Jeweler Hits Up D.C.'s Gays For Three Months Salary. That's What I Call Progress.
If everything goes off without a hitch in the halls of Congress, gay people will be able to get legally hitched in Washington, D.C., on March 2. And one man, at least, is poised to profit off that moment, God bless him. Regional D.C. diamond mogul Ronnie Mervis hosted a party at his downtown jewelry store yesterday, targeted at getting his hands on local gays' three months salary as soon as humanly possible. The invite said the event was to"mark a historic occasion." By which he naturally meant "the unveiling of our first-ever line of gay wedding rings"!
Jonathan Mervis, the son of the owner and the company's "digital strategist" explained the decision making process. The timing of the event, he says, wasn't about playing the politics of gay marriage (although they welcomed the chance to do something "positive"), it was about gearing up a marketing campaign on Mervis's new product line before the official legal deadline. In other words, making money: "We wanted to do something to get the word out early."
Mervis fils said he contacted one of Mervis's designers with an idea for a gay line, only to discover that the designer had a stash of rings ready, but had failed to drum up interest. The jewelers decided to pull the trigger. "Being younger, I personally wasn't worried. I just thought 'It's 2010. Grow up!' I was worried that my parents' generation would be worried." But he says his dad surprised him by agreeing to the plan.
Mervis says he has received only one lone angry email so far. Far more typical was this tweet:
wow - Mervis Diamond Importers supports teh Gheys!
As local caterers passed out samples of their wares and shoppers snagged complimentary champagne, I chatted with a man of the church looking to drum up business as well. Sporting a vibrant magenta shirt and clerical dog collar, Michael Seneco, the Bishop of North America of the Old Catholic Church says he performs about 120 marriages a year, half a dozen of which are gay unions. "People don't think of the church as a business, but it is" he says, explaining that the income from the marriages he performs support the rest of his ministry.
Like many cheerleaders for gay marriage, Rev. Seneco suggested that legalizing gay marrige will be a boost to the local economy. That argument's a little dubious: it's not as if gay men and women across America have special wedding piggy banks tucked inside their hope chests labeled "Break in Case of Legalized Gay Marriage." Still, it's nice to see a company treating gay men and women just like the rest of us: suckers in love who will pay an inordinate amount for jewelry.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I don't care if you're gay or straight, if you buy a diamond ring (especially costing three month's salary), you are a fucking idiot.
At least I'm fucking.
If you have to get married and spend three months' salary to get laid, you're more than an idiot.
You would be an idiot who's being fucked.
Yes. Well put.
Who are these people who are both (a) married and (b) getting laid?
adulterers
LOL, poor married people.
Mine bought me two. Then again I am a damn good ...
Q: What do you call a woman who can suck an orange through a garden hose?
A: "Darling."
The jewelers decided to pull the trigger.
NTTAWTT.
ORly? No gays from VA or MD will make the trip to DC to get married? Maybe a "boost for a few specific businesses in DC" is a better way of putting it.
This logic was actually used during the prop 8 vote here in California. In the summary of ever proposed proposition, the state has to indicate the fiscal impact to the state government. In the summary of prop 8, the summary specifically stated that the state would lose tens of millions of dollars of sales tax revenue if gay marriage was banned.
Next, I will start my business of Gay Wedding Cakes. They will look s-o p-r-e-c-i-o-u-s!
Can you make rock hard erect buttcakes?
Anything for you, sweetheart!
"suckers in love"
Heh.
These poor bastards will live to regret that they got what they wished for. The current regulatory climate allows most gays to cohabit however they wish, with whoever they wish, with few mandated responsibilities. That will change and they will be welcomed into the brotherhood (or sisterhood) of the "formally hitched." Good luck, soon you'll find out why you need it.
Agree totally. The only gay people I know of who really want marriage rights are all lesbians. Men just don't want to give up their freedom, esp. when you put two of them together.
You know some very different gay men than I do.
Yeah, fuck guys like this.
http://freestudents.blogspot.c.....ality.html
Marriage is gay.
bigbigslacker, how long have you been gay?
I'm just not clear on what makes a ring design "gay".
If you covered a table with an assortment of gay rings and straight rings, who could really tell them apart. Does gaydar even work in that situation?
You can tell by the ring's lisp and the fact that it ordered a Fuzzy Navel.
So watchout for inscriptions that read like this?: "To My Dear Husthband Lanthe (Lance)"
Got it. Thanks Epi.
Those rings aren't gay enough. More glitter.
Where's all the sequins? Then you'd really know they were gay rings.
Maybe a little rainbow setting of stones, instead of a diamond.
Diamonds of the rainbow plus rhinestones. Perhaps some fringe or tassels?
J T, "plus rhinestones. Perhaps some fringe or tassels". I think you are confusing your gay bar with your stripper bar stereotyping but then I don't spend time in either places.
what do you think of these rings honey???
enough glitter?
http://www.rings4love.com/wrin.....d_id=17317
Oh, and obvious comment that we've all missed so far:
"Gay wedding rings? They're finally selling Liberache's jewelry collection?"
"That argument's a little dubious: it's not as if gay men and women across America have special wedding piggy banks tucked inside their hope chests labeled "Break in Case of Legalized Gay Marriage."
That's not what's important.
When gay marriage was briefly legal in SF, an acquaintance who married his partner made it clear he was gonna get revenge for all the wedding gifts *he'd* bought.
He registered at Tiffany, Wilkes-Bashford, Bloomies, etc,
Hee, hee, hee.....
Straight people do that too. There's a big advantage for waiting until your 30s when you get married. When you're 21, your friends can't afford nice gifts. When you're 31, they can.
You're still just getting the his and hers beer cozies.
"plus rhinestones. Perhaps some fringe or tassels". I think you are confusing your gay bar with your stripper bar stereotyping but then I don't spend time in either places.