Reason Writers Around Town: Anthony Randazzo on Alcohol Regulation and the 2010 Elections
Writing at FoxNews.com, Anthony Randazzo of the Reason Foundation and Jason Mercier of the Center for Government Reform explain how 77 years after the end of prohibition the battle of the "wets" versus the "drys" is alive and well in those states considering ending their government monopolies over the sale of liquor.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Will we ever be free?
No. Now shut up and do as you're told.
Washington is trying to get the State out of the liquor monopoly with two initiatives. Here's The Stranger's take, a newspaper which swings wildly between liberal and progressive:
I find it impossible to believe the state will not figure out a way to tax alcohol no matter who sells it. 2/3? I'd be surprised if it wasn't 100% in favor.
I like the subtle swipe at Costco. Heavens, we wouldn't want anyone to make any evil corporate profits, now, would we?
Funny thing is, hard alcohol isn't one of those things that individuals typically buy in bulk (college students and winos excepted). As such, Costco is going to be a lesser choice compared to a closer store for many people who need a fifth of something.
Having in the hooch in grocery stores everywhere makes a lot of sense, though, which is undoubtedly why it's illegal in so many places.
This and the newspaper reaction to Prop 19 reveals the sad, pathetic "Progressive" philosophy that is so common in the Democratic establishment.
Freer alcohol-- but what about the taxes? (Used in VA, WA, and everywhere else) Freer pot-- we can't give any sort of nod to federalism.
God I hate the fucking state of Washington's liquor stores.
Go in on a Thursday afternoon, no other customers than you, and there are four employees standing around.
Go in on a Saturday night, there are customers in line from the check-out stands all way to the back of the store. That's b/c there are exactly two employees working, slowly, at the check-out stands. Never mind that there are four check-out stands.
Blow it up, please. I'll take any replacement system you can think of as it could not be any worse than the current one. Even during prohibition your local neighborhood bootlegger offered better service.
Up until about a year ago, when you ran your card, you could hear a 28.8k modem* in the back get dialtone, dial, a carrier signal, then your transaction would go through... slowly... while the person behind the counter would nervously smile at you.
I made note of the high-tech proceedings to the employee once... she shrugged.
*ok ok, it was probably a 56k modem.
What we need is a "proposition" that will give the states the authority to tax and regulate alcohol. Everybody wins!
As special treat, you can meet Great Hero of Washington State, this weekend only at Downtown store!
Bring kids! Bring vife! Bring goat!
My town finally voted full wet last month. Not that I couldn't already grab a bottle of whiskey on a Sunday a half mile from home.