No child left insured?
Killing Kids' Insurance
Six months after passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (a.k.a. ObamaCare), a rule requiring insurers to cover children with pre-existing conditions took effect. Although the regulation was intended to make health coverage more accessible to children, in some cases it has had the opposite effect: At least six major insurers decided that the easiest way to comply was to cease selling child-only insurance policies.
Insurers nixed the policies out of fear that they could lead to insurance gaming, with families picking up coverage just before getting treatment and dropping it immediately afterward. The law's authors created a limited enrollment period to discourage such behavior, but insurers argued that the rule was still sufficiently vague that they might have to allow a parent to purchase a child's policy on the way to the doctor's office, or even in a hospital lobby.
Child-only policies make up about 10 percent of the individual insurance market, which itself is only about 5 percent of the overall insurance market in most states. Insurers will continue to service existing child-only policies and cover children as dependents through adult plans. But that still leaves a substantial number of parents who won't be able to get their kids the coverage they want.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Peter, I was stunned to read that child-only policies are 10 percent of the individual market because that in effect mean that their parents are likely uninsured; 5 percent of the state market is not inconsequential.
thank u