Steal This Law!

Judicial transparency


Stephen Schultze, a fellow at Harvard's Berkman Center for Internet and Society, is a computer geek, not a lawyer. So he was shocked by what he found when he went spelunking for some First Amendment cases in the clunky proprietary database that holds the country's judicial records. Prying information such as judicial filings or court transcripts out of the PACER document system requires users to wade through unsorted data and pay eight cents for each page they download.

"Because there's no keyword search, there was no way for me to find out the answer to a relatively simple question without paying for the whole archive," says Schultze. Inspired to use his skills to improve the bleak situation, he teamed up with Prince-ton computer science graduate students Tim Lee and Harlan Yu. The trio is part of a do-it-yourself movement of digital natives working to drag government kicking and screaming into the transparent, fully searchable Internet age. Their project is to take information about the law, which isn't copyrighted and should be public already, from the government and make it accessible to all comers.

The team, based at Prince-ton's Center for Information Technology Policy, created an add-on to the popular Firefox Internet browser, which they dubbed RECAP (PACER spelled backward). Paying customers of the federal court system can download it from Then, as they go about their normal business, the add-on quietly copies every page they buy to the free Internet Archive. These data join other government information poached by transparency activists, all of which is formatted for easier use.

Activists hope this particular set of court records will be liberated within 12 months, but efforts to improve executive and legislative transparency still have a long way to go.

NEXT: Full Service

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. My only point is that if you take the Bible straight, as I’m sure many of Reasons readers do, you will see a lot of the Old Testament stuff as absolutely insane. Even some cursory knowledge of Hebrew and doing some mathematics and logic will tell you that you really won’t get the full deal by just doing regular skill english reading for those books. In other words, there’s more to the books of the Bible than most will ever grasp. I’m not concerned that Mr. Crumb will go to hell or anything crazy like that!

  2. Unfortunately, the Free Law Project has decided to charge other organizations money to access RECAP documents, and it now denies access to organizations which refuse to pay. The new version of the RECAP plug-in only uploads documents to the FLP’s own CourtListener site, while other sites, such as PlainSite and the United States Courts Archive, are no longer being updated. This decision was made in secret with no public discussion, and it was made despite the FLP’s stated position that court documents should be free and freely available to everyone. For more information, please see

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.