK YEAH!
Band-aids, FUCK YEAH!
Las Vegas, FUCK YEAH!
Christmas, FUCK YEAH!
Immigrants, FUCK YEAH!
Popeye, FUCK YEAH!
Democrats, FUCK YEAH!
Republicans (republicans)
(fuck yeah, fuck yeah)
Sportsmanship
Books
You sound like a child after his parents explained to him that they don't own the electric company. Yeah, there are people out there who suck and who you don't want to meet. And no amount of blame and self hatred on our part is going to change that. Yes, they really hate our guts and are not going to give up any time soon. We will get peace when our enemies give it to us and not a moment before.
You mean when we go around the world dropping bombs on brown people, that they get mad at us?
Who'd a thunk it.
You couldn't be implying that dropping bombs on brown people might cause some of them to harbor some resentment, perhaps enough resentment to go out and kill Americans?
You couldn't possibly be implying that American interference in world affairs has actually been a factor in encouraging brown people to come to this country and commit acts of terrorism?
Rubbish!
None of this is America's fault!
None of it!
Those brown people deserve to die!
They hate us for no reason!
No reason at all!
We're saints for fuck's sake!
We bomb brown people for their own good and it's their fault if they don't like it!
Fuck off peacenik!
Afghans aren't "brown" people.
Yes, they really do hate us for reasons that have nothing to do with US foreign policy. Same reason they blow up shit in places like Spain, and Bali.
I guess that is a hard fact for the typical self hating western peacenik to swallow.
Someone who thinks dropping bombs on people makes them mad is a self hating western peacenik.
Got it.
We had never bombed anyone in Afghanistan before 9-11. And Bin Ladin and most of the highjackers were Saudis, another country we hadn't bombed. As a matter of fact, before 9-11 the last place we bombed was Serbia. And we did that in defense of Muslims. Yet, they terrorized Americans clear through the 90s culminating in 9-11. But they hate us because we bomb them. I guess they anticipated that we might some day bomb them and attacked us just in case. If anything bombing them has helped. They blew up the WTC twice, the KOBAR Towers and the USS Cole in the 1990s. They haven't done much but take on the military since.
/sarcasm off
I think it makes sense to use the military against a military.
But we're not fighting against people who are employees of a government who will stop fighting when their employer tells them to stop.
There is no central authority who will order our foes to surrender.
We're talking about an ideology here. You can't fight an ideology with military might, though you can inadvertently use military might to help that ideology gain more converts.
With that in mind I do not see how sending tens of thousands of military into a foreign nation will do anything but make things worse.
I hate to admit, but I'm tempted to agree with Biden here. We can't "let them win", but you're right that our military can't defeat an ideology.
It's a more of a policing problem, policing people for whom life is cheap (no different than it used to be in europe). If we're in it for the long haul, better to throw technology at the problem (drones) than our own people.
/sarcasm off
We "let them win" when we tell our children that it is OK if a government employee runs their fingers up and down places where nobody has any business touching.
We "let them win" when we tell our children to report their neighbors to government agents, Soviet style, with a "See something, say something" campaign.
We "let them win" when everyone is suspected to be guilty until submitting to public humiliation by a government agent.
They've won regardless of what happens militarily in foreign lands.
It's true that there would be no immediate practical impact to abandoning Afghanistan to the thugs who would like to have the run of the place.
But there would be a very unpredictable longer term impact. My offhand statement that we can't "let them win" was a reference to avoiding this unknown impact.
I certainly debatable whether this is something to worry about. It's also debatable if there is any moral responsibility to future generations in this regard, if it is believed that the negative impact will play out over a very long time horizon.
But on-topic, I wish I had a fraction of her courage. There are far to few dissidents in either country.
I wish I had a fraction of her courage
Not having her courage seems to be the least of your problems if you place the U.S.S.R. on the same moral plane as the U.S. Then again, you're in the right place for spewing such infantile pronouncements. Your audience is, shall we say, not very discerning?
^^This^^
Same moral plane? WTF? If I said that both Somalia and Canada could use more doctors I would not be saying their medical care is the same.
I'm not sure you can equate the US with the SU in terms of evil, (those 100 million deaths at the SU's feet form a good barrier), but I am sure the old Soviet generals and leaders are watching our folly in Afghanistan and quietly chuckling.
^^THIS^^
A surprising number of my Brighton Beach neighbors are veterans of the Soviet 40th Army and the 1979 invasion. More often than not, they are quiet and taciturn but after a few ice-cold slivovitzes they will indeed open up and have a rousing discussion on the folly of adventurism in Kaffiristan.
It is people like these that have true courage, it is easy for people in America to protest and shout "Bush is a pig", the real test is if one has the courage to do it in a country like the USSR.
This woman was a true hero.
The people shouting "Bush pig" would still be shouting if they lived in a place like the USSR. They would just be shouting what the government told them to shout.
I read somewhere, I forgot where, that when you live under a regime like the old Soviet Union or Cuba it takes unimaginable human courage just to be a decent human being every day. The pressure to cooperate and perpetuate the regime is that great.
And there still are people out there who have that kind of moral rectitude. The Chinese artist AI Weiwei seems to be one. And this guy seems to be one.
http://old.news.yahoo.com/s/ap.....ded_mickey
Yes they do.
Hey, two sticks with one stone -- the White House AND the Kremlin can burn down simultaneously!
Very touching piece. The names of Elena Bonner and Andrei Sakharov should never be forgotten.
I noticed that people around here don't like you too much. What did you do? :O
He keeps spelling his name wrong.
He a Truth-type liberal, or something?
Quit spelling my name wrong!
It would have been nice to hear the KGB's side of the story.
Yeah nice for a laugh.
That's ignorant!
Nice piece, Cathy.
Wow, OK I never even thought about it like that before. Makes sense dude.
http://www.total-privacy.se.tc
Cathy, I adore reading personal accounts of illustrious women but despite your noting her ten year political advocacy pre-Sakharov, and her influence on his radicalization, she was no Yoko Ono.
Personally, I think like many great women, she was happy to be in the shadow.
Elena Bonner deserves and obit that mentions her marriage and partnership as a minor detail of her own courageous stand.
thank you
Not Funny