Riders Railroaded

Blowing up buses

|

In late October, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) approved a $5.2 billion subway extension that will almost certainly decrease the number of Angelenos using mass transit. Overall ridership—counting both buses and trains—goes down for every mile of rail service MTA adds, because rail grows at the expense of the bus lines people actually use.

Bus fares have been hiked three times in the last three years, and these increases are usually coupled with cuts to bus service, as more of the authority's budget gets sucked into the rail project. In September, for example, the MTA eliminated 4 percent of its bus lines. Meanwhile, subway ridership has been dropping.

By some estimates, the MTA has lost more than 3 billion boardings since construction of the rail network began in 1985. During that time, the population of Los Angeles County has grown about 35 percent, yet overall MTA ridership is the same as or slightly lower than it was in 1985.

Rail is traditionally a liberal cause, but because bus riders tend overwhelmingly to be lower-income people, some of the L.A. left has turned against trains. "The 20-year experiment with rail has been a failure," Eric Romann, an organizer for the leftist Bus Riders Union, says. "If you go back to 1985, L.A. had more people using public transit than use it today. They spent more than $8 billion over that time, and we have seen a drop in transit use. The one time they saw an increase in ridership during that time was when our civil suit forced them to cut fares and expand bus lines." 

NEXT: Capital Kid Cash

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. The Liberal Intellectual Radical Progressive left loves rail, because rail is hard to shift and thus sets their Urban Planning in – so to speak – concrete. They dislike bus lines because bus lines can be shifted easily to routes that people actually want to use, and thus cannot allow them to feel that they are guiding the Unwashed to do things that are good for them.

    If you keep in mind at all times that the Unwashed just CAN’T know what is good for them, can’t POSSIBLY take care of themselves, and absolutely MUST be guided by their betters, much more of the behavior of the LIRP left makes sense.

    1. Trains are socialist and go where the elites dictate that you must go. Not like highways where go where ever you want. Just yesterday I smashed through a guardrail and plowed through a cornfield – just because I could.

      1. Same deal with planes. You buy a ticket on United, they’ll fly you anywhere you want. Just let ’em know and they’ll fly right over your house and let you jump out! That’s capitalist convenience for you.

  2. because bus riders tend overwhelmingly to be lower-income people, some of the L.A. left has turned against trains. “The 20-year experiment with rail has been a failure,” Eric Romann, an o

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.