Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Policy

Government's Broken Promises

Peter Suderman | 2.23.2011 5:05 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Since I disagreed with Ezra Klein earlier today, and since I don't often get the opportunity to agree with him, I should note that I'm basically with him on one of the biggest problems with deferred compensation in the public sector: "Workers think their pension is a fact when it's really just a promise—and promises can be broken." That's especially true when you bring the vagaries, rivalries, and petty disputes that drive most of our country's politics into the equation.

I'd add, however, that the broken promises of politicians are also something more people should think about when it comes to another realm of domestic policy: entitlements, especially Social Security. As Cato's Michael Tanner pointed out last year, one of the problems with the current Social Security system is that "workers have no ownership of their benefits. This means that they are left totally dependent on the goodwill of 535 politicians to determine what they'll receive in retirement." In other words, when the government makes promises about what it will do in the future but subjects those promises to the political process, it's usually a good idea to be wary.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: This Is What a Broke Democracy Looks Like

Peter Suderman is features editor at Reason.

PolicySocial Security
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Show Comments (44)

Latest

Trump's Move To Replace 12 ICE Directors Could Mean More Aggressive and Unconstitutional Immigration Enforcement

Autumn Billings | 10.29.2025 5:20 PM

Trump's 'Golden Dome' Missile Defense Could Cost $3.6 Trillion: Report

Matthew Petti | 10.29.2025 4:36 PM

Republican Socialism Goes Nuclear: Trump Bets $80 Billion on Government-Backed Energy

Jeff Luse | 10.29.2025 2:13 PM

The Trump Administration Waives Obscure Safety Rule Blocking Driverless Trucks

Christian Britschgi | 10.29.2025 1:05 PM

Jake Tapper Called Out Obama and Biden for Free Speech Abuses. He Says Trump Is on a New Level.

Nick Gillespie | 10.29.2025 12:30 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300