3 Reasons Why ObamaCare Won't Cut The Deficit
[Original air date: March 24, 2010]
One of the main selling points of health care reform was that it would cut the federal deficit by a supposed $143 billion over the next decade and a trillion-plus dollars in the one after that.
But not only will the legislation not cut one thin dime from the deficit, it will also certainly cost far more than the $940 billion in new spending already on the table for at least three reasons.
These include:
1. Legislative Trickery. Congressional Democrats have pledged support for "the doc fix," a permanent upward adjustment to the rates at which Medicare providers are reimbursed. As Speaker Nancy Pelosi has said, "We have made a commitment to do this. This is very important." The cost of the "doc fix"? Some $247 billion over the next 10 years, wiping out any deficit reduction from health care reform.
2. Higher Premiums. In 2006, Massachusetts passed health care reform very similar to what President Obama just signed. The result? The Bay State now has the highest premiums in the country and cost about 33 percent more than expected.
3. Bad Accounting. The government is terrible at predicting how much programs will cost, especially when it comes to medical care. Initial 1960s' projections of Medicare's costs in 1990 had the program costing about $12 billion; the actual result was almost 10 times that amount. As a Joint Economic Committee report notes, "Major health care proposals have almost always cost more…than the highest cost estimates published while the legislation was pending."
Approximately 2.19 minutes. Written and produced by Meredith Bragg, Dan Hayes, and Nick Gillespie, who also hosts.
Read more about health care reform and its costs here.
Subscribe to Reason.tv's YouTube channel and receive automatic notification when new videos go live.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
There is only one reason it failed: You bastards didn't clap hard enough!
"Higher Premiums"
To the liberal Democrats, this is a feature - not a bug.
They will attempt to pin the blame for this entirely on the insurance companies and call for a single payer, direct government run system to "solve the problem".
What does 1) have to do with anything? Is the doc fix something they are only doing because of HCR? Maybe it is a bribe to keep the AMA in check, but it seems that they were going to do this anyways ( both parties have done 'doc fixes' multiple time). So, its like arguing that HCR isn't going to save any money b/c the war in Afghanistan isn't payed for, or better yet because entitlement spending is going to explode.
Shouldn't whether it saves money over the status quo be the issue? Sure, point out that the 'savings' are a small fraction of the new taxes, that Dems have plans to spend two dollars for every one they 'save'. But it shouldn't be 'Why Obama care willn't cut the Deficit'
Lies, damned lies, and government accounting.
Some folks seem to be under the delusion that the truth of things counts for anything in this world. It does not.