Banning home nudity
The Naked Coffee Guy
Erick Williamson says he woke up early in the morning on October 19 to pack because he was in the process of moving out of his townhouse in Springfield, Virginia. Since his roommates had already left for the day, he didn't feel obligated to put on clothes. Instead he went about his business—cleaning, making coffee, eating his breakfast—in the nude.
Unfortunately for Williamson, two witnesses seem to have seen him in a state of undress through uncovered windows that morning. The first was a neighbor who says she spotted Williamson while driving by his house around 6:15 a.m. She called the police, who came to investigate but saw nothing. The second witness was a woman who said she saw Williamson while walking by his home with her son at 8:40 a.m. When the second witness notified authorities, police broke into Williamson's home, arrested him, and charged him with indecent exposure.
At Williamson's trial in December, his attorney argued that "nudity in one's home is not a crime," adding, "If you're in a private place and take your clothes off, you have not committed a crime." Apparently, you have. Williamson was convicted of "intentional nudity" in his own home and received a suspended sentence of 180 days in jail. Williamson plans to appeal.
In the course of the trial, Williamson declared that he had no intention of exposing himself to the public. Fairfax County General District Court Judge Ian M. O'Flaherty wasn't impressed with this argument. Likening Williamson to a notorious bank robber, O'Flaherty pointed out that John Dillinger "thought he was doing nothing wrong when he walked into banks and shot them up."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
frig, I can't believe he was tried and convicted. I don't think there is anyone on this planet who has not walked around naked in their own house. Next, they will charge someone with 'intentional nudity' for enjoying sex in their home.
SO....
Why haven't the PEEPING TOMS who were looking into the mans house without his permission been prosecuted?
I think we should all practice this form of civil disobedience and see how long they keep trying to put us away.
The day the government tells me I can't make my morning coffee naked is a sad, sad day.
The women who reported this crime sould be called "Peeping Tanya's", IMHO, and prosecuted for said crime.
"The first was a neighbor who says she spotted Williamson while driving by his house around" Not paying attention to the road: reckless driving!
It is interesting and informative article. Thank you.
hjy
clothes
a state of undress through uncovered windows that morning. The first was a neighbor w
ve seen him in a state of undress through uncovered windows that morning. The first was a neighbor who says she spotted Williamson while driving by his house around 6:15 a.m. S
seem to have seen him in a state of undress through uncovered windows that morning.
ve seen him in a state of undress through uncovered windows that morning. The first wa
ke up early in the morning on October 19 to pack because he was in the process of moving out of his townhouse in Springfield, Virginia. Since his roommates had already left for t