Unfree Checking
Bank regulation payoff
The very notion of monthly fees for checking accounts was until recently another scalp on the belt of technology, like paying for porn or worrying about the length of a long-distance call. But the era of free checking may be coming to an end, thanks to new consumer protection rules issued by the Federal Reserve under pressure from Congress and the White House.
More than half of all checking accounts are currently unprofitable, according to a May report by the financial research firm Celent. Overdraft fees minimized the losses on the smallest accounts. But the new rules, which kicked in on July 1, prohibit overdraft fees without a customer's explicit consent. So now many banks are instead choosing to spread those costs evenly by charging poorer people monthly fees.
People who have a lot of money in their accounts, use a bank credit card, or employ bank-based investment advisers won't pay the new fees. Only people with small, relatively low-volume accounts will. The increased costs are likely to push marginal customers out of the traditional banking system altogether. They will turn instead to companies that cater to the "unbanked"—that is, to check cashers and pawn shops.
Having triggered this near-future cascade of fees and departures from mainstream banking, Congress is now gearing up to regulate payday lenders and other institutions that cater to the unbanked. ATM fees are also up for increased congressional scrutiny. No word yet on whether Congress will be announcing new regulations on mattress manufacturers to prevent customers from stuffing cash under the bed.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
So. Instead of punishing the banks that caused the collapse for fraud, Congress is simply going to stick it to the people who can least afford it. What a racket!
isn't that what they normally do? The poor usually suffer the worst under regulations, even the ones *intended* to help them!
very
is good
thank u
good