Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Policy

Health Care Reform Endgame: Old People Matter More Than Poor People

Nick Gillespie | 3.30.2010 12:54 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

The Sunlight Foundation reports on a "last minute deal" between pharmaceutical companies and health care reformers. The upshot? Old people covered by Medicare matter more than poor people covered by Medicaid.

According to the Associated Press, Senator Max Baucus stated in an interview that the pharmaceutical industry agreed to provide an additional $10 billion to cover the coverage gap in Medicare Part D known as the "donut hole" in exchange for eliminating the expansion of drug discounts at certain health facilities initially included in the Senate health care bill.

The Senate health care bill would have expanded drug discounts under a Medicaid program that serves over 14,000 covered facilities. The Medicaid 340B program provides outpatient discounts on brand name drugs to a variety of health facilities that serve low-income communities. The provision removed in the reconciliation bill would have expanded access to the discount program to cover inpatient drug purchases….

More here. Big PhRma spent about $100 million in "grassroots" activity and advertising in favor of health care reform.

The AP notes the following:

"Pharma came out of this better than anyone else," said Ramsey Baghdadi, a Washington health policy analyst who projects a $30 billion, 10-year net gain for the industry. "I don't see how they could have done much better."

Costly brand-name biotech drugs won 12 years of protection against cheaper generic competitors, a boon for products that comprise 15 percent of pharmaceutical sales. The industry will have to provide 50 percent discounts beginning next year to Medicare beneficiaries in the "doughnut hole" gap in pharmaceutical coverage, but those price cuts plus gradually rising federal subsidies will mean more elderly people will purchase more drugs.

Lobbyists beat back proposals to allow importation of low-cost medicines and to have Medicare negotiate drug prices with companies. They also defeated efforts to require more industry rebates for the 9 million beneficiaries of both Medicare and Medicaid, and to bar brand-name drugmakers' payments to generic companies to delay the marketing of competitor products.

More here.

I'm all in favor of drugs. And health care too. And free markets. What a shame that whatever behemoth just passed will stave off anything approaching free markets in drugs and health care for another decade or so. But at least by then, we'll actually know what was in the law that was just created.

Note for future legislation: Remember, the poor you will have with you always, whereas the old might die but will be replaced immediately by similarly motivated and connected folks.

Hat tip: Ted Smith's Twitter feed.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: The Fascists Are Coming! The Fascists Are Coming!

Nick Gillespie is an editor at large at Reason and host of The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie.

PolicyNanny StateObamacare
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (14)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Steve Smith   15 years ago

    Hat tip: Ted Smith's Twitter feed.

    TED PARIAH OF STEVE FAMILY. TED SHAVE BODY AND LIVE INDOORS LIKE PINK SKINS. STEVE HANG HEAD IN SHAME.

  2. Citizen Nothing   15 years ago

    Woohoo! I'm hoping to be old, and I'm not poor!
    Gimme gimme gimme!

  3. VinceP1974   15 years ago

    I got a bright fucking idea....

    Don't want corporations involving themselves in the Legistlative process through Lobbying?

    How about stop making Legislation that seeks to control them.

  4. Xeones   15 years ago

    Old people covered by Medicare matter more than poor people covered by Medicaid.

    Well, duh. Old people vote.

    1. BakedPenguin   15 years ago

      Beat me to it. Also, if I remember correctly, AARP is the single largest PAC in the United States. AFAIK, there is no "American Association of Poor People".

      1. Rewrite   15 years ago

        I was a member of AARP for a few weeks. I quit several months ago when they came out in favor of the Health Care Bill.
        I realized it was the American Association of Raging Pedophiles as in let's screw our kids by claiming more benefits and leaving them to pay the bills when we're dead.
        What a greedy bunch of old bastards organization. I'm sorry I was ever a member.

        1. James Ard   15 years ago

          You are forgiven. Although you should have known that the AARP has been raping children for decades.

          1. Rewrite   15 years ago

            Thanks. I like that better: American Association of Rapist Pedophiles.

  5. Doc Merlin   15 years ago

    Well, duh. Old people vote.
    Also, old people are the richest age group by assets. High asset wealth gives you political power, high income means you are gathering political power.
    So naturally most social welfare is taking money from people with high income but low assets to give to those with high assets but low income.

  6. John Thacker   15 years ago

    Health Care Reform Endgame: Old People Matter More Than Poor People

    This was also Health Care Reform Pregame and Midgame, too.

    Don't forget that the biggest part of Health Care Reform involves young healthy people paying higher premiums in order to subsidize mostly older, mostly wealthier people. It's made even worse by noting that all old people were young once, and most of them were healthy, but some young healthy people will die of accidents and never be old.

    Does it make sense for someone who will never get to be old to subsidize someone who got to enjoy youth and live to old age?

  7. Xeones   15 years ago

    This was also Health Care Reform Pregame and Midgame, too.

    And let us not forget all the Health Care Reform Mindgames.

  8. tkwelge   15 years ago

    So all of what the old folks were feeding me the "SS and Medicare can work if we reform the entitlements to shift benefits to the people who really need it" line were just bullshitting. The only reforms they want to make is MORE entitlement just for being a certain age. Still no word on making these programs solvent. This is why I think that the only way to move forward is to end these programs for everyone under 55, and give a small buy out to everyone between 45 and 55, and just cut taxes on everyone else by a wide margin, reducing SS and Medicare taxes to zero on everyone under 35. If you keep the entitlements in place, people will just keep asking for more while making the exact opposite of the necessary reforms.

  9. WASP   14 years ago

    The cost of health care in the U.S. is too high. We spend over 16% of our entire GDP on it and still have a material number of uninsured and a very large number of underinsured in this country. And the cost continues to skyrocket upwards leaving more and more uninsured and underinsured.

    But we can spend over $700 billion this year on military spending to protect Europe from nobody, wealthy asian countries, and fight wars in the Middle East we shouldn't even be in without so much as a hiccup.

    We doubled our national debt under Bush in a mere 8 years and it increased from there to over $14 trillion under Obama.

    We won't decertify government unions and end tenure placing government employees on the same level as private sector employees.

    We won' do anything we should do but we will steal from old people's medicare and social security funds.

    Shameful.

    1. WASP   14 years ago

      Here's a comparison chart from 2006 showing how lousy AND expensive our medical care in this country is compared to other industrialized nations.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F....._%_GDP.png

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

The Government Seized Her Home for a Project That Never Happened

John Stossel | 6.18.2025 12:30 AM

Federal Courts Shrug at Potentially Lethal Wrong-Door Raids

Jacob Sullum | 6.18.2025 12:01 AM

Why Is the Energy Department Making Rules About Sex and School Sports?

Jeff Luse | 6.17.2025 5:25 PM

Citizen Fundraisers Outpace E.U. in Arming Ukraine Against Russia

Miroslav Hanušniak | 6.17.2025 3:45 PM

South Carolina County Ends Its Civil Forfeiture Blitz After 20 Years

Rob Johnson and Daryl James | 6.17.2025 1:45 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!