Hands Off
Airport checkpoint revolt
"I just want to be able to go to work and not be harassed or molested," Michael Roberts told the Memphis Commercial Appeal. "I'm just not comfortable being physically manhandled…every time I go to work." So on a Friday in mid-October, the pilot finally took a stand against the Transportation Security Administration (TSA).
Roberts, a first officer for ExpressJet Airlines, refused to submit to a full-body scan at the Memphis International Airport. He also declined the alternative pat-down. Since the TSA would not let him through the security checkpoint without one or the other, he was unable to fly to his duty base in Houston. Later he called the TSA a "make-work" program that does little to enhance the safety of air travel. "I don't believe this approach is a necessary or effective way to mitigate the threat," he said.
Although the TSA later said uniformed pilots will be exempt from the new procedures, Roberts plans to challenge them on First Amendment grounds. "I'm not against airline security, but this is not security in any stretch of the imagination," he told a Memphis TV station. "It's not reasonable when you walk into the airport, and just because you want to fly on an airplane that they should strip search you, or physically put their hands on your crotch, or feel your body from top to bottom."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
is good
perfect
perfect
perfect
How about mbt kisumu sandals this one: there are X driving deaths a year- what % of driving deaths (or serious injuries) involve alcohol, or other intoxicating substances? kisumu 2 People are pretty darn good drivers when they are not impaired.
outlet
outlet
outlet
impairment" that corresponds to a probability nike shox tl3 of an accident. Standard psychomotor tests of impairment do not test driving habits. For instance almost *all* people over the age of 60 are "impaired" in terms of those tests, oakely sunglasses but these people do not have a higher accident rate. Older people develop compensatory driving habits
Although the TSA later said uniformed pilots will be exempt from the new procedures, Roberts plans to challenge them on First Amendment grounds. "I'm not against airline security, but this is not security in any stretch of the imagination," ???? ????? ???? ???? ????? ??? ????
he told a Memphis TV station. "It's not reasonable when you walk into the airport, and just because you want to fly on an airplane that they should strip search you, or physically put their hands on your crotch, or feel your body from top to bottom."
thanks