Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Reason.tv: Boobquake, Live from Dupont Circle

Reason Staff | 4.27.2010 12:19 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

On Monday April 26, 2010 at Dupont Circle in Washington, D.C. a group small in number (five to seven participants) but large in heart participated in Boobquake, an event coordinated online through Facebook and Twitter to respond to a Islamic cleric's recent comments that "women dressing immodestly" led to earthquakes.

"Many women who do not dress modestly…lead young men astray, corrupt their chastity and spread adultery in society, which (consequently) increases earthquakes," Hojatoleslam Kazem Sedighi was quoted as saying by Iranian media. Sedighi is Tehran's acting Friday prayer leader. (He is not available for children's parties.)

For the record, there was an earthquake off the coast of Taiwan that was possibly related to Boobquake.

Here's a short video explaining from the event. Approximately 1.36 minutes; shot and edited by Dan Hayes.

Subscribe to Reason.tv's YouTube channel and receive automatic notification when new material goes live.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Legalize It (Immigration Edition)

Reason Staff
PoliticsCultureReason.tvSexismReligion
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (59)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Draco   15 years ago

    Has anyone noticed that ever since Pamela Anderson first appeared on Baywatch (not to mention her subsequent video appearances), earthquakes have been a common occurrence worldwide?

  2. Some dude   15 years ago

    Very scientific

  3. The Other Kevin   15 years ago

    Sadly, participation in my geographic area was very limited.

    1. Valerie   15 years ago

      You'd be surprised. A t-shirt and jeans are considered "immodest" in some places.

  4. Further Proof   15 years ago

    "Washington is Hollywood for ugly people"

    1. Draco   15 years ago

      Sir, you are a cad. You should not insult these lovely women who've shown the courage they've shown here. If this were the 18th century, you might need to answer for this deed with cold steel.

      1. Further Proof   15 years ago

        I only see the face of 2 of 7 participants. The spokeswoman might be OK but the lack of a camera angle showing waist-to-hip ratio is troubling.

  5. John   15 years ago

    What do you mean by "legalize it"? Is it Reason's position that every person who wants to should be able to come? If so, how do you plan to pay for the welfare benefits such people will be entitled to? Given the problems in Mexico, it is difficult to imagine how anyone wouldn't come here for safety if nothing else.

    Maybe you if you legalized drugs first and killed the drug problem in the Mexico and did something about the entitlement disparity between the two countries, you could set up like an EU with Mexico and Canada. But until you solve those two problems, you are just pissing in the wind screaming legalization.

    1. hmm   15 years ago

      I say legalize boobs!!

      wait what?

    2. C-man   15 years ago

      "enTITlement disparity"...took me a while to figure out what the hell you were talking about.

  6. hmm   15 years ago

    hmmmmm boobs

  7. Slim Charles   15 years ago

    The first women is well-spoken, highly rational, and has a swell rack.

    I may be ready to marry.

    1. Further Proof   15 years ago

      What if her waist circumference equals or exceeds her that of her hips ?

      1. Slim Charles   15 years ago

        Does the word may mean anything to you?

      2. bob   15 years ago

        Doesn't bother me.

    2. leviramsey   15 years ago

      Not to mention lacks a ring.

  8. The Big Secret   15 years ago

    There is a God, and he hates clerics, ALL OF THEM.

    Your primary purpose in life is to THINK. To figure shit out. Faith requires you to stop doing that, and when you start pulling any old shit out of your ass like the idea immodesty causes earthquakes because your standing as a 'Man of God' allows you to get away with it, you really, really piss Him off. Think about it. Your most unique quality is what you do with your mind, not with what you do with you loins. If there be a God, why would he not be offended that you take his greatest gift for granted? Yet, these clerics want you to believe their intellectual sloth is less offensive to Him than wearing short shorts or showing cleavage.

    If you want to avoid Hell, don't become a cleric.

    Dawkins is going to be surprised when he is standing at the pearly gates, and God in human personification comes up to him and shakes his hand, and says, 'well, you got most of it wrong, but it is good of you to at least try.'

    1. God   15 years ago

      Don't speak for me.

      1. The Big Secret   15 years ago

        Just because I have your number you really old fuck is no reason to get all pissy about it.

        1. zoltan   15 years ago

          Are you the sequel to that book that came out last year?

  9. Ken Shultz   15 years ago

    You know, every day, there's an earthquake somewhere.

    And the other thing you have to think about is moral hazard...

    All it takes is a one Mullah over there who gets a kick out of seeing thousands of women on YouTube exposing themselves just because of what he said, and all of a sudden he's blaming scantily clad women for epidemics, tsunamis...

    Only next time, maybe he blames it on thongs... Like givin' himself a birthday present!

    1. New World Dan   15 years ago

      I think this is a subject that needs to be studied with scientific rigor. We'll have to line up a bunch of random days where women are directed to show as much cleaveage as possible, some more random days where they cover up as much as possible, and some control days where no directions are given. We'll need to devise a unit of measure for cleaveage and we'll need some volunteers to go out and do some statistical sampling and report back.

      And you're right, if this bears out, we'll have to examine all sorts of depravities: thongs, alcohol, oral sex, Pauly Shore movies, and pizza with anchovies.

      1. BakedPenguin   15 years ago

        I don't care if Pauly Shore movies cure cancer, that is one depravity that should not be examined. Rob Schneider, niether.

        1. Lost_In_Translation   15 years ago

          Bobcat Goldthwait
          Gilbert Gottfriet
          Dana Carvey

          what are your positions on them?

  10. Nick   15 years ago

    Well, this cleric douche, by saying immodest dress causes earthquakes, triggered these women to dress immodestly to prove him wrong. Yet an earthquake did happen in Taiwan that would not have happened if he had kept his trap shut, ergo he caused the earthquake in Taiwan. God hates his dumbassery.

    1. Mark   15 years ago

      Wrong, God bless him! What a great idea to get women to show their bodacious ta-tas.

      I only wish I had thought of it. I guess God IS smarter than me...

  11. Michael Ejercito   15 years ago

    Who would have imagined that Iranian sex could cause earthquakes?

    Did the people who said that even think of the implications?

  12. Ska   15 years ago

    Why isn't reason girl wearing something a little more provocative for the cause?

    She does look a bit flat-chested, but I'm sure she has some tricks for that.

  13. Dan T.   15 years ago

    Whew, thank goodness for Boobquake, for a while there I was about to take Sedighi's proclamation seriously.

    Kudos to all involved! I love it when people go out on a limb.

    1. Warty   15 years ago

      "It's okay. He poured the milk. It's over."

      I smiled. "It's over for today, Otis. But we cannot be sure that the transmissions have ceased. There could be more."

      Otis was silent. I opened the door to find him back behind the counter.

      "Finding everything okay?" he asked.

      "Sure, I just needed to take a shit," I told him.

      The tall man was gone. I looked down at my thumb. It had stopped bleeding.

    2. Citizen Nothing   15 years ago

      I don't think, technically, that those are "limbs."

      1. SugarFree   15 years ago

        They are more powerful than any leg and more expressive than any arm.

    3. Slut Bunwalla   15 years ago

      I never thought I'd say this, but I agree with Dan T. on this one. Boobquake is incredibly stupid. Yeah, the cleric said something dumb. Everyone fucking knows it was dumb. What is the motherfucking point of this stunt? It's not clever.

  14. P Brooks   15 years ago

    Paging Warty!

  15. Jamie Kelly   15 years ago

    I must say that my girlfriend's tits really rock my world.
    Not at any measurable geological scale, but still...

  16. joe b   15 years ago

    This proves nothing as it is likely the cleric was referring only to the immodestly of Muslim women. While there may have been Muslim women participating in the Boobquake trial there is no real way to know that unless the test was designed to control for them. We need more tests. Moreover, can we be certain the intensity of immodestly was sufficient to attain the necessary threshold for earthquake production? Increase the dose.

    1. alan   15 years ago

      I knew an irreligious Palestinian girl from a Muslim background who possesses some huge fucking titties. We did go to the beach once where she wore a bikini about as modest as a wicked weasel. The resulting tsunami killed thirty thousand people.

      1. Horatio   15 years ago

        It's only an outrageous claim until you post the photos to prove it.

    2. troy   15 years ago

      Here here. We need more testing.

      1. Pat in Colorado   15 years ago

        And more pictures.

  17. Rich   15 years ago

    Of course those clerics are wrong! Earthquakes cause "women dressing immodestly". It's a simple matter of post hoc ergo propter hoc.

  18. James Anderson Merritt   15 years ago

    "For the record, there was an earthquake off the coast of Taiwan that was possibly related to Boobquake."

    It was only 6.5; perhaps the organizers didn't get enough enough participatory cleavage?

    1. Jake   15 years ago

      There is apparently a rather high activation energy required for immodesty-induced earthquakes. All is not lost, however. A nice start translated into a nice little temblor... we'll just need to make it bigger and bustier next time to show those women-oppressing Iranian clerics.

  19. Urkobold?   15 years ago

    THESE POOR GIRLS HAVE MISTRANSLATED SEDIGHI'S QUOTE. THE WORD MODESTLY IS AN IMPROPER INSERTION. THE CORRECT TRANSLATION IS "Many women who do not dress...lead young men astray, corrupt their chastity and spread adultery in society, which (consequently) increases earthquakes."

    IT IS OBVIOUS TO ANYONE SCHOOLED IN FARSI THAT THE PRAYER LEADER WAS OBJECTING TO WOMEN WALKING AROUND IN PUBLIC IN A STATE OF TOTAL NUDITY, NOT TO THEM WEARING SLIGHTLY REVEALING ATTIRE.

    1. rosignol   15 years ago

      I feel it is necessary to test this hypothesis. Due to the extraordinary danger earthquakes pose to human life and property, this is obviously an urgent matter that should be investigated as soon as possible.

    2. heller   15 years ago

      I concur. We should tell the women this.

  20. ?   15 years ago

    Wake me when it's time for Slotquake.

    1. Jaime Kelly   15 years ago

      Surely, you mean "Slitquake."

  21. Man The   15 years ago

    HARPOONS !!!

  22. Muslim Cleric   15 years ago

    I'd also like to point out that the volcanic eruption in Iceland is caused by whorish American women giving out far too many blowjobs. It's terrible, and I as an asshole fundamentalist would be absolutely furious if the women of America were to try to prove me wrong somehow.

    1. American Paternalist   15 years ago

      I also hate it when our women get all "uppity" and try to prove you wrong. We may disagree on the details of our religions, but we agree in that they should know their place... and it is decidedly *not* between the knees.

  23. troy   15 years ago

    Damn all you. Did Katherine participate? If so, is thier photographic evidence? If so, can someone please mail it to me? And is there evidence. God damn it, this is the most important issue of the day.

    1. troy   15 years ago

      And Katherine. Please don't get me wrong. I will always love you most for your mind and those to kill for eyes.

      1. Jaime Kelly   15 years ago

        Say that when she's cumming, and she just may believe you.

  24. Constitution First   15 years ago

    I''m here to apply for the grant, to study the viability of boobquakes... I'm going to need a lot of money, It may be an extended study, you see...

  25. Paul   15 years ago

    More observation is required.

  26. ed   15 years ago

    I didn't watch the vid. Does she take off her shirt or not?

  27. Late to the Party   15 years ago

    This vid needs more boobs.

  28. Grace   14 years ago

    Do you know what IMMODEST mean?

    immodest
    adj.
    1. Lacking modesty.
    2.
    a. Offending against sexual mores in conduct or appearance; indecent.
    b. Not properly restrained in expression or self-assertion; boastful.
    3. Arrogant.

    adjective
    1. indecent, esp. with regard to sexual propriety; improper
    2. bold, impudent, or shameless

    Adj. 1. immodest - having or showing an exaggerated opinion of your importance, ability, etc.
    domineering - tending to domineer
    proud - feeling self-respect or pleasure in something by which you measure your self-worth; or being a reason for pride.
    disrespectful - exhibiting lack of respect; rude and discourteous

    Those who are immodest are simply in Satan's side.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Are the News Media in Their Onion Era?

Joe Lancaster | From the June 2025 issue

Alton Brown on Cultural Appropriation, Ozempic, and the USDA

Nick Gillespie | From the June 2025 issue

James Comey's Deleted '86 47' Instagram Post Is Obviously Protected by the First Amendment

Billy Binion | 5.16.2025 4:48 PM

New Montana Law Blocks the State From Buying Private Data To Skirt the Fourth Amendment

Joe Lancaster | 5.16.2025 4:05 PM

Trump's Tariffs Are Sapping Small Business Optimism

Autumn Billings | 5.16.2025 12:00 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!