Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Civil Liberties

How Martin Luther King's "I Have a Dream Speech" Was Composed

Nick Gillespie | 1.17.2011 9:36 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Via Andrew Hazlett's always-great Twitter feed comes this sory of how Martin Luther King, Jr. finished his spectacular "I Have a Dream Speech" in the wee hours of the day he delivered it on August 28, 1963. No, this was not your typical all-nighter, for sure. Here's how the scholars behind Stanford's online encyclopedia on King and "the global freedom struggle" explain it:

King continued to give versions of this speech throughout 1961 and 1962, then calling it "The American Dream." Two months before the March on Washington, King stood before a throng of 150,000 people at Cobo Hall in Detroit to expound upon making "the American Dream a reality" (King, A Call, 70). King repeatedly exclaimed, "I have a dream this afternoon" (King, A Call, 71). He articulated the words of the prophets Amos and Isaiah, declaring that "justice will roll down like waters, and righteousness like a mighty stream," for "every valley shall be exalted, and every hill and mountain shall be made low" (King, A Call, 72). As he had done numerous times in the previous two years, King concluded his message imagining the day "when all of God's children, black men and white men, Jews and Gentiles, Protestants and Catholics, will be able to join hands and sing with the Negroes in the spiritual of old: Free at last! Free at last! Thank God Almighty, we are free at last!" (King, A Call,73).

As King and his advisors prepared his speech for the conclusion of the 1963 march, he solicited suggestions for the text. Clarence Jones offered a metaphor for the unfulfilled promise of constitutional rights for African Americans, which King incorporated into the final text: "America has defaulted on this promissory note insofar as her citizens of color are concerned" (King, A Call, 82). Several other drafts and suggestions were posed. References to Abraham Lincoln and the Emancipation Proclamation were sustained throughout the countless revisions. King recalled that he did not finish the complete text of the speech until 3:30 A.M. on the morning of August 28.

More here.

Here's video of the speech:

And here's a link to the great "Letter from a Birmingham Jail," which remains one of the great statements of American political discourse.

The Nation's Chris Hayes reminds us via his Twitter feed that King wrote an annual essay on civil rights for The Nation between 1961 and 1966. You can read them here.

Reason on King here.

And read Damon Root's essay about "a forgotten civil rights hero," T.R.M. Howard, who followed a very different path than King's but had a profound influence on civil rights discourse.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: A Birthright, and a Mess of Pottage

Nick Gillespie is an editor at large at Reason and host of The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie.

Civil LibertiesCultureHistory
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (95)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. RAH   14 years ago

    Glad to see a libertarian website celebrating a communist.

    MLK supported affirmative action. In other words, he wasn't against discrimination, only discrimination against blacks.

    1. Suki   14 years ago

      Have some respect. Find something nice to say. Obama got his last speech done in an all-nighter too. The parallels abound!

    2. Slap the Enlightened!   14 years ago

      Look, if you're waiting for the Sunday Girls at reason to say anything about MLK you couldn't read just as easily at The Nation, you'll wait a long, long time.

      Try Paul Gottfried instead.

      1. Suki   14 years ago

        To be fair, reason has to plaster something on their webspace to be edgy and different, just like the rest of the MSM. See how they are ignoring the Eric Fuller thing but they had story after story on Jared Lee Loughner? It is like getting "The Morning Joe" without a cable bill.

      2. Suki   14 years ago

        StE,

        Thanks for the link and the reminder that this is also Robert E. Lee day. Time to polish the lawn jockey.

    3. Charles 3E   14 years ago

      Dude, this is enormously simple-minded. I don't agree with affirmative action, but it's not wild-eyed, after seeing the government stamp its foot on the throats of one group of people for two centuries, to expect the government to do something for that same group.

    4. Kreel Sarloo   14 years ago

      There's some question as to whether MLK supported Affirmative Action in the way it is practised today.

      But the, we'll never know since he was killed a fewe years before AA became firmly entrenched.

      Always good to know that there's always someone with the classy comment at Hit and Run.

  2. RAH   14 years ago

    Did he spend donated money on prostitutes? The most sordid charges about MLK's sex life, this one included, come from the FBI and can't necessarily be trusted. But there's no doubt about what one biographer calls King's "compulsive sexual athleticism." King's attitude toward women was chauvinist and often exploitative. In his 1989 autobiography, And the Walls Came Tumbling Down, King's close friend and fellow civil rights leader Ralph Abernathy writes that on the night before he died, King gave a rousing speech, had dinner with a woman afterward and remained with her till 1 AM, then came back to his motel to spend the night with a second woman. In the early morning hours a third woman came looking for King and became angry when she found the bed in the room he shared with Abernathy unoccupied. When King reappeared, he argued with woman #3 and wound up knocking her across the bed.

    In his 1991 memoir, Breaking Barriers, journalist Carl Rowan writes that in 1964 congressman John Rooney told him that he and his congressional committee had heard J. Edgar Hoover play an audiotape of an apparent orgy held in King's Washington hotel suite. Over the sounds of a couple having intercourse in the background, according to Rooney, King could be heard saying to a man identified as Abernathy, "Come on over here, you big black motherfucker, and let me suck your dick." Horrors, King was gay! (Rowan thinks this was just ribald repartee.) In his account of the same episode, civil rights historian Taylor Branch attributes a couple more quotes to King: "I'm fucking for God!" and "I'm not a Negro tonight!" The FBI anonymously sent King (or, according to some accounts, King's wife, Coretta) a tape of compromising material recorded in his hotel rooms. The tape was either accompanied or followed up by a note suggesting that King should commit suicide if he wished to avoid exposure.

    http://www.straightdope.com/co.....plagiarist

    1. Reality   14 years ago

      Yet, you with merely your greased palm are infinitely less useful a human being than King.

    2. Nick   14 years ago

      What purpose would the FBI have to silence MLK? Did they want to maintain the status quo or racial segregation, a policy that doesn't serve the liberty of all Americans, or could it be a fabrication? I mean, these things didn't apparently silence King, so...did they exist at all or did the FBI have a change of heart and decide to sit on the information?

      Maybe these things are true. If so, why not use them, if MLK was considered an enemy of the state? Or maybe you're full of shit. Or maybe these things are true but it's not relevant to his impact.

    3. ClubMedSux   14 years ago

      I like how this link clearly refutes the assertion in your initial comment that King was a communist.

    4. AlmightyJB   14 years ago

      You does RAH stand for redneck asshole?

    5. Joshua   14 years ago

      Wait - this is supposed to make me like him less? Now he's TOTALLY my hero!

    6. moob   14 years ago

      Abernathy didn't report any of the kind in his book. This is mostly fabrication:

      http://urbanlegends.about.com/.....r_king.htm

  3. Max   14 years ago

    C'mon, Nick, King wanted to "free" Negroes by government fiat. He called for the intervention of the state. Because of him laws restricting property rights ("We resevre the right to refuse service.") were enacted. Restricting freedom! Be a cosnistent right-wing fanatic asshole, or pull that copy of Atals shrugged out of your ass. You don't dserve the honor of having it shoved up there.

    1. OhioOrrin   14 years ago

      restricting property rights? u mean like the "right" for a restaurant to serve a burger w a side of e coli. or maybe u mean transferring school levy monies to for-profit charters WITHOUT local voter approval to move public monies outta the public school district?

      1. JT   14 years ago

        In Sardinia they eat maggot cheese.
        mmm maggot cheese

      2. God, you're an   14 years ago

        idiot

      3. Zeb   14 years ago

        Shut up everybody. Maybe the trolls will just eat each other if we leave them to it.

        1. P. Shaw   14 years ago

          Every voice is sacred. Let blog anarchy bloom.

    2. DanD   14 years ago

      Unlike plenty of other people, I don't claim to have a window into King's mind. However, I'm pretty sure that regardless of his other stated beliefs, the major goal of his movement was to get the government to enforce the rights and liberties granted by the Constitution. I think any libertarian would find that to be a noble goal, and he did well towards that end.

  4. Slap the Enlightened!   14 years ago

    Celebrate Diversity.

  5. Cy Nickelfuque   14 years ago

    "Let freedom ring from every hill and molehill of Mississippi. From every mountainside, let freedom ring."

    Talk about your incendiary rhetoric!

  6. Rather   14 years ago

    He was a man and was subject to his desires. No one can deny he was a inspiration to many people, and that his life and death continues to have consequence.

    1. Skip   14 years ago

      Sounds like he was subject to a woman's desires too.

  7. Fist of Etiquette   14 years ago

    Wait a minute. How could King have a dream if he was awake all night writing the speech? I smell a rat.

    1. Almanian   14 years ago

      Perhaps he meant a "daydream", and just didn't spell that out?

    2. Ice Nine   14 years ago

      >>Wait a minute. How could King have a dream if he was awake all night writing the speech?

      Wait a minute. How could King write speeches at night if he's up all night coinkin' broads and blowing Ralph Abernathy?

  8. Tiger Woods   14 years ago

    He was my inspiration.

    1. Brett Favre   14 years ago

      You were mine

      1. Rectal   14 years ago

        Read my blog

        1. rather   14 years ago

          Do you realize you're stupid?

          1. Rather   14 years ago

            I'm an expert.

            1. fuck off   14 years ago

              heller

              1. Rather   14 years ago

                I wunt to play wit deh big kidz. Derr.

                1. fuck off heller the   14 years ago

                  ^ stalker who doesn't' get it.
                  Here's a message from every woman you ever will meet- I'm just not into you AKA fuck off

                  1. Rather   14 years ago

                    I AM WOMAN. WE ARE ONE. WE ARE THE BORG.

  9. AlmightyJB   14 years ago

    Great story Nick!

    1. Max   14 years ago

      Yeah, for the Nation or some other left-wing rag, but for Reason, the beacon of right-wing idiocy writ large. Fuck!

  10. Todd   14 years ago

    First of all, MLK was, broadly speak, a democratic socialist, not a communist. Get it right. 🙂 On economic policy, he was probably no different than, say, a random left-wing European MP. That said, I don't see how having the rights of Black people recognized is not a libertarian project. For that, we should all be thankful, as it makes everyone freer.

    1. OhioOrrin   14 years ago

      todd - these libtards r too wrapped-up in their narratives against MLK to grasp that black civil rights stands apart fm any one person.

      1. R C Dean   14 years ago

        Err, wouldn't that mean the libtards can question MLK without necessarily questioning black civil rights?

      2. Xeones   14 years ago

        The irony of some fool using the word "libtard" immediately before misspelling "are"... ah, it stings so sweetly.

        1. OhioOrrin   14 years ago

          ahh the hissy fit of a supposed grammarian...completely aside fm anything on-point of course.

      3. Zeb   14 years ago

        If you actually want to argue with us, please do. If you are just going to continue with the stupid nonsense, please fuck off.

        1. OhioOrrin   14 years ago

          go back up the thread & read RAH's "stupid nonsense".

  11. mark   14 years ago

    Bran-new Shoes:Air Jordan,Nike Shox,Nike Air Max,Air Force One,Puma,Adidas.100% quality and save 70% OFF.storage shoes Inc ,You will find more than 50000 kind of product.

  12. Brian from Texas   14 years ago

    While it is true Dr. King stood for non-Libertarian causes, his fight against STATE-MANDATED bigotry and segregation that had existed for over a century far outweighs the negative. People want to make an issue out of his alleged adultery or call him a Communist, so what. Many baby-boomers I know who are staunch Libertarians today were once student radicals who dabbled in Marxist beliefs, not to mention screwed everything in sught.

    1. Xeones   14 years ago

      Word.

  13. Max   14 years ago

    The John Fucking Birch Society would be turning over in its grave if it were dead. Shame on you libertoid right-wing assholes for embracing King. Shame!

    1. Kreel Sarloo   14 years ago

      Why? Nothing in the John Birch Society's mission statement has anything at all to do with race.

      There have been a number of black members of the JBS.

  14. CalebT   14 years ago

    Listen, Dr. King wrote an awesome speech and fought for something he deeply believed. He kicked ass, despite not being a libertarian!

    1. CalebT   14 years ago

      That is unless he WASN'T the author of the speech, which according to what we know about his doctoral thesis, is entirely possible.

  15. Sean Mack   14 years ago

    Also, I might actually like the man better if it turns out he was NOT the author of doctoral thesis on comparative protestant mythology, or whatever.

  16. Max   14 years ago

    Right-wing fanatics distrust every government agency EXCEPT the FBI when it spies on left wingers.

    1. CalebT   14 years ago

      You're damn right!

    2. Zeb   14 years ago

      Why don't you go tell it to some right wing fanatics who do that, then?

  17. Warty   14 years ago

    I went looking for metal songs with lyrics that mention Martin Luther King, but the only one I could find was by a mid-90s rap-metal band. Even I couldn't inflict that on you people.

    1. dave c   14 years ago

      How about U2? "in the name of love" was the name of the song I believe?

      1. dave c   14 years ago

        Sorry, I missed the part about metal songs 🙂

        1. Ragin Cajun   14 years ago

          U2 isn't metal? What about Jethro Tull?

    2. BakedPenguin   14 years ago

      ...the only one I could find was by a mid-90s rap-metal band.

      1. Warty   14 years ago

        "I'm the singer-rapper! I can do it all, son!"

      2. Warty   14 years ago

        Best Metalocalpyse quote ever: "Marriage has always been a black and repugnant sore on human living."

  18. Daryl   14 years ago

    Thanks so much for this post and the link to MLKs Letter from Birmingham Jail. I remember how profoundly that letter impacted me when I first read it in High School nearly 30 years ago. Since then, I have read it nearly every year on his birthday. It never ceases to both shame and inspire me.

    1. waffles   14 years ago

      just read it for maybe the first time. At least inrecent memory. But amazing. I am shamed. Yet I am inspire.

      Also, need naptime. Sentences cannot complete. I've failed. You.

  19. Alice Bowie   14 years ago

    MLK wasn't much of a libertarian.

    In fact, I'm sure today's libertarians would argue that the FREE MARKET would have resolved the matter and there was really no need for civil rights.

    1. OhioOrrin   14 years ago

      scooore!

    2. JD   14 years ago

      Pretty much any libertarian would argue that the civil rights movement was necessary precisely because of the institutionalized racism enforced by government agents.

      1. Tony   14 years ago

        Why is it unacceptable for there to be any villains besides government? Surely libertarians are capable of acknowledging social phenomena that happen outside of government, and can be in favor of changing them through social movements.

        1. Apogee   14 years ago

          Why is it unacceptable for there to be any villains besides government?

          Straw man. It is you who ignores the fact that the government is the villain, as well as an enabler of other villains.

          Changing things through 'social movements' is entirely possible in a free market. Once the government decides to 'regulate' everyone and everything, however, any 'social movement' must obtain permission from the government.

          The marches were against government mandated segregation - hence the link to "letter from a birmingham jail". Read it - it explains a lot.

  20. Spur   14 years ago

    FFS - As a libertarian I am glad not all the people that do awesome things in this world like MLK are libertarians - I think folks like Havel and Mandela are pretty cool too despite not sounding like Jacob Hornblower everything they give a speech or write an essay...bloody hell.

  21. Adonisus   14 years ago

    My grandmother once had this say to me reguarding King's womanizing:

    "Now, sweetheart, God considered King David a man after his own heart. Yet, King David did something far worse than Dr. King ever did...he had an affair with another man's wife and then sent that man off to be killed in the wars so that he could have his wife all to himself. Yet God forgave King David and still held him in high esteem. Now, if God can forgive King David, I think you and I can forgive Dr. King for his own failings, don't you think?"

    1. Alice Bowie   14 years ago

      not unless you're an american conservative that would bring up ANYTHING to dis-credit MLK.

      Either way, Both King David and MLK were no good cheats when it came to their women...just like many people (conservatives and liberals alike).

      1. Daryl   14 years ago

        I'm and American conservative and I have no desire to discredit him. While I recognize King's imperfections, I also recognize my own. I also see absolutely no connection between his public calls for justice and his personal failings.

        Whatever his personal failings and private goals, the words and works for which he is primarily remembered were a positive force for freedom and justice. His efforts dismantled oppressive laws and forced Americans to confront immorality in our midst. That sounds conservative to me.

        1. Alice Bowie   14 years ago

          His efforts dismantled oppressive laws and forced Americans to confront immorality in our midst. That sounds conservative to me.

          Except for the fact that it was CONSERVATIVES against him ALL of THE WAY.

          1. Daryl   14 years ago

            True. Lots of conservatives (mostly conservative southern democrats like Al Gore's dad) were against him and civil rights in general. Luckily people change. Most conservatives TODAY support King's message (though many oppose modern so-called civil rights leaders that no longer pursue King's dream). While I'm not a Tea Partier, I'd bet good money that more that 90% support the ideals voiced in King's "I have a dream" speech. Remember, King's niece spoke at Beck's rally, not Sharpton's.

            1. Tony   14 years ago

              Yeah but you guys were pretty late to the party. It's not exactly brave to pick the winner after the winner has been chosen.

              And it doesn't help the conservative cause when one of the movement's main priorities (still) is keeping all the welfare away from minorities and in the pockets of millionaires.

              1. Apogee   14 years ago

                one of the movement's main priorities (still) is keeping all the welfare away from minorities and in the pockets of millionaires.

                Damn that Bill Clinton!

                Because if the past few years have taught us anything, it's that any excess tax money goes straight into the pockets of the poor - like Hank Paulson and Larry Summers.

            2. Apogee   14 years ago

              Except for the fact that it was CONSERVATIVES against him ALL of THE WAY.

              And now the Left is against him, because of all that messy talk of liberty and freedom, and the unpleasant fact that he resisted government imposed limitations on his and others' behavior.

              So many confused assholes like you that imagine this site as a bastion of conservatism.

              Face it, it's the talk of individual freedom that you can't stand.

              1. Alice Bowie   14 years ago

                Anti-Drugs
                Anti-gay Marriage
                Anti-abortion
                Anti-EVERYTHING
                ...is this the LEFT? And, is it NOT the Government by LAWS put there by the RIGHT that is, in fact, imposing limitation on people.

                U R THE ASSHOLE that is clueless...Just like those in the past that supported and were very happy with MLKs assassination.

        2. Clarence Thomas   14 years ago

          Word, Bro.

    2. Alice Bowie   14 years ago

      Rudy Guiliani cheated on his wife...the conservatives forgave him.

      Larry Craig tried to play dick-doctor with an undercover cop in a public mens room...his wife forgave him.

      Slick Willie got his willy wet by Monica...Hilary and pretty much the rest of the progressive world forgave him.

      1. Max   14 years ago

        Yeah, but they weren't black. Right-wing fanatics hate blacks. Ask Ron Paul.

  22. Joshua   14 years ago

    I definitely think King had a positive effect on human freedom. What other standard would a libertarian use?

    1. Xeones   14 years ago

      Precisely. Whatever his ideology or extracurricular activities, the man stood up for people whose natural rights as human beings were not being recognized, and he changed things. So what if he wasn't a saint?

  23. Xeones   14 years ago

    So MLK Day brings out Reason's dumbest/most drug-addled trolls en force. Fantastic.

    1. Alice Bowie   14 years ago

      Keep Dope Alive !!!

    2. Apogee   14 years ago

      Xeones - drugs could only improve their intellectual capacity.

  24. Alice Bowie   14 years ago

    How many leaders in this country that tried to help black people that have been assassinated?

    Black people have been enslaved, sold like luggage, told to sit in the back of the bus, give sub-standard education, work, and housing opportunities.

    And, throughout all of that, CONSERVATIVES CLAIMED (as they do today) that they are NOT RACIST.

    1. heller   14 years ago

      Conservatives did racist things in the past. Hence today's conservatives are racists even though they don't do racist things.

      Makes perfect sense.

  25. Apogee   14 years ago

    How many leaders in this country that tried to help black people that have been assassinated?

    It's really really difficult, seeing as they're dead.

  26. EcoDude   14 years ago

    Capitalists actually opposed segregation, and in some surprising places as well:

    http://www.jeffjacoby.com/4093/the-enemies-of-jim-crow

  27. R C Dean   14 years ago

    There's a post over at The Volokh Conspiracy about how MLK personally convinced Nichelle Nichols to stay on as Uhura on Star Trek after the first season.

    A great man. A truly great man, and I won't hear anyone say any different.

  28. LongTimeLurker   14 years ago

    +1 of something RC.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Texans Gain the Right To Try Individualized Medical Treatments

J.D. Tuccille | 6.6.2025 7:00 AM

Review: There Are No Top-Down Solutions to the Problems Depicted in Adolescence

Autumn Billings | From the July 2025 issue

Review: A Comic Book Villain Runs for Mayor of New York in the New Daredevil Series

Joe Lancaster | From the July 2025 issue

Brickbat: Friends in High Places

Charles Oliver | 6.6.2025 4:00 AM

Is the Supreme Court Really That Divided? The Facts Say No.

Billy Binion | 6.5.2025 5:21 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!