The Internet Is For Podcasts About Net Neutrality
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I'm skeptical having info companies being able to decide these kinds of things about the information superhighway. Imagine if markets drove regular highways: those who could pay would get an uncluttered lane and a limitless speed limit while average people would get traffic jams in a 55 mph lane. The poor would walk alongside the road, but there would probably be no hitchhiking laws.
I don't know where you live but this sounds a lot like Sleepytown.
Those who can pay cab fare get a ride that ignores any posted speed limit. Cluttered lanes be damned.
Those who drive their average cars create their own traffic jams as some drive like the cabbies and a few drag their asses and make it miserable for any one else.
The poor can walk or ride the bus. Consumers choice.
It shouldn't be referred to as a podcast unless there is a link to an mp3 file available. That's my rule for the internet.
Question: Is the blog post title a parody of the song, "The Internet is for Porn"?
FCC Chairman