I like to watch
Video UnDemand
Should movie studios be able to control how consumers use playback devices to watch video on demand? The Motion Picture Association of America, a trade group representing major movie studios, thinks so, but it faces tough opposition from tech policy and consumer groups.
Movie studios are petitioning the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to permit the use of a technology known as "selectable output control"—code hidden in video streams that would allow the studios to determine which devices consumers can use to play them. Basically, the studios want the sole power to keep their content off your DVD player, sound system, or TV if they so desire.
Since 2003, when the idea was first proposed, the FCC has prohibited content owners from exercising such control. But movie studios have recently ramped up their campaign to get the FCC's permission. In a November letter to the FCC, a law firm representing the studios argued that the scheme is crucial to their plans to start releasing streaming, high-definition digital copies of movies prior to their release on DVD. "MPAA-member studios," the letter said, "have a legitimate, well-founded concern that distribution of high-value, high-definition movies prior to their release on DVD or other prerecorded media would present a significant risk of content theft."
Michael Kwun of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a tech-focused nonprofit group, calls the idea "crazy," writing that "if the MPAA has its way, we'll be well on the way to a world in which every new feature to every home theater product has to be pre-approved by the content industry." And the consumer advocacy group Public Knowledge notes that some smaller Hollywood studios already release films digitally and in theaters simultaneously, indicating that selectable output is not necessary.
Still, that doesn't mean the studios shouldn't be allowed to experiment. If the playback limitations are too restrictive, Ryan Radia of the Competitive Enterprise Institute notes, "the market will punish overly aggressive" technologies designed to prevent piracy.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I like that saying, thanks!
Thanks for posting this. Very nice recap of some of the key points in my talk. I hope you and your readers find it useful! Thanks again
kgy
vices consumers can use to play them. Basically, the studios want the sole power to ke
has its way, we'll be well on the way to a world in which every new feature to every home theater product has to be pre-approved by the content industry." And the consumer advoca
heir plans to start releasing streaming, high-definition digital copies of movies prior to their
le output control"?code hidden in video streams that would allow the studios to dete
output control"?code hidden in video streams that would allow the studios to determi