ObamaCare Cash? Tim Pawlenty Says "No Thanks"
Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty, who may or may not (wink, nudge, wink) be running for the GOP presidential nomination in 2012, is telling state agencies not to go after any of the new discretionary federal health care funds created by the PPACA.
Republican Gov. Tim Pawlenty Tuesday ordered all state agencies to not to submit applications to any health care funding from the federal government related to the health care overhaul.
Any applications must be either required by law or approved by the governor's office.
Pawlenty, who appears to be gearing up for a run for president in 2012, has long decried the health care overhaul, which opponents call Obamacare, and has pledged to join a lawsuit to undo it.
"Obamacare is an intrusion by the federal government into personal health care matters and it's an explosion of federal spending that does nothing to make health care more affordable," Pawlenty said in a news release.
As a political move, this suggests how much Republicans are likely counting on making a fight out of ObamaCare in 2012. A lot of Democrats hoped support for the law would rebound enough that it would help them in 2010, but at this point, that doesn't seem likely. Now, some Republicans seem to be betting that the reverse will be true during the next couple election cycles. It's not just Pawlenty, either. For another example, see the race for the GOP nomination in the Florida governor's race, which pitted Rick Scott, who had spent millions on advertisements opposing the health care overhaul, against Attorney General Bill McCollum, who is leading the multi-state lawsuit against the PPACA.
And, as we're starting to see, those political bets are going to have policy consequences. Implementing a bill as unwieldy as the PPACA was bound to be a complex, frustrating process. But because the law relies heavily on state governments for implementation, and because, as we've already seen with the various suits challenging the law's constitutionality, a number of those state governments are led by politicians who would like to see the law struck down, the implementation phase for this law is going to be especially messy.
For more on the challenges to implementing the health care overhaul at the state level, check out my feature on ObamaCare and the states in Reason's current print edition.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Cue Reasons favorite Obama fellator........in 4,3,2
It will be the same heads I win tails you lose argument from the stimulus. If Pawlenty takes the money, they will say he is a hypocrite to argue against a program he accepted money from. If he turns it down, he is playing politics with the health of the voters.
Of course, the "hypocrite" argument only works on people who's IQ is < 80.
He's a fucking hypocrite!
Not True.
Many smart people have a different opinion than you
Sure, there are smart people who favor the program. But the "hypocrite" argument is stupid, and it's just as stupid as saying that Democratic voters and Congressmen who want the Bush tax cuts to expire are "hypocrites" if they haven't been voluntarily paying extra taxes to the Treasury all along.
Soon, it won't be "voluntary" at all.
"the implementation phase for this law is going to be especially messy."
messy = juicy
What the hell is that fish?
Bait?
For what, the Creature from the Black Lagoon? It's not walleye or pike. In fact, I'm not sure it's Terran.
Looks good to me. Damn good!
All I could think was whatever that fish was a big muskie got a hold of it.
Just like the government to take something normal, like a fish, and mangle it beyond all recognition.
It's me....sorry it's been a tough week!
I've fished all over Minnesota and I couldn't tell you what it is if my life depended on it. It looks prehistoric.
Not a gar. Not a coelacanth. Not a catfish.
Clearly photoshopped.
http://minnesotaindependent.co.....-palin.jpg
Google "Time Magazine" "The Good Life in Minnesota" It's been done a number of ways with a number of people.
Not a fish. Not a real magazine cover. Not a governor.
Looks like a propeller fish to me.
Now you're just being silly.
The original cover.
You know, I don't think that guy's really standing by a lake.
I wonder where Suder-man got that image. It's not a real Time cover. There is no June 4th, 2003 issue of Time.
Not a real fish. Not a real magazine cover. What is going on here?
And yet reason gets it's panties in a bunch whenever the AP photoshops the truth.
Does the AP fake fish, too?
Looks like maybe a Sauger. Has some algae on it or something.
Or a Walleye chewed up by a propeller.
I said "propeller fish" and was mocked by PL.
Now I feel vindicated.
Ain't ya never been dynamite fishin'?
No mention that T-Paw TOOK some of the health care money (as long as it went for abstinence only sex ed), even when the state had to pay matching funds. Oh yeah, and he said "no" to more money with no matching because it was for comprehensive sex ed.
http://www.startribune.com/politics/state/101849063.html
Neither comprehensive sex ed nor abstinence only sex ed belong in the public schools. If you can't teach your kid about sex, then you shouldn't have one.
Sadly, it's the people who can't or, more likely, won't teach their kids about sex that have the most kids. Then they have kids, and not all of them get to be on Dancing With The Stars.
That's true in some cases, but not true in others, and sometimes it can be exactly the opposite. Otherwise, you're spot on.
^^This^^
Yay for federalism!
The GOP courage on Obamacare is directly related to those poll numbers, as I've been saying. But that's to be expected with politicians. At least it's working for us at the moment.
I'm pretty excited about the new polls! Hopefully the GOP will wipe away this whole Obamacare nightmare after the midterms.
They need to institute a House rule that no bill, no matter what, leaves the House without a "repeal PPACA" rider, even after reconciliation. Let Obama veto every appropriations bill for two years if he likes; he isn't going to win over voters by fighting tooth and nail for the health care deform.
Screw the Republicans, Obamacare rocks! Say, when does my free health care kick in?
I've even seen it said that Obamacare is on track. It's on track to fail so the taxpayer can bail out the insurance companies...