State Crafts

Art for politics' sake


In August the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) helped organize a teleconference for a few dozen artists, community organizers, and other players in the country's cultural scene. One of the participants was the Los Angeles–based filmmaker Patrick Courrielche, who was stunned by what he heard.

"The conference call," Courrielche wrote on the website Big Hollywood, "was billed as an opportunity for those in the art community to inspire service in four key categories, and at the top of the list were 'health care' and 'energy and environment.' The service was to be attached to the President's United We Serve campaign, a nationwide federal initiative to make service a way of life for all Americans."

Established in the 1960s, the NEA has long been a lightning rod for political controversy. But this may be the first time the agency has been accused of pushing the people it funds to create art that supports an administration's legislative agenda. "I would encourage you to pick something," NEA spokesman Yosi Sergant told the participants, "whether it's health care, education, the environment.…Then my task would be to apply your artistic, creativity community's utilities. Bring them to the table."

After Courrielche's account of the teleconference was published, Sergant told The Washington Times that the NEA did not organize the call and that "the invites didn't come from us." Then Courrielche published an email message from Sergant asking "arts oriented marketers & producers" to participate in the call. The message's subject line: "A call has come in to our generation. A call from the top. A call from a house that is White. A call that we must answer."

Sergant was subsequently "reassigned" from his role as the NEA's communications director. A White House spokesman told ABC News that far from politicizing arts funding, the call simply reflected "an attempt to get Americans from all walks of life to answer the President's call for people to get involved with their communities."

NEXT: Full Service

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. My only point is that if you take the Bible straight, as I’m sure many of Reasons readers do, you will see a lot of the Old Testament stuff as absolutely insane. Even some cursory knowledge of Hebrew and doing some mathematics and logic will tell you that you really won’t get the full deal by just doing regular skill english reading for those books. In other words, there’s more to the books of the Bible than most will ever grasp. I’m not concerned that Mr. Crumb will go to hell or anything crazy like that!

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.