Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Culture

AP Report on DC Snowball Fight Brouhaha Featuring Reason.tv's Dan Hayes

Nick Gillespie | 12.21.2009 10:27 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Reason.tv's Dan Hayes, the producer who captured footage of Saturday's DC snowball fight gone tense, was interviewed by the AP about the incident. Watch above.

And check out the original video and Hayes' appearance on the Today Show by going here.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: What Price Deadbeat?

Nick Gillespie is an editor at large at Reason and host of The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie.

CultureMediaReason.tv
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (122)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. sage   16 years ago

    If you guys could get Sarah Palin, the monkey cartoon, the Ron Paul newsletters, and circumcision into this post, you could easily top a billion comments. Just sayin'.

    1. BeesInTheBrain   16 years ago

      You forgot climategate.

      1. sage   16 years ago

        D'oh! Thanks, I knew there was something I was leaving out.

        1. Pilt-down Man   16 years ago

          Are you denyin' me? Are you denyin' me?
          Are you denyin' me? Then what the hell else are you denyin'...are you denyin' me?

          1. Kennewick Man   16 years ago

            Hey, quit your griping, Pilt. Bill Clinton played candyass politics with me, and now mankind will likely never learn of my origins.

            But at least I'm authentic.

      2. Mad Elf   16 years ago

        Speaking of Climategate, there's an interesting show about Jan Hendrik Schoen on Discovery Science Channel right now.

  2. Rick H.   16 years ago

    "...until Internal Affairs completes its investigation." Uh huh. Need more time... not enough data. That didn't stop Assistant Chief Pete Newsham, who leads DCPD's investigative services bureau, from lying to the press right off the bat, claiming that "Detective Baylor" never unholstered his weapon.

    1. Episiarch   16 years ago

      I noticed this as well, and the news talking heads don't express any skepticism or outrage--whatsoever--that the Assistant Chief got completely contradicted by the footage.

      Every time there is video footage of an incident we find that the cops utterly, blatantly lie about what happened. Which says, at least to me, that they lie about everything.

      1. Tulpa   16 years ago

        Yeah, I wonder how Assistant Chief would know one way or the other since he wasn't there during the incident (and if it was stated that way, the press should have asked how). Perhaps he was just saying Baylor denied unholstering his weapon.

        1. Suki   16 years ago

          Maybe he was trying to say he never unloaded the gun? Some meaningless but true statement.

          1. TrickyVic   16 years ago

            No, unholstered pretty much means one thing. To pull the weapon out of the holster.

            1. The Libertarian Guy   16 years ago

              Something Baylor should not have done, which he's probably lamenting in retrospect - or should be.

              1. TrickyVic   16 years ago

                If he's a decent person.

                But what are the odds are he has issues about being the second toughest guy in the hood, always being beat up by the #1. He was merely flashing back when he pulled his weapon.

        2. sailshonan   16 years ago

          If Detective Baylor made a false statement about never unholstering his gun, most state statutes REQUIRE that an internal investigation be opened. If the allegations that he lied are sustained, they must be forwarded to the state standards office who can then revoke his LEO certification. Never gonna happen though. My BF's a cop and he's seen the corruption and the cover-ups and has agreed that nothing will happen to this guy. If his agency is REALLY harsh, maybe a few days suspension without pay. MAYBE. And he's a minority, so his agency will be very hesitant to do anything to him because the detective will come after them with a racial discrimination suit.

          1. TrickyVic   16 years ago

            Part of the reason nothing usually happens in these situations is because the "good" cops won't "rat out" the bad cops, coupled with the us vs them attitude. After decades of those beliefs, the higher-ups don't like treating fellow officers like the scum they police.

            How many times has your BF reported the corruption and cover-ups he's seen. My bet is on 0. Because he fears retribution from the bad cops.

            1. sailshonan   16 years ago

              And you would be wrong. He has been in the middle of trying to get his supervisors LE certifications revoked. His supervisors committed state and federal misdemeanors and felonies. He has filed reports with the local PD, the USPS inspectors, the IG's office, the state department of law enforcement, and the governor's office. In each case, the cops at the PD, USPS and DLE were willing to invetigate and wanted to see the supervisors charged. Yet each time, the state attorney and US attorney refused to file charges. Nineteen out of twenty of his colleaugues, all cops, provided witness statements/and or support, even though two have been suspended FOR ABSOLUTELY RIDICULOUS REASONS (One was suspended for workplace violence for cleaning out the dirt from his fingernails with a pocket knife at the conference table) and the Agency faces deep budget cuts and possible layoffs. These cops were stymied at every turn by the management or the state and feds. The IG's office's investigation of his ass clown supervisors let them off (of course). There are a lot of good cops out there, but they're not supervisors or wanna-be supervisors. Those guys are corrupt immoral assholes who only promote their kind so they can continue to flout the law and line their pockets. There are corrupt foot soldiers too, but I think alot of them know even if you report the problems up the chain, in the end, no government entity is going to come down on any gov't entity, and the little guys know that. AND you will always be a little guy if stay honest. So my BF and his colleagues are doing the right thing. what have they learned? No matter what you do, government taks care of their own.

      2. j.i.am   16 years ago

        Emergency response personnel get payed buku bucks for be well trained emergency response personnel. It doesn't matter whether or not their services are needed at any given time, they need to get payed and won't miss any opportunity to justify their participation in quelling any and all disburbances.

  3. Rick Santorum   16 years ago

    Reporting for mega-thread...

    1. sage   16 years ago

      What a frothy comment.

  4. Star Simpson   16 years ago

    I've got some red Play-Doh with wires hanging out and a circuit board.Should I go act weird at the airport again?

  5. HeadTater   16 years ago

    Now, if I (as a private citizen) did what that cop did, I would be in F-ing jail! Oh well, I guess that's almost as bad as desk duty.

    Oh, by the way, that first girl they interviewed is kinda hot in my opinion.

    1. The Art-P.O.G.   16 years ago

      Yeah. But it was kinda funny when she said "organize spontaneous events." Ha!

      1. Suki   16 years ago

        Is that like well regulated anarchy?

  6. Clay Davis   16 years ago

    I didn't know Reason employed hipsters. Are they working there ironically?

    1. The Art-P.O.G.   16 years ago

      Ha! Hayes may look like a hipster, but at least he talks like a normal human being and not a beatnik.

  7. anarch   16 years ago

    The uniformed officers arrived, as I understand it, in response to a citizen's 911 call. Whom was the officer, out of his jurisdiction, calling/speaking to on his radio? His department in Maryland?

    1. ConHugeCo   16 years ago

      Every time I read the phrase "uniformed officer" I read it as "Uninformed Officer" guess I have been reading to much Balko.

  8. Tulpa   16 years ago

    You already know my opinion. I don't want to crash Reason's server by questioning the conventional wisdom and making the herd get all crazy-like.

    1. hmm   16 years ago

      I'm amazed Dan didn't change into his orange and white spandex outfit with the giant "R" on the cape and charge in to save that poor officers property. What an unreasonable thing to do. And you call yourself a libertarian Mr. Hayes!

      Again, nice work Mr. Hayes.

      1. Tulpa   16 years ago

        It doesn't take a superhero to tell your fellow hipsters to stop throwing snowballs at moving vehicles (and uninvolved people!) in the midst of poor driving conditions.

        1. Tulpa   16 years ago

          Not that Robin was a real superhero (that's a different thread), but you know what I mean.

    2. Snowball/thread ref   16 years ago

      Tulpa, don't quit "making the herd get all crazy-like" because the last thread fight was a blast.
      Are you telling me you are going to kiss and make-up?

      1. Tulpa   16 years ago

        No, it's just not worth the energy to argue about this with a bunch of people (myself included) who aren't going to change the outcome in any way. I guess I'm just becoming a snowball nihilist.

        1. Snowball/thread ref   16 years ago

          Bah humbug!

  9. Episiarch   16 years ago

    I didn't have a chance to participate in the earlier threads, but I'd like to have a question answered from those who defend the cop: what if someone had gotten shot? Over snowballs?

    1. hmm   16 years ago

      As another said here. He would probably be dead in most CCW states. It takes a real retard to pull a weapon in anger and threaten a crowd. That kind of silly shit will prompt some people to defend themselves. Talk about an ugly mess if that happened.

      1. Suki   16 years ago

        Are there even enough CCW holders in the entire country to find 150 that behave like the snowball kids?

        1. hmm   16 years ago

          CCW permits doubled for this year in my state. Most people wouldn't carry to a snowball fight.

      2. sailshonan   16 years ago

        That's how you know the cop didn't feal threatened by the crowd and therefore should never have pulled his weapon. That cop would NEVER have gotten out of his vehicle and confronted a bunch of snowballers in a bad area of town. NEVER. He was just asserting his authoritah at whiny wimpy white kids.

    2. Tulpa   16 years ago

      Considering he was pointing the gun at the ground the whole time, that would have been highly unlikely. Less likely than a motorist losing control of the car due to snowballs covering his windshield and swerving off into the snowballers, cutting off the flower of the hipster community before their time. What a tragedy that would be!

      1. Episiarch   16 years ago

        So people that you think are douchebags (and very well may be) don't have basic rights, like the right to not be threatened by some thug with a badge and a gun?

        Also:

        "Even the authorities/are minorities/in my water park national capitol"

        1. Mad Elf   16 years ago

          The cop didn't pull the gun until the hipsters started throwing snowballs at him. One of those could have had large pieces of ice or another hard object that could do serious damage. I agree that the cop should've kept on driving and avoided a confrontation, but the snowball throwers also helped escalate the situation here. If they would simply have acted like adults instead of throwing snowballs at someone that was justifiably pissed at having shit thrown at his vehicle, then it's unlikely the cop would have drawn his weapon.

          1. Episiarch   16 years ago

            Dude, this line of argument is specious. Haven't you ever been tagged by someone with a snowball? Would you really go to yourself "oh shizzle that could have really hurt me"?

            They didn't respect his authoritah, and he pulled a fucking piece over snowballs. This is flat out bullshit. You know it, I know it, and he knows it.

            1. Mad Elf   16 years ago

              I would have kept driving in that situation. However assuming that I did make the mistake of confronting the crowd, if I'm confronted by a mob of 20 people that don't want to be reasoned with, then yes, I might be worried about defending myself. A snowball packed with ice can knock you unconscious. You could ask Sid Brooks about that if he was still alive.

            2. Entendrer   16 years ago

              Trust me, a snowball can ruin a hummer.

            3. Mad Elf   16 years ago

              And yes, I've been involved in plenty of snowball fights. I grew up in north central PA. However, whenever I was involved in a snowball fight, it was always with friends not a hostile mob, so I wasn't worried about them intentionally packing ice or rocks in their snow balls.

              1. Episiarch   16 years ago

                Well, I have been involved in many impromptu snowball fights, and have had total strangers gun snowballs at me, and never once did I think anything other than "you son of a bitch, I am so totally going to get you back". Which is exactly what the cop thought, but my "get you back" is "hit you with a snowball" and his is "I'm a fucking cop and I feel totally fine threatening you with a gun because you disrepected my suthoritah".

                1. Tulpa   16 years ago

                  Well you're super cool Epi, were/are a very fun target to throw snow at, and I'm sure all of us appreciate that. However, you shouldn't expect everyone to be that way.

                  1. Episiarch   16 years ago

                    If I ambush you with a snowball, you're comfortable pulling a gun on me? Guess what--you'd be arrested instantly for brandishing. Unless you're a cop.

                    1. Tulpa   16 years ago

                      Not if I ice you and all the witnesses before the cops arrive.

                    2. Episiarch   16 years ago

                      Ah, so we've graduated to murder now. You really have zero argument, don't you.

                      Guess what, genius--I always have a gun on me. When you try to ice me, I get to ice you. But I don't even need to do that. I'll just play Cartman singing "Poker Face" and destroy your mind that way. You like Lady Gaga, don't you?

                    3. Tulpa   16 years ago

                      I'm not here for an argument, I'm just here for the kittens. And if everyone stays out of my way, no one will get hurt.

                    4. Suki   16 years ago

                      Kittens!

                2. The Art-P.O.G.   16 years ago

                  How did that work for Jack in "Four Brothers"!? Huh?

      2. somedude   16 years ago

        Just snowball the cop already.

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v.....re=related

    3. TrickyVic   16 years ago

      Come on, you know how that plays out. The officer was assulted and used necessary force to subdue the attacker.

  10. John C. Randolph   16 years ago

    I'm just trying to imagine how this scenario would have played out in any "must issue" state. Asshole cop draws his weapon, sixty people in the crowd draw theirs... Someone in the crowd says "how many rounds you got in that gun, officer? Maybe you should just walk away."

    -jcr

    1. Mad Elf   16 years ago

      I don't think people would be throwing snowballs at random moving vehicles and people if they thought the driver had a gun.

      1. Tulpa   16 years ago

        They weren't even throwing them at random vehicles -- they were targeting Hummers specifically. Which is makeist discrimination, even worse.

        1. highnumber   16 years ago

          ...sez the hipster hater.

      2. wylie   16 years ago

        Sounds like a good argument for CCW permits. And lots of them.

        The whole situation would never have happened then.

  11. The Johnny Appleseed of Crack   16 years ago

    Question for everyone:

    Is Tulpa
    a.) A troll
    b.) A total moron
    c.) A reasonable human being who happens to believe that having your car (or your person) pelted by snowballs actually constitutes assault.

    1. Tulpa   16 years ago

      (d) a guy who had a bad experience with a hummer and a snowball.

      1. The Art-P.O.G.   16 years ago

        I actually think Tulpa raises good points, but then again I'm not important in any way.

        1. Suki   16 years ago

          Me too.

          1. Tulpa   16 years ago

            Anyone who compliments me is ipso facto important.

            1. anarch   16 years ago

              Or even eo ipso.

        2. highnumber   16 years ago

          What good points?

          1. VikingMoose as Thunderchicken   16 years ago

            silly mortal. haven't you read the good points?

            1. highnumber   16 years ago

              Didn't see any. Thought his point was that it was just and right to threaten deadly force because someone threw a snowball at your car.

              1. VikingMoose   16 years ago

                BUT OF COURSE IT IS!

                a Man's car (pronounced, "KOR") is his castle. It's his manhood. You throw the junk at the manhood, you have to pull the other manhood extender out to defend the one manhood that was just sullied.

                Bottom line: no junk at manhood, no need to pull the other m'hood out.

                oh yeah. gaggidy gaggidy goo.

                1. highnumber   16 years ago

                  Ah, yes. The manhood extender.
                  The piece.
                  The heater.
                  The equalizer.
                  The boom stick.
                  The pea shooter.
                  Your little friend. (Hello!)

                  1. VikingMoose   16 years ago

                    exactly! and the doctor said that i'd stop shooting peas if my diet were cleaned up somewhat...

                    just don't heave at the KOR. It's mah KOR.

                    (do you think anybody else is paying attention to us?)

                    1. highnumber   16 years ago

                      We were late to this party.

                      Not that anyone ever pays attention anyway. I'm going to lock myself in my room and listen to Bauhaus while I cut myself just to show them.

                    2. VikingMoose   16 years ago

                      do Emo Vampire and Mr. Steven Crane assist by holding the blade to a candle to "sterilize" it?

                    3. highnumber   16 years ago

                      They used to. Not anymore.

                      Not anymore.

                    4. VikingMoose   16 years ago

                      then you can borrow my 8-track player as a model for what you want on your forearms.

                    5. VikingMoose   16 years ago

                      then you can borrow my 8-track player as a model for what you want on your forearms.

  12. Colonel_Angus   16 years ago

    They should go do that shit in one of DC's fine needle-infested parks, I think there's this huge one they call "the mall" even though there are no stores in it. Fucking hipsters were throwing snow at a non participant. I would pull a gun too.

  13. ?   16 years ago

    I'm just trying to imagine how this scenario would have played out in any "must issue" state.

    It wouldn't have. Dorks don't throw stuff there.

  14. Snowball/thread ref   16 years ago

    Doesn't anybody think it a tad suspicious Reason had a camera on site. Hmm, story ideas: climate gate , health ins, climate gate , health ins, climate gate , health ins, climate gate , health ins, climate gate , health ins, something for Dec...snowball fight with a gun.

    1. Tulpa   16 years ago

      I don't find it suspicious at all. You probably couldn't swing a yo-yo in that office without hitting an Orange Line-riding hipster who rides the Orange Line.

      1. Snowball/thread ref   16 years ago

        Work with me Tulpa. You know someone will freak out and agree.

      2. Kolohe   16 years ago

        This is sadly Lonewacko's legacy.

        Reason HQ in NW are closer to the Red Line than the Orange Line.

        (also, hipsters tend to stay in Adams Morgan, or more recently U-Street. (red&green; lines)

        The Virginia Orange Line and the Washington/Clarendon/Wilson Blvd coordidor specifically is mostly what would traditionally called Yuppies (but Obama-type, not Reagan-type))

        ((btw, I also think Tulpa has brought up a lot of good points and I also am no one of consequence))

    2. Suki   16 years ago

      They left out prostitution and drugs. If that was in there, then yea.

    3. Tonio   16 years ago

      Doesn't anybody think it a tad suspicious Reason had a camera on site.

      No. For starters, there are doubtlessly hundreds of similar incidents every day in the USA, and it was inevitable that one would eventually happen in the presence of a "Reason" staffer, stringer or whatever.

      Second, with the proliferation of digicams, including cell-phone based ones, it's increasingly likely that every conflict, or act of douchebaggery will be captured on video, or at least still-photographed.

      The problem, dear Snowball, is not with the messengers, but with our cops.

  15. Hobo Chang Ba   16 years ago

    Ah, another one of those dilemmas that basic libertarianism can not solve - at what point does the right to defend one's own property supercede the right of others to have a good time? Not that he didn't go overboard, and not that a law-abiding citizen could have defended his property in the same fashion in DC, but were he in a town with CC and a non-cop citizen doing the same thing, would Reason make a big deal out of it? I wonder...frankly, if we had an expensive Hummer, most of us wouldn't really want it to get dented by ironic hipsters who could give less of a shit about property rights if it interferes with their fun.

  16. You dumbasses   16 years ago

    Really pathetic how some are trying to make a thing out of this. You throw stuff at a cop car or a cop, you're breaking the law. It doesn't matter if it's snow, rocks or whatever. That cop didn't do anything wrong and he should have kicked some ass. If you are down to trying to entrap cops with a snowball fight, all the other problems in the world must be fixed. Now, go home and water your pot plants.

    1. Tulpa   16 years ago

      I hadn't thought about the entrapment angle. Very creative.

      1. Episiarch   16 years ago

        Wow, are you serial? Super serial? You really think some idiots throwing snowballs came up with the perfect plan to "entrap" (which only LEOs and gov. officials can do, of course) some out-of-jurisdiction Maryland cop?

        I can't believe you're willing to look this ridiculous just in order to continue fellating authority.

        1. Tulpa   16 years ago

          No, I'm not serial. I'm very asynchronous indeed.

        2. Tulpa   16 years ago

          Actually, I think this whole thing was organized by the DC govt to try to entrap a passing motorist and manufacture a story about the "inevitable consequences" of the SCOTUS allowing concealed carry in DC. But then when it turned out to be an off-duty cop that got hooked, they had to abort the whole thing and try to paint it as just a bunch of hipsters getting theirs.

          1. TrickyVic   16 years ago

            Is your foil hat tingling?

            1. wylie   16 years ago

              I thought the foil hat was supposed to stop that tingling sensation. Mine does, anyway.

      2. anarch   16 years ago

        If some members of crowd did want to entrap an indignant, anngry cop, what would be a more efficient way than pelting him with a snowball while yelling "F*in' pig!"

    2. The Libertarian Guy   16 years ago

      Another idiot who assumes every libertarian is a "stoner". Lame.

    3. R C Dean   16 years ago

      You throw stuff at a cop car or a cop, you're breaking the law.

      It wasn't a cop car.

      The cop wasn't in uniform, or even in his jurisdiction. I'm not even sure he was actually a cop at the time, to tell you the truth. You're a cop when you are on duty, and just another peon when you're not, in my book.

      But other than that, spot on.

      1. TrickyVic   16 years ago

        ""You're a cop when you are on duty, and just another peon when you're not, in my book.""

        Too bad your book doesn't apply in real life.

      2. TrickyVic   16 years ago

        How many times have you heard being a cop is 24/7 job?

  17. BakedPenguin   16 years ago

    (d) a guy who had a bad experience with a hummer and a snowball.

    By "hummer", do you mean the vehicle, or the sex act? Because I can see how a snowball could ruin that.

    I still wouldn't pull a gun, though.

    1. Tulpa   16 years ago

      Well, my six shooter was already unholstered (obviously) before getting the snowball in the mouth.

      1. BakedPenguin   16 years ago

        Since I missed the fact that you were making the exact same joke I repeated, I think it's past my bedtime.

        1. BakedPenguin   16 years ago

          Let me try again: since I missed the fact that I made the exact same joke as you...

          Sleep deprivation is a bad thing.

    2. Suki   16 years ago

      By snowball do you mean the sex act or the ball of water?

  18. Joe M   16 years ago

    I find it interesting that no one, as far as I know, has commented on the fact that the Today clip mentions that the police initially denied he even pulled out his gun. They instinctively circled the wagons without even bothering to get the facts. Pretty damning imo.

    1. Episiarch   16 years ago

      Uh, read upthread. We mentioned this already.

      1. Joe M   16 years ago

        Duh, how did I miss that? I just spent all that effort searching the other threads and somehow skimmed right over that. Well, uh, I agree with you then.

  19. Tulpa   16 years ago

    Is Dan Hayes demonstrating proper mind-melding technique in that video still?

  20. FrenchHash   16 years ago

    I think the girl is hot, but how the fuck do you organize a spontaneous event? (1:45)

    1. The Art-P.O.G.   16 years ago

      I pointed this out upthread. It was funny.

      1. FrenchHash   16 years ago

        haha ok my bad

    2. anarch   16 years ago

      If G.K. Chesterton were around, he would say that organizing a spontaneous event is, pathetically, the very emblem of modernity.

      Of course, he'd be tweeting that critique.

      1. The Art-P.O.G.   16 years ago

        Good one, anarch. I guffawed.

  21. Tulpa   16 years ago

    That would happen if the spontaneous event comes into being as a disorganized thing, and then someone comes along and organizes it. That wouldn't change the fact that it was spontaneous.

    1. FrenchHash   16 years ago

      True, but you have to be chronological about it. She said they would continue to organize spontaneous events, not spontaneously organize events.

      1. FrenchHash   16 years ago

        Its WAY too late for this shit....so forgive me if I'm wrong

      2. Tulpa   16 years ago

        Maybe she's not all there. But then again, not all of her has to be...

      3. Me   16 years ago

        That means they organize a kernel couple of people, a threesome, hoping that lots of witnesses will spontaniously join them and make it into an event.
        That's Mao schooling.

  22. A Different Bill   16 years ago

    Hmmm.... lessee...

    People hit a guy's car with snowballs. Guy gets out and starts waving gun around (i.e., brandishing a firearm).

    This is like the easiest law school hypo ever. The dude broke the law, at least in most states. It's illegal to display a firearm in a threatening manner or with intent to intimidate unless it is necessary to prevent an imminent threat of significant bodily injury or death.

    So if the crowd converged and started kicking the shit out of the guy, or of some thugs approached him holding pipes and two-by-fours or something, and saying they were gonna bash his head in, then yeah, by all means, he can justifiably and legally pull his gun out and show it to them.

    But someone hits your car with a snowball? Even if they dented it or scratched it or chipped the windshield, nope, there is no justification for unholstering your firearm and waving it around.

    But of course I'm sure his "superiors" (which in a sane universe includes pretty much everybody else in the video) will "consider all the facts and circumstance" and then come to the conclusion that he "acted appropriately" and "in accordance with departmental policy."

    What a crock.

  23. P Brooks   16 years ago

    Threaded comments SUCK.

  24. The Libertarian Guy   16 years ago

    I had a friend-with-benefits not long ago, and she surprised me by introducing me to snowballing.

    It freaked me out, but I didn't pull a loaded gun over it.

    1. R C Dean   16 years ago

      Hell, the first time I got snowballed, I damn near had an accidental discharge. Believe me, I was unholstered, baby.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

In Defense of the Tourist Trap: Why Following the Crowd Might Be the Smartest Way To Travel

Christian Britschgi | From the August/September 2025 issue

69 Percent of Americans Say American Dream Is Not Dead

Autumn Billings | 7.4.2025 8:30 AM

With Environmental Regulatory Reform, California Gov. Gavin Newsom Finally Does Something Substantial

Steven Greenhut | 7.4.2025 7:30 AM

Celebrate Independence Day by Insulting a Politician

J.D. Tuccille | 7.4.2025 7:00 AM

Independence Day Reminds Us You Can Be American by Choice

Billy Binion | 7.4.2025 6:30 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!