In-flight phone ban
HANG UP Act
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) both prohibit the use of cell phones on airplanes in flight. The FCC's ban is meant to avoid overtaxing cellular towers, while the FAA's rule is aimed at preventing interference with an airplane's navigation and communication systems. Now that new technology addresses the concerns of both agencies, members of Congress cite a different reason for banning phones from flights: They're annoying.
"The public doesn't want to be subjected to people talking on their cell phones on an already over-packed airplane," declares Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.), chief sponsor of the Halting Airplane Noise to Give Us Peace (HANG UP) Act, which would codify the cell phone ban and explicitly extend it to voice-over-Internet calls on flights that offer Wi-Fi access. "Cell phone users should not be able to disrupt the comfort of an entire airplane cabin, especially when other passengers have no choice but to sit there and listen."
The Inflight Passenger Communication Coalition, an alliance of electronics manufacturers, cell phone service providers, and consumer groups, is trying to stir up opposition to DeFazio's bill, which was incorporated into the House version of the FAA Reauthorization Act. The coalition argues that many passengers would welcome the opportunity to make and receive calls while flying, and it cites the experiences of 52 countries that already allow such calls as evidence that DeFazio's nightmare scenario of being surrounded by loud yakkers who refuse to quiet down is unlikely to transpire.
DeFazio insists that the desires of passengers who do not share his preferences shouldn't count. "The free market wasn't adequate to regulate smoking on planes," he says, "and it won't be sufficient to regulate cell phones either."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Obnoxiously loud {defined as any speech into a microphone over 70db within 10 feet of my ears} (and most likely multiple) cell phone conversations.....
One more reason to add to the list of dis-incentives to flying.
The argument stems from people "not having any choice", but it's like people not having any choice to sit in a bar with smokers. You can always go to a bar that doesn't allow smoking, not go to any bars at all, or suck it up and deal with it.
I will trade you smoking for lifting the cell phone ban.
So, when are they going to ban conversation completely on our government-mandated unfriendly skies?
I like that saying, thanks!
Thanks for posting this. Very nice recap of some of the key points in my talk. I hope you and your readers find it useful! Thanks again
ter
1992. Because of rate regulations, insurers were hesitant to offer them policies, so the st
n their cell phones on an already over-packed airplane," declares Rep. Peter DeFazio
Coalition, an alliance of electronics manufacturers, cell phone service providers,
ng on their cell phones on an already over-packed airplane," declares Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.), chief sponsor of the Halting Airplane Noise to Give Us Peace (HANG UP
phones on airplanes in flight. The FCC's ban is meant to avoid overtaxing cellular towers, whi